Certain Liquid Crystal Ewriters and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Last Remaining Respondent Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding, 29930-29931 [2017-13686]

Download as PDF 29930 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Notices treated in a similar manner, with objects from disparate localities being cataloged together. Due to this generalized catalog entry, the human remains were originally reported by the Museum of Natural History and Planetarium in an inventory as culturally unidentifiable (CUI). A 1983 study identified the human remains as American Indian based on the associated funerary objects. Following an examination by representatives of The Osage Nation (previously listed as the Osage Tribe) in January 2016, The Osage Nation and the Museum of Natural History and Planetarium, Roger Williams Park concurred that the human remains and associated funerary objects are from a burial site located on Osage ancestral lands. mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Determinations Made by the Museum of Natural History and Planetarium, Roger Williams Park Officials of the Museum of Natural History and Planetarium, Roger Williams Park, have determined that: • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the human remains described in this notice represent the physical remains of 1 individual of Native American ancestry. • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(A), the 16 objects described in this notice are reasonably believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony. • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American human remains and associated funerary objects and The Osage Nation (previously listed as the Osage Tribe). Additional Requestors and Disposition Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains and associated funerary objects should submit a written request with information in support of the request to Michael W. Kieron, Museum of Natural History and Planetarium, Roger Williams Park, 1000 Elmwood Avenue, Providence, RI 02907, telephone (401) 680–7248, email m.kieron@musnathist.com, by July 31, 2017. After that date, if no additional requestors have come forward, transfer of control of the human remains and associated funerary objects to The Osage Nation (previously listed as the Osage Tribe) may proceed. The Museum of Natural History and Planetarium, Roger Williams Park, is responsible for notifying the Apache VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Jun 29, 2017 Jkt 241001 Tribe of Oklahoma; Comanche Nation, Oklahoma; Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians; Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma; and The Osage Nation (previously listed as the Osage Tribe) that this notice has been published. Dated: April 24, 2017. Melanie O’Brien, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2017–13739 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1035] Certain Liquid Crystal Ewriters and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Last Remaining Respondent Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 11) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on May 31, 2017, terminating the last remaining respondent based on a withdrawal of the complaint. The Commission requests written submissions, under the schedule set forth below, on remedy, public interest, and bonding concerning a previously defaulted respondent. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on January 13, 2017, based on a complaint filed by Kent Displays, Inc. (‘‘Kent Displays’’) of Kent, Ohio. 82 FR 4418. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal eWriters and components thereof that infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,351,506 and 8,947,604. Id. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents Shenzhen Howshow Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a Shenzhen Howshare Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a Howshare (‘‘Howshare’’) of Shenzhen, China, and Shenzhen SUNstone Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a iQbe (‘‘iQbe’’) of Shenzhen, China. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not participating in this investigation. Id. On April 11, 2017, the ALJ issued an ID finding iQbe in default for failing to respond to the complaint, the notice of investigation, and multiple discovery requests, and for failing to respond to an order to show cause why it should not be found in default. Order No. 9, not reviewed, Notice (May 11, 2017). On May 24, 2017, Kent Displays moved to terminate the investigation with respect to Howshare based on a withdrawal of the complaint. On May 26, 2017, Howshare responded that it did not oppose its termination from the investigation. On May 31, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the motion and terminating the investigation with respect to Howshare. Order No. 11. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. On June 1, 2017, Kent Displays filed a declaration seeking relief against the defaulted respondent iQbe pursuant to section 337(g)(1) and Commission Rule 210.16(c), 19 CFR 210.16(c). The declaration contains Kent Displays’ views on remedy, the public interest, and bonding. A proposed limited exclusion order and a proposed cease and desist order are attached to the declaration. Section 337(g)(1) and Commission Rule 210.16(c) authorize the Commission to order relief against a respondent found in default, unless, after considering the public interest, it finds that such relief should not issue. In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM 30JNN1 mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 125 / Friday, June 30, 2017 / Notices Commission may: (1) Issue an order that could result in the exclusion of articles manufactured or imported by iQbe; and/ or (2) issue cease and desist orders that could result in iQbe being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and provide information establishing that activities involving other types of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC Pub. No. 2843, Comm’n Op. at 7–10 (December 1994). If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The factors that the Commission will consider include the effect that the exclusion order and/or cease and desists orders would have on (1) the public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in the context of this investigation. If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve or disapprove the Commission’s action. See Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed if a remedy is ordered. Written Submissions: Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Kent Displays is requested to state the HTSUS numbers under which the accused products are imported, to state the dates that the patents expire, and to VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Jun 29, 2017 Jkt 241001 supply information concerning the identity of any known importers. Written submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on July 10, 2017. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the close of business July 17, 2017. No further submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadline stated above and submit eight true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 337– TA–1035’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ secretary/documents/handbook_on_ filing_procedures.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All information, including confidential business information and documents for which confidential treatment is properly sought, submitted to the Commission for purposes of this Investigation may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel[1], solely for cybersecurity purposes. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of 1 All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 29931 Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 26, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–13686 Filed 6–29–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–287 (Second Review)] Raw In-Shell Pistachios From Iran Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on raw in-shell pistachios from Iran would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted this review on April 1, 2016 (81 FR 18882) and determined on July 5, 2016 that it would conduct a full review (81 FR 45306, July 13, 2016). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s review and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on December 15, 2016 (81 FR 90867) (as revised effective March 7, 2017 (82 FR 14031, March 16, 2017)). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on April 27, 2017, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on June 26, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4701 (June 2017), entitled Raw In-Shell Pistachios from Iran: Investigation No. 731–TA–287 (Second Review). 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM 30JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 125 (Friday, June 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29930-29931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13686]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1035]


Certain Liquid Crystal Ewriters and Components Thereof; 
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Terminating the Last Remaining Respondent Based on Withdrawal of the 
Complaint; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public 
Interest, and Bonding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 11) issued by the presiding administrative law 
judge (``ALJ'') on May 31, 2017, terminating the last remaining 
respondent based on a withdrawal of the complaint. The Commission 
requests written submissions, under the schedule set forth below, on 
remedy, public interest, and bonding concerning a previously defaulted 
respondent.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 13, 2017, based on a complaint filed by Kent Displays, Inc. 
(``Kent Displays'') of Kent, Ohio. 82 FR 4418. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain liquid crystal eWriters and components 
thereof that infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,351,506 and 8,947,604. Id. The 
Commission's notice of investigation named as respondents Shenzhen 
Howshow Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a Shenzhen Howshare Technology Co., 
Ltd., d/b/a Howshare (``Howshare'') of Shenzhen, China, and Shenzhen 
SUNstone Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a iQbe (``iQbe'') of Shenzhen, 
China. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not 
participating in this investigation. Id.
    On April 11, 2017, the ALJ issued an ID finding iQbe in default for 
failing to respond to the complaint, the notice of investigation, and 
multiple discovery requests, and for failing to respond to an order to 
show cause why it should not be found in default. Order No. 9, not 
reviewed, Notice (May 11, 2017).
    On May 24, 2017, Kent Displays moved to terminate the investigation 
with respect to Howshare based on a withdrawal of the complaint. On May 
26, 2017, Howshare responded that it did not oppose its termination 
from the investigation.
    On May 31, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the motion 
and terminating the investigation with respect to Howshare. Order No. 
11. No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
    On June 1, 2017, Kent Displays filed a declaration seeking relief 
against the defaulted respondent iQbe pursuant to section 337(g)(1) and 
Commission Rule 210.16(c), 19 CFR 210.16(c). The declaration contains 
Kent Displays' views on remedy, the public interest, and bonding. A 
proposed limited exclusion order and a proposed cease and desist order 
are attached to the declaration.
    Section 337(g)(1) and Commission Rule 210.16(c) authorize the 
Commission to order relief against a respondent found in default, 
unless, after considering the public interest, it finds that such 
relief should not issue.
    In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the

[[Page 29931]]

Commission may: (1) Issue an order that could result in the exclusion 
of articles manufactured or imported by iQbe; and/or (2) issue cease 
and desist orders that could result in iQbe being required to cease and 
desist from engaging in unfair acts in the importation and sale of such 
articles. Accordingly, the Commission is interested in receiving 
written submissions that address the form of remedy, if any, that 
should be ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an article from entry 
into the United States for purposes other than entry for consumption, 
the party should so indicate and provide information establishing that 
activities involving other types of entry either are adversely 
affecting it or likely to do so. For background, see Certain Devices 
for Connecting Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, 
USITC Pub. No. 2843, Comm'n Op. at 7-10 (December 1994).
    If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must 
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The 
factors that the Commission will consider include the effect that the 
exclusion order and/or cease and desists orders would have on (1) the 
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. 
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly 
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. 
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written 
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in 
the context of this investigation.
    If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade 
Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve 
or disapprove the Commission's action. See Presidential Memorandum of 
July 21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the 
subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under 
bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the 
Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in 
receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be 
imposed if a remedy is ordered.
    Written Submissions: Parties to the investigation, interested 
government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to 
file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, 
and bonding. Kent Displays is requested to state the HTSUS numbers 
under which the accused products are imported, to state the dates that 
the patents expire, and to supply information concerning the identity 
of any known importers.
    Written submissions must be filed no later than the close of 
business on July 10, 2017. Reply submissions must be filed no later 
than the close of business July 17, 2017. No further submissions on 
these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the 
Commission.
    Persons filing written submissions must file the original document 
electronically on or before the deadline stated above and submit eight 
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary pursuant to section 
210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the investigation number (``Inv. 
No. 337-TA-1035'') in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the 
first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf). 
Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary 
(202-205-2000).
    Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in 
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests 
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include 
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such 
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment 
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All 
information, including confidential business information and documents 
for which confidential treatment is properly sought, submitted to the 
Commission for purposes of this Investigation may be disclosed to and 
used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract 
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a 
related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, 
and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of 
the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 
government employees and contract personnel\[1]\, solely for 
cybersecurity purposes. All nonconfidential written submissions will be 
available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on 
EDIS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure 
agreements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 26, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-13686 Filed 6-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.