Extension of Port Limits of Savannah, GA, 32669 [C1-2017-13983]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 135 / Monday, July 17, 2017 / Proposed Rules ■ b. Remove the figure ‘‘$138’’ in each place that it appears. Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Approved: July 10, 2017. Timothy E. Skud, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. [FR Doc. 2017–14824 Filed 7–14–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–14–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection 19 CFR Part 101 [Docket No. USCBP–2017–0017] Extension of Port Limits of Savannah, GA Correction In proposed rule document 2017– 13983, beginning on page 30807, in the issue of Monday, July 3, 2017, make the following correction: On page 30808, in the first column, the coordinates listed in line seven of ‘‘III. Proposed Port Limits of Savannah, Georgia’’, ‘‘080°04.998′ W.’’ should read ‘‘080°54.998′ W.’’ [FR Doc. C1–2017–13983 Filed 7–14–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1301–00–D ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R05–OAR–2016–0327; FRL–9964–95– Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; State Board Requirements Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a state implementation plan (SIP) submission from Minnesota addressing the state board requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is also proposing to approve elements of Minnesota’s submission addressing the infrastructure requirements relating to state boards for the 1997 ozone, 1997 fine particulate (PM2.5), 2006 PM2.5, 2008 lead (Pb), 2008 ozone, 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2), 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2), and 2012 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This SIP revision was jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:53 Jul 14, 2017 Jkt 241001 submitted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) on May 26, 2016. Comments must be received on or before August 16, 2017. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– OAR–2016–0327 at https:// www.regulations.gov, or via email to aburano.douglas@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Svingen, Environmental Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–4489, svingen.eric@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: DATES: I. What is the background of this SIP submission? II. What guidance is EPA using to evaluate this SIP submission? III. What is the result of EPA’s review of this SIP submission? IV. What action is EPA taking? V. Incorporation by Reference. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews. I. What is the background of this SIP submission? This rulemaking addresses a SIP submission from the MPCA dated May PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 32669 26, 2016, which addresses CAA requirements relating to the state board requirements under section 128, as well as infrastructure requirements of section 110 relating to state boards for the 1997 ozone, 1997 PM2.5, 2006 PM2.5, 2008 Pb, 2008 ozone, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The requirement for states to make infrastructure SIP submissions arises out of CAA section 110(a)(1). Pursuant to section 110(a)(1), states must make SIP submissions ‘‘within 3 years (or such shorter period as the Administrator may prescribe) after the promulgation of a national primary ambient air quality standard (or any revision thereof),’’ and these SIP submissions are to provide for the ‘‘implementation, maintenance, and enforcement’’ of such NAAQS. The statute directly imposes on states the duty to make these SIP submissions, and the requirement to make the submissions is not conditioned upon EPA’s taking any action other than promulgating a new or revised NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) includes a list of specific elements that ‘‘[e]ach such plan’’ submission must address. EPA has historically referred to these SIP submissions made for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(1) and (2) as ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ submissions. Although the term ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ does not appear in the CAA, EPA uses the term to distinguish this particular type of SIP submission from submissions that are intended to satisfy other SIP requirements under the CAA. This specific rulemaking is only taking action on the CAA 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) element of these infrastructure SIP requirements. II. What guidance is EPA using to evaluate this SIP submission? EPA’s guidance relating to infrastructure SIP submissions can be found in a guidance document entitled ‘‘Guidance on SIP Elements Required Under Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 1997 8-hour Ozone and PM2.5 1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards’’ (2007 Guidance). Further guidance is provided in a September 13, 2013, document entitled ‘‘Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under CAA Sections 110(a)(1) and (2)’’ (2013 Guidance). III. What is the result of EPA’s review of this SIP submission? Pursuant to section 110(a), states must provide reasonable notice and 1 PM 2.5 refers to particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers, oftentimes referred to as ‘‘fine’’ particles. E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 135 (Monday, July 17, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 32669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2017-13983]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

19 CFR Part 101

[Docket No. USCBP-2017-0017]


Extension of Port Limits of Savannah, GA

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2017-13983, beginning on page 30807, in 
the issue of Monday, July 3, 2017, make the following correction:
    On page 30808, in the first column, the coordinates listed in line 
seven of ``III. Proposed Port Limits of Savannah, Georgia'', 
``080[deg]04.998' W.'' should read ``080[deg]54.998' W.''

[FR Doc. C1-2017-13983 Filed 7-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D