Certain RF Capable Integrated Circuits and Products Containing the Same: Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of Investigation, 20920 [2017-08962]

Download as PDF 20920 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 85 / Thursday, May 4, 2017 / Notices Flexispot, 4569 Las Positas Rd, Suite A, Livermore, CA 94551 The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 1, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–09018 Filed 5–3–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES [Investigation No. 337–TA–982] Certain RF Capable Integrated Circuits and Products Containing the Same: Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant’s Unopposed Motion To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 May 03, 2017 Jkt 241001 ACTION: Notice. Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 28) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based upon withdrawal of the complaint. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– TA–982 on January 21, 2016, based on a complaint filed by ParkerVision, Inc. of Jacksonville, Florida (‘‘ParkerVision’’). 81 FR 3474–75 (Jan. 21, 2016). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain RF capable integrated circuits and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,571,135 (‘‘the ’135 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,879,817 (‘‘the ’817 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,929,638 (‘‘the ’638 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 9,118,528. The notice of investigation named the following respondents: Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California; LG Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, Republic of Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California; Qualcomm Incorporated of San Diego, California; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon-Shi, Republic of Korea; Samsung PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California. Id. at 3474. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also a party to the investigation. Id. at 3475. After institution, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. and the Samsung respondents separately were terminated from the investigation. See Notice (Aug. 18, 2016); Notice (Aug. 19, 2016). The asserted claims of the ’135 patent, the ’817 patent, and the ’638 patent were also terminated from the investigation. See Notice (Feb. 22, 2017); Notice (Sept. 7, 2016). On March 12, 2017, ParkerVision moved to terminate the investigation in its entirety based upon withdrawal of the complaint. On March 23, 2017, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion. That same day, the respondents indicated that they do not oppose the motion. On April 3, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the unopposed motion. The ALJ found that the motion complied with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) and further found that no extraordinary circumstances prohibited granting the motion. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 28, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–08962 Filed 5–3–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice 17–022] NASA International Space Station Advisory Committee; Meeting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice of meeting. AGENCY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA International Space Station (ISS) Advisory SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM 04MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 85 (Thursday, May 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 20920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08962]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-982]


Certain RF Capable Integrated Circuits and Products Containing 
the Same: Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion To Terminate the 
Investigation in Its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal of the Complaint; 
Termination of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 28) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation 
in its entirety based upon withdrawal of the complaint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
982 on January 21, 2016, based on a complaint filed by ParkerVision, 
Inc. of Jacksonville, Florida (``ParkerVision''). 81 FR 3474-75 (Jan. 
21, 2016). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain RF capable integrated 
circuits and products containing the same by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,571,135 (``the '135 patent''); U.S. 
Patent No. 6,879,817 (``the '817 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,929,638 
(``the '638 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 9,118,528. The notice of 
investigation named the following respondents: Apple Inc. of Cupertino, 
California; LG Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, Republic of Korea; LG 
Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; LG 
Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California; Qualcomm 
Incorporated of San Diego, California; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of 
Suwon-Shi, Republic of Korea; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of 
Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San 
Jose, California. Id. at 3474. The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations is also a party to the investigation. Id. at 3475.
    After institution, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. and the Samsung 
respondents separately were terminated from the investigation. See 
Notice (Aug. 18, 2016); Notice (Aug. 19, 2016). The asserted claims of 
the '135 patent, the '817 patent, and the '638 patent were also 
terminated from the investigation. See Notice (Feb. 22, 2017); Notice 
(Sept. 7, 2016).
    On March 12, 2017, ParkerVision moved to terminate the 
investigation in its entirety based upon withdrawal of the complaint. 
On March 23, 2017, the Commission investigative attorney filed a 
response in support of the motion. That same day, the respondents 
indicated that they do not oppose the motion.
    On April 3, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the 
unopposed motion. The ALJ found that the motion complied with the 
requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) and 
further found that no extraordinary circumstances prohibited granting 
the motion. None of the parties petitioned for review of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 28, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-08962 Filed 5-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.