30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Implementation of the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995 (HOPA), 31622-31624 [2017-14299]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
31622
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2017 / Notices
For the 935.2B & C, the hours per
response is 6 hours).
Information
collection
Number of
respondents
8,050
Responses
per annum
1 .................
8,050
Burden hour per
response
Annual burden
hours
New 6 × 300 ......
New 1,800 .........
Respondents:
Respondents:
Review Only 2 ×
3,720.
Review & Update 4 × 4,030.
HUD–935.2A
(MFH).
Frequency
of response
Total Estimated Burdens: 25,540
hours.
Hourly cost per
response
Reviews Only
7,440.
Review & Update 16,120.
$35/hour (professional
work).
$16/hour (clerical work)
New = ($35 × 4 × 300) + ($16 × 2
× 300) = $51,600.
Reviews = ($35 × 2 × 3,720) =
$260,400.
Updates = ($35 × 2 × 4,030) +
($16 × 2 × $4,030) = $411,060.
Mailing Costs = $1.25 × 4,330 =
$5,412.50.
Annual Cost = $51,600 +
$260,400
+
$411,060
+
$5,412.50 = $728,472.50.
Government:
New = ($38.56 × 3 × 300) +
($17.55 × 0.5 × 300) =
$37,336.50.
Reviews & Updates = ($38.56 × 3
× 4,030) + ($17.55 × 0.5 ×
$4,030) = $501,553.65.
Annual Cost = $37,336.50 +
$501,553.65 = $538,890.15.
Respondents:
$1.25 per report mailing
Government:
$38.56/hour 1 (professional work)..
$17.55/hour 2 (clerical
work).
HUD–935.2B
(SFH) & C
(Condos and
Co-Ops).
30
1 .................
30
6 ........................
180 ....................
Respondents:
$35/hour (professional
work).
$16/hour (clerical work)
$1.25 per report mailing
Government:
$38.56/hour (professional work).
Annual cost
($35 × 4 × 30) + ($16 × 2 × 30) =
$5,160.
$1.25 × 30 = $37.50.
Annual Cost = $5,160 + $37.50 =
$5,197.50.
Government:
Annual Cost = ($38.56 × 3 × 30) +
($17.55 × 0.5 × 30) =
$3,733.65.
$17.55/hour (clerical
work).
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Total .............
8,080
1 each ........
8,080
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
1 Rate for GS 12 Step 5 ($38.56/hour) based on the
salary information available on OPM.gov.
2 Rate for GS 5 step 5 ($17.55/hour) based on the
salary information available on OPM.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:56 Jul 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
Avg. of 3.16 .......
25,540 ...............
Avg. of $28.73 ..............
.......................................
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Dated: July 3, 2017.
Inez C. Downs,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–14289 Filed 7–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5997–N–17]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Implementation of the
Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995
(HOPA)
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD submitted the proposed
information collection requirement
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Respondents: $733,670.
Government: $542,623.80.
described below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act. The purpose
of this notice is to allow for an
additional 30 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: August 7,
2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806. Email:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Inez C. Downs, Reports Management
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20410; email Inez
C. Downs at Inez.C.Downs@hud.gov or
telephone 202–402–8046. This is not a
toll-free number. Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the toll-
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Downs.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
The Federal Register notice that
solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on December 13,
2016 at 81 FR 89964.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Implementation of the Housing for
Older Persons Act of 1995 (HOPA).
OMB Approval Number: 2529–0046.
Type of Request: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Form Number: None.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The Fair
Housing Act [42 U.S.C.3601 et seq.],
prohibits discrimination in the sale,
rental, occupancy, advertising, insuring,
or financing of residential dwellings
based on familial status (individuals
living in households with one or more
children under 18 years of age).
However, under § 3607(b)(2) of the Act,
Congress exempted three (3) categories
of ‘‘housing for older persons’’ from
liability for familial status
discrimination: (1) Housing provided
under any State or Federal program
which the Secretary of HUD determines
is ‘‘specifically designed and operated
to assist elderly persons (as defined in
the State or Federal program)’’; (2)
housing ‘‘intended for, and solely
occupied by persons 62 years of age or
older’’; and (3) housing ’’intended and
operated for occupancy by at least one
person 55 years of age or older per unit
[‘55 or older’ housing].’’ In December
1995, Congress passed the Housing for
Older Persons Act of 1995 (HOPA)
[Public Law 104–76, 109 STAT. 787] as
an amendment to the Fair Housing Act.
The HOPA modified the ‘‘55 or older’’
housing exemption provided under
§ 3607(b)(2)(C) of the Fair Housing Act
by eliminating the requirement that a
housing provider must offer ‘‘significant
facilities and services specifically
designed to meet the physical or social
needs of older persons.’’ In order to
qualify for the HOPA exemption, a
housing community or facility must
meet each of the following criteria: (1)
At least 80 percent of the occupied units
in the community or facility must be
occupied by at least one person who is
55 years of age of older; (2) the housing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:56 Jul 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
provider must publish and adhere to
policies and procedures that
demonstrate the intent to operate
housing for persons 55 years of age or
older; and (3) the housing provider must
demonstrate compliance with ‘‘rules
issued by the Secretary for verification
of occupancy, which shall . . . provide
for [age] verification by reliable surveys
and affidavits.’’
The HOPA did not significantly
increase the record-keeping burden for
the ‘‘55 or older’’ housing exemption. It
describes in greater detail the
documentary evidence which HUD will
consider when determining, in the
course of a familial status
discrimination complaint investigation,
whether or not a housing facility or
community qualified for the ‘‘55 or
older’’ housing exemption as of the date
of the alleged Fair Housing Act
violation.
The HOPA information collection
requirements are necessary to
demonstrate a housing provider’s
eligibility to claim the ‘‘55 or older’’
housing exemption as an affirmative
defense to a familial status
discrimination complaint filed with
HUD under the Fair Housing Act. The
information will be collected in the
normal course of business in connection
with the sale, rental, or occupancy of
dwelling units situated in qualified
senior housing facilities or
communities. The HOPA’s requirement
that a housing provider must
demonstrate the intent to operate a ‘‘55
or older’’ housing community or facility
by publishing, and consistently
enforcing, age verification rules, policies
and procedures for current and
prospective occupants reflects the usual
and customary practice of the senior
housing industry. Under the HOPA, a
‘‘55 or older’’ housing provider should
conduct an initial occupancy survey of
the housing community or facility to
verify compliance with the HOPA’s ‘‘80
percent occupancy’’ requirement, and
should maintain such compliance by
periodically reviewing and updating
existing age verification records for each
occupied dwelling unit at least once
every two years. The creation and
maintenance of such occupancy/age
verification records should occur in the
normal course of individual sale or
rental housing transactions, and should
require minimal preparation time.
Further, a senior housing provider’s
operating rules, policies and procedures
are not privileged or confidential in
nature, because such information must
be disclosed to current and prospective
residents, and to residential real estate
professionals.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31623
The HOPA exemption also requires
that a summary of the occupancy survey
results must be made available for
public inspection. This summary need
not contain confidential information
about individual residents; it may
simply indicate the total number of
dwelling units occupied by persons 55
years of age or older. While the
supporting age verification records may
contain confidential information about
individual occupants, such information
would be protected from disclosure
unless the housing provider claims the
‘‘55 or older’’ housing exemption as an
affirmative defense to a jurisdictional
familial status discrimination complaint
filed with HUD under the Fair Housing
Act. HUD’s Office of Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity will only require a
housing provider to disclose such
confidential information to HUD if and
when HUD investigates a jurisdictional
familial status discrimination complaint
filed against the housing provider under
the Fair Housing Act, and if and when
the housing provider claims the ‘‘55 or
older’’ housing exemption as an
affirmative defense to the complaint.
Members of affected public: The
HOPA requires that small businesses
and other small entities that operate
housing intended for occupancy by
persons 55 years of age or older must
routinely collect and update reliable age
verification information necessary to
meet the eligibility criteria for the
HOPA exemption. The record keeping
requirements are the responsibility of
the housing provider that seeks to
qualify for the HOPA exemption.
Estimation of the total numbers of
hours needed to prepare the information
collection, including the number of
respondents, frequency of response, and
hours of response: The HOPA
information collection requirements are
the responsibility of the individual
housing facility or community that
claims eligibility for the HOPA’s ‘‘55 or
older’’ housing exemption. The HOPA
does not authorize HUD to require
submission of this information by
individual housing providers as a means
of certifying that their housing
communities or facilities qualify for the
exemption. Further, since the HOPA has
no mandatory registration requirement,
HUD cannot ascertain the actual number
of housing facilities and communities
that are currently collecting this
information with the intention of
qualifying for the HOPA exemption.
Accordingly, HUD has estimated that
approximately 1,000 housing facilities
or communities would seek to qualify
for the HOPA exemption. HUD
estimated the occupancy/age
verification data would require routine
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
31624
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 129 / Friday, July 7, 2017 / Notices
updating with each new housing
transaction within the facility or
community, and that the number of
such transactions per year might vary
significantly depending on the size and
nature of the facility or community.
HUD also estimated the average number
Type of collection
activity
Number of
respondents
One: Publication of and
adherence to policies
and procedures that
demonstrate the intent to operate as 55or-older housing .......
Two: Collect age
verification data for at
least one occupant
per unit to meet the
HOPA’s minimum
‘‘80’’ requirement ......
Three: Periodic updates
of occupancy records
Total Burden Hours
and Costs ..........
Frequency of
response
Burden hour
per response
Total annual
burden hours
Hourly cost
per response
Annual cost
1
1,000
2
2,000
$21.30
$42,600.00
1,000
1
1,000
1
1,000
21.30
21,300.00
1,000
1
1,000
2.50
2,500
21.30
53,250.00
........................
........................
3,000
........................
5,500
........................
117,150.00
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including using
appropriate automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Total annual
responses
hours
business. The estimated total annual
burden hours are 5,500 hours.
Estimation of the total numbers of
hours needed to prepare the information
collection including number of
respondents, frequency of response, and
hours of response:
Please see table below.
1,000
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Dated: July 3, 2017.
Inez C. Downs,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–14299 Filed 7–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
of housing transactions per year at ten
(10) transactions per community.
HUD concluded that the publication
of policies and procedures is likely to be
a one-time event, and in most cases will
require no additional burden beyond
what is done in the normal course of
20:56 Jul 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5997–N–33]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Delta Community Capital
Initiative
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 30 days of public
comment.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Comments Due Date: August 7,
2017.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806, Email:
OIRA Submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SW., Washington, DC 20410; email
Anna P. Guido at Anna.P.Guido@
hud.gov or telephone 202–402–5535.
This is not a toll-free number. Person
with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339. Copies of
available documents submitted to OMB
may be obtained from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A. The Federal Register notice
that solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on April 7, 2017 at
82 FR 17027.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Delta
Community Capital Initiative.
OMB Approval Number: 2506–0200.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Form Number: SF 424; HUD 424CB;
HUD 424–CBW; SF–LLL; HUD 2990;
HUD 2991; HUD 2993; HUD 2994A;
HUD 27061; and HUD 27300.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
purpose of this submission is for the
application for the Delta Community
Capital Initiative grant process.
Information is required to rate and rank
competitive applications and to ensure
eligibility of applicants for funding.
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 129 (Friday, July 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31622-31624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14299]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5997-N-17]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Implementation
of the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995 (HOPA)
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HUD submitted the proposed information collection requirement
described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The purpose of
this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: August 7, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC
20503; fax: 202-395-5806. Email: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Inez C. Downs, Reports Management
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; email Inez C. Downs at
Inez.C.Downs@hud.gov or telephone 202-402-8046. This is not a toll-free
number. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the toll-
[[Page 31623]]
free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from
Ms. Downs.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in
Section A.
The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60 days was published on
December 13, 2016 at 81 FR 89964.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Implementation of the Housing for
Older Persons Act of 1995 (HOPA).
OMB Approval Number: 2529-0046.
Type of Request: Extension without change of a currently approved
collection.
Form Number: None.
Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The
Fair Housing Act [42 U.S.C.3601 et seq.], prohibits discrimination in
the sale, rental, occupancy, advertising, insuring, or financing of
residential dwellings based on familial status (individuals living in
households with one or more children under 18 years of age). However,
under Sec. 3607(b)(2) of the Act, Congress exempted three (3)
categories of ``housing for older persons'' from liability for familial
status discrimination: (1) Housing provided under any State or Federal
program which the Secretary of HUD determines is ``specifically
designed and operated to assist elderly persons (as defined in the
State or Federal program)''; (2) housing ``intended for, and solely
occupied by persons 62 years of age or older''; and (3) housing
''intended and operated for occupancy by at least one person 55 years
of age or older per unit [`55 or older' housing].'' In December 1995,
Congress passed the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995 (HOPA)
[Public Law 104-76, 109 STAT. 787] as an amendment to the Fair Housing
Act. The HOPA modified the ``55 or older'' housing exemption provided
under Sec. 3607(b)(2)(C) of the Fair Housing Act by eliminating the
requirement that a housing provider must offer ``significant facilities
and services specifically designed to meet the physical or social needs
of older persons.'' In order to qualify for the HOPA exemption, a
housing community or facility must meet each of the following criteria:
(1) At least 80 percent of the occupied units in the community or
facility must be occupied by at least one person who is 55 years of age
of older; (2) the housing provider must publish and adhere to policies
and procedures that demonstrate the intent to operate housing for
persons 55 years of age or older; and (3) the housing provider must
demonstrate compliance with ``rules issued by the Secretary for
verification of occupancy, which shall . . . provide for [age]
verification by reliable surveys and affidavits.''
The HOPA did not significantly increase the record-keeping burden
for the ``55 or older'' housing exemption. It describes in greater
detail the documentary evidence which HUD will consider when
determining, in the course of a familial status discrimination
complaint investigation, whether or not a housing facility or community
qualified for the ``55 or older'' housing exemption as of the date of
the alleged Fair Housing Act violation.
The HOPA information collection requirements are necessary to
demonstrate a housing provider's eligibility to claim the ``55 or
older'' housing exemption as an affirmative defense to a familial
status discrimination complaint filed with HUD under the Fair Housing
Act. The information will be collected in the normal course of business
in connection with the sale, rental, or occupancy of dwelling units
situated in qualified senior housing facilities or communities. The
HOPA's requirement that a housing provider must demonstrate the intent
to operate a ``55 or older'' housing community or facility by
publishing, and consistently enforcing, age verification rules,
policies and procedures for current and prospective occupants reflects
the usual and customary practice of the senior housing industry. Under
the HOPA, a ``55 or older'' housing provider should conduct an initial
occupancy survey of the housing community or facility to verify
compliance with the HOPA's ``80 percent occupancy'' requirement, and
should maintain such compliance by periodically reviewing and updating
existing age verification records for each occupied dwelling unit at
least once every two years. The creation and maintenance of such
occupancy/age verification records should occur in the normal course of
individual sale or rental housing transactions, and should require
minimal preparation time. Further, a senior housing provider's
operating rules, policies and procedures are not privileged or
confidential in nature, because such information must be disclosed to
current and prospective residents, and to residential real estate
professionals.
The HOPA exemption also requires that a summary of the occupancy
survey results must be made available for public inspection. This
summary need not contain confidential information about individual
residents; it may simply indicate the total number of dwelling units
occupied by persons 55 years of age or older. While the supporting age
verification records may contain confidential information about
individual occupants, such information would be protected from
disclosure unless the housing provider claims the ``55 or older''
housing exemption as an affirmative defense to a jurisdictional
familial status discrimination complaint filed with HUD under the Fair
Housing Act. HUD's Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity will
only require a housing provider to disclose such confidential
information to HUD if and when HUD investigates a jurisdictional
familial status discrimination complaint filed against the housing
provider under the Fair Housing Act, and if and when the housing
provider claims the ``55 or older'' housing exemption as an affirmative
defense to the complaint.
Members of affected public: The HOPA requires that small businesses
and other small entities that operate housing intended for occupancy by
persons 55 years of age or older must routinely collect and update
reliable age verification information necessary to meet the eligibility
criteria for the HOPA exemption. The record keeping requirements are
the responsibility of the housing provider that seeks to qualify for
the HOPA exemption.
Estimation of the total numbers of hours needed to prepare the
information collection, including the number of respondents, frequency
of response, and hours of response: The HOPA information collection
requirements are the responsibility of the individual housing facility
or community that claims eligibility for the HOPA's ``55 or older''
housing exemption. The HOPA does not authorize HUD to require
submission of this information by individual housing providers as a
means of certifying that their housing communities or facilities
qualify for the exemption. Further, since the HOPA has no mandatory
registration requirement, HUD cannot ascertain the actual number of
housing facilities and communities that are currently collecting this
information with the intention of qualifying for the HOPA exemption.
Accordingly, HUD has estimated that approximately 1,000 housing
facilities or communities would seek to qualify for the HOPA exemption.
HUD estimated the occupancy/age verification data would require routine
[[Page 31624]]
updating with each new housing transaction within the facility or
community, and that the number of such transactions per year might vary
significantly depending on the size and nature of the facility or
community. HUD also estimated the average number of housing
transactions per year at ten (10) transactions per community.
HUD concluded that the publication of policies and procedures is
likely to be a one-time event, and in most cases will require no
additional burden beyond what is done in the normal course of business.
The estimated total annual burden hours are 5,500 hours.
Estimation of the total numbers of hours needed to prepare the
information collection including number of respondents, frequency of
response, and hours of response:
Please see table below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total annual
Type of collection activity Number of Frequency of responses Burden hour Total annual Hourly cost Annual cost
respondents response hours per response burden hours per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One: Publication of and adherence to 1,000 1 1,000 2 2,000 $21.30 $42,600.00
policies and procedures that
demonstrate the intent to operate as 55-
or-older housing.......................
Two: Collect age verification data for 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 21.30 21,300.00
at least one occupant per unit to meet
the HOPA's minimum ``80'' requirement..
Three: Periodic updates of occupancy 1,000 1 1,000 2.50 2,500 21.30 53,250.00
records................................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden Hours and Costs........ .............. .............. 3,000 .............. 5,500 .............. 117,150.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in
Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond; including using appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to
these questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Dated: July 3, 2017.
Inez C. Downs,
Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-14299 Filed 7-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
