Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Regarding the Acknowledgment of End-of-Day Net-Net Settlement Balances by Settling Banks, 74819-74822 [2015-30245]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Notices Plan, please see https:// www.globalchange.gov/strategic-plan. would also make other changes to the Guide as set forth below. Ted Wackler, Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant Director. II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change [FR Doc. 2015–30292 Filed 11–27–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3270–F6–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76510; File No. SR–DTC– 2015–011] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Regarding the Acknowledgment of End-of-Day Net-Net Settlement Balances by Settling Banks November 23, 2015. Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on November 16, 2015, The Depository Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by DTC. DTC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to section 19(b)(2) 3 of the Act thereunder. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The proposed rule change would amend the DTC Settlement Service Guide (‘‘Guide’’) to provide that any Settling Bank that does not affirmatively acknowledge by the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time (as defined below) its endof-day net-net settlement balance 4 or notify DTC of its refusal to settle for one or more Participants for which it is the designated Settling Bank, would be deemed to have acknowledged its endof-day net-net settlement balance.5 DTC 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 4 The end-of-day net-net settlement balance for each Settling Bank reflects (i) a net credit amount due to the Settling Bank from DTC, (ii) a net debit amount due from the Settling Bank to DTC, or (iii) a zero balance so that no payment is due to or from the Settling Bank. In accordance with the timeframes set forth in the Guide, DTC’s end-of-day funds settlement process begins with the posting by DTC of ‘‘final settlement figures’’ at approximately 3:45 p.m. each Business Day unless extended. 5 Terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning set forth in the DTC Rules (the ‘‘Rules’’), available at https://www.dtcc.com/legal/rules-andprocedures.aspx.> jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 2 17 VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:23 Nov 27, 2015 Jkt 238001 In its filing with the Commission, DTC included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. DTC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. (A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of this proposed rule change is to mitigate a risk to DTC in settlement relating to a Settling Bank’s failure to take the action required to acknowledge its end-of-day net-net settlement balance, or notify DTC of a refusal to settle for any Participant for which it is the designated Settling Bank, by the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time (as defined below). Background The DTC end-of-day net settlement structure depends upon the use of Settling Banks.6 Each Participant must designate a Settling Bank to settle on its behalf. Any Participant that is a bank may settle for itself.7 Today, a Settling Bank that settles for other Participants must acknowledge its end-of-day net-net settlement balance for the group of Participants for which it settles, or notify DTC if it refuses to settle for any Participant for which it is the designated Settling Bank, by the later of 4:15 p.m. and the time that is 30 minutes after the Settling Bank end-ofday net-net settlement balances are first made available by DTC (‘‘Acknowledgment Cutoff Time’’).8 If a Settling Bank notifies DTC that it refuses to settle for a Participant, DTC would recalculate the Settling Bank’s net-net settlement balance by excluding the net settlement balance of the Participant for which the Settling Bank 6 See the Guide at pp. 17–18, available at https://www.dtcc.com/∼/media/Files/ Downloads/legal/service-guides/Settlement.pdf for an overview of the end-of-day net settlement process. 7 See Rule 9(B), supra note 5. 8 Currently, a Settling Bank that settles only for itself may opt out of the requirement to acknowledge its balance, but it cannot refuse to settle for itself. PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 74819 refused to settle.9 DTC would then provide the Settling Bank with its adjusted net-net settlement balance (‘‘Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance’’). The Settling Bank may not refuse to settle for any other Participant on that day and must immediately respond to DTC to acknowledge its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance. After the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time and any adjustments, DTC will prepare and submit to the National Settlement Service (‘‘NSS’’) provided by the Federal Reserve Banks (individually and collectively, the ‘‘Fed’’) a file (‘‘NSS File’’) reflecting the net debits or credits from and to all Settling Banks. NSS will process a debit or credit of each Settling Bank’s Fed account (‘‘Fed Account’’), as applicable.10 Today, failure of a Settling Bank to timely respond to DTC after posting of final settlement figures creates uncertainty with respect to timely completion of settlement at DTC. The proposed rule change is intended to address this issue as discussed below. Proposal To promote settlement certainty, DTC is proposing to treat a Settling Bank that fails to timely provide its affirmative acknowledgement of its end-of-day netnet settlement balance or notify DTC of its refusal to settle for one or more Participants for which it is the designated Settling Bank, as having been deemed to acknowledge its end-ofday net-net settlement balance. DTC proposes to modify the Guide to provide that a Settling Bank that (i) fails to affirmatively acknowledge its end-ofday net-net settlement balance, or (ii) does not notify DTC of its refusal to settle on behalf of a Participant or Participants for which it is the designated Settling Bank, by the Acknowledgement Cutoff Time, would be deemed to have acknowledged its end-of-day net-net settlement balance.11 9 Any Participant for which its designated Settling Bank has refused to settle on its behalf remains obligated to DTC for the payment of any net debit balance and must make another arrangement to timely pay that amount by Fedwire. 10 The Guide currently provides that if NSS is unavailable then, if instructed by DTC, Settling Banks in a net-net debit balance must remit payments to DTC via Fedwire by the later of 5:00 p.m. or 1 hour after net settlement balances are first made available. This provision would be clarified to note an operational detail that all such payments must be remitted prior to the close of Fedwire. 11 DTC would provide reminders to Settling Banks when they have not affirmatively acknowledged their settlement balance. Notwithstanding delivery of reminders, once a Settling Bank is deemed to have acknowledged its balance, it may not notify DTC of a refusal to settle for a Participant for which it is the designated Settling Bank. E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1 jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 74820 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Notices The Settling Bank’s balance would then, in the ordinary course of settlement processing, be debited from or credited to its Fed Account through the NSS process. Likewise, DTC proposes that the Guide provide that a Settling Bank that fails to acknowledge immediately upon receipt its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance, if any, would be deemed to have acknowledged its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance and the Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance would then, in the ordinary course of settlement processing, be debited from or credited to its designated Fed Account through the NSS process. DTC would continue to maintain flexibility and allow for a Settling Bank to request extra time if the Settling Bank has a reason that it cannot affirmatively acknowledge or refuse its net-net settlement balance so long as the Settling Bank notifies DTC accordingly at or before the Acknowledgement Cutoff Time, or, in the case of a PostRefusal Adjusted Balance, it notifies DTC immediately where it is unable to affirmatively acknowledge its PostRefusal Adjusted Balance. In this regard, the Guide would be updated to clarify that the Settling Bank is required to notify DTC of its request for extra time via a dedicated DTC Settlement phone ‘‘hotline’’ prior to the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time. In the event that DTC provides the Settling Bank with a PostRefusal Adjusted Balance, the Settling Bank would be required to notify DTC of its request for extra time immediately via the hotline. Any Settling Bank that timely complies with this notification requirement would not be deemed to have acknowledged its net-net Settlement Balance or its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance.12 If, after the initial release of final settlement figures, a Settling Bank’s netnet settlement balance is adjusted for any reason, other than as a result of the Settling Bank’s refusal to settle, then the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time for that Settling Bank would be extended to 30 minutes after DTC advises the Settling Bank of the adjusted net-net settlement balance. DTC would attempt to contact the Settling Bank if DTC does not receive a response in the form of (i) an acknowledgment or refusal prior to the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time, (ii) an immediate acknowledgment of a PostRefusal Adjusted Balance, or (iii) a notification from the Settling Bank that it cannot acknowledge or refuse, as 12 If the problem is due to a connectivity issue with DTC, DTC may then direct the Settling Bank to submit its acknowledgement/refusal instruction via email or as otherwise specified by DTC at that time. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:23 Nov 27, 2015 Jkt 238001 described in the preceding paragraph.13 If DTC is able to contact the Settling Bank and the Settling Bank notifies DTC that it cannot, at that time, acknowledge or refuse its net-net settlement balance, or Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance, as applicable, then the Settling Bank would not be deemed to have acknowledged its net-net settlement balance. However, if the Settling Bank cannot be reached, the Settling Bank would be deemed to have acknowledged its net-net settlement balance or PostRefusal Adjusted Balance, as applicable. DTC would update the Guide to clarify that each Settling Bank must ensure that it maintains accurate contact details with DTC so that DTC may contact the Settling Bank regarding settlement issues. Settling Banks must update any contact details by contacting their DTC Relationship Manager. The Fed’s cutoff for NSS processing, unless extended, is 5:30 p.m. In order to facilitate timely processing of the NSS File, DTC would maintain discretion to exclude a Settling Bank’s balance from the NSS File if the Settling Bank (i) (A) does not acknowledge its net-net settlement balance by the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time, or (B) does not immediately acknowledge its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance; and (ii) is not deemed to have acknowledged its net-net settlement balance or PostRefusal Adjusted Balance because it has notified DTC that it is unable to affirmatively acknowledge its net-net settlement balance or to refuse to settle on behalf of a Participant. If DTC proceeds to process the NSS File excluding the Settling Bank’s debit balance, then the Settling Bank must pay the debit balance via Fedwire. If DTC proceeds to process the NSS File excluding the Settling Bank’s credit balance, then DTC would pay the credit balance via Fedwire after the Settling Bank acknowledges its settlement balance. The text of the Guide would also state that a Settling Bank which settles on behalf of others that timely notifies DTC that it cannot acknowledge or refuse its end-of-day net-net settlement balance would not be assessed a flat fee for failure to acknowledge or notify DTC of its refusal to settle. However, such a Settling Bank would be charged interest with respect to any borrowing DTC is required to make to complete settlement that day for any Participant that the Settling Bank settles on behalf of, if the Settling Bank has not timely refused to settle for that Participant. 13 DTC uses the most recent contact information provided by the Settling Bank to its DTC Relationship Manager for this purpose. PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Additionally, DTC would revise the Guide to: (i) clarify that it is DTC’s Settlement Operations group that controls and coordinates the settling of Participant and Settling Bank accounts on DTC’s systems; (ii) define the Federal Reserve Banks individually and collectively within the Guide’s text as the ‘‘Fed’’ unless indicated otherwise; (iii) clarify text for descriptive purposes, and consistent with the Rules, that Participants make formal arrangements for a Settling Bank to be designated as the Settling Bank to settle with DTC on the Participant’s behalf; (iv) clarify that certain online reports DTC provides Participants and Settling Banks through the processing day reflect ‘‘intraday’’ gross debits and credits, and net debit and credit balances; (v) clarify that a Settling Bank’s endof-day net-net settlement balance includes the Settling Bank’s own settlement obligations as a Participant if it settles for itself; (vi) add text for the purpose of context, consistent with the Rules, that each Participant is obligated to settle timely with DTC and if its Settling Bank refuses to settle for it then it must make alternative arrangements to make payment to DTC via Fedwire, [sic] (vii) add text for the purpose of context, consistent with the Rules, that a Participant that acts as its own Settling Bank may not refuse to settle for itself and that it will be in default if it does not fund its settlement obligation; (viii) for clarity, change the heading to an existing example of how a Settling Bank’s settlement balance is calculated from ‘‘Settlement Example’’ to ‘‘Example of the Calculation of a DTC Settling Bank’s Net-Net Settlement Balance’’; (ix) remove the provision from the Guide indicating that that a Settling Bank that settles only for itself would need to affirmatively opt out in order to not be required to affirmatively acknowledge its settlement balance, and add text simply stating that a Settling Bank that settles only for itself would not be required to acknowledge its settlement balance; (x) clarify the interest charged to Participants for a failure to settle; (xi) delete references to a Settling Bank’s failure to timely settle its settlement balance from being referred to as a ‘‘failure to settle’’ and remove references to related procedures as being ‘‘failure-to-settle’’ procedures, as the terminology could be confused with an individual Participant’s failure to meet its settlement obligation; E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Notices (xii) rewrite text in the Guide in light of the proposed changes, as applicable, including Addendum A of the Guide, to incorporate proposed changes, consolidate text, clarify text for readability and eliminate duplication; (xiii) clarify certain Settling Bank and settlement processing timeframes; (xiv) apply initial capitalization as appropriate for the terms ‘‘Participant’’ and ‘‘Settling Bank’’ where they are used as defined terms; (xv) remove references to Participant Terminal System (PTS) functions, which are no longer used for DTC settlement processing; and (xvi) insert the title of the Guide on the Guide’s front page. Implementation The effective date of the proposed rule change would be announced via a DTC Important Notice. jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 2. Statutory Basis Section 17A(b)(3)(F) 14 of the Act requires that the rules of the clearing agency be designed, inter alia, to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. DTC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with this provision of the Act because the proposed rule change would reduce delays in the settlement process by allowing DTC to collect net debits and release net credits within scheduled timeframes despite the failure of a Settling Bank to affirmatively acknowledge its end-of-day net-net settlement balance or notify DTC of its refusal to settle for a Participant for which it is the designated Settling Bank on a timely basis. Rule 17Ad–22(d)(5) 15 promulgated under the Act requires, inter alia, that a clearing agency establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to, as applicable, employ money settlement arrangements that eliminate or strictly limit the clearing agency’s settlement bank risks, that is, its credit and liquidity risks from the use of banks to effect money settlements with its participants; and require funds transfers to the clearing agency to be final when effected. DTC believes the proposed rule change is consistent with this provision because it would reduce DTC’s credit and liquidity risk by mitigating the risk that end-of-day net-net debit settlement balances would not be paid due to the failure of a Settling Bank to respond to 14 15 15 17 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:23 Nov 27, 2015 Jkt 238001 DTC after posting of final settlement figures. (B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on Burden on Competition DTC does not believe that the proposed rule change would have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition because the proposed rule change applies to all Settling Banks and would not have an impact on Settling Banks’ current ability to timely acknowledge their net-net settlement balances or notify DTC of a refusal to settle on behalf of a Participant. (C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others DTC filed a substantially similar proposed rule change on April 15, 2015 (‘‘April Rule Filing’’),16 which was subsequently withdrawn.17 The Commission received a favorable written comment to the April Rule Filing.18 DTC also received written comments in connection with the April Rule Filing from a Participant that is a Settling Bank for other Participants. The Participant commented to the effect that it was expecting, but the April Rule Filing did not clearly state, that a Settling Bank (i) will be granted an extension to acknowledge its net-net settlement balance whenever it is requested prior to DTC processing the NSS File, and (ii) will not be charged a fee in situations where such an extension has been requested. In order to fully consider these comments DTC withdrew the April Rule Filing. With respect to (i) above, in order to avoid wider disruption to the DTC settlement process and the industry, DTC must have the discretion to promptly complete settlement for the Settling Banks that have timely acknowledged or have been deemed to have acknowledged their respective netnet settlement balances. Therefore, although DTC can grant limited extensions, DTC cannot grant an indefinite extension to a Settling Bank to acknowledge its balance prior to DTC processing the NSS File.19 16 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74830 (April 29, 2015), 80 FR 25727 (May 5, 2015) (File No. SR–DTC–2015–003). 17 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74380 (July 7, 2015), 80 FR 40116 (July 13, 2015) (File No. SR–DTC–2015–003). 18 Letter from Suzanne Shatto (May 3, 2015), available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-dtc2015-003/dtc2015003.shtml. 19 As stated above, DTC would maintain flexibility to allow for a Settling Bank to request extra time if the Settling Bank cannot affirmatively acknowledge or refuse, so long as the Settling Bank promptly notifies DTC at or before the PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 74821 With respect to (ii) above, the proposed rule change adds text to the Guide so that a Settling Bank that timely notifies DTC that it cannot acknowledge or refuse its net-net settlement balance will not be charged a flat fee for failure to acknowledge its balance. However the Settling Bank may be charged interest. To the extent any additional written comments are received by DTC on the proposed rule change, DTC will forward them to the Commission. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– DTC–2015–011 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–DTC–2015–011. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements Acknowledgement Cutoff Time or upon receipt of an Adjusted Balance. E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1 74822 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Notices with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of DTC and on DTCC’s Web site (https://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rulefilings.aspx). All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–DTC– 2015–011 and should be submitted on or before December 21, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.20 Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–30245 Filed 11–27–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Dated: November 25, 2015. Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–30481 Filed 11–25–15; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–76507; File No. SR–ISE– 2015–41] Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees November 23, 2015. Sunshine Act Meeting jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session. The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; Adjudicatory matters; Resolution of litigation claims; and Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings. At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551–5400. Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94–409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present. The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting. Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on November 10, 2015, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change ISE proposes to amend the Schedule of Fees as described in more detail below. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Internet Web site at https://www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, 1 15 20 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:23 Nov 27, 2015 2 17 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Schedule of Fees to introduce a new set of rebates to the Qualified Contingent Cross (‘‘QCC’’) and/or other solicited crossing orders, including solicited orders executed in the Solicitation, Facilitation or Price Improvement Mechanisms, pricing initiative that offers rebates to members who execute a specified volume of QCC and other solicited crossing orders in a month. This new set of rebates, as proposed, offers a lower rebate to members that execute a specified volume of QCC and solicited orders between two Priority Customers 3 (‘‘‘Customer to Customer’ Orders’’). The Exchange notes that there is no change to how volume is calculated for the volume tiers. Thus, members will continue to obtain the tier level based on all QCC and/or solicited crossing orders’ originating side volume. Members will receive the Non‘‘Customer to Customer’’ Order 4 rebate for their Non-‘‘Customer to Customer’’ Orders and the ‘‘Customer to Customer’’ Order rebate for their ‘‘Customer to Customer’’ Orders. Currently, the Exchange offers members rebates in QCC and/or other solicited crossing orders (including ‘‘Customer to Customer’’ Orders), i.e. orders executed in the Solicitation, 3 The term ‘‘Priority Customer’’ means a person or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) does not place more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s). 4 ‘‘Non-‘Customer to Customer’ Orders’’ are QCC and/or other solicited crossing orders, including solicited orders executed in the Solicitation, Facilitation or Price Improvement Mechanisms, and excluding ‘‘Customer to Customer’’ Orders. E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 229 (Monday, November 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74819-74822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30245]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76510; File No. SR-DTC-2015-011]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Regarding the Acknowledgment 
of End-of-Day Net-Net Settlement Balances by Settling Banks

November 23, 2015.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on November 16, 2015, The Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed 
rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have 
been prepared by DTC. DTC filed the proposed rule change pursuant to 
section 19(b)(2) \3\ of the Act thereunder. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the 
Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change would amend the DTC Settlement Service 
Guide (``Guide'') to provide that any Settling Bank that does not 
affirmatively acknowledge by the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time (as defined 
below) its end-of-day net-net settlement balance \4\ or notify DTC of 
its refusal to settle for one or more Participants for which it is the 
designated Settling Bank, would be deemed to have acknowledged its end-
of-day net-net settlement balance.\5\ DTC would also make other changes 
to the Guide as set forth below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The end-of-day net-net settlement balance for each Settling 
Bank reflects (i) a net credit amount due to the Settling Bank from 
DTC, (ii) a net debit amount due from the Settling Bank to DTC, or 
(iii) a zero balance so that no payment is due to or from the 
Settling Bank. In accordance with the timeframes set forth in the 
Guide, DTC's end-of-day funds settlement process begins with the 
posting by DTC of ``final settlement figures'' at approximately 3:45 
p.m. each Business Day unless extended.
    \5\ Terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning set 
forth in the DTC Rules (the ``Rules''), available at https://www.dtcc.com/legal/rules-and-procedures.aspx.>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, DTC included statements 
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. DTC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, 
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to mitigate a risk to 
DTC in settlement relating to a Settling Bank's failure to take the 
action required to acknowledge its end-of-day net-net settlement 
balance, or notify DTC of a refusal to settle for any Participant for 
which it is the designated Settling Bank, by the Acknowledgment Cutoff 
Time (as defined below).
Background
    The DTC end-of-day net settlement structure depends upon the use of 
Settling Banks.\6\ Each Participant must designate a Settling Bank to 
settle on its behalf. Any Participant that is a bank may settle for 
itself.\7\ Today, a Settling Bank that settles for other Participants 
must acknowledge its end-of-day net-net settlement balance for the 
group of Participants for which it settles, or notify DTC if it refuses 
to settle for any Participant for which it is the designated Settling 
Bank, by the later of 4:15 p.m. and the time that is 30 minutes after 
the Settling Bank end-of-day net-net settlement balances are first made 
available by DTC (``Acknowledgment Cutoff Time'').\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See the Guide at pp. 17-18, available at https://
www.dtcc.com/~/media/Files/Downloads/legal/service-guides/
Settlement.pdf for an overview of the end-of-day net settlement 
process.
    \7\ See Rule 9(B), supra note 5.
    \8\ Currently, a Settling Bank that settles only for itself may 
opt out of the requirement to acknowledge its balance, but it cannot 
refuse to settle for itself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If a Settling Bank notifies DTC that it refuses to settle for a 
Participant, DTC would recalculate the Settling Bank's net-net 
settlement balance by excluding the net settlement balance of the 
Participant for which the Settling Bank refused to settle.\9\ DTC would 
then provide the Settling Bank with its adjusted net-net settlement 
balance (``Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance''). The Settling Bank may not 
refuse to settle for any other Participant on that day and must 
immediately respond to DTC to acknowledge its Post-Refusal Adjusted 
Balance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Any Participant for which its designated Settling Bank has 
refused to settle on its behalf remains obligated to DTC for the 
payment of any net debit balance and must make another arrangement 
to timely pay that amount by Fedwire.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time and any adjustments, DTC will 
prepare and submit to the National Settlement Service (``NSS'') 
provided by the Federal Reserve Banks (individually and collectively, 
the ``Fed'') a file (``NSS File'') reflecting the net debits or credits 
from and to all Settling Banks. NSS will process a debit or credit of 
each Settling Bank's Fed account (``Fed Account''), as applicable.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Guide currently provides that if NSS is unavailable 
then, if instructed by DTC, Settling Banks in a net-net debit 
balance must remit payments to DTC via Fedwire by the later of 5:00 
p.m. or 1 hour after net settlement balances are first made 
available. This provision would be clarified to note an operational 
detail that all such payments must be remitted prior to the close of 
Fedwire.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Today, failure of a Settling Bank to timely respond to DTC after 
posting of final settlement figures creates uncertainty with respect to 
timely completion of settlement at DTC. The proposed rule change is 
intended to address this issue as discussed below.
Proposal
    To promote settlement certainty, DTC is proposing to treat a 
Settling Bank that fails to timely provide its affirmative 
acknowledgement of its end-of-day net-net settlement balance or notify 
DTC of its refusal to settle for one or more Participants for which it 
is the designated Settling Bank, as having been deemed to acknowledge 
its end-of-day net-net settlement balance.
    DTC proposes to modify the Guide to provide that a Settling Bank 
that (i) fails to affirmatively acknowledge its end-of-day net-net 
settlement balance, or (ii) does not notify DTC of its refusal to 
settle on behalf of a Participant or Participants for which it is the 
designated Settling Bank, by the Acknowledgement Cutoff Time, would be 
deemed to have acknowledged its end-of-day net-net settlement 
balance.\11\

[[Page 74820]]

The Settling Bank's balance would then, in the ordinary course of 
settlement processing, be debited from or credited to its Fed Account 
through the NSS process. Likewise, DTC proposes that the Guide provide 
that a Settling Bank that fails to acknowledge immediately upon receipt 
its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance, if any, would be deemed to have 
acknowledged its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance and the Post-Refusal 
Adjusted Balance would then, in the ordinary course of settlement 
processing, be debited from or credited to its designated Fed Account 
through the NSS process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ DTC would provide reminders to Settling Banks when they 
have not affirmatively acknowledged their settlement balance. 
Notwithstanding delivery of reminders, once a Settling Bank is 
deemed to have acknowledged its balance, it may not notify DTC of a 
refusal to settle for a Participant for which it is the designated 
Settling Bank.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DTC would continue to maintain flexibility and allow for a Settling 
Bank to request extra time if the Settling Bank has a reason that it 
cannot affirmatively acknowledge or refuse its net-net settlement 
balance so long as the Settling Bank notifies DTC accordingly at or 
before the Acknowledgement Cutoff Time, or, in the case of a Post-
Refusal Adjusted Balance, it notifies DTC immediately where it is 
unable to affirmatively acknowledge its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance. 
In this regard, the Guide would be updated to clarify that the Settling 
Bank is required to notify DTC of its request for extra time via a 
dedicated DTC Settlement phone ``hotline'' prior to the Acknowledgment 
Cutoff Time. In the event that DTC provides the Settling Bank with a 
Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance, the Settling Bank would be required to 
notify DTC of its request for extra time immediately via the hotline. 
Any Settling Bank that timely complies with this notification 
requirement would not be deemed to have acknowledged its net-net 
Settlement Balance or its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ If the problem is due to a connectivity issue with DTC, DTC 
may then direct the Settling Bank to submit its acknowledgement/
refusal instruction via email or as otherwise specified by DTC at 
that time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If, after the initial release of final settlement figures, a 
Settling Bank's net-net settlement balance is adjusted for any reason, 
other than as a result of the Settling Bank's refusal to settle, then 
the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time for that Settling Bank would be extended 
to 30 minutes after DTC advises the Settling Bank of the adjusted net-
net settlement balance.
    DTC would attempt to contact the Settling Bank if DTC does not 
receive a response in the form of (i) an acknowledgment or refusal 
prior to the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time, (ii) an immediate 
acknowledgment of a Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance, or (iii) a 
notification from the Settling Bank that it cannot acknowledge or 
refuse, as described in the preceding paragraph.\13\ If DTC is able to 
contact the Settling Bank and the Settling Bank notifies DTC that it 
cannot, at that time, acknowledge or refuse its net-net settlement 
balance, or Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance, as applicable, then the 
Settling Bank would not be deemed to have acknowledged its net-net 
settlement balance. However, if the Settling Bank cannot be reached, 
the Settling Bank would be deemed to have acknowledged its net-net 
settlement balance or Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance, as applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ DTC uses the most recent contact information provided by 
the Settling Bank to its DTC Relationship Manager for this purpose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DTC would update the Guide to clarify that each Settling Bank must 
ensure that it maintains accurate contact details with DTC so that DTC 
may contact the Settling Bank regarding settlement issues. Settling 
Banks must update any contact details by contacting their DTC 
Relationship Manager.
    The Fed's cutoff for NSS processing, unless extended, is 5:30 p.m. 
In order to facilitate timely processing of the NSS File, DTC would 
maintain discretion to exclude a Settling Bank's balance from the NSS 
File if the Settling Bank (i) (A) does not acknowledge its net-net 
settlement balance by the Acknowledgment Cutoff Time, or (B) does not 
immediately acknowledge its Post-Refusal Adjusted Balance; and (ii) is 
not deemed to have acknowledged its net-net settlement balance or Post-
Refusal Adjusted Balance because it has notified DTC that it is unable 
to affirmatively acknowledge its net-net settlement balance or to 
refuse to settle on behalf of a Participant. If DTC proceeds to process 
the NSS File excluding the Settling Bank's debit balance, then the 
Settling Bank must pay the debit balance via Fedwire. If DTC proceeds 
to process the NSS File excluding the Settling Bank's credit balance, 
then DTC would pay the credit balance via Fedwire after the Settling 
Bank acknowledges its settlement balance.
    The text of the Guide would also state that a Settling Bank which 
settles on behalf of others that timely notifies DTC that it cannot 
acknowledge or refuse its end-of-day net-net settlement balance would 
not be assessed a flat fee for failure to acknowledge or notify DTC of 
its refusal to settle. However, such a Settling Bank would be charged 
interest with respect to any borrowing DTC is required to make to 
complete settlement that day for any Participant that the Settling Bank 
settles on behalf of, if the Settling Bank has not timely refused to 
settle for that Participant.
    Additionally, DTC would revise the Guide to:
    (i) clarify that it is DTC's Settlement Operations group that 
controls and coordinates the settling of Participant and Settling Bank 
accounts on DTC's systems;
    (ii) define the Federal Reserve Banks individually and collectively 
within the Guide's text as the ``Fed'' unless indicated otherwise;
    (iii) clarify text for descriptive purposes, and consistent with 
the Rules, that Participants make formal arrangements for a Settling 
Bank to be designated as the Settling Bank to settle with DTC on the 
Participant's behalf;
    (iv) clarify that certain online reports DTC provides Participants 
and Settling Banks through the processing day reflect ``intraday'' 
gross debits and credits, and net debit and credit balances;
    (v) clarify that a Settling Bank's end-of-day net-net settlement 
balance includes the Settling Bank's own settlement obligations as a 
Participant if it settles for itself;
    (vi) add text for the purpose of context, consistent with the 
Rules, that each Participant is obligated to settle timely with DTC and 
if its Settling Bank refuses to settle for it then it must make 
alternative arrangements to make payment to DTC via Fedwire, [sic]
    (vii) add text for the purpose of context, consistent with the 
Rules, that a Participant that acts as its own Settling Bank may not 
refuse to settle for itself and that it will be in default if it does 
not fund its settlement obligation;
    (viii) for clarity, change the heading to an existing example of 
how a Settling Bank's settlement balance is calculated from 
``Settlement Example'' to ``Example of the Calculation of a DTC 
Settling Bank's Net-Net Settlement Balance'';
    (ix) remove the provision from the Guide indicating that that a 
Settling Bank that settles only for itself would need to affirmatively 
opt out in order to not be required to affirmatively acknowledge its 
settlement balance, and add text simply stating that a Settling Bank 
that settles only for itself would not be required to acknowledge its 
settlement balance;
    (x) clarify the interest charged to Participants for a failure to 
settle;
    (xi) delete references to a Settling Bank's failure to timely 
settle its settlement balance from being referred to as a ``failure to 
settle'' and remove references to related procedures as being 
``failure-to-settle'' procedures, as the terminology could be confused 
with an individual Participant's failure to meet its settlement 
obligation;

[[Page 74821]]

    (xii) rewrite text in the Guide in light of the proposed changes, 
as applicable, including Addendum A of the Guide, to incorporate 
proposed changes, consolidate text, clarify text for readability and 
eliminate duplication;
    (xiii) clarify certain Settling Bank and settlement processing 
timeframes;
    (xiv) apply initial capitalization as appropriate for the terms 
``Participant'' and ``Settling Bank'' where they are used as defined 
terms;
    (xv) remove references to Participant Terminal System (PTS) 
functions, which are no longer used for DTC settlement processing; and
    (xvi) insert the title of the Guide on the Guide's front page.
Implementation
    The effective date of the proposed rule change would be announced 
via a DTC Important Notice.
2. Statutory Basis
    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) \14\ of the Act requires that the rules of the 
clearing agency be designed, inter alia, to promote the prompt and 
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. DTC 
believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with this 
provision of the Act because the proposed rule change would reduce 
delays in the settlement process by allowing DTC to collect net debits 
and release net credits within scheduled timeframes despite the failure 
of a Settling Bank to affirmatively acknowledge its end-of-day net-net 
settlement balance or notify DTC of its refusal to settle for a 
Participant for which it is the designated Settling Bank on a timely 
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 17Ad-22(d)(5) \15\ promulgated under the Act requires, inter 
alia, that a clearing agency establish, implement, maintain and enforce 
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to, as applicable, 
employ money settlement arrangements that eliminate or strictly limit 
the clearing agency's settlement bank risks, that is, its credit and 
liquidity risks from the use of banks to effect money settlements with 
its participants; and require funds transfers to the clearing agency to 
be final when effected. DTC believes the proposed rule change is 
consistent with this provision because it would reduce DTC's credit and 
liquidity risk by mitigating the risk that end-of-day net-net debit 
settlement balances would not be paid due to the failure of a Settling 
Bank to respond to DTC after posting of final settlement figures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    DTC does not believe that the proposed rule change would have any 
impact, or impose any burden, on competition because the proposed rule 
change applies to all Settling Banks and would not have an impact on 
Settling Banks' current ability to timely acknowledge their net-net 
settlement balances or notify DTC of a refusal to settle on behalf of a 
Participant.

(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change 
Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    DTC filed a substantially similar proposed rule change on April 15, 
2015 (``April Rule Filing''),\16\ which was subsequently withdrawn.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74830 (April 29, 2015), 
80 FR 25727 (May 5, 2015) (File No. SR-DTC-2015-003).
    \17\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74380 (July 7, 2015), 
80 FR 40116 (July 13, 2015) (File No. SR-DTC-2015-003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission received a favorable written comment to the April 
Rule Filing.\18\ DTC also received written comments in connection with 
the April Rule Filing from a Participant that is a Settling Bank for 
other Participants. The Participant commented to the effect that it was 
expecting, but the April Rule Filing did not clearly state, that a 
Settling Bank (i) will be granted an extension to acknowledge its net-
net settlement balance whenever it is requested prior to DTC processing 
the NSS File, and (ii) will not be charged a fee in situations where 
such an extension has been requested. In order to fully consider these 
comments DTC withdrew the April Rule Filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Letter from Suzanne Shatto (May 3, 2015), available at 
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-dtc-2015-003/dtc2015003.shtml.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to (i) above, in order to avoid wider disruption to 
the DTC settlement process and the industry, DTC must have the 
discretion to promptly complete settlement for the Settling Banks that 
have timely acknowledged or have been deemed to have acknowledged their 
respective net-net settlement balances. Therefore, although DTC can 
grant limited extensions, DTC cannot grant an indefinite extension to a 
Settling Bank to acknowledge its balance prior to DTC processing the 
NSS File.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ As stated above, DTC would maintain flexibility to allow 
for a Settling Bank to request extra time if the Settling Bank 
cannot affirmatively acknowledge or refuse, so long as the Settling 
Bank promptly notifies DTC at or before the Acknowledgement Cutoff 
Time or upon receipt of an Adjusted Balance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to (ii) above, the proposed rule change adds text to 
the Guide so that a Settling Bank that timely notifies DTC that it 
cannot acknowledge or refuse its net-net settlement balance will not be 
charged a flat fee for failure to acknowledge its balance. However the 
Settling Bank may be charged interest.
    To the extent any additional written comments are received by DTC 
on the proposed rule change, DTC will forward them to the Commission.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the 
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be 
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or 
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change 
should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-DTC-2015-011 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-DTC-2015-011. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements

[[Page 74822]]

with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the 
Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of DTC and on DTCC's Web site 
(https://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings.aspx). All comments received 
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal 
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-DTC-2015-011 and should be submitted on 
or before December 21, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-30245 Filed 11-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.