Certain Document Cameras and Software for Use Therewith; Institution of Investigation, 15069-15070 [2017-05846]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 56 / Friday, March 24, 2017 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1030] Certain High-Potency Sweeteners, Processes for Making Same, and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainants’ Motion for Termination of the Investigation Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting Complainants’ motion for termination of the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–4716. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Investigation No. 337–TA–1030 on November 28, 2016, based on a complaint filed by Complainants Celanese International Corporation of Irving, Texas; Celanese Sales U.S. Ltd. of Irving, Texas; and Celanese IP Hungary Bt of Budapest, Hungary (collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’ or ‘‘Celanese’’). See 81 FR 85640–1 (Nov. 28, 2016). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:56 Mar 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain high-potency sweeteners, processes for making same, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,024,016 (‘‘the ’016 patent’’). See id. The notice of investigation identified Suzhou Hope Technology Co., Ltd. of Suzhou City, China; Anhui Jinhe Industrial Co., Ltd. of Anhui, China; and Vitasweet Co., Ltd. of Beijing, China (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’) as respondents in this investigation. See id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also a party to this investigation. See id. On February 2, 2017, Complainants filed a motion for termination of the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. On February 13, 2017, Respondents filed responses in opposition to Complainants’ motion. On the same day, the Commission Investigative Attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a response in support of Complainants’ motion. Additionally, on February 17, 2017, Complainants filed a motion for leave to file a reply in support of their motion. On March 1, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID, denying Complainants’ motion for leave to file a reply but granting their motion for termination of the investigation. The ALJ found that Complainants’ motion complied with Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1), 19 CFR 210.21(a)(1), ‘‘insomuch as it includes a statement that ‘[t]here are no agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between Complainant and Respondents . . . concerning the subject matter of this Investigation.’ ’’ ID at 4 (alteration in original). The ALJ also found no ‘‘extraordinary circumstances that merit denying Celanese’s motion at this relatively early point in the investigation.’’ Id. (citations omitted). No party has filed a petition for review of the subject ID. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 20, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–05830 Filed 3–23–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15069 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1045] Certain Document Cameras and Software for Use Therewith; Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on February 17, 2017, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Pathway Innovations and Technologies, Inc. of San Diego, California. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain document cameras and software for use therewith by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,508,751 (‘‘the ’751 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of the Secretary, Docket Services Division, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. SUMMARY: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1 15070 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 56 / Friday, March 24, 2017 / Notices jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2016). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on March 17, 2017, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain document cameras and software for use therewith by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–10, 12–18, and 20 of the ’751 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Pathway Innovations and Technologies, Inc., 10211 Pacific Mesa Boulevard, Suite 412, San Diego, CA 92121. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: IPEVO, Inc., 440 North Wolfe Road, Sunnyvale, CA 94085 AVer Information Inc., 668 Mission Court, Fremont, CA 94539 Lumens Integration, Inc., 4116 Clipper Court, Fremont, CA 94538 (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:56 Mar 23, 2017 Jkt 241001 complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 20, 2017. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–05846 Filed 3–23–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Prisons Notice of Public Meeting for the Draft Supplemental Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed United States Penitentiary and Federal Prison Camp in Letcher County, Kentucky Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) is announcing a public meeting for the Draft Supplemental Revised Final Environmental Impact Statement (RFEIS) for the proposed United States Penitentiary (USP) and Federal Prison Camp (FPC) in Letcher County, Kentucky. A 45-day public comment period on the Draft Supplemental RFEIS was initiated with the publication of the Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplemental RFEIS in the Federal Register on March 24, 2017, and will end on May 8, 2017. During the 45-day public comment period, the Bureau will conduct a public meeting to receive oral and written comments on the Draft Supplemental RFEIS. This notice announces the date, time, and location of the public meeting and provides supplementary information about the environmental planning effort. DATES: The public meeting will be held on April 12, 2017 between 5:30 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. ADDRESSES: Letcher County Central High School located at 435 Cougar Drive, Whitesburg, Kentucky. Bureau representatives will be available at SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 poster stations during the public meeting to clarify information related to the Draft Supplemental RFEIS. Federal, state, and local agencies and officials, and interested groups and individuals are encouraged to provide comments in person at the public meeting or in writing anytime during the public comment period. At the public meetings, attendees will be able to submit comments in writing and orally to a stenographer who will transcribe comments. Written comments on the Draft Supplemental RFEIS may be submitted during the 45-day review period via the U.S. Postal Service or electronically. Written comments may be submitted via mail to: Mr. Issac Gaston, Site Selection Specialist, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street NW., Washington, DC 20534. Written comments may also be submitted via email to igaston@bop.gov. All written comments must be postmarked or received via email by May 8, 2017 to ensure consideration in connection with the Final Supplemental RFEIS. All comments received during the public comment period, whether oral or written, will be given equal consideration, become part of the public record on the Draft Supplemental RFEIS and be responded to in the Final Supplemental RFEIS. The Draft Supplemental RFEIS is available electronically on the project Web site at https:// www.fbopletchercountyeis.com. Copies of the Draft Supplemental RFEIS are available for public review at the following repositories: 1. Harry M. Caudill Memorial Library, 220 Main Street, Whitesburg, KY. 2. Blackey Public Library, 295 Main Street Loop, Blackey, KY. 3. Jenkins Public Library, 9543 Highway 805, Jenkins, KY. 4. Fleming Neon Public Library, 1049 Highway 317, Neon, KY. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Issac Gaston, Site Selection Specialist, Capacity Planning and Construction Branch, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street NW., Washington, DC 20534 (Telephone: (202) 514–6470, Fax: (202) 616–6024, or Email: igaston@bop.gov). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice of Intent to prepare a Supplemental RFEIS was published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2016 (81 Federal Register 81809). The Draft Supplemental RFEIS was prepared to address changes to the proposed action, as required under NEPA [40 CFR 1502.9(c)], and to assess new circumstances or information relevant to potential environmental impacts. In E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 56 (Friday, March 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15069-15070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1045]


Certain Document Cameras and Software for Use Therewith; 
Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on February 17, 2017, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Pathway 
Innovations and Technologies, Inc. of San Diego, California. The 
complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain document cameras and 
software for use therewith by reason of infringement of certain claims 
of U.S. Patent No. 8,508,751 (``the '751 patent''). The complaint 
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as 
required by the applicable Federal statute.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of the Secretary, Docket 
Services Division, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-1802.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
19

[[Page 15070]]

U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2016).

    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on March 17, 2017, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain document 
cameras and software for use therewith by reason of infringement of one 
or more of claims 1-10, 12-18, and 20 of the '751 patent, and whether 
an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection 
(a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: Pathway Innovations and Technologies, Inc., 
10211 Pacific Mesa Boulevard, Suite 412, San Diego, CA 92121.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

IPEVO, Inc., 440 North Wolfe Road, Sunnyvale, CA 94085
AVer Information Inc., 668 Mission Court, Fremont, CA 94539
Lumens Integration, Inc., 4116 Clipper Court, Fremont, CA 94538

    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as 
a party in this investigation.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 20, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-05846 Filed 3-23-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.