Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Spain, and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 59733-59734 [2015-25151]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Notices
manufacturer is, then the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recently completed segment of this
Weightedproceeding for the manufacturer of the
average
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
dumping
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
margin
(percent)
covered in this or any previous review
or the LTFV investigation, then the cash
0.00 deposit rate will be the ‘‘all-others’’ rate
of 15.67 percent established in the LTFV
0.00 investigation.6 These deposit rates,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
through February 28, 2014, are as
follows:
Producer/Exporter
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd ..............
Pacific Pipe Company Limited ....................................
Assessment Rates
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2) and the Final Modification
for Reviews,4 the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate
entries for Saha Thai and Pacific Pipe
without regard to antidumping duties.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003.5 This clarification applies
to entries of subject merchandise during
the POR produced by Saha Thai and
Pacific Pipe for which it did not know
its merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results
of administrative review for all
shipments of circular welded carbon
steel pipes and tubes from Thailand
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for Saha Thai and Pacific Pipe will
be 0.00 percent, the weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2)
for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less than fair value
(LTFV) investigation, but the
4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
5 For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:43 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
The Department is issuing and
publishing these final results of
administrative review in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: September 25, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–25168 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
6 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded
Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR
8341 (March 11, 1986).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59733
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–820, A–588–843, A–580–829, A–469–
807, A–583–828]
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy,
Japan, the Republic of Korea, Spain,
and Taiwan: Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
reviews, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty orders on
stainless steel wire rod (SSWR) from
Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea
(Korea), Spain, and Taiwan would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at the levels
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset
Reviews’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: October 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Bailey or Elizabeth Eastwood,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0193 or (202) 482–3874,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 1, 2015, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
third sunset reviews of the antidumping
duty orders on SSWR from Italy, Japan,
Korea, Spain, and Taiwan, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act).1 On May 15,
2015, the Department received a Notice
of Intent to Participate in these reviews
from Carpenter Technology Corporation
(Carpenter), a domestic interested party,
within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). Carpenter claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer
of a domestic-like product in the United
States. On June 1, 2015, we received a
complete substantive response for each
review from the domestic interested
party within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).2
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (’’Sunset’’) Reviews,
80 FR 24900 (May 1, 2015).
2 See June 1, 2015, letters from the petitioners
regarding ‘‘Five-Year (3rd Sunset) Review of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel Wire
Rod from Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan
Substantive Response.’’
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
59734
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Notices
We received no substantive responses
from respondent interested parties with
respect to any of the orders covered by
these sunset reviews, nor was a hearing
requested. As a result, pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the
Department is conducting expedited
(120-day) sunset reviews of these orders.
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping up to the
following weighted-average margin
percentages:
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to these
orders is SSWR. The products subject to
these orders are currently classifiable
under subheadings 7221.00.0005,
7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030,
7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of these
orders is dispositive.3
Italy ...........................................
Japan ........................................
Korea ........................................
Spain .........................................
Taiwan ......................................
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews,
including the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping in the event
of revocation and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the orders
were revoked, are addressed in the
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1),(2) and (3) of the Act, we
determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on SSWR from
Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
County
11.25
33.58
28.44
2.71
2.22
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: August 27, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to
Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–25151 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3A
full description of the scope of the orders is
contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy, Japan, the
Republic of Korea, Spain, and Taiwan’’ (Issues and
Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with
these results and hereby adopted by this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:43 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
[A–570–894]
Certain Tissue Paper Products From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Expedited Sunset Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty order on
certain tissue paper products (tissue
paper) from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Sunset Review’’ section of
this notice.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: October 2, 2015.
Terre Keaton
Stefanova or Brian Smith, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1280 or (202) 482–
1766, respectively.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 30, 2005, the Department
published the antidumping duty order
on tissue paper from the PRC.1 On June
1, 2015, the Department published the
notice of initiation of the second sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on tissue paper from the PRC pursuant
to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).2 On June
15, 2015, the Department received a
Notice of Intent to Participate in this
review from the following domestic
producers of tissue paper: Seaman Paper
Company of Massachusetts, Inc., Eagle
Tissue LLC, Flower City Tissue Mills
Co. and Garlock Printing & Converting
Inc. (collectively, ‘‘the petitioners’’),
within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioners claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers,
producers or wholesalers of a domestic
like product in the United States. On
June 30, 2015, we received a complete
substantive response from the
petitioners within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).3
We received no substantive responses
from any respondent interested parties.
As a result, pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Certain Tissue Paper Products From the
People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 16223 (March 30,
2005) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80
FR 31012 (June 1, 2015).
3 See June 30, 2015, letter from the petitioners
regarding ‘‘Certain Tissue Paper Products from the
People’s Republic of China: Substantive Response
to Notice of Initiation.’’
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59733-59734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25151]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-820, A-588-843, A-580-829, A-469-807, A-583-828]
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy, Japan, the Republic of
Korea, Spain, and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews
of the Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on stainless steel wire rod (SSWR) from Italy, Japan, the
Republic of Korea (Korea), Spain, and Taiwan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the
``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: October 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Bailey or Elizabeth Eastwood,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0193
or (202) 482-3874, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 1, 2015, the Department published the notice of initiation
of the third sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on SSWR from
Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan, pursuant to section 751(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\ On May 15, 2015, the
Department received a Notice of Intent to Participate in these reviews
from Carpenter Technology Corporation (Carpenter), a domestic
interested party, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). Carpenter claimed interested party status under
section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a manufacturer of a domestic-like
product in the United States. On June 1, 2015, we received a complete
substantive response for each review from the domestic interested party
within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\2\
[[Page 59734]]
We received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties
with respect to any of the orders covered by these sunset reviews, nor
was a hearing requested. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department is
conducting expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of these orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (''Sunset'') Reviews, 80 FR
24900 (May 1, 2015).
\2\ See June 1, 2015, letters from the petitioners regarding
``Five-Year (3rd Sunset) Review of the Antidumping Duty Orders on
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan
Substantive Response.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to these orders is SSWR. The products
subject to these orders are currently classifiable under subheadings
7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and
7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of these
orders is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A full description of the scope of the orders is contained
in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited
Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Stainless Steel
Wire Rod from Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Spain, and
Taiwan'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with
these results and hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews, including the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation and
the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the orders were
revoked, are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and
to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1),(2) and (3) of the
Act, we determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
SSWR from Italy, Japan, Korea, Spain, and Taiwan would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping up to the following
weighted-average margin percentages:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
County margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Italy...................................................... 11.25
Japan...................................................... 33.58
Korea...................................................... 28.44
Spain...................................................... 2.71
Taiwan..................................................... 2.22
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: August 27, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-25151 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
