Mesabi Radial Tire Company, 1801 5th Avenue East, Hibbing, Minnesota; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 57626-57627 [2016-20049]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
57626
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Notices
APPENDIX
[46 TAA Petitions instituted between 7/11/16 and 7/22/16]
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (State/One-Stop) .........................................
Atlas Copco Hurricane LLC (Workers) .....................................................
CTS Corporation (Company) ...................................................................
Thermo Fisher Scientific (State/One-Stop) ..............................................
DSI Underground Systems (Workers) ......................................................
Perceptive (Parexel) Informatics (State/One-Stop) ..................................
Epicor Software Corporation (Workers) ...................................................
Atos IT Solutions and Services (State/One-Stop) ....................................
GateHouse Media (Lawyers Weekly LLC/Virginia Publishing), Customer Service (State/One-Stop).
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) (State/One-Stop) ...
Plano, TX ........................................
Franklin, IN ......................................
Elkhart, IN .......................................
Chelmsford, MA ..............................
Martinsburg, WV .............................
Billerica, MA ....................................
Westminster, CO .............................
Redmond, WA .................................
Boston, MA .....................................
07/11/16
07/11/16
07/11/16
07/11/16
07/12/16
07/12/16
07/13/16
07/13/16
07/13/16
07/08/16
07/11/16
07/08/16
06/29/16
07/11/16
07/11/16
07/12/16
07/12/16
07/11/16
Schaumburg and the Atlanta locations, IL.
Williamstown, WV ...........................
Dundee, MI .....................................
East Aurora, NY ..............................
07/14/16
07/13/16
07/15/16
07/15/16
07/15/16
07/08/16
07/13/16
07/13/16
Erie, PA ...........................................
Tulsa, OK ........................................
Tysons, VA ......................................
Houston, TX ....................................
Mullins, SC ......................................
Shelbyville, TN ................................
Plymouth, IN ...................................
Naperville, IL ...................................
El Segundo, CA ..............................
Clackamas, OR ...............................
Portland, OR ...................................
Columbus, OH ................................
New Province, NJ ...........................
Fairview, PA ....................................
Kansas City, MO .............................
07/15/16
07/15/16
07/15/16
07/15/16
07/18/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/20/16
07/20/16
07/14/16
07/14/16
07/14/16
07/14/16
07/15/16
07/18/16
07/19/16
07/18/16
07/18/16
07/18/16
07/18/16
07/18/16
07/18/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
Brooklyn, NY ...................................
New York, NY .................................
Osceola, AR ....................................
Forest Grove, OR ...........................
Holloman Air Force Base, NM ........
New Berlin, WI ................................
Asheboro, NC .................................
Dunkirk, NY .....................................
Salisbury, NC ..................................
Huntington, TN ................................
Canby, OR ......................................
Colorado Springs, CO .....................
07/20/16
07/20/16
07/20/16
07/20/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
07/22/16
07/22/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/19/16
07/20/16
07/20/16
07/20/16
07/20/16
07/20/16
07/20/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
Canby, OR ......................................
Portland, OR ...................................
Milpitas, CA .....................................
Denver, CO .....................................
Portland, OR ...................................
Irving, TX .........................................
07/22/16
07/22/16
07/22/16
07/22/16
07/22/16
07/22/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
07/21/16
07/22/16
TA–W
92003
92004
92005
92006
92007
92008
92009
92010
92011
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
92012 ....................
92013 ....................
92014 ....................
92015 ....................
92016
92017
92018
92019
92020
92021
92022
92023
92024
92025
92026
92027
92028
92029
92030
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
92031 ....................
92032 ....................
92033 ....................
92034 ....................
92035 ....................
92036 ....................
92037 ....................
92038 ....................
92039A .................
92039 ....................
92040 ....................
92041 ....................
92042 ....................
92043 ....................
92043A .................
92044 ....................
92045 ....................
92046 ....................
Fenton Art Glass Company (Workers) .....................................................
Chrysler Dundee Engine Plant (Workers) ................................................
Mattel, Inc., Mattel Global Shared Service Solutions (MGSSS) (State/
One-Stop).
Erie Bolt Company (EBC) (Union) ...........................................................
D & L Oil Tool (State/One-Stop) ..............................................................
Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) (State/One-Stop) .......................
Halliburton (Wireline and Perforating) (State/One-Stop) ..........................
American Light Bulb Manufacturing Inc. (State/One-Stop) ......................
Sanford LP (Company) ............................................................................
Indiana Tool & Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Company) .......................
Alcatel-Lucent Nokia (State/One-Stop) ....................................................
TEKsystems (State/One-Stop) .................................................................
Conmet/Consolidated Metco Inc. (State/One-Stop) .................................
Daimler Trucks North America, LLC (State/One-Stop) ............................
McDonald’s Corporation (State/One-Stop) ...............................................
Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise (ALE) (State/One-Stop) ...................................
Control Devices, LLC formerly Flexi-Hinge Valve Co., Inc. (Workers) ....
Blue Scope Buildings of North America/Blue Scope Steel (State/OneStop).
JP Morgan Chase, Hedge Fund Service Division (State/One-Stop) .......
Ralph Lauren (State/One-Stop) ...............................................................
Viskase Companies, Inc. (Company) .......................................................
TTM/Viasystems Technologies Corp., LLC (State/One-Stop) .................
Federal Republic of Germany (Company) ...............................................
ITW Ark-Les (Company) ..........................................................................
Specialty/Euclid Vidaro (Workers) ............................................................
Berry Plastics (Company) ........................................................................
Norandal USA, Inc. (Company) ...............................................................
Norandal USA, Inc. (Company) ................................................................
Willamette Egg Farms (State/One-Stop) ..................................................
Verizon Communications/Enterprise Solutions/Verizon Business Order
Pro (State/One-Stop).
Shimadzu USA Manufacturing Inc. (State/One-Stop) ..............................
SeaChange International, Inc. (State/One-Stop) .....................................
SeaChange International, Inc. (State/One-Stop) .....................................
Northwest Pipe Company (Company) ......................................................
CH2M (State/One-Stop) ...........................................................................
Blueprint Consulting Services (State/One-Stop) ......................................
[FR Doc. 2016–20047 Filed 8–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
[TA–W–91,218]
Mesabi Radial Tire Company, 1801 5th
Avenue East, Hibbing, Minnesota;
Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated January 29,
2016, the state workforce office
requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:56 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance applicable to
workers and former workers of Mesabi
Radial Tire Company, 1801 5th Avenue
East, Hibbing, Minnesota. The
determination was issued on January 12,
2016.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
Date of
petition
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that imports did not increase,
and that the workers’ firm does not
import wholesale or repair services.
Further, the firm did not shift the
supply of wholesale or repair services or
like or directly competitive services to
a foreign country or acquire wholesale
or repair services or like or directly
competitive services from a foreign
country. Further, the firm is not a
Supplier to a firm that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). The
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Notices
services supplied by the workers firm
were not used in the production of an
article, iron ore. The services supplied
were used within the tools/equipment
used to mine for ore. Finally, the firm
does not act as a Downstream Producer
to a firm that employed a group of
workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). The workers’
firm was not engaged in value-added
finishing processes used in the
production of an article or supply of a
service.
The request for reconsideration states
that this determination is erroneous and
that the subject firm should be
considered to be a downstream supplier
because without their products steel
cannot be manufactured. The request
also included additional information
relating to this statement.
The Department of Labor has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of
July, 2016.
Jessica R. Webster,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016–20049 Filed 8–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility to Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of July 11, 2016
through July 22, 2016.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:56 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) the sales or production, or both, of
such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) the increase in imports contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation
or threat of separation and to the decline
in the sales or production of such firm;
or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from
a foreign country by the workers’ firm
of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) the shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57627
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) either—
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and
the component parts it supplied to the
firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) a loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(e) of the Act must be met.
(1) the workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) an affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) a summary of the report submitted
to the President by the International
Trade Commission under section
202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative
determination described in paragraph
(1)(A) is published in the Federal
Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57626-57627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20049]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-91,218]
Mesabi Radial Tire Company, 1801 5th Avenue East, Hibbing,
Minnesota; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated January 29, 2016, the state workforce office
requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination
regarding workers' eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance applicable to workers and former workers of Mesabi Radial
Tire Company, 1801 5th Avenue East, Hibbing, Minnesota. The
determination was issued on January 12, 2016.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the findings that imports did not increase, and that the
workers' firm does not import wholesale or repair services. Further,
the firm did not shift the supply of wholesale or repair services or
like or directly competitive services to a foreign country or acquire
wholesale or repair services or like or directly competitive services
from a foreign country. Further, the firm is not a Supplier to a firm
that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). The
[[Page 57627]]
services supplied by the workers firm were not used in the production
of an article, iron ore. The services supplied were used within the
tools/equipment used to mine for ore. Finally, the firm does not act as
a Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). The workers' firm was not engaged in value-
added finishing processes used in the production of an article or
supply of a service.
The request for reconsideration states that this determination is
erroneous and that the subject firm should be considered to be a
downstream supplier because without their products steel cannot be
manufactured. The request also included additional information relating
to this statement.
The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of July, 2016.
Jessica R. Webster,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016-20049 Filed 8-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
