Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 2013-2014 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 22164-22165 [2015-09206]
Download as PDF
22164
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,821,891.
Estimated Time per Response: 5
seconds to 2 hours per response.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 78,576 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: April 16, 2015.
Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into
Modules, From the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Rescission of
2013—2014 Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new
shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the
antidumping duty order on crystalline
silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or
not assembled into modules (solar
cells), from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’). The NSR covers one
exporter and producer of subject
merchandise, Hengdian Group DMEGC
Magnetics Co., Ltd. (‘‘DMEGC’’). The
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18:07 Apr 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
On July 28, 2014, the Department
published a notice of initiation of a new
shipper review of the antidumping duty
order on solar cells from the PRC.1 The
Department subsequently issued an
antidumping duty questionnaire, and
supplemental questionnaires, to DMEGC
and received timely responses thereto.
Also, interested parties submitted
comments on surrogate country and
surrogate value selection. The
Department extended the deadline for
issuing the preliminary results of this
review until April 7, 2015.2
The merchandise covered by the order
is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,
and modules, laminates, and panels,
consisting of crystalline silicon
photovoltaic cells, whether or not
partially or fully assembled into other
products, including, but not limited to,
modules, laminates, panels and building
integrated materials.3 Merchandise
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Background
Scope of the Order
[FR Doc. 2015–09095 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
period of review (‘‘POR’’) is December 1,
2013, through May 31, 2014. The
Department preliminarily determines
that DMEGC’s sale to the United States
was not bona fide; therefore, we are
preliminarily rescinding this NSR.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on the preliminary results of
this review.
DATES: Effective: April 21, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the
People’s Republic of China: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 79 FR
43710 (July 28, 2014).
2 See the memoranda to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, from Jeff Pedersen,
International Trade Analyst, Office IV,
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
entitled, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review’’ dated January 13, 2015 and February 11,
2015 and the memorandum to Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
from Valerie Ellis, International Trade Analyst,
Office IV, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, entitled, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review’’ dated March 16, 2015.
3 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, see Memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entititled ‘‘Preliminary Rescission of
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
covered by this review is classifiable
under subheadings 8501.61.0000,
8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030,
and 8501.31.8000 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’) and 19 CFR
351.214. For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the internet at https://www.trade.gov/
enforcement/. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Preliminary Rescission of the
Antidumping New Shipper Review of
DMEGC
As discussed in the Bona Fide Sales
Analysis Memorandum,4 the
Department preliminarily finds that the
sale made by DMEGC to the United
States is not a bona fide sale. The
Department reached this conclusion
based on the totality of circumstances
surrounding the reported sale,
including, among other things, the price
and quantity of the sale and DMEGC’s
the 2013–2014 Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the
People’s Republic of China’’ issued concurrently
with and hereby adopted by this notice
(‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’).
4 See Memorandum from Jeffrey Pedersen,
International Trade Analyst, Office IV AD/CVD
Operations, to Howard Smith, Acting Director,
Office IV, AD/CVD Operations entitled ‘‘2013–2014
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or
Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Bona Fide Sales
Analysis for Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics
Co., Ltd.’’ dated concurrently with and hereby
adopted by this notice (‘‘Bona Fide Sales Analysis
Memorandum’’).
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
failure to provide evidence that the
subject merchandise was resold at a
profit. Because the non-bona fide sale
was the only reported sale of subject
merchandise during the POR, and thus
there are no reviewable transactions on
this record, we are preliminarily
rescinding the instant administrative
review. See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Because much of the factual information
used in our analysis of DMEGC’s sale
involves business proprietary
information, a full discussion of the
basis for our preliminary determination
is set forth in the Memorandum to
Howard Smith, Acting Director, AD/
CVD Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Preliminary
Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Hengdian
Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.,’’
dated April 7, 2015, which is on the
record of this proceeding.
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case
briefs no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of the preliminary
results of review.5 Rebuttals to case
briefs may be filed no later than five
days after the briefs are filed. All
rebuttal comments must be limited to
comments raised in the case briefs.6
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing must submit a written request
to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement & Compliance, U.S.
Department of Commerce, within 30
days after the date of publication of this
notice.7 Requests should contain the
party’s name, address, and telephone
number, the number of participants, and
a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral
argument presentations will be limited
to issues raised in the briefs. If a request
for a hearing is made, the Department
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, at a date and
time to be determined.8 Parties should
confirm by telephone the date, time, and
location of the hearing two days before
the scheduled date.
All submissions, with limited
exceptions, must be filed electronically
using ACCESS. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by the Department’s
electronic records system, ACCESS, by
5 p.m. Eastern Time (‘‘ET’’) on the due
date. Documents excepted from the
electronic submission requirements
must be filed manually (i.e., in paper
form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in
Room 18022, and stamped with the date
5 See
19 CFR 351.309(c).
19 CFR 351.309(d).
7 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
8 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
6 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Apr 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the
due date.9
The Department intends to issue the
final results of this NSR, which will
include the results of its analysis of
issues raised in any briefs received, no
later than 90 days after the date these
preliminary results of review are issued
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
‘‘Act’’).
Assessment Rates
If the Department proceeds to a final
rescission of DMEGC’s NSR, the
assessment rate to which DMEGC’s
shipments will be subject will not be
affected by this review. However, the
Department initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on solar cells from the PRC covering
numerous exporters, including DMEGC,
and the period December 1, 2013
through November 30, 2014, which
encompasses the POR of this NSR.10
Thus, if the Department proceeds to a
final rescission, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
continue to suspend entries during the
period December 1, 2013 through
November 30, 2014 of subject
merchandise exported by DMEGC until
CBP receives instructions relating to the
administrative review of this order
covering the period December 1, 2013
through November 30, 2014.
If the Department does not proceed to
a final rescission of this new shipper
review, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), we will calculate
importer-specific (or customer)
assessment rates based on the final
results of this review. However,
pursuant to the Department’s refinement
to its assessment practice in NME cases,
for entries that were not reported in the
U.S. sales database submitted by
DMEGC, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
PRC-wide rate.11
Cash Deposit Requirements
Effective upon publication of the final
rescission or the final results of this
NSR, pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(e), the Department will instruct
CBP to discontinue the option of posting
a bond or security in lieu of a cash
9 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
10 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
6041, 6042 (February 4, 2015).
11 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22165
deposit for entries of subject
merchandise by DMEGC. If the
Department proceeds to a final
rescission of this new shipper review,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the PRC-wide rate for DMEGC because
the Department will not have
determined an individual margin of
dumping for DMEGC. If the Department
issues final results for this new shipper
review, the Department will instruct
CBP to collect cash deposits, effective
upon the publication of the final results,
at the rates established therein.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 7, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Scope
2. Bona Fide Sales Analysis
[FR Doc. 2015–09206 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–916]
Laminated Woven Sacks From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 28, 2015, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published the
Preliminary Results 1 of the 2013–2014
AGENCY:
1 See Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
2014, 80 FR 4537 (January 28, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
Continued
21APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22164-22165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09206]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled
Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary
Rescission of 2013--2014 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is conducting
a new shipper review (``NSR'') of the antidumping duty order on
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into
modules (solar cells), from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').
The NSR covers one exporter and producer of subject merchandise,
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd. (``DMEGC''). The period of
review (``POR'') is December 1, 2013, through May 31, 2014. The
Department preliminarily determines that DMEGC's sale to the United
States was not bona fide; therefore, we are preliminarily rescinding
this NSR. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary
results of this review.
DATES: Effective: April 21, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2769.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 28, 2014, the Department published a notice of initiation
of a new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on solar cells
from the PRC.\1\ The Department subsequently issued an antidumping duty
questionnaire, and supplemental questionnaires, to DMEGC and received
timely responses thereto. Also, interested parties submitted comments
on surrogate country and surrogate value selection. The Department
extended the deadline for issuing the preliminary results of this
review until April 7, 2015.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not
Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of China:
Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 79 FR 43710 (July
28, 2014).
\2\ See the memoranda to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from
Jeff Pedersen, International Trade Analyst, Office IV, Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled, ``Extension of
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review'' dated January 13, 2015 and February 11, 2015 and the
memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Valerie
Ellis, International Trade Analyst, Office IV, Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled, ``Extension of Deadline
for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review''
dated March 16, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is crystalline silicon
photovoltaic cells, and modules, laminates, and panels, consisting of
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not partially or
fully assembled into other products, including, but not limited to,
modules, laminates, panels and building integrated materials.\3\
Merchandise covered by this review is classifiable under subheadings
8501.61.0000, 8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, and 8501.31.8000
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'').
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see
Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
entititled ``Preliminary Rescission of the 2013-2014 Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of
China'' issued concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice
(``Preliminary Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'') and 19
CFR 351.214. For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at https://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Preliminary Rescission of the Antidumping New Shipper Review of DMEGC
As discussed in the Bona Fide Sales Analysis Memorandum,\4\ the
Department preliminarily finds that the sale made by DMEGC to the
United States is not a bona fide sale. The Department reached this
conclusion based on the totality of circumstances surrounding the
reported sale, including, among other things, the price and quantity of
the sale and DMEGC's
[[Page 22165]]
failure to provide evidence that the subject merchandise was resold at
a profit. Because the non-bona fide sale was the only reported sale of
subject merchandise during the POR, and thus there are no reviewable
transactions on this record, we are preliminarily rescinding the
instant administrative review. See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). Because much
of the factual information used in our analysis of DMEGC's sale
involves business proprietary information, a full discussion of the
basis for our preliminary determination is set forth in the Memorandum
to Howard Smith, Acting Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
``Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Hengdian Group DMEGC
Magnetics Co., Ltd.,'' dated April 7, 2015, which is on the record of
this proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum from Jeffrey Pedersen, International Trade
Analyst, Office IV AD/CVD Operations, to Howard Smith, Acting
Director, Office IV, AD/CVD Operations entitled ``2013-2014
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Crystalline Silicon
Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Analysis for
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.'' dated concurrently with
and hereby adopted by this notice (``Bona Fide Sales Analysis
Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of the preliminary results of review.\5\
Rebuttals to case briefs may be filed no later than five days after the
briefs are filed. All rebuttal comments must be limited to comments
raised in the case briefs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement &
Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice.\7\ Requests should contain the party's
name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a
list of the issues to be discussed. Oral argument presentations will be
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is
made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230, at a date and time to be determined.\8\ Parties should confirm
by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days
before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed
electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic
records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (``ET'') on the due
date. Documents excepted from the electronic submission requirements
must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/Dockets Unit
in Room 18022, and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 5 p.m.
ET on the due date.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to issue the final results of this NSR,
which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any
briefs received, no later than 90 days after the date these preliminary
results of review are issued pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').
Assessment Rates
If the Department proceeds to a final rescission of DMEGC's NSR,
the assessment rate to which DMEGC's shipments will be subject will not
be affected by this review. However, the Department initiated an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on solar cells from
the PRC covering numerous exporters, including DMEGC, and the period
December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014, which encompasses the POR
of this NSR.\10\ Thus, if the Department proceeds to a final
rescission, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
to continue to suspend entries during the period December 1, 2013
through November 30, 2014 of subject merchandise exported by DMEGC
until CBP receives instructions relating to the administrative review
of this order covering the period December 1, 2013 through November 30,
2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 6041, 6042 (February 4, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the Department does not proceed to a final rescission of this
new shipper review, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate
importer-specific (or customer) assessment rates based on the final
results of this review. However, pursuant to the Department's
refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases, for entries that
were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by DMEGC, the
Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide
rate.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Effective upon publication of the final rescission or the final
results of this NSR, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.214(e), the Department will instruct CBP to discontinue
the option of posting a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for
entries of subject merchandise by DMEGC. If the Department proceeds to
a final rescission of this new shipper review, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the PRC-wide rate for DMEGC because the Department
will not have determined an individual margin of dumping for DMEGC. If
the Department issues final results for this new shipper review, the
Department will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits, effective upon
the publication of the final results, at the rates established therein.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 7, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Scope
2. Bona Fide Sales Analysis
[FR Doc. 2015-09206 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P