Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed New Information Collection Activity; Comment Request, Proposed Study Entitled “Evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Sexual Assault Kit Initiative”, 27872-27873 [2017-12623]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
27872
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 116 / Monday, June 19, 2017 / Notices
limited exclusion order against all
respondents and the entry of a cease and
desist order against Basic Medical, that
the public interest factors do not weigh
against granting these remedial orders,
and that bonding should be set at 100
percent of the entered value of the
infringing products.
The Commission finds that the
statutory requirements of section
337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) and
Commission Rule 210.16(a)(1) (19 CFR
210.16(a)(1)) are met with respect to all
respondents. Pursuant to section
337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) and
Commission Rule 210.16(c) (19 CFR
210.16(c)), the Commission presumes
the facts alleged in the complaint to be
true. The Commission finds that
Laerdal’s amended complaint
sufficiently alleged a violation of section
337 by Medsource International,
Medsource Factory, and Basic Medical
with respect to claim 1 of the ’058
patent and the ’656 mark. The
Commission, however, finds that even
when the factual allegations of Laerdal’s
amended complaint are presumed true,
Laerdal has not shown a violation of
section 337 with respect to the ’023
copyright, the ’026 copyright, the trade
dresses, or any of the other respondents.
The Commission has determined that
the appropriate form of relief in this
investigation is: (a) A limited exclusion
order against Medsource International,
Medsource Factory, and Basic Medical
prohibiting the unlicensed entry of
cervical collars that infringe claim 1 of
the ’058 patent and CPR masks that
infringe the ’656 mark; and (b) an order
that Basic Medical cease and desist from
importing, selling, offering for sale,
marketing, advertising, distributing,
offering for sale, transferring (except for
exportation), or soliciting U.S. agents or
distributors of imported cervical collars
that infringe claim 1 of the ’058 patent
and CPR masks that infringe the ’656
mark. The Commission has further
determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in section 337(g)(1)
(19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) do not preclude
the issuance of the limited exclusion
order and cease and desist order.
Finally, the Commission has determined
that the bond for importation during the
period of Presidential review shall be in
the amount of 100 percent of the entered
value of the imported subject articles of
the respondents. The investigation is
terminated.
The Commission’s orders and opinion
were delivered to the President and the
United States Trade Representative on
the day of their issuance.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Jun 16, 2017
Jkt 241001
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 14, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–12689 Filed 6–16–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Institute of Justice
[OMB Number 1121–NEW]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed New Information
Collection Activity; Comment Request,
Proposed Study Entitled ‘‘Evaluation of
the Bureau of Justice Assistance
Sexual Assault Kit Initiative’’
National Institute of Justice,
U.S. Department of Justice
ACTION: 60-day notice.
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs,
National Institute of Justice, will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until
August 18, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Christine Crossland, National Institute
of Justice, Office of Research &
Evaluation, 810 Seventh Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20531 (overnight
20001) or via email at
christine.crossland@ojp.usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the National Institute of
Justice, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether, and if so how, the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
SUMMARY:
[CPCLO Order No. 001–2017]
Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of
Records; Correction
AGENCY:
United States Department of
Justice.
ACTION:
Notice; correction.
The Department of Justice
(Department or DOJ) published a notice
in the Federal Register, 82 FR 25812, on
June 5, 2017, concerning a System of
Records Notice (SORN) for a new DOJ
system of records titled, ‘‘DOJ Insider
Threat Program Records (ITPR),’’
JUSTICE/DOJ–018. The document
contains two incorrect SORN reference
numbers. References to JUSTICE/DOJ–
001 should be replaced by JUSTICE/
DOJ–018.
SUMMARY:
Beth
Zelman, Attorney Advisor, 202–305–
9318.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Correction:
In the Federal Register of June 5,
2017, in FR Doc. 2017–11445, on page
25813, in the SORN title and the
‘‘SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER’’
section, correct the DOJ SORN reference
number to read:
JUSTICE/DOJ–018
SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
DOJ Insider Threat Program Records
(ITPR), JUSTICE/DOJ–018.
Dated: June 12, 2017.
Peter A. Winn,
Acting Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties
Officer, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017–12703 Filed 6–16–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–NW–P
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 116 / Monday, June 19, 2017 / Notices
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of this information
collection:
1. Type of Information Collection: Site
visits, which will include individual
and group interviews.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Evaluation of the Bureau of Justice
Assistance Sexual Assault Kit Initiative.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The applicable component within the
U.S. Department of Justice is the
National Institute of Justice in the Office
of Justice Programs.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Sexual assault kits (SAKs) are
invaluable tools used in investigations
to collect evidence such as DNA and to
document injuries from alleged victims;
this evidence in turn is used to identify
and prosecute offenders and to
exonerate innocent suspects. Despite the
importance of SAKs, backlogs of
unsubmitted and untested kits have
emerged in jurisdictions across the
country (e.g., Peterson and Hickman,
2005; Strom et al., 2009). The Bureau of
Justice Assistance (BJA) established the
Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (SAKI) to
provide assistance to jurisdictions who
are addressing these issues. In FY 2015,
20 sites were funded through SAKI to
engage in reforms intended to improve
the national response to sexual assault
cases.
The objectives of the current study are
to conduct an evaluability assessment of
all 20 FY2015 sites to determine their
readiness to participate in an evaluation
of the SAKI and to develop a
comprehensive and rigorous evaluation
plan to ultimately determine the extent
to which SAKI reforms have resulted in
intended (and/or unintended) system
changes. The evaluability assessment
data collection process will include
visits to the 20 sites, which will be
comprised of individual and group
interviews with a maximum of 20
respondents per site.
The types of respondents who will be
asked to respond to requests for
interviews will include the SAKI Site
Coordinator, representatives from
sectors involved in working groups (e.g.,
law enforcement, forensic medical
personnel, forensic laboratory
personnel, prosecutors, victim
advocates, victim treatment providers),
specialized staff (e.g., cold case
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Jun 16, 2017
Jkt 241001
detectives, police administrative
support, victim compensation staff).
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: The estimated average burden
for a respondent completing a site visit
interview is approximately 60 minutes.
A maximum of 20 respondents will be
interviewed, either individually or in
groups, at each of the 20 sites.
Therefore, the total number of estimated
respondents for the entire evaluability
site visit data collection is 400 (20 sites
× 20 respondents per site).
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The maximum estimated
public burden associated with this
collection is 400 hours. It is estimated
that each of the 400 site visit interviews
will take 60 minutes to complete (400
respondents × 60 minutes = 400 hours).
If additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405A,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: June 14, 2017
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017–12623 Filed 6–16–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Labor, as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95). This program helps to ensure
that requested data can be provided in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is
minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents
can be properly assessed. The Bureau of
Labor Statistics (BLS) is soliciting
comments concerning the proposed
extension of the ‘‘Current Population
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27873
Survey (CPS).’’ A copy of the proposed
information collection request (ICR) can
be obtained by contacting the individual
listed below in the ADDRESSES section of
this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice on or
before August 18, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Erin
Good, BLS Clearance Officer, Division
of Management Systems, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Room 4080, 2
Massachusetts Avenue NE.,
Washington, DC 20212. Written
comments also may be transmitted by
fax to 202–691–5111 (this is not a tollfree number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
Good, BLS Clearance Officer, 202–691–
7763 (this is not a toll-free number).
(See ADDRESSES section.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The CPS has been the principal
source of the official Government
statistics on employment and
unemployment for over 75 years. The
labor force information gathered
through the survey is of paramount
importance in keeping track of the
economic health of the Nation. The
survey is the only source of monthly
data on total employment and
unemployment. The Employment
Situation news release contains data
from this survey and is designated as a
Principal Federal Economic Indicator
(PFEI). Moreover, the survey also yields
data on the characteristics of persons
not in the labor force. The CPS data are
used monthly, in conjunction with data
from other sources, to analyze the extent
to which, and with what success, the
various components of the American
population are participating in the
economic life of the Nation.
The labor force data gathered through
the CPS are provided to users in the
greatest detail possible, in conjunction
with the demographic information
obtained in the survey. In brief, the
labor force data can be broken down by
sex, age, race, ethnicity, marital status,
family composition, educational level,
certification and licensing status,
disability status, and other
characteristics. Through such
breakdowns, one can focus on the
employment situation of specific
population groups as well as on general
trends in employment and
unemployment. Information of this type
can be obtained only through
demographically oriented surveys such
as the CPS.
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 116 (Monday, June 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27872-27873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12623]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Institute of Justice
[OMB Number 1121-NEW]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed New
Information Collection Activity; Comment Request, Proposed Study
Entitled ``Evaluation of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Sexual
Assault Kit Initiative''
AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice
ACTION: 60-day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs,
National Institute of Justice, will be submitting the following
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until
August 18, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact
Christine Crossland, National Institute of Justice, Office of Research
& Evaluation, 810 Seventh Street NW., Washington, DC 20531 (overnight
20001) or via email at christine.crossland@ojp.usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and suggestions from the public and
affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following
four points:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the National Institute
of Justice, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
--Evaluate whether, and if so how, the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected can be enhanced; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of
[[Page 27873]]
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
Overview of this information collection:
1. Type of Information Collection: Site visits, which will include
individual and group interviews.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Evaluation of the Bureau of
Justice Assistance Sexual Assault Kit Initiative.
3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of
the Department sponsoring the collection: The applicable component
within the U.S. Department of Justice is the National Institute of
Justice in the Office of Justice Programs.
4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract: Sexual assault kits (SAKs) are invaluable
tools used in investigations to collect evidence such as DNA and to
document injuries from alleged victims; this evidence in turn is used
to identify and prosecute offenders and to exonerate innocent suspects.
Despite the importance of SAKs, backlogs of unsubmitted and untested
kits have emerged in jurisdictions across the country (e.g., Peterson
and Hickman, 2005; Strom et al., 2009). The Bureau of Justice
Assistance (BJA) established the Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (SAKI)
to provide assistance to jurisdictions who are addressing these issues.
In FY 2015, 20 sites were funded through SAKI to engage in reforms
intended to improve the national response to sexual assault cases.
The objectives of the current study are to conduct an evaluability
assessment of all 20 FY2015 sites to determine their readiness to
participate in an evaluation of the SAKI and to develop a comprehensive
and rigorous evaluation plan to ultimately determine the extent to
which SAKI reforms have resulted in intended (and/or unintended) system
changes. The evaluability assessment data collection process will
include visits to the 20 sites, which will be comprised of individual
and group interviews with a maximum of 20 respondents per site.
The types of respondents who will be asked to respond to requests
for interviews will include the SAKI Site Coordinator, representatives
from sectors involved in working groups (e.g., law enforcement,
forensic medical personnel, forensic laboratory personnel, prosecutors,
victim advocates, victim treatment providers), specialized staff (e.g.,
cold case detectives, police administrative support, victim
compensation staff).
5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of
time estimated for an average respondent to respond: The estimated
average burden for a respondent completing a site visit interview is
approximately 60 minutes. A maximum of 20 respondents will be
interviewed, either individually or in groups, at each of the 20 sites.
Therefore, the total number of estimated respondents for the entire
evaluability site visit data collection is 400 (20 sites x 20
respondents per site).
6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: The maximum estimated public burden associated
with this collection is 400 hours. It is estimated that each of the 400
site visit interviews will take 60 minutes to complete (400 respondents
x 60 minutes = 400 hours).
If additional information is required contact: Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405A, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: June 14, 2017
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017-12623 Filed 6-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
