Certain Preserved Mushrooms From India: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 26049-26050 [2017-11671]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
respect to 194 companies.3 On April 21,
2017, the petitioners withdrew their
request for an administrative review for
191 out of 194 companies.4 See the
Initiation Notice for the full list of
companies for which the Department
initiated a review. No other party
requested an administrative review of
this order.
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party that requested the
review withdraws its request within 90
days of the publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. In
this case, the petitioners timely
withdrew their review request, in part,
by the 90-day deadline, and no other
party requested an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order.
Therefore, we are rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on small
diameter graphite electrodes from the
PRC for the period February 1, 2016,
through January 31, 2017, with respect
to the 191 for which all review requests
were withdrawn. The review will
continue with respect to the remaining
three companies: (1) Fangda Group; 5 (2)
Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co.,
Ltd.; and (3) Xuzhou Jianglong Carbon
Products Co., Ltd.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the companies
for which this review is rescinded,
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of this notice.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
17188 (April 10, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
4 See the petitioners’ submission, ‘‘Small
Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People’s
Republic of China—Petitioners’ Withdrawal of
Certain Requests for Review and Respondent
Selection Comments,’’ dated April 20, 2017.
5 The Fangda Group consists of Beijing Fangda
Carbon Tech Co., Ltd., Chengdu Rongguang Carbon
Co., Ltd., Fangda Carbon New Material Co., Ltd.,
Fushun Carbon Co., Ltd., and Hefei Carbon Co., Ltd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We intend to issue and publish this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 31, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–11670 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–813]
Certain Preserved Mushrooms From
India: Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms (mushrooms)
from India for the period of February 1,
2016 through January 31, 2017.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Johnson or Denisa Ursu,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; Telephone: (202) 482–4929
or (202) 482–2285, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26049
Background
On February 8, 2017, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms from India for the
period of February 1, 2016 through
January 31, 2017.1
On February 28 2017, in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.213(b), the Department received a
timely request from Himalya
International Limited and Himalya
International Inc. (collectively, Himalya)
to conduct an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
mushrooms from India manufactured
and exported by Himalya International
Limited.2
On April 10, 2017, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order.3
This administrative review covers
Himalya during the period February 1,
2016 through January 31, 2017. On May
16, 2017, Himalya timely withdrew its
request for an administrative review.4
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation of the
requested review. Himalya withdrew its
review request before the 90-day
deadline, and no other party requested
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order. Therefore, in
response to the timely withdrawal of the
review request, the Department is
rescinding in its entirety the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on mushrooms
from India for the review period
February 1, 2016 through January 31,
2017.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 82 FR 9709
(February 8, 2017).
2 See Himalya’s letter, ‘‘Preserved Mushrooms
from India—Request for Administrative Review of
Himalya International Inc & Himalya International
Limited,’’ dated February 28, 2017.
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
17188 (April 10, 2017).
4 See Himalya’s letter, ‘‘Certain Preserved
Mushrooms from India: Withdraw of Admin
Review Request Made on February 28th, 2017’’
dated May 16, 2017.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
26050
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 6, 2017 / Notices
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Antidumping duties
shall be assessed at rates equal to the
cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as the only
reminder to importers whose entries
will be liquidated as a result of this
rescission notice, of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties and/or
countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement may
result in the presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
and/or countervailing duties occurred
and the subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751 of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 31, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–11671 Filed 6–5–17; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–552–818]
Certain Steel Nails From the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary
Results and Partial Rescission of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
nails from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam (Vietnam). The period of
review (POR) is December 29, 2014,
through June 30, 2016. The Department
preliminarily determines that Truong
Vinh Ltd. (Truong Vinh), Rich State,
Inc. (Rich State), and Dicha Sombrilla
Co., Ltd. (Dicha Sombrilla) did not
demonstrate their eligibility for a
separate rate and are, therefore, part of
the Vietnam-wide entity. Further,
because Mid Continent Steel & Wire,
Inc. (the petitioner) withdrew its request
for review of eight companies, we are
rescinding the administrative review
with regard to them. Interested parties
are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chelsey Simonovich or Mark Flessner,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VI,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1979 or
(202) 482–6312, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 13, 2015, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
nails from Vietnam.1 On July 5, 2016,
the Department published in the
Federal Register an opportunity to
request administrative review of the
Order.2 The Department received
requests for a review of 11 companies.3
1 See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of
Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan,
and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13,
2015) (the Order).
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 43584
(July 5, 2016).
3 See Letter from Amifast Corporation, ‘‘Amifast
Corporation; Request for Administrative Review;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:52 Jun 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On September 12, 2016, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of this review,
covering the above-referenced
companies.4 On September 28, 2016, the
Department placed entry data from U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on
the record of this review.5 On October
18, 2016, the Department issued its
antidumping duty questionnaires to
Truong Vinh and Rich State. On
November 8, 2016, both companies, in
a joint submission, stated that neither
intended to respond to the Department’s
questionnaires.6
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is certain steel nails having a
nominal shaft length not exceeding 12
inches. Certain steel nails subject to this
order are currently classified under
HTSUS subheadings 7317.00.55.02,
7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05,
7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08,
7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18,
7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20,
7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40,
7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60,
7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80,
7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30,
7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00.
Certain steel nails subject to this order
also may be classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7907.00.60.00,
Case No. A–522–818; Antidumping Duty Order on
Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,’’
dated August 1, 2016. See also Letter from
Petitioner, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Request for Administrative
Reviews,’’ dated August 1, 2016. See also Letter
from Olympic Manufacturing Group, ‘‘Request for
Administrative Review and Request to Defer
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam (A–552–818) (POR: December 29, 2014—
June 30, 2016),’’ dated August 1, 2016. See also
Letter from Truong Vinh, ‘‘Request for
Administrative Review and Request to Defer
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam (A–552–818) (POR: December 29, 2014—
June 30, 2016),’’ dated August 1, 2016.
4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
62720 (September 12 2016) (Initiation Notice).
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from
Vietnam: U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Information for 12/29/14–6/30/2016 Review
Period,’’ dated September 28, 2016.
6 See Letter from Truong Vinh and Rich State,
‘‘Truong Vinh Ltd. and Rich State Inc.,
Questionnaire Response, First Annual
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Steel Nails from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam, (A–552–818),’’ dated November 8, 2016.
Therein, Truong Vinh and Rich State indicated that
they believe that their zinc anchors would be found
outside of the scope of the Order based on an
ongoing scope proceeding. As such, Truong Vinh
and Rich State stated that they would not respond
to the Department’s October 18, 2016, request for
information, and that this letter constituted their
full response to sections A, C, and D of the
Department’s questionnaire. Neither company
submitted a separate rate application.
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26049-26050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11671]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-813]
Certain Preserved Mushrooms From India: Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is rescinding the
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain
preserved mushrooms (mushrooms) from India for the period of February
1, 2016 through January 31, 2017.
DATES: Effective June 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Johnson or Denisa Ursu,
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230; Telephone: (202) 482-4929 or (202) 482-2285, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 8, 2017, the Department published in the Federal
Register a notice of ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review''
of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from India
for the period of February 1, 2016 through January 31, 2017.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review, 82 FR 9709 (February 8, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 28 2017, in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b), the
Department received a timely request from Himalya International Limited
and Himalya International Inc. (collectively, Himalya) to conduct an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on mushrooms from
India manufactured and exported by Himalya International Limited.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Himalya's letter, ``Preserved Mushrooms from India--
Request for Administrative Review of Himalya International Inc &
Himalya International Limited,'' dated February 28, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 10, 2017, the Department published in the Federal Register
a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order.\3\ This administrative review covers Himalya during the
period February 1, 2016 through January 31, 2017. On May 16, 2017,
Himalya timely withdrew its request for an administrative review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 17188 (April 10, 2017).
\4\ See Himalya's letter, ``Certain Preserved Mushrooms from
India: Withdraw of Admin Review Request Made on February 28th,
2017'' dated May 16, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an
administrative review, if the party that requested the review withdraws
its request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of
initiation of the requested review. Himalya withdrew its review request
before the 90-day deadline, and no other party requested an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order. Therefore, in
response to the timely withdrawal of the review request, the Department
is rescinding in its entirety the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on mushrooms from India for the review period
February 1, 2016 through January 31, 2017.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to
[[Page 26050]]
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Antidumping
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as the only reminder to importers whose entries
will be liquidated as a result of this rescission notice, of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 31, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017-11671 Filed 6-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P