Occupational Safety and Health Research and Related Activities: Removal of Regulations Regarding Administrative Functions, Practices, and Procedures, 73667-73669 [2015-29827]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 227 / Wednesday, November 25, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
under the legal framework provided by
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Section
408 of the Federal Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), which allows
EPA to assess the risk of pesticides and
set tolerance levels for those pesticides
on food commodities as deemed
necessary to protect human health while
still providing tools for growers so that
they can meet the ever-growing food
demands of this country and others.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of saflufenacil, (2-chloro-5[3,6-dihydro-3-methyl-2,6-dioxo-4(trifluoromethyl)-1(2H)-pyrimidinyl]-4fluoro-N-[[methyl(1methylethyl)amino]sulfonyl]benzamide)
and its metabolites, in or on
pomegranate at 0.03 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Nov 24, 2015
Jkt 238001
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 17, 2015.
Susan Lewis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
73667
§ 180.649 Saflufenacil; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * * (1) * * *
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
Pomegranate ........................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
0.03
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–29889 Filed 11–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 80
[Docket No. CDC–2015–0062; NIOSH–286]
RIN 0920–AA55
Occupational Safety and Health
Research and Related Activities:
Removal of Regulations Regarding
Administrative Functions, Practices,
and Procedures
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
With this action, the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) removes its regulations
pertaining to fees for direct training in
occupational safety and health
conducted by the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) in the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC). As a part
of the retrospective review conducted
by all Federal agencies, HHS has
determined that these regulations are no
longer in use by NIOSH and should be
removed.
DATES: This rule is effective on
November 25, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Weiss, Program Analyst, 1090
Tusculum Ave., MS: C–46, Cincinnati,
OH 45226; telephone (855)818–1629
(this is a toll-free number); email
NIOSHregs@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
I. Public Participation
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
In a notice of proposed rulemaking
published on August 13, 2015 (80 FR
48473), HHS invited interested persons
or organizations to submit written
views, recommendations, and data
regarding the removal of part 80. We
received no comments on this rule.
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.649, add alphabetically the
entry to the table in paragraph (a)(1) to
read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
73668
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 227 / Wednesday, November 25, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
II. Statutory Authority
HHS promulgated part 80 of title 42
to facilitate Section 21(a)(1) of the
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH)
Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 670(a)(1)), which
authorizes the Director of NIOSH to
conduct educational programs to
provide an adequate supply of qualified
personnel to carry out the purposes of
the OSH Act. Part 80 established tuition
fees for such training, as authorized by
31 U.S.C. 483a (31 U.S.C. 9701, as
revised by Public Law 97–258,
September 13, 1982), which permits
agencies to ‘‘prescribe regulations
establishing the charge for service or
thing of value provided by the agency.’’
In accordance with section 6 of
Executive Order 13563, HHS conducted
a retrospective analysis of its existing
rules, determined Part 80 to be obsolete,
and is hereby removing Part 80 from
Title 42.
is entirely administrative and does not
affect the economic impact, cost, or
policies of any activities authorized by
title 42, HHS has not prepared an
economic analysis and the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has not
reviewed this rulemaking.
III. Summary of Final Rule
The provisions in Part 80 establish the
NIOSH policies with respect to the
charging of fees for direct training in
occupational safety and health. Because
NIOSH no longer offers direct training
programs, these provisions are no longer
needed. Removing Part 80 from Title 42
will have no effect on NIOSH
procedures or practices, including the
NIOSH funding of the Education and
Research Centers for Occupational
Safety and Health. This action is being
done in accordance with Executive
Order 13563, section 6, which requires
that Federal agencies conduct
retrospective analyses of existing rules.
In conducting the analysis, HHS
discovered that the Part 80 provisions
were outdated.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., requires an
agency to invite public comment on,
and to obtain OMB approval of, any
regulation that requires 10 or more
people to report information to the
agency or to keep certain records. This
rule does not contain any information
collection requirements; thus, HHS has
determined that the PRA does not apply
to this rule.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
IV. Regulatory Assessment
Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
This final rule has been determined
not to be a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866.
With this action, HHS is removing part
80 from title 42. Because this final rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Nov 24, 2015
Jkt 238001
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires each
agency to consider the potential impact
of its regulations on small entities
including small businesses, small
governmental units, and small not-forprofit organizations. Because no
substantive changes will be made to 42
CFR part 80 as a result of this action,
HHS certifies that this rule has ‘‘no
significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities’’
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
D. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
As required by Congress under the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq.), HHS reported the promulgation of
this rule to Congress prior to its effective
date.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) directs agencies to assess the
effects of Federal regulatory actions on
State, local, and Tribal governments,
and the private sector ‘‘other than to the
extent that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in
law.’’ For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, this final rule
does not include any Federal mandate
that may result in increased annual
expenditures in excess of $100 million
by State, local or Tribal governments in
the aggregate, or by the private sector.
F. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice)
This final rule has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice Reform,’’
and will not unduly burden the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
court system. This rule has been
reviewed carefully to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguities.
G. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
HHS has reviewed this final rule in
accordance with Executive Order 13132
regarding federalism, and has
determined that it does not have
‘‘federalism implications.’’ The rule
does not ‘‘have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks)
In accordance with Executive Order
13045, HHS has evaluated the
environmental health and safety effects
of this final rule on children. HHS has
determined that the rule would have no
environmental health and safety effect
on children.
I. Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use)
In accordance with Executive Order
13211, HHS has evaluated the effects of
this final rule on energy supply,
distribution or use, and has determined
that the rule will not have a significant
adverse effect.
J. Plain Writing Act of 2010
Under Public Law 111–274 (October
13, 2010), executive Departments and
Agencies are required to use plain
language in documents that explain to
the public how to comply with a
requirement the Federal Government
administers or enforces. HHS has
attempted to use plain language in
promulgating the final rule consistent
with the Federal Plain Writing Act
guidelines.
Final Rule
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble and under the authorities 29
U.S.C. 671, 31 U.S.C. 9701, and 42
U.S.C. 216(b), the Department of Health
and Human Services amends 42 CFR
chapter I by removing part 80.
PART 80—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
■
1. Remove and reserve part 80.
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 227 / Wednesday, November 25, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: November 16, 2015.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–29827 Filed 11–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 64
[Docket ID FEMA–2015–0001; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–8411]
Suspension of Community Eligibility
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule identifies
communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) that are scheduled for
suspension on the effective dates listed
within this rule because of
noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the
program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives
documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain
management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this
rule, the suspension will not occur and
a notice of this will be provided by
publication in the Federal Register on a
subsequent date. Also, information
identifying the current participation
status of a community can be obtained
from FEMA’s Community Status Book
(CSB). The CSB is available at https://
www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm.
DATES: The effective date of each
community’s scheduled suspension is
the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) listed in the
third column of the following tables.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended
on the suspension date or for further
information, contact Patricia Suber,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP
enables property owners to purchase
Federal flood insurance that is not
otherwise generally available from
private insurers. In return, communities
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Nov 24, 2015
Jkt 238001
agree to adopt and administer local
floodplain management measures aimed
at protecting lives and new construction
from future flooding. Section 1315 of
the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022,
prohibits the sale of NFIP flood
insurance unless an appropriate public
body adopts adequate floodplain
management measures with effective
enforcement measures. The
communities listed in this document no
longer meet that statutory requirement
for compliance with program
regulations, 44 CFR part 59.
Accordingly, the communities will be
suspended on the effective date in the
third column. As of that date, flood
insurance will no longer be available in
the community. We recognize that some
of these communities may adopt and
submit the required documentation of
legally enforceable floodplain
management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual
suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue
to be eligible for the sale of NFIP flood
insurance. A notice withdrawing the
suspension of such communities will be
published in the Federal Register.
In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
identifies the Special Flood Hazard
Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
The date of the FIRM, if one has been
published, is indicated in the fourth
column of the table. No direct Federal
financial assistance (except assistance
pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act not in connection with a
flood) may be provided for construction
or acquisition of buildings in identified
SFHAs for communities not
participating in the NFIP and identified
for more than a year on FEMA’s initial
FIRM for the community as having
flood-prone areas (section 202(a) of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973,
42 U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This
prohibition against certain types of
Federal assistance becomes effective for
the communities listed on the date
shown in the last column. The
Administrator finds that notice and
public comment procedures under 5
U.S.C. 553(b), are impracticable and
unnecessary because communities listed
in this final rule have been adequately
notified.
Each community receives 6-month,
90-day, and 30-day notification letters
addressed to the Chief Executive Officer
stating that the community will be
suspended unless the required
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73669
floodplain management measures are
met prior to the effective suspension
date. Since these notifications were
made, this final rule may take effect
within less than 30 days.
National Environmental Policy Act.
This rule is categorically excluded from
the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
Environmental Considerations. No
environmental impact assessment has
been prepared.
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
Administrator has determined that this
rule is exempt from the requirements of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act because
the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, as amended, Section 1315, 42
U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance
coverage unless an appropriate public
body adopts adequate floodplain
management measures with effective
enforcement measures. The
communities listed no longer comply
with the statutory requirements, and
after the effective date, flood insurance
will no longer be available in the
communities unless remedial action
takes place.
Regulatory Classification. This final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
under the criteria of section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993, Regulatory Planning and Review,
58 FR 51735.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This rule involves no policies that have
federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule meets the applicable
standards of Executive Order 12988.
Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule
does not involve any collection of
information for purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.
List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64
Flood insurance, Floodplains.
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is
amended as follows:
PART 64—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 64
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp.; p. 376.
§ 64.6
[Amended]
2. The tables published under the
authority of § 64.6 are amended as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 227 (Wednesday, November 25, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73667-73669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29827]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 80
[Docket No. CDC-2015-0062; NIOSH-286]
RIN 0920-AA55
Occupational Safety and Health Research and Related Activities:
Removal of Regulations Regarding Administrative Functions, Practices,
and Procedures
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: With this action, the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) removes its regulations pertaining to fees for direct training in
occupational safety and health conducted by the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC). As a part of the retrospective review
conducted by all Federal agencies, HHS has determined that these
regulations are no longer in use by NIOSH and should be removed.
DATES: This rule is effective on November 25, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Weiss, Program Analyst, 1090
Tusculum Ave., MS: C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226; telephone (855)818-1629
(this is a toll-free number); email NIOSHregs@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
In a notice of proposed rulemaking published on August 13, 2015 (80
FR 48473), HHS invited interested persons or organizations to submit
written views, recommendations, and data regarding the removal of part
80. We received no comments on this rule.
[[Page 73668]]
II. Statutory Authority
HHS promulgated part 80 of title 42 to facilitate Section 21(a)(1)
of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C.
670(a)(1)), which authorizes the Director of NIOSH to conduct
educational programs to provide an adequate supply of qualified
personnel to carry out the purposes of the OSH Act. Part 80 established
tuition fees for such training, as authorized by 31 U.S.C. 483a (31
U.S.C. 9701, as revised by Public Law 97-258, September 13, 1982),
which permits agencies to ``prescribe regulations establishing the
charge for service or thing of value provided by the agency.'' In
accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13563, HHS conducted a
retrospective analysis of its existing rules, determined Part 80 to be
obsolete, and is hereby removing Part 80 from Title 42.
III. Summary of Final Rule
The provisions in Part 80 establish the NIOSH policies with respect
to the charging of fees for direct training in occupational safety and
health. Because NIOSH no longer offers direct training programs, these
provisions are no longer needed. Removing Part 80 from Title 42 will
have no effect on NIOSH procedures or practices, including the NIOSH
funding of the Education and Research Centers for Occupational Safety
and Health. This action is being done in accordance with Executive
Order 13563, section 6, which requires that Federal agencies conduct
retrospective analyses of existing rules. In conducting the analysis,
HHS discovered that the Part 80 provisions were outdated.
IV. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This final rule has been determined not to be a ``significant
regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866. With this action,
HHS is removing part 80 from title 42. Because this final rule is
entirely administrative and does not affect the economic impact, cost,
or policies of any activities authorized by title 42, HHS has not
prepared an economic analysis and the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has not reviewed this rulemaking.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
requires each agency to consider the potential impact of its
regulations on small entities including small businesses, small
governmental units, and small not-for-profit organizations. Because no
substantive changes will be made to 42 CFR part 80 as a result of this
action, HHS certifies that this rule has ``no significant economic
impact upon a substantial number of small entities'' within the meaning
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., requires
an agency to invite public comment on, and to obtain OMB approval of,
any regulation that requires 10 or more people to report information to
the agency or to keep certain records. This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements; thus, HHS has determined that the
PRA does not apply to this rule.
D. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
As required by Congress under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), HHS reported
the promulgation of this rule to Congress prior to its effective date.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.) directs agencies to assess the effects of Federal regulatory
actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, and the private sector
``other than to the extent that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in law.'' For purposes of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, this final rule does not include any
Federal mandate that may result in increased annual expenditures in
excess of $100 million by State, local or Tribal governments in the
aggregate, or by the private sector.
F. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice)
This final rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform,'' and will not unduly
burden the Federal court system. This rule has been reviewed carefully
to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguities.
G. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
HHS has reviewed this final rule in accordance with Executive Order
13132 regarding federalism, and has determined that it does not have
``federalism implications.'' The rule does not ``have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks)
In accordance with Executive Order 13045, HHS has evaluated the
environmental health and safety effects of this final rule on children.
HHS has determined that the rule would have no environmental health and
safety effect on children.
I. Executive Order 13211 (Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use)
In accordance with Executive Order 13211, HHS has evaluated the
effects of this final rule on energy supply, distribution or use, and
has determined that the rule will not have a significant adverse
effect.
J. Plain Writing Act of 2010
Under Public Law 111-274 (October 13, 2010), executive Departments
and Agencies are required to use plain language in documents that
explain to the public how to comply with a requirement the Federal
Government administers or enforces. HHS has attempted to use plain
language in promulgating the final rule consistent with the Federal
Plain Writing Act guidelines.
Final Rule
For the reasons discussed in the preamble and under the authorities
29 U.S.C. 671, 31 U.S.C. 9701, and 42 U.S.C. 216(b), the Department of
Health and Human Services amends 42 CFR chapter I by removing part 80.
PART 80--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
0
1. Remove and reserve part 80.
[[Page 73669]]
Dated: November 16, 2015.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2015-29827 Filed 11-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
