Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products; Commission Determination To Reset the Time for the Beginning of the April 20, 2017, Oral Argument, 18468 [2017-07758]

Download as PDF 18468 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19, 2017 / Notices Total Annual Burden Cost The Department assumes that the majority of individuals who will complete this instrument are Site Security Officers (SSOs), although a smaller number of other individuals may also complete this instrument (e.g., Federal, State, and local government employees and contractors). For the purpose of this notice, the Department maintains this assumption. Therefore, to estimate the total annual burden, the Department multiplied the annual burden of 10,000 hours by the average hourly wage rate of SSOs of $67.72 per hour. Therefore, the total annual burden cost for the CVI Authorization instrument is $677,200 [10,000 total annual burden hours × $67.72 per hour]. Analysis Agency: Department of Homeland Security, National Protection and Programs Directorate, Office of Infrastructure Protection, Infrastructure Security Compliance Division. Title: CFATS Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information. OMB Number: 1670–0015. Instrument: Chemical-terrorism Vulnerability Information Authorization. Frequency: ‘‘On occasion’’ and ‘‘Other’’. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit. Number of Respondents: 20,000 respondents (rounded estimate). Estimated Time per Respondent: 0.50 hours. Total Burden Hours: 10,000 annual burden hours. Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): $0. Total Recordkeeping Burden: $0. Total Burden Cost: $677,200. David Epperson, Chief Information Officer, National Protection and Programs Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. 2017–07927 Filed 4–18–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [Investigation No. 337–TA–1002] Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products; Commission Determination To Reset the Time for the Beginning of the April 20, 2017, Oral Argument U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 Apr 18, 2017 Jkt 241001 Commission has determined to reset the time for the beginning of the oral argument, see 82 FR 16417–8 (Apr. 4, 2017), to 10 a.m. on April 20, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–4716. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted Investigation No. 337–TA–1002 on June 2, 2016, based on a complaint filed by Complainant United States Steel Corporation of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (‘‘U.S. Steel’’), alleging a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. See 81 FR 35381–2 (June 2, 2016). The complaint alleges violations of Section 337 based upon the importation, the sale for importation, or the sale after importation into the United States of certain carbon and alloy steel products by reason of: (1) A conspiracy to fix prices and control output and export volumes, the threat or effect of which is to restrain or monopolize trade and commerce in the United States; (2) misappropriation and use of trade secrets, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States; and (3) false designation of origin or manufacturer, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. Id. The notice of investigation identified forty (40) respondents that are Chinese steel manufacturers or distributors, as well as some of their Hong Kong and United States affiliates. Id. In addition to the private parties, the Commission assigned an Investigative Attorney from the Commission’s Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII), who functions as an independent litigant or party in the investigation. Id. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 On August 26, 2016, Respondents filed a motion to terminate U.S. Steel’s antitrust claim under 19 CFR 210.21. On November 14, 2016, the administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 38), granting Respondents’ motion to terminate Complainant’s antitrust claim under 19 CFR 210.21 and, in the alternative, under 19 CFR 210.18. On December 19, 2016, the Commission issued a Notice determining to review the ID (Order No. 38). See 81 FR 94416–7 (Dec. 23, 2016). In the December 19, 2016, Notice, the Commission requested written submissions from ‘‘[t]he parties to the investigation, including the Office of Unfair Import Investigations, and interested government agencies,’’ and set a date of March 14, 2017, for possible oral argument. Id. On March 3, 2017, the Commission issued another notice seeking further written submissions from the public and rescheduling the date and time for the oral argument to April 20, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. See 82 FR 13133–4 (Mar. 9, 2017). On March 30, 2017, the Commission issued another notice setting the procedure for the oral argument. See 82 FR 16417–8 (Apr. 4, 2017). The Commission has determined to reset the time for the beginning of the oral argument to 10 a.m. on April 20, 2017. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 12, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–07758 Filed 4–18–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States V. Danone S.A. and the Whitewave Foods Company; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, Stipulation and Competitive Impact Statement have been filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in United States of America v. E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM 19APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 18468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07758]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1002]


Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products; Commission Determination 
To Reset the Time for the Beginning of the April 20, 2017, Oral 
Argument

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to reset the time for the beginning of the 
oral argument, see 82 FR 16417-8 (Apr. 4, 2017), to 10 a.m. on April 
20, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4716. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Investigation No. 
337-TA-1002 on June 2, 2016, based on a complaint filed by Complainant 
United States Steel Corporation of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (``U.S. 
Steel''), alleging a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. See 81 FR 35381-2 (June 2, 2016). The 
complaint alleges violations of Section 337 based upon the importation, 
the sale for importation, or the sale after importation into the United 
States of certain carbon and alloy steel products by reason of: (1) A 
conspiracy to fix prices and control output and export volumes, the 
threat or effect of which is to restrain or monopolize trade and 
commerce in the United States; (2) misappropriation and use of trade 
secrets, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially 
injure an industry in the United States; and (3) false designation of 
origin or manufacturer, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or 
substantially injure an industry in the United States. Id. The notice 
of investigation identified forty (40) respondents that are Chinese 
steel manufacturers or distributors, as well as some of their Hong Kong 
and United States affiliates. Id. In addition to the private parties, 
the Commission assigned an Investigative Attorney from the Commission's 
Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII), who functions as an 
independent litigant or party in the investigation. Id.
    On August 26, 2016, Respondents filed a motion to terminate U.S. 
Steel's antitrust claim under 19 CFR 210.21. On November 14, 2016, the 
administrative law judge (``ALJ'') issued an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 38), granting Respondents' motion to terminate 
Complainant's antitrust claim under 19 CFR 210.21 and, in the 
alternative, under 19 CFR 210.18.
    On December 19, 2016, the Commission issued a Notice determining to 
review the ID (Order No. 38). See 81 FR 94416-7 (Dec. 23, 2016). In the 
December 19, 2016, Notice, the Commission requested written submissions 
from ``[t]he parties to the investigation, including the Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, and interested government agencies,'' and 
set a date of March 14, 2017, for possible oral argument. Id.
    On March 3, 2017, the Commission issued another notice seeking 
further written submissions from the public and rescheduling the date 
and time for the oral argument to April 20, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. See 82 FR 
13133-4 (Mar. 9, 2017).
    On March 30, 2017, the Commission issued another notice setting the 
procedure for the oral argument. See 82 FR 16417-8 (Apr. 4, 2017).
    The Commission has determined to reset the time for the beginning 
of the oral argument to 10 a.m. on April 20, 2017.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 12, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-07758 Filed 4-18-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.