Xanthan Gum From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of 2013 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 29615-29617 [2015-12520]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Notices
chemical form, such as UO2, or
fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies,
regardless of the means by which the
LEU is produced (including lowenriched uranium produced through the
down-blending of highly enriched
uranium).2
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by the parties in the
case briefs are addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum. A list of
the issues addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is appended to
this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is available electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Services System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit
of the main Commerce Building, room
7046. In addition, a complete version of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum is
also accessible on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Issues and
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Final Results of CCR
Upon review of the comments
received in this case the Department has
determined that the new regulatory
requirements enacted by Japan’s
Nuclear Regulatory Authority since the
previous CCR 3 do constitute new
circumstances, and that it is appropriate
to extend the deadline for re-exportation
of this sole entry of low-enriched
uranium. The Department is granting an
extension for re-exportation of this sole
entry until January 31, 2018. AREVA
will be required to provide the
Department with a report on the status
of the relevant reactor semi-annually.4
AREVA and the end-user will be
required to submit amended
certifications to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP). The
2 For a full description of the scope of the order
see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Final Results of
Changed Circumstances Review of Low Enriched
Uranium from France,’’ (Issues and Decision
Memorandum) from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance (Issues and Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with these results and hereby
adopted by this notice.
3 See Low Enriched Uranium From France: Final
Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 78 FR
66898 (November 7, 2013).
4 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at page
3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
Department will release amended
certifications to parties for comment
before AREVA and the end-user are
required to submit such certifications to
CBP.
In the event that the deadline for reexport expires and the subject uranium
has not been re-exported, and no further
extension is granted, the Department
will take appropriate action, which may
include our reexamination of the cash
deposit rate applied to all entries of
AREVA’s merchandise under the
18-month re-export provision.
Instructions to CBP
The Department will inform CBP that
the deadline for re-exportation of the
single entry at issue is extended until
January 31, 2018. The Department will
instruct CBP to collect amended
certifications from AREVA and its enduser within 30 days of publication of
these final results of CCR.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice is the only reminder to
parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results in accordance with sections
751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.216.
Dated: May 15, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—Topics in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues Allowing Further
Extension of the Re-Export Deadline
V. Department Position
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–12547 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29615
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–985]
Xanthan Gum From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
2013 Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: May 22, 2015.
SUMMARY: On December 31, 2014, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results of the antidumping
duty new shipper review of xanthan
gum from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We invited interested
parties to comment on our preliminary
results. Following our analysis of the
comments received, we made changes to
our preliminary margin calculation for
the new shipper Meihua Group
International Trading (Hong Kong)
Limited, Langfang Meihua BioTechnology Co., Ltd., and Xinjiang
Meihua Amino Acid Co., Ltd.
(collectively, ‘‘Meihua’’). We continue
to find that Meihua did not make sales
of subject merchandise at less than
normal value.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0182.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Case History
The Department published the
Preliminary Results on December 31,
2014.2 On January 30, 2015, CP Kelco
U.S., Inc.3 submitted its case brief. On
February 9, 2015, Meihua submitted a
rebuttal brief.
Period of Review
The period of review (‘‘POR’’) for this
new shipper review is July 19, 2013
through December 31, 2013. This POR
corresponds to the period from the date
1 See Xanthan Gum From the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of 2013 Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review, 79 FR 78797 (December
31, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 Also adopted as part of the preliminary results
was the Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen
entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Results of the 2013 Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review of Xanthan Gum from the
People’s Republic of China,’’ dated December 18,
2014 (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’).
3 CP Kelco U.S., Inc. is the petitioner.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
29616
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Notices
of suspension of liquidation to the end
of the month immediately preceding the
first semiannual anniversary month
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(ii)(B).
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order covers dry
xanthan gum, whether or not coated or
blended with other products. Further,
xanthan gum is included in this order
regardless of physical form, including,
but not limited to, solutions, slurries,
dry powders of any particle size, or
unground fiber. Merchandise covered by
the scope of this order is classified in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
(‘‘HTS’’) of the United States at
subheading 3913.90.20. This tariff
classification is provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the
scope is dispositive.4
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this new
shipper review are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
A list of the issues which parties raised
and to which we respond in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is attached
to this notice as an Appendix. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and it is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Issues and
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results Margin
The Department finds that the
following weighted-average dumping
margin exists for the exporter/producer
combination listed below for the period
July 19, 2013 through December 31,
2013:
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Exporter
Producer
Meihua Group International Trading (Hong Kong) Limited/
Langfang Meihua Bio-Technology Co., Ltd./Xinjiang Meihua
Amino Acid Co., Ltd.
Meihua Group International Trading (Hong Kong) Limited/
Langfang Meihua Bio-Technology Co., Ltd./Xinjiang Meihua
Amino Acid Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
We intend to disclose to parties the
calculations performed in this
proceeding within five days of the date
of public announcement of the results of
this review in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries in accordance with
19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of the final results of
review. Because Meihua’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties. For entries that were not
reported in the U.S. sales database
submitted by Meihua, the Department
will instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the NME-wide rate.5
new shipper review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’). For the
exporter/producer combination listed
above, the cash deposit rate will be 0.00
percent. This deposit requirement,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of the
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Notification Regarding APO
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
This notice also serves as a reminder
to the parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
4 For a complete description of the Scope of the
Order, see ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review of Xanthan Gum from the People’s
Republic of China,’’ (‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’), dated concurrently with this
notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
0.00
responsibility concerning the
disposition of business proprietary
information (‘‘BPI’’) disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), which continues to
govern BPI in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely notification of
return or destruction of APO materials
or conversion to judicial protective
order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: May 18, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—Issues for Final Results
Summary
Background
Period of Review
Scope of the order
Single company treatment
Bona fide analysis
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Discussion of Issues
Issue 1: Corn starch intermediate input
Issue 2: Corn SV
Issue 3: Surrogate Financial Statements
5 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Notices
Issue 4: Whether Meihua’s energy
allocation methodology is distortive
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–12520 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Application No. 99–8A005]
Export Trade Certificate of Review
Notice of Issuance of an
Amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review for the California Almond
Export Association, LLC, Application
no. 99–8A005.
ACTION:
The Secretary of Commerce,
through the Office of Trade and
Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’), issued an
amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review to the California Almond Export
Association, LLC (‘‘CAEA’’) on May 6,
2015. The previous amendment was
issued on May 1, 2014.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade
and Economic Analysis, International
Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at etca@trade.gov.
Title III of
the Export Trading Company Act of
1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce to issue Export
Trade Certificates of Review. An Export
Trade Certificate of Review protects the
holder and the members identified in
the Certificate from State and Federal
government antitrust actions and from
private treble damage antitrust actions
for the export conduct specified in the
Certificate and carried out in
compliance with its terms and
conditions. The regulations
implementing Title III are found at 15
CFR part 325 (2015). OTEA is issuing
this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b),
which requires the Secretary to publish
a summary of the certificate in the
Federal Register. Under Section 305(a)
of the Act and 15 CFR 325.11(a), any
person aggrieved by the Secretary’s
determination may, within 30 days of
the date of this notice, bring an action
in any appropriate district court of the
United States to set aside the
determination on the ground that the
determination is erroneous.
Description of the Amendment to the
Certificate: Remove the following
company as a Member of CAEA’s
Certificate: Minturn Nut Company, Inc.,
Le Grand, CA.
CAEA’s Export Trade Certificate of
Review complete amended Membership
is listed below:
Almonds California Pride, Inc.,
Caruthers, CA
Baldwin-Minkler Farms, Orland, CA
Blue Diamond Growers, Sacramento, CA
Campos Brothers, Caruthers, CA
Chico Nut Company, Chico, CA
Del Rio Nut Company, Inc., Livingston,
CA
Fair Trade Corner, Inc., Chico, CA
Fisher Nut Company, Modesto, CA
Hilltop Ranch, Inc., Ballico, CA
Hughson Nut, Inc., Hughson, CA
Mariani Nut Company, Winters, CA
Nutco, LLC d.b.a. Spycher Brothers,
Turlock, CA
Paramount Farms, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
P–R Farms, Inc., Clovis, CA
Roche Brothers International Family
Nut Co., Escalon, CA
South Valley Almond Company, LLC,
Wasco, CA
Sunny Gem, LLC, Wasco, CA
Western Nut Company, Chico, CA
Dated: May 18, 2015.
Joseph Flynn,
Director, Office of Trade and Economic
Analysis, International Trade Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–12405 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
International Trade Administration
[A–489–822]
Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of
Turkey: Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) preliminarily determines
that welded line pipe from the Republic
of Turkey (Turkey) is being, or is likely
to be, sold in the United States at less
than fair value (LTFV), as provided in
section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act). The period of
investigation (POI) is October 1, 2013,
through September 30, 2014. The
estimated weighted-average dumping
margins of sales at LTFV are shown in
the ‘‘Preliminary Determination’’
section of this notice. Interested parties
are invited to comment on this
preliminary determination.
DATES: Effective Date: May 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Maldonado or David Crespo, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29617
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4682 or (202) 482–
3693, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department initiated this
investigation on November 5, 2014.1 For
a complete description of the events that
followed the initiation of this
investigation, see the memorandum that
is dated concurrently with this
determination and hereby adopted by
this notice.2 The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be found at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of the investigation covers
welded line pipe, which is carbon and
alloy steel pipe of a kind used for oil
and gas pipelines, not more than 24
inches in nominal outside diameter. For
a complete description of the scope of
the investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
Certain interested parties commented
on the scope of the investigation as it
appeared in the Initiation Notice. For
discussion of those comments, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Act. There are two mandatory
respondents participating in this
investigation, Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve
¸
¨
Ticaret A.S./Yucel Boru Ithalat-Ihracat
1 See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of
Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 79 FR 68213
(November 14, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Determination in the Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from the
Republic of Turkey’’ (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29615-29617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12520]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-985]
Xanthan Gum From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of
2013 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: May 22, 2015.
SUMMARY: On December 31, 2014, the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') published the preliminary results of the antidumping
duty new shipper review of xanthan gum from the People's Republic of
China (``PRC'').\1\ We invited interested parties to comment on our
preliminary results. Following our analysis of the comments received,
we made changes to our preliminary margin calculation for the new
shipper Meihua Group International Trading (Hong Kong) Limited,
Langfang Meihua Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., and Xinjiang Meihua Amino
Acid Co., Ltd. (collectively, ``Meihua''). We continue to find that
Meihua did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal
value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Xanthan Gum From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of 2013 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 79
FR 78797 (December 31, 2014) (``Preliminary Results'').
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
0182.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Case History
The Department published the Preliminary Results on December 31,
2014.\2\ On January 30, 2015, CP Kelco U.S., Inc.\3\ submitted its case
brief. On February 9, 2015, Meihua submitted a rebuttal brief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Also adopted as part of the preliminary results was the
Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen entitled ``Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the 2013 Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review of Xanthan Gum from the People's Republic of China,'' dated
December 18, 2014 (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum'').
\3\ CP Kelco U.S., Inc. is the petitioner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Review
The period of review (``POR'') for this new shipper review is July
19, 2013 through December 31, 2013. This POR corresponds to the period
from the date
[[Page 29616]]
of suspension of liquidation to the end of the month immediately
preceding the first semiannual anniversary month pursuant to 19 CFR
351.214(g)(1)(ii)(B).
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order covers dry xanthan gum, whether or not
coated or blended with other products. Further, xanthan gum is included
in this order regardless of physical form, including, but not limited
to, solutions, slurries, dry powders of any particle size, or unground
fiber. Merchandise covered by the scope of this order is classified in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (``HTS'') of the United States at
subheading 3913.90.20. This tariff classification is provided for
convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of
the scope is dispositive.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Xanthan Gum from the People's
Republic of China,'' (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''), dated
concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this new shipper review are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the
issues which parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and
it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046
of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results Margin
The Department finds that the following weighted-average dumping
margin exists for the exporter/producer combination listed below for
the period July 19, 2013 through December 31, 2013:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter Producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meihua Group International Meihua Group 0.00
Trading (Hong Kong) Limited/ International Trading
Langfang Meihua Bio-Technology (Hong Kong) Limited/
Co., Ltd./Xinjiang Meihua Amino Langfang Meihua Bio-
Acid Co., Ltd. Technology Co., Ltd./
Xinjiang Meihua Amino
Acid Co., Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose to parties the calculations performed in this
proceeding within five days of the date of public announcement of the
results of this review in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b). The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to
CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of
review. Because Meihua's weighted-average dumping margin is zero, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard
to antidumping duties. For entries that were not reported in the U.S.
sales database submitted by Meihua, the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the NME-wide rate.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this new shipper review for
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the ``Act''). For the exporter/producer combination listed
above, the cash deposit rate will be 0.00 percent. This deposit
requirement, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding APO
This notice also serves as a reminder to the parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of business proprietary information
(``BPI'') disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern BPI in this segment of the proceeding. Timely
notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: May 18, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--Issues for Final Results
Summary
Background
Period of Review
Scope of the order
Single company treatment
Bona fide analysis
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Discussion of Issues
Issue 1: Corn starch intermediate input
Issue 2: Corn SV
Issue 3: Surrogate Financial Statements
[[Page 29617]]
Issue 4: Whether Meihua's energy allocation methodology is
distortive
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-12520 Filed 5-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
