PetSmart, Inc., Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order, 81086-81089 [2016-27644]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
81086
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
weak. The strongest support for marked
separation comes from the best available
genetic data which, although limited
and preliminary, support a conclusion
that at least some of the harbor seals in
Iliamna Lake are likely isolated from
harbor seals in the Egegik and Ugashik
regions of eastern Bristol Bay. Thus, we
conclude that the harbor seal population
in Iliamna Lake is separated from other
populations of the taxon and meet the
discreteness criterion of our DPS policy
(61 FR 4722; February 7, 1996).
Per the second component of our DPS
Policy, we are to consider available
scientific evidence of the discrete
population’s importance to the taxon to
which it belongs (61 FR 4722; February
7, 1996). Our review of the best
available information suggests the only
characteristic which may make this
population of harbor seals unique
within its taxon is the fact that they
persist year-round in a freshwater
system which freezes over to some
degree in most winters. While that
characteristic is unique within the
subspecies P. v. richardii, we
determined such persistence is not
biologically or ecologically important to
the taxon as a whole. Furthermore, the
information available supports a
conclusion that loss of this population
would not be detrimental to the
persistence of the taxon or constitute a
gap in the range of the taxon; this
population is not the only natural
surviving population; and there are no
unique genetic characteristics conveying
significance of this population to the
taxon. After reviewing the best available
data as they apply to the significance
criterion, we conclude that the harbor
seals in Iliamna Lake are not significant
to the taxon P. v. richardii.
Under our DPS Policy, both the
discreteness and significance elements
must be met to qualify as a DPS. Our
review has determined that the seals
persisting year-round in Iliamna Lake
are discrete but not significant;
therefore, the harbor seals in Iliamna
Lake do not qualify as a DPS and are not
a listable entity under the ESA.
Finding
In assessing whether the actions in
the petition are warranted, we reviewed
the best available scientific and
commercial information available,
including the BRT report, the petition
and literature cited in the petition,
published and grey literature relevant to
the topic, correspondence with experts
in academic and government
institutions, documentation of LTK, and
public comments. On the basis of this
review, we have determined that harbor
seals in Iliamna Lake meet the criteria
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:24 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
for discreteness but do not meet the
criteria for significance. As such, the
harbor seals in Iliamna Lake do not meet
all the criteria necessary to constitute a
DPS, and thus are not a listable entity
under the ESA. Therefore, we find that
the petitioned actions to list the harbor
seals in Iliamna Lake as a threatened or
endangered species under the ESA, and
to designate critical habitat, are not
warranted.
In our 90-day finding (78 FR 29098;
May 17, 2013), we indicated we were
commencing a status review of the
harbor seals in Iliamna Lake. To assist
our evaluation of whether the seals in
Iliamna Lake constitute a DPS, the BRT
prepared a report which compiled
background information about the
harbor seals in Iliamna Lake and
evaluated the scientific information
relevant to the DPS criteria (Boveng et
al., 2016). Upon our determination that
the DPS criteria were not met and the
seals in Iliamna Lake are not a ‘‘species’’
under the ESA, there is no need to
complete the status review by
conducting a threats assessment or
extinction risk assessment in light of the
factors in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA.
In some instances, where we find a
petitioned action is not warranted
because the petitioned population does
not constitute a ‘‘species’’ under the
ESA, we have initiated a status review
of a related or larger population (e.g.,
the 12-month determination that the
petitioned action to list Lynn Canal
Pacific herring was not warranted,
followed by a status review of the
Southeast Alaska population of Pacific
herring; 73 FR 19824; April 11, 2008).
Here, the scope of the petition was
limited to the seals in Iliamna Lake, and
since the most recent abundance data
for the Bristol Bay harbor seal stock (the
stock that includes seals in Iliamna
Lake) indicates this stock increased
from an estimated 18,577 seals in 2005
to an estimated 32,350 seals in 2011
(Allen and Angliss 2014; Muto and
Angliss 2015), we are not initiating a
status review of the Bristol Bay harbor
seal stock at this time.
References
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES).
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: November 10, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–27690 Filed 11–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 17–C0001]
PetSmart, Inc., Provisional Acceptance
of a Settlement Agreement and Order
Consumer Product Safety
Commission
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
It is the policy of the
Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the
Consumer Product Safety Act in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
terms of the Consumer Product Safety
Commission’s regulations. Published
below is a provisionally-accepted
Settlement Agreement with PetSmart,
Inc., containing a civil penalty in the
amount of four million, two hundred
fifty thousand dollars ($4,250,000)
within thirty (30) days of service of the
Commission’s final Order accepting the
Settlement Agreement.
DATES: Any interested person may ask
the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its
contents by filing a written request with
the Office of the Secretary by December
2, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to
comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the
Comment 17–C0001, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East-West Highway,
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Philip Z. Brown, Trial Attorney,
Division of Compliance, Office of the
General Counsel, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408; telephone (301) 504–7645.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the Agreement and Order appears
below.1
SUMMARY:
1 The Commission voted (4–1) to provisionally
accept the Settlement Agreement and Order
regarding PetSmart, Inc. Chairman Kaye,
Commissioner Adler, Commissioner Robinson and
Commissioner Mohorovic voted to provisionally
accept the Settlement Agreement and Order.
Commissioner Buerkle voted to reject the
Settlement Agreement and Order.
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Notices
Dated: November 14, 2016.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
In the Matter of: PETSMART, INC. CPSC
Docket No.: 17–C0001
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
1. In accordance with the Consumer
Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C.
2051¥2089 (‘‘CPSA’’) and 16 CFR
1118.20, PetSmart, Inc. (‘‘PetSmart’’),
and the United States Consumer
Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), through its staff,
hereby enter into this Settlement
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’). The
Agreement and the incorporated
attached Order resolve staff’s charges set
forth below.
THE PARTIES
2. The Commission is an independent
federal regulatory agency, established
pursuant to, and responsible for, the
enforcement of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2051¥2089. By executing the
Agreement, staff is acting on behalf of
the Commission, pursuant to 16 CFR
1118.20(b). The Commission issues the
Order under the provisions of the CPSA.
3. PetSmart is a corporation,
organized and existing under the laws of
the state of Delaware, with its principal
place of business in Phoenix, AZ.
STAFF CHARGES
4. Between April 2009 and September
2013, PetSmart imported and offered for
sale in the United States, approximately
127,444 ‘‘Great Choice’’ or ‘‘Top Fin’’
brand 1.75 gallon, brandy snifter-style
glass fish bowls (‘‘Fish Bowls’’ or
‘‘Subject Products’’) .
5. The Fish Bowls are a ‘‘consumer
product,’’ ‘‘distribut[ed] in commerce,’’
as those terms are defined or used in
sections 3(a)(5) and (8) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2052(a)(5) and (8). PetSmart is an
‘‘importer,’’ ‘‘manufacturer’’ and
‘‘retailer’’ of the Fish Bowls, as such
terms are defined in sections 3(a)(11)
and (13) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2052(a)(11) and (13).
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Violation of CPSA Section 19(a)(4)
6. The Fish Bowls contain a defect
which could create a substantial
product hazard and create an
unreasonable risk of serious injury
because they can crack, shatter, or break
during normal use, posing a laceration
hazard to consumers.
7. Between August 2011 and January
2014, PetSmart received at least 19
incident reports of Fish Bowls cracking,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:24 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
breaking, or shattering during normal
use, which, in at least 12 instances,
resulted in serious injuries, including
deep lacerations requiring stitches and
severed tendons necessitating surgery.
8. PetSmart received at least three
reports of consumers sustaining serious
injuries during normal use of the Fish
Bowls between August 2011 and
September 2011 but neither initiated an
investigation into the Subject Products
in response to these reports of serious
injury nor immediately reported to the
Commission.
9. In May 2013, after receiving
additional reports, including two
reports of serious injuries to consumers,
PetSmart initiated an investigation and
evaluation of the defect and risk
associated with the Fish Bowls. That
investigation, which concluded in July
2013, identified deficiencies in the
thickness and distribution of the glass in
the Fish Bowls. During its investigation,
PetSmart continued to receive reports of
serious injury caused by the Fish Bowls.
Firms may conduct a reasonably
expeditious investigation, not normally
exceeding 10 days, to evaluate their
reporting obligations. See 16 CFR
1115.14(d). PetSmart’s investigation
took over two months to complete.
10. PetSmart stopped sale of the Fish
Bowls in September 2013. At the time
PetSmart stopped sale of the Fish
Bowls, PetSmart had received at least 12
reports of consumers being injured
during normal use of the Subject
Products.
11. PetSmart did not file a Full Report
with the Commission until January 31,
2014, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 2064(b).
PetSmart and the Commission jointly
announced a recall of 10,200 Fish Bowls
on April 24, 2014.
12. PetSmart’s Full Report contained
information on only 10,211 Fish Bowls
imported and sold between February
2013 and September 2013. However,
information produced by PetSmart
during staff’s civil penalty investigation
revealed that PetSmart had actually sold
a total of 91,500 Fish Bowls between
March 2010 and September 2013 that
posed the same laceration hazard.
PetSmart and the Commission jointly
announced an expanded recall of 91,500
Fish Bowls on November 17, 2015.
13. By the date of the expanded recall,
PetSmart received at least 32 reports of
Fish Bowls cracking, breaking or
shattering during normal use, including
18 reports of injury. PetSmart received
at least six of these reports of injury
after the first recall.
14. Despite having information that
the Fish Bowls contained a defect and
created an unreasonable risk of serious
injury, PetSmart did not notify the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
81087
Commission immediately of such defect
or risk, as required by sections 15(b)(3)
and (4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(b)(3) and (4), in violation of
section 19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2068(a)(4).
15. Because the information in
PetSmart’s possession constituted actual
and presumed knowledge, PetSmart
knowingly violated section 19(a)(4) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4), as the
term ‘‘knowingly’’ is defined in section
20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
16. Pursuant to Section 20 of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, PetSmart is
subject to civil penalties for its knowing
violation of section 19(a)(4) of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4).
Violation of CPSA Section 19(a)(13)
17. PetSmart’s January 31, 2014 Full
Report identified the Subject Products
as 10,211 Fish Bowls, sold between
February 2013 and September 2013,
which posed a laceration hazard to
consumers. The Full Report did not
identify an additional 81,300 units of
Subject Products that were sold prior to
February 2013 that posed the same
hazard and had been the subject of
incident and injury reports received by
PetSmart.
18. By failing to identify the correct
amount and distribution dates of the
Subject Products in PetSmart’s Full
Report, PetSmart knowingly
misrepresented the scope of consumer
products subject to an action required
under section 15 of the CPSA. As a
result of PetSmart’s misrepresentation,
the April 24, 2014 CPSC press release
announcing the recall inaccurately
stated that ‘‘[a]bout 10,200’’ Fish Bowls
were affected by the hazard posed by
the Fish Bowls. An expansion of the
recall was announced on November 17,
2015.
19. By knowingly misrepresenting the
scope of consumer products subject to
an action under section 15 of the CPSA,
PetSmart knowingly violated section
19(a)(13) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2068(a)(13), as the term ‘‘knowingly’’ is
defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2069(d).
20. Pursuant to section 20 of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, PetSmart is
subject to civil penalties for its knowing
violation of section 19(a)(13) of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(13).
RESPONSE OF PETSMART
21. PetSmart’s settlement of this
matter does not constitute an admission
of staff’s charges in paragraphs 4
through 20 above.
22. Between November 2013 and
January 2014, PetSmart corresponded
with CPSC staff regarding certain Fish
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
81088
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Notices
Bowl incidents. In this correspondence,
PetSmart clearly stated that it first began
selling the Fish Bowls in 2009. PetSmart
also stated that it believed any product
issues were limited to Fish Bowls
manufactured for sale in 2013. CPSC
staff did not ask PetSmart anything
further regarding PetSmart’s
determination that the issues were
limited to Fish Bowls sold between
February 2013 and September 2013.
23. Following this correspondence, in
January 2014, PetSmart provided the
Commission with its report under
section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(b) concerning PetSmart’s receipt of
complaints and incident reports about
the Fish Bowls. PetSmart’s report
provided information related only to
Fish Bowls manufactured for sale in
2013, consistent with its
communications to CPSC staff. CPSC
staff did not ask PetSmart anything
further regarding Fish Bowls sold prior
to 2013.
24. On April 24, 2014, in conjunction
with the Commission, PetSmart
voluntarily announced a recall of Fish
Bowls sold at PetSmart between
February 2013 and September 2013.
25. PetSmart conducted the April 24,
2014, voluntary recall of the Fish Bowls,
as well as the section 15(b) reporting,
out of an abundance of caution and
without PetSmart having concluded that
the Fish Bowls contained a defect,
posed a substantial product hazard, or
created an unreasonable risk of serious
injury or death.
26. On November 17, 2015, in
conjunction with the Commission,
PetSmart voluntarily expanded the
recall of Fish Bowls to include units
sold at PetSmart between March 2010
and February 2013. PetSmart disputes
Staff’s allegation that PetSmart had
information that the Fish Bowls
manufactured prior to 2013 contained a
defect and created an unreasonable risk
of serious injury.
27. PetSmart denies Staff’s allegations
that PetSmart knowingly
misrepresented the scope of consumer
products subject to an action under
section 15 of the CPSA and that
PetSmart knowingly violated section
19(a)(13).
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES
28. Under the CPSA, the Commission
has jurisdiction over the matter
involving the Fish Bowls and over
PetSmart.
29. The parties enter into the
Agreement for settlement purposes only.
The Agreement does not constitute an
admission by PetSmart or a
determination by the Commission that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:24 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
PetSmart violated the CPSA’s reporting
requirements.
30. In settlement of staff’s charges,
and to avoid the cost, distraction, delay,
uncertainty, and inconvenience of
protracted litigation or other
proceedings, PetSmart shall pay a civil
penalty in the amount of four million,
two hundred fifty thousand dollars
($4,250,000) within thirty (30) calendar
days after receiving service of the
Commission’s final Order accepting the
Agreement. All payments to be made
under the Agreement shall constitute
debts owing to the United States and
shall be made by electronic wire transfer
to the United States via: https://
www.pay.gov, for allocation to, and
credit against, the payment obligations
of PetSmart under this Agreement.
Failure to make such payment by the
date specified in the Commission’s final
Order shall constitute Default.
31. All unpaid amounts, if any, due
and owing under the Agreement, shall
constitute a debt due and immediately
owing by PetSmart to the United States,
and interest shall accrue and be paid by
PetSmart at the federal legal rate of
interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. 1961(a)
and (b) from the date of Default, until all
amounts due have been paid in full
(hereinafter ‘‘Default Payment Amount’’
and ‘‘Default Interest Balance’’).
PetSmart shall consent to a Consent
Judgment in the amount of the Default
Payment Amount and Default Interest
Balance, and the United States, at its
sole option, may collect the entire
Default Payment Amount and Default
Interest Balance, or exercise any other
rights granted by law or in equity,
including, but not limited to, referring
such matters for private collection, and
PetSmart agrees not to contest, and
hereby waives and discharges any
defenses to, any collection action
undertaken by the United States, or its
agents or contractors, pursuant to this
paragraph. PetSmart shall pay the
United States all reasonable costs of
collection and enforcement under this
paragraph, respectively, including
reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses.
32. After staff receives this Agreement
executed on behalf of PetSmart, staff
shall promptly submit the Agreement to
the Commission for provisional
acceptance. Promptly following
provisional acceptance of the
Agreement by the Commission, the
Agreement shall be placed on the public
record and published in the Federal
Register, in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 16 CFR
1118.20(e). If the Commission does not
receive any written request not to accept
the Agreement within fifteen (15)
calendar days, the Agreement shall be
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
deemed finally accepted on the 16th
calendar day after the date the
Agreement is published in the Federal
Register, in accordance with 16 CFR
1118.20(f).
33. This Agreement is conditioned
upon, and subject to, the Commission’s
final acceptance, as set forth above, and
it is subject to the provisions of 16 CFR
1118.20(h). Upon the later of: (i)
Commission’s final acceptance of this
Agreement and service of the accepted
Agreement upon PetSmart, and (ii) the
date of issuance of the final Order, this
Agreement shall be in full force and
effect, and shall be binding upon the
parties.
34. Effective upon the later of: (i) the
Commission’s final acceptance of the
Agreement and service of the accepted
Agreement upon PetSmart, and (ii) and
the date of issuance of the final Order,
for good and valuable consideration,
PetSmart hereby expressly and
irrevocably waives and agrees not to
assert any past, present, or future rights
to the following, in connection with the
matter described in this Agreement: (i)
an administrative or judicial hearing; (ii)
judicial review or other challenge or
contest of the Commission’s actions; (iii)
a determination by the Commission of
whether PetSmart failed to comply with
the CPSA and the underlying
regulations; (iv) a statement of findings
of fact and conclusions of law; and (v)
any claims under the Equal Access to
Justice Act.
35. PetSmart represents and agrees
that it has enhanced its compliance
program to ensure compliance with the
CPSA with respect to any consumer
product imported, manufactured,
distributed or sold by the Firm and will
maintain said compliance program.
PetSmart represents that the ongoing
compliance program contains: (i)
written standards, policies and
procedures including those designed to
ensure that information that may relate
to or impact CPSA compliance
(including information obtained by
quality control personnel) is conveyed
effectively to personnel responsible for
CPSA compliance, whether or not an
injury is referenced; (ii) a mechanism
for confidential employee reporting of
compliance-related questions or
concerns to either a compliance officer
or to another senior manager with
authority to act as necessary; (iii)
effective communication of company
compliance-related policies and
procedures regarding the CPSA to all
applicable employees through training
programs or otherwise; (iv) management
oversight of and responsibility for
compliance; and (v) retention of all
CPSA compliance-related records for at
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 222 / Thursday, November 17, 2016 / Notices
least five (5) years, and availability of
such records to staff upon reasonable
request.
36. PetSmart represents and agrees
that it has designed and implemented
internal controls and procedures
designed to ensure that, with respect to
all consumer products imported,
manufactured, distributed or sold by
PetSmart: (i) information required to be
disclosed by PetSmart to the
Commission is recorded, processed and
reported in accordance with applicable
law; (ii) all reporting made to the
Commission is timely, truthful,
complete, accurate and in accordance
with applicable law; and (iii) prompt
disclosure is made to PetSmart’s
management of any significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in
the design or operation of such internal
controls that are reasonably likely to
affect adversely, in any material respect,
PetSmart’s ability to record, process and
report to the Commission in accordance
with applicable law.
37. Upon reasonable request of staff,
PetSmart shall provide written
documentation of its internal controls
and procedures, including, but not
limited to, the effective dates of the
procedures and improvements thereto.
PetSmart shall cooperate fully and
truthfully with staff and shall, upon
reasonable notice make available all
non-privileged information and
materials, and personnel with direct
involvement in such procedures and
deemed necessary by staff to evaluate
PetSmart’s compliance with the terms of
the Agreement.
38. The parties acknowledge and
agree that the Commission may
publicize the terms of the Agreement
and the Order.
39. PetSmart represents that the
Agreement: (i) is entered into freely and
voluntarily, without any degree of
duress or compulsion whatsoever; (ii)
has been duly authorized; and (iii)
constitutes the valid and binding
obligation of PetSmart, enforceable
against PetSmart in accordance with its
terms. PetSmart will not directly or
indirectly receive any reimbursement,
indemnification, insurance related
payment, or other payment in
connection with the civil penalty to be
paid by PetSmart pursuant to the
Agreement and Order. The individuals
signing the Agreement on behalf of
PetSmart represent and warrant that
they are duly authorized by PetSmart to
execute the Agreement.
40. The signatories represent that they
are authorized to execute this
Agreement.
41. The Agreement is governed by the
laws of the United States.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:24 Nov 16, 2016
Jkt 241001
81089
42. The Agreement and the Order
shall apply to, and be binding upon,
PetSmart and each of its successors,
transferees, and assigns; and a violation
of the Agreement or Order may subject
PetSmart, and each of its successors,
transferees, and assigns, to appropriate
legal action.
43. The Agreement and the Order
constitute the complete agreement
between the parties on the subject
matter contained therein.
44. The Agreement may be used in
interpreting the Order. Understandings,
agreements, representations, or
interpretations apart from those
contained in the Agreement and the
Order may not be used to vary or
contradict their terms. For purposes of
construction, the Agreement shall be
deemed to have been drafted by both of
the parties and shall not, therefore, be
construed against any party, for that
reason, in any subsequent dispute.
45. The Agreement may not be
waived, amended, modified, or
otherwise altered, except as in
accordance with the provisions of 16
CFR 1118.20(h). The Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
46. If any provision of the Agreement
or the Order is held to be illegal,
invalid, or unenforceable under present
or future laws effective during the terms
of the Agreement and the Order, such
provision shall be fully severable. The
balance of the Agreement and the Order
shall remain in full force and effect,
unless the Commission and PetSmart
agree in writing that severing the
provision materially affects the purpose
of the Agreement and the Order.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
In the Matter of: PETSMART, INC. CPSC
Docket No.: 17–C0001
U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Commission
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Settlement
Agreement entered into between
PetSmart, Inc. (‘‘PetSmart’’), and the
U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), and the
Commission having jurisdiction over
the subject matter and over PetSmart,
and it appearing that the Settlement
Agreement and the Order are in the
public interest, it is:
ORDERED that the Settlement
Agreement be, and is, hereby, accepted;
and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that PetSmart
shall comply with the terms of the
Settlement Agreement and shall pay a
civil penalty in the amount of four
million, two hundred fifty thousand
dollars ($4,250,000), within thirty (30)
days after service of the Commission’s
final Order accepting the Settlement
Agreement. The payment shall be made
by electronic wire transfer to the
Commission via: https://www.pay.gov.
Upon the failure of PetSmart to make
the foregoing payment when due,
interest on the unpaid amount shall
accrue and be paid by PetSmart at the
federal legal rate of interest set forth at
28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b). If PetSmart
fails to make such payment or to comply
in full with any other provision of the
Settlement Agreement, such conduct
will be considered a violation of the
Settlement Agreement and Order.
Provisionally accepted and provisional
Order issued on the 14th day of November,
2016.
PETSMART, INC.
BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION:
Dated: October 28, 2016
lllllllllllllllllllll
By: lllllllllllllllllll Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
Michael J. Massey
President and Chief Executive Officer
[FR Doc. 2016–27644 Filed 11–16–16; 8:45 am]
PetSmart, Inc.
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
Dated: October 28, 2016
By: lllllllllllllllllll
Jeffrey B. Margulies, Esq.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
Counsel to PetSmart, Inc.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Mary T. Boyle
General Counsel
Mary B. Murphy
Assistant General Counsel
Dated: October 27, 2016
By: lllllllllllllllllll
Philip Z. Brown
Trial Attorney
Division of Compliance
Office of the General Counsel
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Project No. 14795–001]
Shell Energy North America (US), L.P.;
Notice of Intent To File License
Application, Filing of Pre-Application
Document, and Approving Use of the
Traditional Licensing Process
a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to
File License Application and Request to
Use the Traditional Licensing Process.
b. Project No.: 14795–001.
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81086-81089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27644]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 17-C0001]
PetSmart, Inc., Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement
and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in
the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of the Consumer
Product Safety Commission's regulations. Published below is a
provisionally-accepted Settlement Agreement with PetSmart, Inc.,
containing a civil penalty in the amount of four million, two hundred
fifty thousand dollars ($4,250,000) within thirty (30) days of service
of the Commission's final Order accepting the Settlement Agreement.
DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written
request with the Office of the Secretary by December 2, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the Comment 17-C0001, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway,
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Z. Brown, Trial Attorney,
Division of Compliance, Office of the General Counsel, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-
4408; telephone (301) 504-7645.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears
below.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Commission voted (4-1) to provisionally accept the
Settlement Agreement and Order regarding PetSmart, Inc. Chairman
Kaye, Commissioner Adler, Commissioner Robinson and Commissioner
Mohorovic voted to provisionally accept the Settlement Agreement and
Order. Commissioner Buerkle voted to reject the Settlement Agreement
and Order.
[[Page 81087]]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: November 14, 2016.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
In the Matter of: PETSMART, INC. CPSC Docket No.: 17-C0001
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
1. In accordance with the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C.
2051-2089 (``CPSA'') and 16 CFR 1118.20, PetSmart, Inc. (``PetSmart''),
and the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
(``Commission''), through its staff, hereby enter into this Settlement
Agreement (``Agreement''). The Agreement and the incorporated attached
Order resolve staff's charges set forth below.
THE PARTIES
2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency,
established pursuant to, and responsible for, the enforcement of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051-2089. By executing the Agreement, staff is acting
on behalf of the Commission, pursuant to 16 CFR 1118.20(b). The
Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the CPSA.
3. PetSmart is a corporation, organized and existing under the laws
of the state of Delaware, with its principal place of business in
Phoenix, AZ.
STAFF CHARGES
4. Between April 2009 and September 2013, PetSmart imported and
offered for sale in the United States, approximately 127,444 ``Great
Choice'' or ``Top Fin'' brand 1.75 gallon, brandy snifter-style glass
fish bowls (``Fish Bowls'' or ``Subject Products'') .
5. The Fish Bowls are a ``consumer product,'' ``distribut[ed] in
commerce,'' as those terms are defined or used in sections 3(a)(5) and
(8) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5) and (8). PetSmart is an
``importer,'' ``manufacturer'' and ``retailer'' of the Fish Bowls, as
such terms are defined in sections 3(a)(11) and (13) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2052(a)(11) and (13).
Violation of CPSA Section 19(a)(4)
6. The Fish Bowls contain a defect which could create a substantial
product hazard and create an unreasonable risk of serious injury
because they can crack, shatter, or break during normal use, posing a
laceration hazard to consumers.
7. Between August 2011 and January 2014, PetSmart received at least
19 incident reports of Fish Bowls cracking, breaking, or shattering
during normal use, which, in at least 12 instances, resulted in serious
injuries, including deep lacerations requiring stitches and severed
tendons necessitating surgery.
8. PetSmart received at least three reports of consumers sustaining
serious injuries during normal use of the Fish Bowls between August
2011 and September 2011 but neither initiated an investigation into the
Subject Products in response to these reports of serious injury nor
immediately reported to the Commission.
9. In May 2013, after receiving additional reports, including two
reports of serious injuries to consumers, PetSmart initiated an
investigation and evaluation of the defect and risk associated with the
Fish Bowls. That investigation, which concluded in July 2013,
identified deficiencies in the thickness and distribution of the glass
in the Fish Bowls. During its investigation, PetSmart continued to
receive reports of serious injury caused by the Fish Bowls. Firms may
conduct a reasonably expeditious investigation, not normally exceeding
10 days, to evaluate their reporting obligations. See 16 CFR
1115.14(d). PetSmart's investigation took over two months to complete.
10. PetSmart stopped sale of the Fish Bowls in September 2013. At
the time PetSmart stopped sale of the Fish Bowls, PetSmart had received
at least 12 reports of consumers being injured during normal use of the
Subject Products.
11. PetSmart did not file a Full Report with the Commission until
January 31, 2014, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 2064(b). PetSmart and the
Commission jointly announced a recall of 10,200 Fish Bowls on April 24,
2014.
12. PetSmart's Full Report contained information on only 10,211
Fish Bowls imported and sold between February 2013 and September 2013.
However, information produced by PetSmart during staff's civil penalty
investigation revealed that PetSmart had actually sold a total of
91,500 Fish Bowls between March 2010 and September 2013 that posed the
same laceration hazard. PetSmart and the Commission jointly announced
an expanded recall of 91,500 Fish Bowls on November 17, 2015.
13. By the date of the expanded recall, PetSmart received at least
32 reports of Fish Bowls cracking, breaking or shattering during normal
use, including 18 reports of injury. PetSmart received at least six of
these reports of injury after the first recall.
14. Despite having information that the Fish Bowls contained a
defect and created an unreasonable risk of serious injury, PetSmart did
not notify the Commission immediately of such defect or risk, as
required by sections 15(b)(3) and (4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3)
and (4), in violation of section 19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2068(a)(4).
15. Because the information in PetSmart's possession constituted
actual and presumed knowledge, PetSmart knowingly violated section
19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4), as the term ``knowingly''
is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
16. Pursuant to Section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, PetSmart is
subject to civil penalties for its knowing violation of section
19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4).
Violation of CPSA Section 19(a)(13)
17. PetSmart's January 31, 2014 Full Report identified the Subject
Products as 10,211 Fish Bowls, sold between February 2013 and September
2013, which posed a laceration hazard to consumers. The Full Report did
not identify an additional 81,300 units of Subject Products that were
sold prior to February 2013 that posed the same hazard and had been the
subject of incident and injury reports received by PetSmart.
18. By failing to identify the correct amount and distribution
dates of the Subject Products in PetSmart's Full Report, PetSmart
knowingly misrepresented the scope of consumer products subject to an
action required under section 15 of the CPSA. As a result of PetSmart's
misrepresentation, the April 24, 2014 CPSC press release announcing the
recall inaccurately stated that ``[a]bout 10,200'' Fish Bowls were
affected by the hazard posed by the Fish Bowls. An expansion of the
recall was announced on November 17, 2015.
19. By knowingly misrepresenting the scope of consumer products
subject to an action under section 15 of the CPSA, PetSmart knowingly
violated section 19(a)(13) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(13), as the
term ``knowingly'' is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2069(d).
20. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, PetSmart is
subject to civil penalties for its knowing violation of section
19(a)(13) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(13).
RESPONSE OF PETSMART
21. PetSmart's settlement of this matter does not constitute an
admission of staff's charges in paragraphs 4 through 20 above.
22. Between November 2013 and January 2014, PetSmart corresponded
with CPSC staff regarding certain Fish
[[Page 81088]]
Bowl incidents. In this correspondence, PetSmart clearly stated that it
first began selling the Fish Bowls in 2009. PetSmart also stated that
it believed any product issues were limited to Fish Bowls manufactured
for sale in 2013. CPSC staff did not ask PetSmart anything further
regarding PetSmart's determination that the issues were limited to Fish
Bowls sold between February 2013 and September 2013.
23. Following this correspondence, in January 2014, PetSmart
provided the Commission with its report under section 15(b) of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b) concerning PetSmart's receipt of complaints and
incident reports about the Fish Bowls. PetSmart's report provided
information related only to Fish Bowls manufactured for sale in 2013,
consistent with its communications to CPSC staff. CPSC staff did not
ask PetSmart anything further regarding Fish Bowls sold prior to 2013.
24. On April 24, 2014, in conjunction with the Commission, PetSmart
voluntarily announced a recall of Fish Bowls sold at PetSmart between
February 2013 and September 2013.
25. PetSmart conducted the April 24, 2014, voluntary recall of the
Fish Bowls, as well as the section 15(b) reporting, out of an abundance
of caution and without PetSmart having concluded that the Fish Bowls
contained a defect, posed a substantial product hazard, or created an
unreasonable risk of serious injury or death.
26. On November 17, 2015, in conjunction with the Commission,
PetSmart voluntarily expanded the recall of Fish Bowls to include units
sold at PetSmart between March 2010 and February 2013. PetSmart
disputes Staff's allegation that PetSmart had information that the Fish
Bowls manufactured prior to 2013 contained a defect and created an
unreasonable risk of serious injury.
27. PetSmart denies Staff's allegations that PetSmart knowingly
misrepresented the scope of consumer products subject to an action
under section 15 of the CPSA and that PetSmart knowingly violated
section 19(a)(13).
AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES
28. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over the matter
involving the Fish Bowls and over PetSmart.
29. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes
only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by PetSmart or a
determination by the Commission that PetSmart violated the CPSA's
reporting requirements.
30. In settlement of staff's charges, and to avoid the cost,
distraction, delay, uncertainty, and inconvenience of protracted
litigation or other proceedings, PetSmart shall pay a civil penalty in
the amount of four million, two hundred fifty thousand dollars
($4,250,000) within thirty (30) calendar days after receiving service
of the Commission's final Order accepting the Agreement. All payments
to be made under the Agreement shall constitute debts owing to the
United States and shall be made by electronic wire transfer to the
United States via: https://www.pay.gov, for allocation to, and credit
against, the payment obligations of PetSmart under this Agreement.
Failure to make such payment by the date specified in the Commission's
final Order shall constitute Default.
31. All unpaid amounts, if any, due and owing under the Agreement,
shall constitute a debt due and immediately owing by PetSmart to the
United States, and interest shall accrue and be paid by PetSmart at the
federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b)
from the date of Default, until all amounts due have been paid in full
(hereinafter ``Default Payment Amount'' and ``Default Interest
Balance''). PetSmart shall consent to a Consent Judgment in the amount
of the Default Payment Amount and Default Interest Balance, and the
United States, at its sole option, may collect the entire Default
Payment Amount and Default Interest Balance, or exercise any other
rights granted by law or in equity, including, but not limited to,
referring such matters for private collection, and PetSmart agrees not
to contest, and hereby waives and discharges any defenses to, any
collection action undertaken by the United States, or its agents or
contractors, pursuant to this paragraph. PetSmart shall pay the United
States all reasonable costs of collection and enforcement under this
paragraph, respectively, including reasonable attorney's fees and
expenses.
32. After staff receives this Agreement executed on behalf of
PetSmart, staff shall promptly submit the Agreement to the Commission
for provisional acceptance. Promptly following provisional acceptance
of the Agreement by the Commission, the Agreement shall be placed on
the public record and published in the Federal Register, in accordance
with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). If the Commission
does not receive any written request not to accept the Agreement within
fifteen (15) calendar days, the Agreement shall be deemed finally
accepted on the 16th calendar day after the date the Agreement is
published in the Federal Register, in accordance with 16 CFR
1118.20(f).
33. This Agreement is conditioned upon, and subject to, the
Commission's final acceptance, as set forth above, and it is subject to
the provisions of 16 CFR 1118.20(h). Upon the later of: (i)
Commission's final acceptance of this Agreement and service of the
accepted Agreement upon PetSmart, and (ii) the date of issuance of the
final Order, this Agreement shall be in full force and effect, and
shall be binding upon the parties.
34. Effective upon the later of: (i) the Commission's final
acceptance of the Agreement and service of the accepted Agreement upon
PetSmart, and (ii) and the date of issuance of the final Order, for
good and valuable consideration, PetSmart hereby expressly and
irrevocably waives and agrees not to assert any past, present, or
future rights to the following, in connection with the matter described
in this Agreement: (i) an administrative or judicial hearing; (ii)
judicial review or other challenge or contest of the Commission's
actions; (iii) a determination by the Commission of whether PetSmart
failed to comply with the CPSA and the underlying regulations; (iv) a
statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (v) any
claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
35. PetSmart represents and agrees that it has enhanced its
compliance program to ensure compliance with the CPSA with respect to
any consumer product imported, manufactured, distributed or sold by the
Firm and will maintain said compliance program. PetSmart represents
that the ongoing compliance program contains: (i) written standards,
policies and procedures including those designed to ensure that
information that may relate to or impact CPSA compliance (including
information obtained by quality control personnel) is conveyed
effectively to personnel responsible for CPSA compliance, whether or
not an injury is referenced; (ii) a mechanism for confidential employee
reporting of compliance-related questions or concerns to either a
compliance officer or to another senior manager with authority to act
as necessary; (iii) effective communication of company compliance-
related policies and procedures regarding the CPSA to all applicable
employees through training programs or otherwise; (iv) management
oversight of and responsibility for compliance; and (v) retention of
all CPSA compliance-related records for at
[[Page 81089]]
least five (5) years, and availability of such records to staff upon
reasonable request.
36. PetSmart represents and agrees that it has designed and
implemented internal controls and procedures designed to ensure that,
with respect to all consumer products imported, manufactured,
distributed or sold by PetSmart: (i) information required to be
disclosed by PetSmart to the Commission is recorded, processed and
reported in accordance with applicable law; (ii) all reporting made to
the Commission is timely, truthful, complete, accurate and in
accordance with applicable law; and (iii) prompt disclosure is made to
PetSmart's management of any significant deficiencies or material
weaknesses in the design or operation of such internal controls that
are reasonably likely to affect adversely, in any material respect,
PetSmart's ability to record, process and report to the Commission in
accordance with applicable law.
37. Upon reasonable request of staff, PetSmart shall provide
written documentation of its internal controls and procedures,
including, but not limited to, the effective dates of the procedures
and improvements thereto. PetSmart shall cooperate fully and truthfully
with staff and shall, upon reasonable notice make available all non-
privileged information and materials, and personnel with direct
involvement in such procedures and deemed necessary by staff to
evaluate PetSmart's compliance with the terms of the Agreement.
38. The parties acknowledge and agree that the Commission may
publicize the terms of the Agreement and the Order.
39. PetSmart represents that the Agreement: (i) is entered into
freely and voluntarily, without any degree of duress or compulsion
whatsoever; (ii) has been duly authorized; and (iii) constitutes the
valid and binding obligation of PetSmart, enforceable against PetSmart
in accordance with its terms. PetSmart will not directly or indirectly
receive any reimbursement, indemnification, insurance related payment,
or other payment in connection with the civil penalty to be paid by
PetSmart pursuant to the Agreement and Order. The individuals signing
the Agreement on behalf of PetSmart represent and warrant that they are
duly authorized by PetSmart to execute the Agreement.
40. The signatories represent that they are authorized to execute
this Agreement.
41. The Agreement is governed by the laws of the United States.
42. The Agreement and the Order shall apply to, and be binding
upon, PetSmart and each of its successors, transferees, and assigns;
and a violation of the Agreement or Order may subject PetSmart, and
each of its successors, transferees, and assigns, to appropriate legal
action.
43. The Agreement and the Order constitute the complete agreement
between the parties on the subject matter contained therein.
44. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order.
Understandings, agreements, representations, or interpretations apart
from those contained in the Agreement and the Order may not be used to
vary or contradict their terms. For purposes of construction, the
Agreement shall be deemed to have been drafted by both of the parties
and shall not, therefore, be construed against any party, for that
reason, in any subsequent dispute.
45. The Agreement may not be waived, amended, modified, or
otherwise altered, except as in accordance with the provisions of 16
CFR 1118.20(h). The Agreement may be executed in counterparts.
46. If any provision of the Agreement or the Order is held to be
illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws
effective during the terms of the Agreement and the Order, such
provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and
the Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission
and PetSmart agree in writing that severing the provision materially
affects the purpose of the Agreement and the Order.
PETSMART, INC.
Dated: October 28, 2016
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Massey
President and Chief Executive Officer
PetSmart, Inc.
Dated: October 28, 2016
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey B. Margulies, Esq.
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
Counsel to PetSmart, Inc.
U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
Mary T. Boyle
General Counsel
Mary B. Murphy
Assistant General Counsel
Dated: October 27, 2016
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Z. Brown
Trial Attorney
Division of Compliance
Office of the General Counsel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
In the Matter of: PETSMART, INC. CPSC Docket No.: 17-C0001
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into between
PetSmart, Inc. (``PetSmart''), and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission (``Commission''), and the Commission having jurisdiction
over the subject matter and over PetSmart, and it appearing that the
Settlement Agreement and the Order are in the public interest, it is:
ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement be, and is, hereby, accepted;
and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that PetSmart shall comply with the terms of the
Settlement Agreement and shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of
four million, two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($4,250,000), within
thirty (30) days after service of the Commission's final Order
accepting the Settlement Agreement. The payment shall be made by
electronic wire transfer to the Commission via: https://www.pay.gov.
Upon the failure of PetSmart to make the foregoing payment when due,
interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by PetSmart at
the federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and
(b). If PetSmart fails to make such payment or to comply in full with
any other provision of the Settlement Agreement, such conduct will be
considered a violation of the Settlement Agreement and Order.
Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 14th
day of November, 2016.
BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
[FR Doc. 2016-27644 Filed 11-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
