Magnesium Metal From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 12928-12930 [2017-04549]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
12928
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 8, 2017 / Notices
Number of respondents
Estimated
number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Annual
burden hours
requested
1 ...................................................................................................................................................
293
.25
73.25
(5) Conference Registration Form
Need and Use of the Records:
Approximately 250 4–H youth and 75
adult chaperones attend National 4–H
Conference on an annual basis. They
need to complete a registration form to
attend.
Components of the Record: The form
consists of name, date of birth, address,
phone number, email address, race and
ethnicity, gender, emergency contact,
Land Grant University affiliation,
roundtable preferences, special
accommodations, food requests.
Method of Collection: The delegates
and chaperones will complete the
registration form electronically and
return it via email.
Frequency of Response:
Approximately 250 youth and 75 adult
chaperones will complete the
registration form.
Affected Public: 4–H youth and adult
chaperones who have applied and been
selected to attend National 4–H
Conference.
Type of Respondents: 4–H members
and adult chaperones.
Estimate of Burden:
Number of respondents
Estimated
number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Annual
burden hours
requested
325 ...............................................................................................................................................
1
.25
81.25
Estimated
number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Annual
burden hours
requested
Total Estimate of Burden: The
estimated annual reporting burden for
all National 4–H Conference collection
is as follows:
Type of
respondents
Number of
respondents
50
50
367
293
325
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
.25
.25
.25
100
100
91.75
73.25
81.25
Grand Total ...............................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Youth Leadership Team Applicants ................................................................
Facilitator Applicants ........................................................................................
Program Participant Evaluations .....................................................................
Delegate Health Forms ....................................................................................
Conference Registration Forms .......................................................................
1085
........................
........................
446.25
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed record
keeping requirement and collection of
information are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
to OMB for approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
Obtaining a Copy of the Information
Collection: A copy of the information
collection and related instructions may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
be obtained free of charge by contacting
Robert Martin as directed above.
Done at Washington, DC, this 2 day of
March 2017.
Ann Bartuska,
Acting Under Secretary, Research, Education,
and Economics.
[FR Doc. 2017–04547 Filed 3–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–896]
Magnesium Metal From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 6, 2017, the
Department of Commerce
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(‘‘Department’’) published in the
Federal Register the preliminary results
of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on magnesium
metal from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period April
1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. This
review covers two PRC companies,
Tianjin Magnesium International, Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’) and Tianjin Magnesium
Metal Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMM’’). The
Department gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the
Preliminary Results, but we received no
comments. Hence, the final results are
unchanged from the Preliminary
Results, and we continue to find that
TMI and TMM did not have reviewable
entries during the period of review
(‘‘POR’’).
DATES: Effective March 8, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Terpstra or Brendan Quinn, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 8, 2017 / Notices
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3965 or (202) 482–5848,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 6, 2017, the Department
published the Preliminary Results.1 We
invited interested parties to comment on
the Preliminary Results, but no
comments were received.
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this
antidumping duty order is magnesium
metal from the PRC, which includes
primary and secondary alloy
magnesium metal, regardless of
chemistry, raw material source, form,
shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or
alloy containing by weight primarily the
element magnesium. Primary
magnesium is produced by
decomposing raw materials into
magnesium metal. Secondary
magnesium is produced by recycling
magnesium-based scrap into magnesium
metal. The magnesium covered by this
order includes blends of primary and
secondary magnesium.
The subject merchandise includes the
following alloy magnesium metal
products made from primary and/or
secondary magnesium including,
without limitation, magnesium cast into
ingots, slabs, rounds, billets, and other
shapes; magnesium ground, chipped,
crushed, or machined into rasping,
granules, turnings, chips, powder,
briquettes, and other shapes; and
products that contain 50 percent or
greater, but less than 99.8 percent,
magnesium, by weight, and that have
been entered into the United States as
conforming to an ‘‘ASTM Specification
for Magnesium Alloy’’ 2 and are thus
outside the scope of the existing
antidumping orders on magnesium from
the PRC (generally referred to as ‘‘alloy’’
magnesium).
The scope of this order excludes: (1)
All forms of pure magnesium, including
chemical combinations of magnesium
and other material(s) in which the pure
magnesium content is 50 percent or
1 See Magnesium Metal from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
2016, 82 FR 1696 (January 6, 2017) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’).
2 The meaning of this term is the same as that
used by the American Society for Testing and
Materials in its Annual Book for ASTM Standards:
Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
greater, but less than 99.8 percent, by
weight, that do not conform to an
‘‘ASTM Specification for Magnesium
Alloy’’ 3; (2) magnesium that is in liquid
or molten form; and (3) mixtures
containing 90 percent or less
magnesium in granular or powder form
by weight and one or more of certain
non-magnesium granular materials to
make magnesium-based reagent
mixtures, including lime, calcium
metal, calcium silicon, calcium carbide,
calcium carbonate, carbon, slag
coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite,
feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium
aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons,
graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth
metals/mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly
ash, magnesium oxide, periclase,
ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and
colemanite.4
The merchandise subject to this order
is classifiable under items 8104.19.00,
and 8104.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS items
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise is
dispositive.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted above, the Department
received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results on the record of this
segment of the proceeding. As there are
no changes from, or comments on, the
Preliminary Results, the Department
finds that there is no reason to modify
its analysis. Thus, we continue to find
that TMI and TMM had no shipments of
the subject merchandise, and, therefore,
no reviewable transactions, during the
POR.5 Accordingly, no decision
memorandum accompanies this Federal
3 The material is already covered by existing
antidumping orders. See Notice of Antidumping
Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium from the People’s
Republic of China, the Russian Federation and
Ukraine; Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Pure Magnesium from the Russian
Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995); and
Antidumping Duty Order: Pure Magnesium in
Granular Form from the People’s Republic of China,
66 FR 57936 (November 19, 2001).
4 This third exclusion for magnesium-based
reagent mixtures is based on the exclusion for
reagent mixtures in the 2000–2001 investigations of
magnesium from China, Israel, and Russia. See
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form From the
People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 49345
(September 27, 2001); Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium From
Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 27, 2001); Final
Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value:
Pure Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66
FR 49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are
not magnesium alloys, because they are not
combined in liquid form and cast into the same
ingot.
5 See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 1697.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12929
Register notice. For further details of the
issues addressed in this segment of the
proceeding, see the Preliminary Results.
Assessment Rates
The Department determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b). The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review.
Additionally, consistent with the
Department’s refinement to its
assessment practice in non-market
economy cases, because the Department
determined that TMI and TMM had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR, any suspended entries
of subject merchandise during the POR
from these companies will be liquidated
at the PRC-wide rate.6
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of this notice of final
results of the administrative review, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) For TMI, which claimed no
shipments, the cash deposit rate will
remain unchanged from the rate
assigned to TMI in the most recently
completed review of the company; (2)
for previously investigated or reviewed
PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not
under review in this segment of the
proceeding but who have separate rates,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the exporter-specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate (including TMM, which
claimed no shipments, but has not been
found to be separate from the PRC-wide
entity), the cash deposit rate will be the
PRC-wide rate of 141.49 percent 7 and
(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
6 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
7 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order:
Magnesium Metal From the People’s Republic of
China, 70 FR 19928 (April 15, 2005).
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
12930
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 8, 2017 / Notices
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: Match 2, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–04549 Filed 3–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XF150
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Exempted
Fishing Permit
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of an
application for an exempted fishing
permit; request for comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces the receipt
of an application for an exempted
fishing permit (EFP) from the South
Carolina Aquarium. If granted, the EFP
would authorize the South Carolina
Aquarium to collect, with certain
conditions, various species of snappergrouper, dolphin, wahoo, cobia, king
mackerel, Spanish mackerel, golden
crab, shrimp, and spiny lobster in the
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Mar 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
Federal waters off South Carolina and
North Carolina in the South Atlantic.
The specimens would be used in
educational exhibits displaying native
marine species at the South Carolina
Aquarium located in Charleston, SC.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 7, 2017.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2017–
0008’’, by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20170008, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Nikhil Mehta, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South,
St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method (including email), to any
other address or individual, or received
after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential
business information, or otherwise
sensitive information submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nikhil Mehta, 727–824–5305; email
Nikhil.mehta@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EFP is
requested under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16
U.S.C 1801 et seq.), and regulations at
50 CFR 600.745(b) concerning exempted
fishing.
The proposed specimen collection
involves activities otherwise prohibited
by regulations at 50 CFR part 622, as
they pertain to species managed by the
South Atlantic Fishery Management
Council (Council) including snappergrouper, golden crab, coastal migratory
pelagics, dolphin, wahoo, spiny lobster,
and shrimp. The applicant requires
authorization to collect 1,799 live fish,
crabs, lobsters, and shrimp in the
Federal waters off South Carolina, and
sporadically off North Carolina. The
federally-managed species to be
collected by the applicant per year, over
a 5-year period, listed by common name
with the collection total, are: Black
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
snapper (10); cobia (6); coney (10);
dolphin (50); golden crab (5); graysby
(10); groupers (Epinephelus spp. and
Hyporthodus spp. including red, misty,
red hind, rock hind, snowy, and
yellowedge) (40); groupers (Myctoperca
spp. and Cephalopholis spp. including
black grouper, gag, yellowmouth,
yellowfin, and scamp) (50); grunts
(Haemulon spp. including cottonwick,
margate, sailors choice, tomtate, and
white) (250); hogfish (8); jacks including
greater amberjack, almaco jack, banded
rudderfish, bar jack, and lesser
amberjack(200); king mackerel (15);
little tunny (25); longspine porgy (50);
ocean triggerfish (5); porgies including
knobbed, jolthead, whitebone, and
saucereye (65); porkfish (15); queen
snapper (2); red porgy (25); red snapper
(25); sand tilefish (10); sea basses
including black, bank, and rock (100);
scup (50); Atlantic spadefish (50);
triggerfish (20); white shrimp (200);
pink or brown shrimp (200); snappers
excluding red snapper, but including
yellowtail, gray, mutton, lane, cubera,
silk, and blackfin (75); Spanish
mackerel (15); spiny lobster (25);
vermilion snapper (75); wahoo (5); and
yellowtail snapper (15).
The project would use vertical hookand-line gear with artificial and natural
baits, black sea bass pots, spiny lobster
traps, golden crab traps, habitat traps,
octopus traps, hand nets, dip nets, and
bait traps. Bait traps and minnow traps
would be deployed by hand by divers
using SCUBA gear. Most of the sample
collection would be done in less than
300 ft (91 m) of water. No more than 5
each, black sea bass pots, lobster pots,
golden crab traps, minnow traps, and
bait traps would be deployed with a
soak time of no more than 5 hours at a
time, and will not be tied together on a
groundline. Up to 10 habitat traps will
also be utilized with a soak time of 7
days up to no more than 30 days. All
trap and pot gear will be deployed
either by hand by divers using SCUBA
or through using individual nylon lines
with buoys. All gear types would be
utilized for the collection of requested
species. This EFP would authorize
sampling operations to be conducted on
three vessels designated by the South
Carolina Aquarium including: F/V REEL
SCIENCE SC–9152–DE; F/V CUB
SCOUT SC–9288–BF; and F/V
MISTRESS SC–5326–BS.
All attempts would be made (venting,
controlled ascent and descent, etc.) to
release all non-targeted bycatch species
alive. During each year of sampling
requested through this EFP, there would
be no traps or pots deployed from
November 1 through April 30, to avoid
interactions with North Atlantic right
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12928-12930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04549]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-896]
Magnesium Metal From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 6, 2017, the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') published in the Federal Register the preliminary
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
magnesium metal from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') covering
the period April 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. This review covers
two PRC companies, Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd. (``TMI'')
and Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd. (``TMM''). The Department gave
interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary
Results, but we received no comments. Hence, the final results are
unchanged from the Preliminary Results, and we continue to find that
TMI and TMM did not have reviewable entries during the period of review
(``POR'').
DATES: Effective March 8, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Terpstra or Brendan Quinn, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
[[Page 12929]]
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482-3965 or (202) 482-5848, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 6, 2017, the Department published the Preliminary
Results.\1\ We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results, but no comments were received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Magnesium Metal from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-
2016, 82 FR 1696 (January 6, 2017) (``Preliminary Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this antidumping duty order is magnesium
metal from the PRC, which includes primary and secondary alloy
magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material source, form,
shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight
primarily the element magnesium. Primary magnesium is produced by
decomposing raw materials into magnesium metal. Secondary magnesium is
produced by recycling magnesium-based scrap into magnesium metal. The
magnesium covered by this order includes blends of primary and
secondary magnesium.
The subject merchandise includes the following alloy magnesium
metal products made from primary and/or secondary magnesium including,
without limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, slabs, rounds, billets,
and other shapes; magnesium ground, chipped, crushed, or machined into
rasping, granules, turnings, chips, powder, briquettes, and other
shapes; and products that contain 50 percent or greater, but less than
99.8 percent, magnesium, by weight, and that have been entered into the
United States as conforming to an ``ASTM Specification for Magnesium
Alloy'' \2\ and are thus outside the scope of the existing antidumping
orders on magnesium from the PRC (generally referred to as ``alloy''
magnesium).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The meaning of this term is the same as that used by the
American Society for Testing and Materials in its Annual Book for
ASTM Standards: Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The scope of this order excludes: (1) All forms of pure magnesium,
including chemical combinations of magnesium and other material(s) in
which the pure magnesium content is 50 percent or greater, but less
than 99.8 percent, by weight, that do not conform to an ``ASTM
Specification for Magnesium Alloy'' \3\; (2) magnesium that is in
liquid or molten form; and (3) mixtures containing 90 percent or less
magnesium in granular or powder form by weight and one or more of
certain non-magnesium granular materials to make magnesium-based
reagent mixtures, including lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon,
calcium carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar,
nephaline syenite, feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium aluminate, soda
ash, hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth metals/
mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium oxide, periclase,
ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and colemanite.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The material is already covered by existing antidumping
orders. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium from
the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation and Ukraine;
Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation of Pure Magnesium from the
Russian Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995); and Antidumping Duty
Order: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the People's Republic of
China, 66 FR 57936 (November 19, 2001).
\4\ This third exclusion for magnesium-based reagent mixtures is
based on the exclusion for reagent mixtures in the 2000-2001
investigations of magnesium from China, Israel, and Russia. See
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium
in Granular Form From the People's Republic of China, 66 FR 49345
(September 27, 2001); Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Pure Magnesium From Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 27, 2001);
Final Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value: Pure
Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66 FR 49347 (September 27,
2001). These mixtures are not magnesium alloys, because they are not
combined in liquid form and cast into the same ingot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under items
8104.19.00, and 8104.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS items are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
merchandise is dispositive.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted above, the Department received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results on the record of this segment of the proceeding. As
there are no changes from, or comments on, the Preliminary Results, the
Department finds that there is no reason to modify its analysis. Thus,
we continue to find that TMI and TMM had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, and, therefore, no reviewable transactions, during the
POR.\5\ Accordingly, no decision memorandum accompanies this Federal
Register notice. For further details of the issues addressed in this
segment of the proceeding, see the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 1697.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
of subject merchandise in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final
results of this review.
Additionally, consistent with the Department's refinement to its
assessment practice in non-market economy cases, because the Department
determined that TMI and TMM had no shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR, any suspended entries of subject merchandise during the
POR from these companies will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice of
final results of the administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For TMI, which claimed no shipments, the
cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to TMI
in the most recently completed review of the company; (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who are
not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be
entitled to a separate rate (including TMM, which claimed no shipments,
but has not been found to be separate from the PRC-wide entity), the
cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 141.49 percent \7\ and
(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Magnesium Metal From
the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 19928 (April 15, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12930]]
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: Match 2, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-04549 Filed 3-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
