Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Michigan State Board Requirements, 52399-52401 [2015-21426]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 168 / Monday, August 31, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the safety zone on the waters of Sister
Bay in Sister Bay, WI for the Sister Bay
Marinafest Fireworks. This zone will be
enforced from 8:15 p.m. until 10 p.m. on
each day of September 5 and 6, 2015.
This action is necessary and intended to
ensure safety of life on navigable waters
immediately prior to, during, and
immediately after the fireworks display.
During the aforementioned period, the
Coast Guard will enforce restrictions
upon, and control movement of, vessels
in the safety zone. No person or vessel
may enter the safety zone while it is
being enforced without permission of
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or a designated representative.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.929 will be enforced for safety zone
(f)(15), Table 165.929, from 8:15 p.m.
until 10 p.m. on each day of September
5 and 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this document,
call or email MST1 Joseph McCollum,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at
(414) 747–7148, email
joseph.p.mccollum@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the Sister Bay
Marinafest Fireworks safety zone listed
as item (f)(15) in Table 165.929 of 33
CFR 165.929. Section 165.929 lists
many annual events requiring safety
zones in the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan zone. This safety zone will
encompass all waters of Sister Bay
within an 800-foot radius of the launch
vessel in approximate position
45°11.585′ N., 087°07.392′ W. (NAD 83).
This zone will be enforced from 8:15
p.m. until 10 p.m. on each day of
September 5 and 6, 2015.
All vessels must obtain permission
from the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or the on-scene representative
to enter, move within, or exit the safety
zone. Requests must be made in
advance and approved by the Captain of
the Port before transits will be
authorized. Approvals will be granted
on a case by case basis. Vessels and
persons granted permission to enter the
safety zone must obey all lawful orders
or directions of the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or a designated
representative.
This document is issued under
authority of 33 CFR 165.929, Safety
Zones; Annual events requiring safety
zones in the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan zone, and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In
addition to this publication in the
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Aug 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
Federal Register, the Coast Guard will
provide the maritime community with
advance notification for the enforcement
of this zone via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners.
The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or an on-scene representative may be
contacted via Channel 16, VHF–FM.
Dated: August 14, 2015.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2015–21524 Filed 8–28–15; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0657; FRL–9933–
11—Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Michigan
State Board Requirements
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to its authority
under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is
taking final action to approve a state
implementation plan (SIP) submission
made by the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ)
intended to meet the state board
requirements under section 128 of the
CAA. The proposed rule associated with
this final action was published on June
24, 2015.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0657. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly-available only in hard
copy. Publicly-available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and
Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This
facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that
you telephone Sarah Arra at (312) 886–
9401 before visiting the Region 5 office.
SUMMARY:
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Arra, Environmental Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–9401,
arra.sarah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
52399
Sfmt 4700
I. What is the background for this
action?
Under section 128 of the CAA, each
SIP must contain provisions that
address two requirements: (i) That any
board or body which approves permits
or enforcement orders under this
chapter shall have at least a majority of
members who represent the public
interest and do not derive any
significant portion of their income from
persons subject to permits and
enforcement orders under this chapter,
and (ii) that any potential conflicts of
interest by members of such board or
body or the head of an executive agency
with similar powers be adequately
disclosed. To comply with this statutory
provision, MDEQ submitted rules from
the Civil Service Rule at 2–8.3(a)(1) for
incorporation into the SIP, pursuant to
section 128 of the CAA. EPA’s June 24,
2015, proposed rulemaking (see 80 FR
36306 at 36312) details how these rules
satisfy the applicable requirements of
section 128. EPA did not receive any
comments regarding its proposal to
approve Michigan’s state board
provisions.
II. What action is EPA taking?
For the reasons discussed in our June
24, 2015, proposed rulemaking, EPA is
taking final action to approve MDEQ’s
submissions addressing the state board
requirements under section 128 of the
CAA. The specific rule that we are
approving as satisfying these
requirements is Civil Service Rule at
2–8.3(a)(1). It should be noted that our
June 24, 2015, rulemaking contained
proposed actions for various additional
MDEQ submissions. This final
rulemaking, however, is limited only to
the state board requirements under
section 128 of the CAA.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
52400
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 168 / Monday, August 31, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
by reference of the Michigan
Regulations described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these documents generally
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the appropriate EPA office (see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by October 30, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 19, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.1170, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by adding a new entry
at the end of the section entitled ‘‘State
Statutes’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1170
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MICHIGAN REGULATIONS
Michigan citation
*
State effective
date
Title
*
*
*
Comments
EPA approval date
*
*
*
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
State Statutes
*
*
Michigan Civil Service Commission
Rule 2–8.3(a)(1).
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
Disclosures .......................................
*
13:58 Aug 28, 2015
*
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
*
10/1/2013
*
*
8/31/2015 [insert Federal Register
citation]
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
*
31AUR1
*
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 168 / Monday, August 31, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–21426 Filed 8–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0616; FRL–9931–35–
Region–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New Mexico;
Revisions to the New Source Review
(NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP)
for Albuquerque-Bernalillo County;
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) Permitting
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving two
revisions to the New Mexico State
Implementation Plan (SIP) to update the
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) SIP permitting program consistent
with federal requirements. New Mexico
submitted the Albuquerque-Bernalillo
County PSD SIP permitting revisions on
July 26, 2013, and June 11, 2015, which
includes a request for parallel
processing of the submitted 2015
revisions. These submittals contain
revisions to address the requirements of
the EPA’s May 2008, July 2010, and
October 2012 PM2.5 PSD
Implementation Rules and to
incorporate revisions consistent with
the EPA’s March 2011 Fugitives Interim
Rule, July 2011 Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
Biomass Deferral Rule, and July 2012
GHG Tailoring Rule Step 3 and GHG
PALs Rule. The EPA finds that these
revisions to the New Mexico SIP meet
the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or
CAA) and EPA regulations, and are
consistent with EPA policies. We are
taking this action under section 110 and
part C of title I of the Act. The EPA is
not approving these rules within the
exterior boundaries of a reservation or
other areas within any Tribal Nation’s
jurisdiction.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0616. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Aug 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley Mohr, 214–665–7289,
mohr.ashley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
I. Background
The background for today’s action is
discussed in detail in our May 20, 2015
proposal (80 FR 28901). In that notice,
we proposed to approve portions of SIP
submittals for the State of New Mexico
submitted on July 26, 2013, and March
4, 2015, that contained revisions to the
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County PSD
program. The March 4, 2015 submittal
included a request for parallel
processing of the submitted 2015
revisions, meaning that the EPA
proposed approval of a rule that was not
yet finalized at the local level. Our May
20, 2015 proposed approval and
accompanying Technical Support
Document (TSD) provided the EPA’s
evaluation of the March 4, 2015
revisions to the New Mexico SIP. We
preliminarily determined that the
revisions were consistent with the CAA
and the EPA’s regulations and guidance.
As such, we proposed approval of the
SIP revisions contained in the March 4,
2015 submittal.
Under the EPA’s ‘‘parallel processing’’
procedure, the EPA proposes a
rulemaking action on proposed SIP
revisions concurrently with the State or
Local Agency’s public review process. If
the proposed SIP revision is not
significantly or substantively changed,
the EPA will finalize the rulemaking on
the SIP revision as proposed after
responding to any submitted comments.
Final rulemaking action by the EPA will
occur only after the final SIP revision
has been fully adopted by the State or
Local Agency and submitted formally to
the EPA for approval as a SIP revision.
See 40 CFR part 51, Appendix V.
The City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo
County completed their rulemaking
process, and the Albuquerque-Bernalillo
County Air Quality Control Board
adopted revisions to the PSD program
on April 30, 2015. These adopted
changes were submitted as a revision to
the New Mexico SIP on June 11, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52401
The EPA has evaluated the final SIP
revision submittal for any changes made
from the time of proposal. See
‘‘Addendum to the TSD’’ for EPA–R06–
OAR–2013–0616, available in the
rulemaking docket. Our evaluation
indicates that adopted changes to the
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County PSD
program are the same as the revisions
that we proposed to approve; and
therefore, do not alter our rationale
presented in the May 20, 2015 proposed
approval. As such, the EPA is
proceeding with our final approval of
the revisions to the New Mexico SIP,
consistent with the parallel processing
provisions in 40 CFR part 51, Appendix
V.
This action to approve the
aforementioned revisions to the New
Mexico SIP is being taken under section
110 of the Act. We did not receive any
comments regarding our proposal.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving revisions to the
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County PSD
program that were submitted by New
Mexico as a SIP revision on July 26,
2013, and June 11, 2015. We are
approving the portions of the July 26,
2013, and June 11, 2015 submittals that
revised the following sections under
20.11.61:
• 20.11.61.2 NMAC—Scope,
• 20.11.61.5 NMAC—Effective Date,
• 20.11.61.6 NMAC—Objective,
• 20.11.61.7 NMAC—Definitions,
• 20.11.61.10 NMAC—Documents,
• 20.11.61.11 NMAC—Applicability,
• 20.11.61.12 NMAC—Obligations of
Owners or Operators of Sources,
• 20.11.61.14 NMAC—Control
Technology Review and Innovative
Control Technology,
• 20.11.61.15 NMAC—Ambient
Impact Requirements,
• 20.11.61.18 NMAC—Air Quality
Analysis and Monitoring Requirements,
• 20.11.61.20 NMAC—Actuals
Plantwide Applicability Limits (PALs),
• 20.11.61.23 NMAC—Exclusions
from Increment Consumption,
• 20.11.61.24 NMAC—Sources
Impacting Federal Class I Areas—
Additional Requirements,
• 20.11.61.27 NMAC—Table 2—
Significant Emission Rates,
• 20.11.61.29 NMAC—Table 4—
Allowable PSD Increments, and
• 20.11.61.30 NMAC—Table 5—
Maximum Allowable Increases for Class
I Variances.
The EPA has determined that these
revisions to the New Mexico SIP’s
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County PSD
program are approvable because the
submitted rules are adopted and
submitted in accordance with the CAA
E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM
31AUR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 168 (Monday, August 31, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52399-52401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21426]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0657; FRL-9933-11--Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Michigan State Board Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to its authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA
is taking final action to approve a state implementation plan (SIP)
submission made by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ) intended to meet the state board requirements under section 128
of the CAA. The proposed rule associated with this final action was
published on June 24, 2015.
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0657. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be
publicly-available only in hard copy. Publicly-available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air
and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that you
telephone Sarah Arra at (312) 886-9401 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Arra, Environmental Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-9401, arra.sarah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this action?
Under section 128 of the CAA, each SIP must contain provisions that
address two requirements: (i) That any board or body which approves
permits or enforcement orders under this chapter shall have at least a
majority of members who represent the public interest and do not derive
any significant portion of their income from persons subject to permits
and enforcement orders under this chapter, and (ii) that any potential
conflicts of interest by members of such board or body or the head of
an executive agency with similar powers be adequately disclosed. To
comply with this statutory provision, MDEQ submitted rules from the
Civil Service Rule at 2-8.3(a)(1) for incorporation into the SIP,
pursuant to section 128 of the CAA. EPA's June 24, 2015, proposed
rulemaking (see 80 FR 36306 at 36312) details how these rules satisfy
the applicable requirements of section 128. EPA did not receive any
comments regarding its proposal to approve Michigan's state board
provisions.
II. What action is EPA taking?
For the reasons discussed in our June 24, 2015, proposed
rulemaking, EPA is taking final action to approve MDEQ's submissions
addressing the state board requirements under section 128 of the CAA.
The specific rule that we are approving as satisfying these
requirements is Civil Service Rule at 2-8.3(a)(1). It should be noted
that our June 24, 2015, rulemaking contained proposed actions for
various additional MDEQ submissions. This final rulemaking, however, is
limited only to the state board requirements under section 128 of the
CAA.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
[[Page 52400]]
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the Michigan Regulations described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents generally available electronically
through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA
office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more
information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by October 30, 2015. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 19, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 52.1170, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding a
new entry at the end of the section entitled ``State Statutes'' to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1170 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Michigan Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective
Michigan citation Title date EPA approval date Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Michigan Civil Service Commission Disclosures......... 10/1/2013 8/31/2015 [insert ................
Rule 2-8.3(a)(1). Federal Register
citation]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 52401]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-21426 Filed 8-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
