Large Residential Washers From Mexico: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 12538-12540 [2017-04272]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
12538
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 42 / Monday, March 6, 2017 / Notices
Dated: February 28, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
A. NV Comparisons
1. Determination of Comparison Method
2. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
B. Product Comparisons
C. EP and CEP
D. NV
1. Home Market Viability and Selection of
Comparison Market
2. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test
3. Level of Trade (LOT)
E. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
1. Calculation of COP
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
F. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison
Market Prices
G. Calculation of NV Based on CV
H. Currency Conversion
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–04273 Filed 3–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–051]
Certain Hardwood Plywood Products
From the People’s Republic of China:
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination of Antidumping Duty
Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective March 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Brings at (202) 482–3927 or
Ryan Mullen at (202) 482–5260, AD/
CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On December 8, 2016, the Department
of Commerce (the Department) initiated
an antidumping duty investigation of
certain hardwood plywood products
from the People’s Republic of China.1
1 See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products From
the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Less-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Mar 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.205(b)(1) state that the Department
will make a preliminary determination
no later than 140 days after the date of
the initiation. Accordingly, the
preliminary determination of this
antidumping duty investigation is
currently due no later than April 27,
2017.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
On February 21, 2017, the Coalition
for Fair Trade in Hardwood Plywood
and its individual members
(Petitioners), made a timely request,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(e), for
postponement of the preliminary
determination, in order to facilitate the
Department’s analysis of the data and
questionnaire responses submitted by
respondents.2 Because there are no
compelling reasons to deny the request,
in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A)
of the Act, the Department is postponing
the deadline for the preliminary
determination by 50 days.
For the reasons stated above, the
Department, in accordance with section
733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing
the deadline for the preliminary
determination to no later than 190 days
after the date on which the Department
initiated this investigation. Therefore,
the new deadline for the preliminary
determination is June 16, 2017. In
accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the
Act, the deadline for the final
determination of this investigation will
continue to be 75 days after the date of
the preliminary determination, unless
postponed at a later date.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: February 27, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–04264 Filed 3–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Than-Fair-Value Investigation, 81 FR 91125
(December 16, 2016).
2 See Letter to the Acting Secretary of Commerce
from Petitioners, re: ‘‘Certain Hardwood Plywood
Products from the People’s Republic of China:
Petitioner’s Request to Extend Preliminary
Determination’’ (February 21, 2017).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–842]
Large Residential Washers From
Mexico: Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on large
residential washers from Mexico. The
period of review (POR) is February 1,
2015, through January 31, 2016. The
review covers one producer/exporter of
the subject merchandise, Electrolux
Home Products, Inc., Electrolux Home
Products Corp. N.V., and Electrolux
Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
(collectively, Electrolux). We
preliminarily determine that sales of
subject merchandise by Electrolux have
been made at prices below normal value
(NV). We invite interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective March 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross
Belliveau or Rebecca Janz, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4952 or (202) 482–2972,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
all large residential washers and certain
subassemblies thereof from Mexico. The
products are currently classifiable under
subheadings 8450.20.0040 and
8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff
System of the United States (HTSUS).
Products subject to this order may also
enter under HTSUS subheadings
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080,
8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to this scope is
dispositive.1
1 For a full description of the scope of the order
see Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
2015–2016 Administrative Review of the
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 42 / Monday, March 6, 2017 / Notices
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with sections
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed
export price is calculated in accordance
with section 772 of the Act. NV is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
A list of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as an Appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, the
Department preliminarily determines
that a weighted-average margin of 1.24
percent exists for Electrolux for the
period February 1, 2015, through
January 31, 2016.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure and Public Comment
We will disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this segment of
the proceeding within five days of the
date of publication of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Interested parties may submit case
briefs not later than seven days after the
date on which the final verification
report is issued in this proceeding.2
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in case briefs, may be submitted no later
than five days after the deadline date for
case briefs.3 Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
this proceeding are encouraged to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
Antidumping Duty Order on Large Residential
Washers from Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
2 See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
3 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Mar 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party’s name,
address, and telephone number; the
number of participants; and a list of the
issues to be discussed. If a request for
a hearing is made, the Department
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230, at a time and date to be
determined.4 Parties should confirm by
telephone the date, time, and location of
the hearing two days before the
scheduled date.
All documents must be filed
electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically filed request must be
received successfully in its entirety by
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
The Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its
analysis of issues raised in any written
briefs, not later than 120 days after the
date of publication of this notice, unless
the deadline is extended.5
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.6
We will calculate importer-specific ad
valorem duty assessment rates based on
the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales to the total entered
value of the examined sales to that
importer. Where either the respondent’s
weighted-average dumping margin is
zero or de minimis within the meaning
of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.7
The final results of this review shall be
the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by the final results
4 Id.
5 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
6 See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
7 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103
(February 14, 2012).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12539
of this review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.8
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 41 days after the publication date
of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for Electrolux will
be the rate established in the final
results of this review, except if the rate
is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore,
de minimis within the meaning of 19
CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the
cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not participating in this
review, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the
original investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 36.52
percent, the all-others rate established
in the less-than-fair-value
investigation.9 These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(4).
8 See
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
Large Residential Washers From Mexico and
the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders,
78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013).
9 See
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
12540
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 42 / Monday, March 6, 2017 / Notices
Dated: February 27, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Comparisons to Normal Value
B. Determination of Comparison Method
C. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
V. Product Comparisons
VI. Constructed Export Price
VII. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability and Selection of
Comparison Market
B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test
C. Level of Trade
D. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
1. Calculation of Cost of Production
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Constructed Value
VIII. Currency Conversion
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–04272 Filed 3–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–822]
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From Thailand; Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination
of No Shipments; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from
Thailand. The review covers 160
producers/exporters of the subject
merchandise. The Department selected
two mandatory respondents for
individual examination: A Foods 1991
Co., Limited and May Ao Foods Co.,
Ltd. (collectively, Mayao); and Thai
Union/Pakfood, which consists of Thai
Union Group Public Co., Ltd. (also
known as Thai Union Frozen Products
Public Co., Ltd.), Thai Union Seafood
Company Limited, Pakfood Public
Company Limited, Asia Pacific
(Thailand) Co., Ltd., Chaophraya Cold
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Mar 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
Storage Co. Ltd., Okeanos Co. Ltd.,
Okeanos Food Co. Ltd., and Takzin
Samut Co. Ltd. The period of review
(POR) is February 1, 2015, through
January 31, 2016. We preliminarily
determine that sales to the United States
have been made below normal value
and, therefore, are subject to
antidumping duties. Additionally, we
preliminarily determine that certain
companies for which we initiated a
review did not have any shipments
during the POR. If these preliminary
results are adopted in the final results
of this review, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Effective March 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Medley or Alice Maldonado,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4987
and (202) 482–4682, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain frozen warmwater shrimp.1
The product is currently classified
under the following Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
item numbers: 0306.17.00.03,
0306.17.00.06, 0306.17.00.09,
0306.17.00.12, 0306.17.00.15,
0306.17.00.18, 0306.17.00.21,
0306.17.00.24, 0306.17.00.27,
0306.17.00.40, 1605.21.10.30, and
1605.29.10.10. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and for customs purposes, the written
product description remains dispositive.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Export price and
constructed export price are calculated
in accordance with section 772 of the
Act. Normal value is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
1 For a complete description of the scope of the
Order, see Memorandum from James Maeder,
Senior Director, Office I, for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from
Thailand,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed and electronic versions
of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
A list of the topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as the Appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Among the companies under review,
five companies properly filed
statements reporting that they made no
shipments of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR.2 Based
on the certifications submitted by four
of these companies and our analysis of
CBP information, we preliminarily
determine that the following companies
had no reviewable transactions during
the POR: (1) Calsonic Kansei (Thailand)
Co., Ltd.; (2) Lucky Union Foods Co.,
Ltd.; (3) Marine Gold Products Ltd.
(Marine Gold); 3 and (4) Thai Union
Manufacturing Company Limited (Thai
Union Manufacturing). The Department
finds that it is not appropriate to
preliminarily rescind the review with
respect to these companies but, rather,
to complete the review with respect to
these companies and issue appropriate
instructions to CBP based on the final
results of this review.4
2 For a full explanation of the Department’s
analysis, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
3 Shrimp produced and exported by Marine Gold
was excluded from the AD Thailand order effective
February 1, 2012. See Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial
Rescission of Review, and Revocation of Order (in
Part); 2011–2012, 78 FR 42497, 42499 (July 16,
2013) (2011–2012 Thai Shrimp). Accordingly, we
are conducting this administrative review with
respect to Marine Gold only for shrimp produced
in Thailand where Marine Gold acted as either the
producer or the exporter (but not both).
4 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From Thailand; Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial
Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of
No Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952
(March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results of
E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM
06MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 42 (Monday, March 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12538-12540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04272]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-842]
Large Residential Washers From Mexico: Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large
residential washers from Mexico. The period of review (POR) is February
1, 2015, through January 31, 2016. The review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise, Electrolux Home Products, Inc.,
Electrolux Home Products Corp. N.V., and Electrolux Home Products de
Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Electrolux). We preliminarily
determine that sales of subject merchandise by Electrolux have been
made at prices below normal value (NV). We invite interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective March 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross Belliveau or Rebecca Janz, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4952 or (202) 482-2972,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are all large residential washers
and certain subassemblies thereof from Mexico. The products are
currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080
of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products
subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this
scope is dispositive.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For a full description of the scope of the order see
Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the 2015-2016 Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Large Residential Washers from Mexico,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12539]]
Methodology
The Department is conducting this review in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773
of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of
the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached
as an Appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, the Department preliminarily determines
that a weighted-average margin of 1.24 percent exists for Electrolux
for the period February 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016.
Disclosure and Public Comment
We will disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
segment of the proceeding within five days of the date of publication
of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than seven days
after the date on which the final verification report is issued in this
proceeding.\2\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case
briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after the deadline
date for case briefs.\3\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2),
parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding
are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the
issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce
within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number; the
number of participants; and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the
hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined.\4\
Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the
hearing two days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All documents must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically filed request must be received successfully in its
entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
The Department intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues
raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, unless the deadline is extended.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We will calculate importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment
rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties
calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the
examined sales to that importer. Where either the respondent's
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an importer-specific assessment rate
is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\7\ The final
results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final
results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties,
where applicable.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14,
2012).
\8\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 41 days after the
publication date of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Electrolux will
be the rate established in the final results of this review, except if
the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within
the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit
rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent
period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to
be 36.52 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-
fair-value investigation.\9\ These deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and the Republic
of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
[[Page 12540]]
Dated: February 27, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Comparisons to Normal Value
B. Determination of Comparison Method
C. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
V. Product Comparisons
VI. Constructed Export Price
VII. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability and Selection of Comparison Market
B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test
C. Level of Trade
D. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
1. Calculation of Cost of Production
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
F. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Constructed Value
VIII. Currency Conversion
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-04272 Filed 3-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
