Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 4852-4853 [2017-00825]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
4852
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2017 / Notices
combining occurs in countries other than
China.
Ammonium sulfate that is otherwise
subject to this investigation is not excluded
when commingled (i.e., mixed or combined)
with ammonium sulfate from sources not
subject to this investigation. Only the subject
component of such commingled products is
covered by the scope of this investigation.
The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
registry number for ammonium sulfate is
7783–20–2.
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is currently classifiable under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS) subheading 3102.21.0000.
Although this HTSUS subheading and CAS
registry number are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the investigation
is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2017–00843 Filed 1–13–17; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–898]
Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2014–2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 12, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published its Preliminary
Results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on
chlorinated isocyanurates (‘‘chloro
isos’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘the PRC’’). The period of review
(POR) is June 1, 2014, through May 31,
2015. This review covers three
producers/exporters: (1) Heze Huayi
Chemical Co., Ltd. (‘‘Heze Huayi’’); (2)
Hebei Jiheng Chemical Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Jiheng’’); and (3) Juancheng Kangtai
Chemical Co., Ltd. (‘‘Kangtai’’). We
invited parties to comment on our
Preliminary Results. Based on our
analysis of the comments received, we
made certain changes to our margin
calculations for all three respondents.
The final dumping margins for this
review are listed in the ‘‘Final Results’’
section below.
DATES: Effective January 17, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
18:21 Jan 13, 2017
On July 12, 2016, the Department
published its Preliminary Results of the
administrative review.1 On August 25,
2016, respondents Heze Huayi, Kangtai,
Jiheng, collectively submitted a case
brief.2 On September 6, 2016, Biolab,
Inc., Clearon Corp. and Occidental
Chemical Corp. (collectively,
‘‘Petitioners’’) submitted a rebuttal
brief.3
On October 21, 2016, the Department
fully extended the deadline for the final
results in this administrative review
until January 9, 2017.4 The Department
held a public hearing on December 14,
2016, to address issues raised in the
case and rebuttal briefs.5
Scope of the Order
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Background
Jkt 241001
The products covered by the order are
chloro isos, which are derivatives of
cyanuric acid, described as chlorinated
s-triazine triones. Chlorinated isos are
currently classifiable under subheadings
2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021,
2933.69.6050, 3808.40.50, 3808.50.40
and 3808.94.5000 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of
merchandise subject to the scope is
dispositive. For a full description of the
scope of the order, see Issues and
Decision Memorandum.6
1 See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015, 81 FR 45128 (July 12, 2016) (Preliminary
Results).
2 See ‘‘Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the
People’s Republic of China: Case Brief,’’ (August 25,
2016).
3 See ‘‘The Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Chlorinated
Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China:
Rebuttal Brief of Biolab, Inc., Clearon Corp. and
Occidental Chemical Corporation,’’ (September 6,
2016).
4 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Chlorinated
Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’
(October 21, 2016).
5 See Hearing Transcript, ‘‘Public Hearing in the
Matter of: Administrative Review under the
Antidumping Duty Order on Chlorinated
Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China,’’
(December 20, 2016).
6 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s
Republic of China; 2014–2015,’’ (‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum’’) issued concurrently with
this notice for a complete description of the scope
of the Order.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this
review are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
adopted by this notice. A list of the
issues that parties raised and to which
we responded in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum follows as an
appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and electronic versions of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding our Preliminary
Results, we have made revisions to the
margin calculations for all three
companies as a result of changes in the
surrogate financial ratios and the
surrogate value for steam coal.7
Final Results of Administrative Review
The weighted-average dumping
margins for the administrative review
are as follows:
Exporter
Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd ...
Hebei Jiheng Chemical Co., Ltd
Juancheng Kangtai Chemical
Co., Ltd ...................................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
53.95
61.03
35.05
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
‘‘Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the
Department has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP
7 See
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
Issues and Decision Memorandum, at 1.
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
15 days after publication of the final
results of this administrative review.
Where the respondent reported
reliable entered values, we calculated
importer (or customer)-specific ad
valorem rates by aggregating the
dumping margins calculated for all U.S.
sales to each importer (or customer) and
dividing this amount by the total
entered value of the sales to each
importer (or customer).8 Where the
Department calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin by dividing the
total amount of dumping for reviewed
sales to that party by the total sales
quantity associated with those
transactions, the Department will direct
CBP to assess importer-specific
assessment rates based on the resulting
per-unit rates.9 Where an importer- (or
customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is greater than de minimis (i.e.,
0.50 percent), the Department will
instruct CBP to collect the appropriate
duties at the time of liquidation.10
Where an importer- (or customer-)
specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is
zero or de minimis, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.11
Pursuant to the Department’s
assessment practice, for entries that
were not reported in the U.S. sales
databases submitted by companies
individually examined during this
review, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
PRC-wide entity rate. Additionally, if
the Department determines that an
exporter had no shipments of the
subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the
PRC-wide entity rate.12
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for shipments of
the subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the
exporters listed above, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established in the
final results of this review (except, if the
rate is zero or de minimis, a zero cash
deposit rate will be required for that
8 See
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
company); (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing producer/
exporter-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be eligible for a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC-wide rate of 285.63
percent; 13 and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed regarding these final results
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
has occurred and that subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Order
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results of administrative review in
9 Id.
10 Id.
11 See
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
12 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Jan 13, 2017
Jkt 241001
13 For an explanation on the derivation of the
PRC-wide rate, see Notice of Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Chlorinated
Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China,
70 FR 24502, 24505 (May 10, 2005).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4853
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
Dated: January 9, 2017.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—Issues and Decision
Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Selection of the Primary
Surrogate Country
Comment 2: Selection of Mexican
Surrogate Value Information over the
Romanian Surrogate Value Information
A. Surrogate Financial Ratios
B. Surrogate Values for Certain Other
Inputs
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–00825 Filed 1–13–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–601]
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts
Thereof, Finished and Unfinished,
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Review and
Reinstatement of Shanghai General
Bearing Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping
Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 13, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the changed circumstances
review and intent to reinstate Shanghai
General Bearing Co., Ltd. (SGBC/SKF) in
the antidumping duty order on tapered
roller bearings and parts thereof,
finished and unfinished, (TRBs) from
the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
This review covers TRBs from the PRC
manufactured and exported by SGBC/
SKF. The period of review is June 1,
2014, through May 31, 2015. Based on
our analysis of the comments received,
we made changes to the margin
calculations. Therefore, the final results
differ from the preliminary results.
Further, we continue to determine that
SGBC/SKF sold TRBs at less than
normal value (NV), and, as a result, we
are reinstating SGBC/SKF in the
antidumping order on TRBs from the
PRC. The final weighted-average
dumping margin is listed below in the
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4852-4853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00825]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-898]
Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 12, 2016, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published its Preliminary Results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates
(``chloro isos'') from the People's Republic of China (``the PRC'').
The period of review (POR) is June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015. This
review covers three producers/exporters: (1) Heze Huayi Chemical Co.,
Ltd. (``Heze Huayi''); (2) Hebei Jiheng Chemical Co., Ltd.
(``Jiheng''); and (3) Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd.
(``Kangtai''). We invited parties to comment on our Preliminary
Results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made
certain changes to our margin calculations for all three respondents.
The final dumping margins for this review are listed in the ``Final
Results'' section below.
DATES: Effective January 17, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3964.
Background
On July 12, 2016, the Department published its Preliminary Results
of the administrative review.\1\ On August 25, 2016, respondents Heze
Huayi, Kangtai, Jiheng, collectively submitted a case brief.\2\ On
September 6, 2016, Biolab, Inc., Clearon Corp. and Occidental Chemical
Corp. (collectively, ``Petitioners'') submitted a rebuttal brief.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 45128 (July 12, 2016) (Preliminary
Results).
\2\ See ``Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic
of China: Case Brief,'' (August 25, 2016).
\3\ See ``The Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of
China: Rebuttal Brief of Biolab, Inc., Clearon Corp. and Occidental
Chemical Corporation,'' (September 6, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 21, 2016, the Department fully extended the deadline for
the final results in this administrative review until January 9,
2017.\4\ The Department held a public hearing on December 14, 2016, to
address issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
``Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,'' (October 21, 2016).
\5\ See Hearing Transcript, ``Public Hearing in the Matter of:
Administrative Review under the Antidumping Duty Order on
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China,''
(December 20, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are chloro isos, which are
derivatives of cyanuric acid, described as chlorinated s-triazine
triones. Chlorinated isos are currently classifiable under subheadings
2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021, 2933.69.6050, 3808.40.50, 3808.50.40 and
3808.94.5000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of merchandise subject to the scope
is dispositive. For a full description of the scope of the order, see
Issues and Decision Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Chlorinated
Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China; 2014-2015,''
(``Issues and Decision Memorandum'') issued concurrently with this
notice for a complete description of the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties
in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that
parties raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in
the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have made
revisions to the margin calculations for all three companies as a
result of changes in the surrogate financial ratios and the surrogate
value for steam coal.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum, at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Administrative Review
The weighted-average dumping margins for the administrative review
are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd................................ 53.95
Hebei Jiheng Chemical Co., Ltd.............................. 61.03
Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd......................... 35.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the ``Act''), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department has
determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall
assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions
directly to CBP
[[Page 4853]]
15 days after publication of the final results of this administrative
review.
Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we
calculated importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rates by
aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each
importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered
value of the sales to each importer (or customer).\8\ Where the
Department calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the
total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total
sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will
direct CBP to assess importer-specific assessment rates based on the
resulting per-unit rates.\9\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific
ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis (i.e., 0.50
percent), the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate
duties at the time of liquidation.\10\ Where an importer- (or customer-
) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the
Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\9\ Id.
\10\ Id.
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the Department's assessment practice, for entries that
were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies
individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide entity rate.
Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter had no
shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that
entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's
rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide entity rate.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters
listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the
final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis, a zero cash deposit rate will be required for that company);
(2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing producer/exporter-specific rate published
for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be eligible for a separate
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 285.63
percent; \13\ and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise
which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ For an explanation on the derivation of the PRC-wide rate,
see Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR
24502, 24505 (May 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed regarding these
final results within five days of the date of publication of this
notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and that subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: January 9, 2017.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Selection of the Primary Surrogate Country
Comment 2: Selection of Mexican Surrogate Value Information over
the Romanian Surrogate Value Information
A. Surrogate Financial Ratios
B. Surrogate Values for Certain Other Inputs
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-00825 Filed 1-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
