Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From China and India; Determinations, 68878 [2015-28301]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
68878
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 215 / Friday, November 6, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Varidesk LLC,
117 Wrangler Drive, Coppell, TX 75019.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Brunswick Corp., Life Fitness Division,
1 North Field Court, Lake Forest, IL
60045–4811.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 3, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
17:21 Nov 05, 2015
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
China and India; Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930, that revocation of the
countervailing duty order on carbazole
violet pigment 23 from India and
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on carbazole violet pigment 23
from China and India would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews
on April 1, 2015 (80 FR 17943) and
determined on July 6, 2015 that it would
conduct expedited reviews (80 FR
43119, July 21, 2015).
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed
its determinations in these reviews on
November 2, 2015. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4575 (November 2015),
entitled Carbazole Violet Pigment 23
from China and India: Investigation
Nos. 701±TA±437 and 731±TA±1060±
1061 (Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 2, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–28301 Filed 11–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1121–0259]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Extension
Without Change, of a Previously
Approved Collection: Public Safety
Officer Medal of Valor
Bureau of Justice Assistance,
Department of Justice.
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Jkt 238001
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60-day notice.
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs,
Bureau of Justice Assistance, will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until
January 5, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments on the
estimated burden to facilities covered by
the standards to comply with the
regulation’s reporting requirements,
suggestions, or need additional
information, please contact Gregory Joy,
Program Analyst, Bureau of Justice
Assistance, 810 Seventh Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Bureau of Justice
Assistance, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether, and if so how, the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and/or
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
SUMMARY:
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–437 and 731–
TA–1060–1061 (Second Review)]
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2015–28328 Filed 11–5–15; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
ACTION:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor
(Pub. L. 107–12).
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The application process is managed
through the Internet, using the Office of
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 215 (Friday, November 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 68878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28301]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060-1061 (Second Review)]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From China and India; Determinations
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, that
revocation of the countervailing duty order on carbazole violet pigment
23 from India and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
carbazole violet pigment 23 from China and India would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in
the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on April 1, 2015 (80
FR 17943) and determined on July 6, 2015 that it would conduct
expedited reviews (80 FR 43119, July 21, 2015).
The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed
its determinations in these reviews on November 2, 2015. The views of
the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4575 (November 2015),
entitled Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India:
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060-1061 (Second Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 2, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-28301 Filed 11-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
