Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From India, Indonesia, and the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 18895-18896 [2017-08174]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 77 / Monday, April 24, 2017 / Notices
2016.1 On January 13, 2017, in response
to timely requests from the petitioner 2
and Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd.
(Husqvarna) and in accordance with
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from the PRC with respect to
40 companies, including Husqvarna.3
On April 12, 2016, the petitioner and
Husqvarna withdrew their requests for
an administrative review for
Husqvarna.4
Rescission of Administrative Review in
Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, ‘‘in whole or in
part, if a party that requested a review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the date of publication of notice of
initiation of the requested review.’’
Because the petitioner and Husqvarna
withdrew their review requests in a
timely manner, and because no other
party requested a review of Husqvarna,
we are rescinding the administrative
review in part with respect to
Husqvarna.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For Husqvarna, for
which the review is rescinded,
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
the rate equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP within 15 days after
publication of this notice.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notifications to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 76920
(November 4, 2016).
2 The petitioner in this review is Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition.
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
4294 (January 13, 2017).
4 See the letters of withdrawals of requests for
review from the petitioner and Husqvarna dated
April 12, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:48 Apr 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
comply with this requirement may
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: April 17, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–08210 Filed 4–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
18895
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2016, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
sunset reviews of the AD Orders 1 on
CTL plate from India, Indonesia, and
Korea, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).2 On December 8, 13, and 16, 2016,
respectively, ArcelorMittal USA, Inc.
(AMUSA), Nucor Corporation (Nucor),
and SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB),
(collectively, the petitioners or the
domestic interested parties), notified the
Department of their intent to participate
within the 15-day period specified in 19
CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Each of the
domestic parties claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of
the Act stating that they are each
producers in the United States of a
domestic like product.
On January 3, 2017, the Department
received complete substantive responses
to the Notice of Initiation from the
domestic interested parties within the
30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).4 We received no
substantive responses from respondent
interested parties with respect to these
sunset reviews of the orders on CTL
plate from India, Indonesia, or Korea,
nor was a hearing requested. As a result,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–817, A–560–805, A–580–836]
Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate From India, Indonesia, and
the Republic of Korea: Final Results of
the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
reviews, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on
certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel
plate (CTL plate) from India, Indonesia,
and the Republic of Korea (Korea)
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping at the levels
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset
Reviews’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective April 24, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1280.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 See Notice of Amendment of Final
Determinations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
and Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Cut-ToLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From
France, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and the
Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6585 (February 10, 2000)
(collectively, Orders).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews,
81 FR 86697 (December 1, 2016) (Notice of
Initiation).
3 See AMUSA’s December 13, 2016, submission
‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain Cut-toLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From India,
Indonesia, and South Korea—AMUSA’s Notice of
Intent to Participate.’’ See also Nucor’s December
16, 2016, submissions ‘‘Certain Cut-to-Length
Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from India: Notice of
Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ ‘‘Certain
Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from
Indonesia: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset
Review,’’ and ‘‘Certain Cut-to-Length CarbonQuality Steel Plate from the Republic of Korea:
Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review.’’
See also, SSAB’s December 8, 2016, submissions
‘‘Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
from India, Third Sunset Review,’’ ‘‘Certain Cut-toLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from Indonesia,
Third Sunset Review,’’ and ‘‘Certain Cut-to-Length
Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from Korea, Third
Sunset Review.’’
4 See the domestic interested parties’ January 3,
2017, submissions ‘‘Certain Cut-to-Length CarbonQuality Steel Plate from India,’’ ‘‘Five-Year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Order on
Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
From Indonesia—Substantive Response to Notice of
Initiation,’’ and ‘‘Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate from the Republic of Korea: Substantive
Response to Notice of Initiation.’’
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
18896
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 77 / Monday, April 24, 2017 / Notices
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2),
the Department conducted expedited
(120-day) sunset reviews of the AD
Orders on CTL plate from India,
Indonesia, and Korea.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Orders
The products covered under the
Orders are certain hot-rolled carbonquality steel: (1) Universal mill plates
(i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on four
faces or in a closed box pass, of a width
exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding
1250 mm, and of a nominal or actual
thickness of not less than 4 mm, which
are cut-to-length (not in coils) and
without patterns in relief), of iron or
non-alloy-quality steel; and (2) flatrolled products, hot-rolled, of a nominal
or actual thickness of 4.75 mm or more
and of a width which exceeds 150 mm
and measures at least twice the
thickness, and which are cut-to-length
(not in coils). Steel products to be
included in the scope of the Orders are
of rectangular, square, circular or other
shape and of rectangular or nonrectangular cross-section where such
non-rectangular cross-section is
achieved subsequent to the rolling
process (i.e., products which have been
‘‘worked after rolling’’)—for example,
products which have been beveled or
rounded at the edges. Steel products
that meet the noted physical
characteristics that are painted,
varnished or coated with plastic or other
non-metallic substances are included
within the scope. Also, specifically
included in the scope of the Orders are
high strength, low alloy (HSLA) steels.
HSLA steels are recognized as steels
with micro-alloying levels of elements
such as chromium, copper, niobium,
titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum.
The merchandise subject to the
Orders is currently classifiable in the
HTSUS under subheadings:
7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060,
7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045,
7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000,
7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000,
7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000,
7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030,
7211.14.0045, 7211.90.0000,
7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7212.50.0000, 7225.40.3050,
7225.40.7000, 7225.50.6000,
7225.99.0090, 7226.91.5000,
7226.91.7000, 7226.91.8000,
7226.99.0000. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
covered by the Orders is dispositive.
The Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:48 Apr 21, 2017
Jkt 241001
by this notice, provides a full
description of the scope of the Orders.5
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues
raised in these reviews is provided in
the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The issues discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
include the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margin of dumping
that is likely to prevail if the Orders
were revoked. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing the
results of the reviews and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),
and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4).
Final Results of Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the
Department determines that revocation
of the AD Orders on CTL plate from
India, Indonesia, and Korea would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping, and that the
magnitude of the margin of dumping
that is likely to prevail would be at rates
up to 42.39 percent for India, up to
52.42 percentage for Indonesia, and up
to 4.64 percent for Korea.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a).
Timely written notification of the return
or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
5 See the Department’s memorandum from Gary
Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Third
Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
from India, Indonesia, and the Republic of Korea,’’
dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: March 31, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–08174 Filed 4–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–122–854]
Supercalendered Paper From Canada:
Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Expedited Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) has conducted an
expedited review of the countervailing
duty (CVD) order on supercalendered
paper (SC paper) from Canada. The
period of review (POR) for which we are
measuring subsidies is January 1, 2014,
through December 31, 2014. We
determine that Irving Paper Limited
received countervailable subsidies
during the POR and that Catalyst
received de minimis countervailable
subsidies. As a result of this
determination, we are excluding
Catalyst from the countervailing duty
order on SC paper from Canada.
DATES: Effective April 24, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Toby Vandall or Peter Zukowski, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1664 and (202) 482–0189,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The Department published the
Preliminary Results of the expedited
review on November 28, 2016.1 A
summary of the events that occurred
since the Department published the
Preliminary Results, as well as a full
1 See Supercalendered Paper From Canada:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty
Expedited Review, 81 FR 85520 (November 28,
2016) (Preliminary Results).
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 77 (Monday, April 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18895-18896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08174]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-817, A-560-805, A-580-836]
Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From India,
Indonesia, and the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Expedited
Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) orders on certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate (CTL
plate) from India, Indonesia, and the Republic of Korea (Korea) would
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the
levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of
this notice.
DATES: Effective April 24, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2016, the Department published the notice of
initiation of the sunset reviews of the AD Orders \1\ on CTL plate from
India, Indonesia, and Korea, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\ On December 8, 13, and 16, 2016,
respectively, ArcelorMittal USA, Inc. (AMUSA), Nucor Corporation
(Nucor), and SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), (collectively, the
petitioners or the domestic interested parties), notified the
Department of their intent to participate within the 15-day period
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ Each of the domestic parties
claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act
stating that they are each producers in the United States of a domestic
like product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Amendment of Final Determinations of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Cut-To-
Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From France, India,
Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6585
(February 10, 2000) (collectively, Orders).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 81 FR
86697 (December 1, 2016) (Notice of Initiation).
\3\ See AMUSA's December 13, 2016, submission ``Five-Year
(``Sunset'') Review of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From
India, Indonesia, and South Korea--AMUSA's Notice of Intent to
Participate.'' See also Nucor's December 16, 2016, submissions
``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from India:
Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,'' ``Certain Cut-
to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from Indonesia: Notice of
Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,'' and ``Certain Cut-to-
Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from the Republic of Korea: Notice
of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review.'' See also, SSAB's
December 8, 2016, submissions ``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate from India, Third Sunset Review,'' ``Certain Cut-to-
Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from Indonesia, Third Sunset
Review,'' and ``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
from Korea, Third Sunset Review.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 3, 2017, the Department received complete substantive
responses to the Notice of Initiation from the domestic interested
parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).\4\ We received no substantive responses from
respondent interested parties with respect to these sunset reviews of
the orders on CTL plate from India, Indonesia, or Korea, nor was a
hearing requested. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the
[[Page 18896]]
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted
expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the AD Orders on CTL plate from
India, Indonesia, and Korea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See the domestic interested parties' January 3, 2017,
submissions ``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from
India,'' ``Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review of the Antidumping Order on
Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From Indonesia--
Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,'' and ``Cut-to-Length
Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from the Republic of Korea: Substantive
Response to Notice of Initiation.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The products covered under the Orders are certain hot-rolled
carbon-quality steel: (1) Universal mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled
products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width
exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding 1250 mm, and of a nominal or actual
thickness of not less than 4 mm, which are cut-to-length (not in coils)
and without patterns in relief), of iron or non-alloy-quality steel;
and (2) flat-rolled products, hot-rolled, of a nominal or actual
thickness of 4.75 mm or more and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and
measures at least twice the thickness, and which are cut-to-length (not
in coils). Steel products to be included in the scope of the Orders are
of rectangular, square, circular or other shape and of rectangular or
non-rectangular cross-section where such non-rectangular cross-section
is achieved subsequent to the rolling process (i.e., products which
have been ``worked after rolling'')--for example, products which have
been beveled or rounded at the edges. Steel products that meet the
noted physical characteristics that are painted, varnished or coated
with plastic or other non-metallic substances are included within the
scope. Also, specifically included in the scope of the Orders are high
strength, low alloy (HSLA) steels. HSLA steels are recognized as steels
with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper,
niobium, titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum.
The merchandise subject to the Orders is currently classifiable in
the HTSUS under subheadings: 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030,
7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000,
7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7225.40.3050,
7225.40.7000, 7225.50.6000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000,
7226.91.8000, 7226.99.0000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
merchandise covered by the Orders is dispositive.
The Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this
notice, provides a full description of the scope of the Orders.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See the Department's memorandum from Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate from India, Indonesia, and the Republic of Korea,''
dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in these reviews is
provided in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. The issues
discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum include the likelihood
of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the
margin of dumping that is likely to prevail if the Orders were revoked.
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and
to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Final Results of Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act,
the Department determines that revocation of the AD Orders on CTL plate
from India, Indonesia, and Korea would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the
margin of dumping that is likely to prevail would be at rates up to
42.39 percent for India, up to 52.42 percentage for Indonesia, and up
to 4.64 percent for Korea.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing the results of the reviews and this
notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: March 31, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-08174 Filed 4-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
