Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 19961-19964 [2015-08591]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices
9:00 a.m., Room 3884, in the Herbert C.
Hoover Building, 14th Street between
Pennsylvania and Constitution Avenues
NW., Washington, DC. The Committee
advises the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration
with respect to technical questions that
affect the level of export controls
applicable to materials processing
equipment and related technology.
Agenda
1. Opening remarks and
introductions.
2. Presentation of papers and
comments by the Public.
3. Discussions on results from last,
and proposals from last Wassenaar
meeting.
4. Report on proposed and recently
issued changes to the Export
Administration Regulations.
5. Other business.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2015–08580 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A–570–954]
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results and Final Partial Rescission of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(the ‘‘Department’’) published the
Preliminary Results of the third
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
magnesia carbon bricks from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on
October 9, 2014.1 We gave interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
the Preliminary Results. Based upon our
analysis of the comments received, we
made no change to the Preliminary
Results. The final weighted-average
dumping margins are listed below in the
‘‘Final Results of Administrative
Review’’ section of this notice. The
period of review (‘‘POR’’) is September
1, 2012, through August 31, 2013.
DATES: Effective date: April 14, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Closed Session
6. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 §§ 10 (a) (1) and 10 (a) (3).
The open session will be accessible
via teleconference to 20 participants on
a first come, first serve basis. To join the
conference, submit inquiries to Ms.
Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@
bis.doc.gov, no later than May 12, 2015.
A limited number of seats will be
available for the public session.
Reservations are not accepted. To the
extent that time permits, members of the
public may present oral statements to
the Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
the distribution of public presentation
materials to the Committee members,
the Committee suggests that presenters
forward the public presentation
materials prior to the meeting to Ms.
Springer via email.
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the delegate of the General Counsel,
formally determined on February 20,
2015, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 § 10(d)), that
the portion of the meeting dealing with
matters the premature disclosure of
which would be likely to frustrate
significantly implementation of a
proposed agency action as described in
5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt
from the provisions relating to public
meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2
§§ 10(a) (1) and 10(a) (3). The remaining
portions of the meeting will be open to
the public.
17:42 Apr 13, 2015
Dated: April 8, 2015.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
International Trade Administration
Open Session
VerDate Sep<11>2014
For more information, call Yvette
Springer at (202) 482–2813.
Jkt 235001
Background
On October 9, 2014, the Department
published the Preliminary Results. On
November 10, 2014, the Department
received a case brief from Resco
Products, Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’) and
Magnesita Refractories Company, a
domestic interested party.
1 See Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and
Partial Rescission of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 61052
(October 9, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19961
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
includes certain magnesia carbon bricks.
Certain magnesia carbon bricks that are
the subject of this order are currently
classifiable under subheadings
6902.10.1000, 6902.10.5000,
6815.91.0000, 6815.99.2000 and
6815.99.4000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
is dispositive.2
Analysis of Comments Received
We addressed all issues raised in the
case brief by parties in this review in the
Decision Memo. A list of issues
included in the Decision Memo is
attached as Appendix I to this notice.
The Decision Memo is a public
document and it is available
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and it is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room 7046 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, the Decision
Memo can be accessed directly on
Enforcement and Compliance’s Web site
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Decision Memo
and the electronic version of the
Decision Memo are identical in content.
Final Partial Rescission of the
Administrative Review
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department indicated its intention to
rescind this review with respect to
Fedmet Resources Corporation
(‘‘Fedmet’’), based on Fedmet’s
statement and supplemental
information that it is a U.S. importer,
not a PRC producer.3 Subsequent to the
Preliminary Results, no information was
submitted on the record contrary to
Fedmet’s claim, and no party provided
written arguments regarding this issue.
Thus, we are rescinding this review
with respect to Fedmet, and Fedmet’s
entries will be subject to the appropriate
2 For a full description of the scope of the Order,
see Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate
Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of Third
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the People’s Republic
of China,’’ (‘‘I&D Memo’’) dated concurrently with
these results and hereby adopted by this notice.
3 See Preliminary Results, 79 FR 61053.
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
19962
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices
exporter’s cash deposit requirements
and assessment rates, as outlined below.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results,
Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. of
Haicheng City (‘‘Fengchi’’) submitted a
timely-filed certification that it had no
shipments of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR. Thus, we
preliminarily determined that Fengchi
had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR.4 We
received no contradictory information
from CBP indicating that there were
suspended entries of subject
merchandise into the United States
exported by Fengchi. Accordingly, for
the final results we continue to find that
Fengchi had no shipments of subject
merchandise, and it will retain its
separate-rate status which was in effect
at the initiation of this administrative
review.5 Consistent with our assessment
clarification, the Department will issue
appropriate instructions to CBP based
on our final results.6
PRC-Wide Entity
In the Preliminary Results, for the
PRC-Wide Entity, the Department
assigned the rate of 236 percent, the
only rate ever determined for the PRCWide Entity in this proceeding.7
Because this rate is the same as the rate
for the PRC-Wide Entity from previous
completed segments in this proceeding
and nothing on the record of the instant
review calls into question the reliability
of this rate, we find it appropriate to
continue to apply a rate of 236 percent
to the PRC-Wide Entity.8
Further, in the Preliminary Results,
the Department determined that those
companies which did not demonstrate
eligibility for a separate rate are
properly considered part of the PRCWide Entity.9 Since the Preliminary
Results, none of these companies
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4 Id.
5 Fengchi’s no shipments certification also
applied to Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng
City; however, that company did not previously
qualify for a separate rate and remains subject to the
cash deposit requirements for the PRC-Wide Entity
as discussed below. See letter to the Department
from Fengchi, ‘‘Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China
Case No. A–570–954: No Shipments Letter,’’ dated
January 2, 2014.
6 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (‘‘Assessment Practice
Refinement’’); see also the ‘‘Assessment’’ section of
this notice, below.
7 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4.
8 See, e.g., Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 74 FR 8907, 8910
(February 27, 2009).
9 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Apr 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
submitted comments regarding these
findings. Therefore, we continue to treat
these companies as part of the PRCWide Entity.10
Additionally, in the Preliminary
Results, for 155 companies, the
Department found that, while the
request for review had been withdrawn,
none of these companies was eligible for
a separate rate at the time of the
initiation of this review. Accordingly,
these 155 companies will continue to be
considered part of the PRC-Wide Entity,
which remained under review for the
Preliminary Results.11 Thus, the
Department did not rescind the review
for any of these 155 companies in the
Preliminary Results.12 Since the
Preliminary Results, no party has
presented information to the contrary,
and, thus, these 155 companies
continue to be considered as part of the
PRC-Wide Entity, which remains under
review for the final results.13
Final Results of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
period September 1, 2012, through
August 31, 2013:
Exporter
Weighted-average
dumping margin
(percent)
PRC-Wide Entity ...........
236.00
Assessment
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.212. The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of the final results of
review. For all appropriate entries
10 For a list of companies that are subject to this
administrative review as part of the PRC-Wide
Entity, see Appendix II to this notice.
11 See Preliminary Results, 79 FR 61503.
12 See, e.g., Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR
47363, 47365 (August 8, 2012), unchanged in
Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 20102011, 78 FR 10130 (February 13, 2013). A change
in practice with respect to the conditional review
of the PRC-wide entity is not applicable to this
administrative review. See Antidumping
Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in
Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional
Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME
Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65964,
65969–70 (November 4, 2013).
13 For a list of companies that are subject to this
administrative review as part of the PRC-Wide
Entity, see Appendix II to this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
exported by the PRC-Wide Entity, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate these entries at an
antidumping assessment rate of 236.00
percent.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of these final results, as provided
by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
For previously investigated or reviewed
PRC and non-PRC exporters that are
eligible for a separate rate from a prior
completed segment of this proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for
all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be eligible for a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate for the PRCWide Entity; and (3) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
are not eligible for a separate rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notifications
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Department’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as
a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO,
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
These final results are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices
Dated: April 7, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I
Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
(1) Whether the Department Should Limit
CBP Data Query to Suspended AD/CVD
Entries
(2) Whether the Department Should Issue
Q&V Questionnaires to All Companies
Under Review
(3) Whether Identifying Misclassified
Entries Falls Under the Department’s
Authority
V. Conclusion
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix II
Companies Subject to the Administrative
Review that Are Part of the PRC-Wide Entity
1. ANH (Xinyi) Refractories Co. Ltd.
2. Anyang Rongzhu Silicon Industry Co., Ltd.
3. Barsan Global Lojistik Ve Gum. Mus.
4. Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd.
5. Beijing Tianxing Ceramic Fiber Composite
Materials Corp.
6. Benxi Iron & Steel (Group) International
Economic & Trading Co.
7. Changxing Magnesium Furnace Charge
Co., Ltd.
8. Changxing Wangfa Architectural &
Metallurgical Materials Co., Ltd.
9. Changzing Zhicheng Refractory Material
Factory.
10. China Metallurgical Raw Material Beijing
Company.
11. China Quantai Metallurgical (Beijing)
Engineering & Science Co., Ltd.
12. Chosun Refractories.
13. Cimm Group of China.
14. CNBM International Corporation.
15. Dalian Cerax Co., Ltd.
16. Dalian Dalmond Trading Co., Ltd.
17. Dalian F.T.Z. Huaxin International.
18. Dalian F.T.Z. Maylong Resources Co.,
Ltd.
19. Dalian Huayu Refractories International
Co., Ltd.
20. Dalian LST Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
21. Dalian Masoo International Trading.
22. Dalian Mayerton Refractories Ltd.
23. Dalian Morgan Refractories Ltd.
24. Dashiqiao Bozhong Mineral Products Co.,
Ltd.
25. Dashiqiao City Magnesite.
26. Dashiqiao City Guangcheng Refractory
Co., Ltd.
27. Dashiqiao Jia Sheng Mining Co., Ltd.
28. Dashiqiao Jinlong Refractories Co., Ltd.
29. Dashiqiao RongXing Refractory Material
Co., Ltd.
30. Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Material
Co., Ltd.
31. Dashiqiao Yutong Packing Factory.
32. Dashiqiao Zhongjian Magnesia.
33. Dengfeng Desheng Refractory Co., Ltd.
34. DFL Minmet Refractories Corp.
35. Duferco SA.
36. Duferco BarInvest SA Beijing Office.
37. Duferco Ironet Shanghai Representative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Apr 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
Office.
38. Eastern Industries & Trading Co., Ltd.
39. Far Horizon Trading Limited.
40. Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd of Haicheng
City.
41. Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng
City.
42. Fengchi Refractories Corp.
43. Ferro Alliages & Mineraux Inc.
44. Firma.
45. Haicheng City Qunli Mining Co., Ltd.
46. Haicheng City Xiyang Import & Export
Corporation.
47. Haicheng Donghe Taidi Refractory Co.,
Ltd.
48. Haicheng Ruitong Mining Co., Ltd.
49. Haiyuan Talc Powder Manufacture
Factory.
50. Henan Boma Co. Ltd.
51. Henan Kingway Chemicals Co., Ltd.
52. Henan Tagore Refractories Co., Ltd.
53. Henan Xinmi Changzxing Refractories,
Co., Ltd.
54. Hebei Qinghe Refractory Group Co. Ltd.
55. Huailin Refractories (Dashiqiao) Pte. Ltd.
56. Hualude Hardware Products Co. Ltd.
57. Indian Technomac Co., Ltd.
58. Jfe Refractories Corporation.
59. Jiangsu Sujia Group New Materials Co.,
Ltd.
60. Jiangsu Sujia Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.
61. Jinan Forever Imp. & Emp. Trading Co.,
Ltd.
62. Jinan Linquan Imp. & Emp. Co. Ltd.
63. Jinan Ludong Refractory Co., Ltd.
64. Kosmokraft Refractory Limited.
65. Kuehne & Nagel Ltd. Dalian Branch
Office.
66. Kumas Sanayi Urunleri Ve Insaat Paz.
67. Lechang City Guangdong Province
SongXin Refractories Co., Ltd.
68. Liaoning Fucheng Refractories Group Co.,
Ltd.
69. Liaoning Fucheng Special Refractory Co.,
Ltd.
70. Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Minerals Ltd.
71. Liaoning Jinding Magnesite Group.
72. Liaoning Mayerton Refractories Co., Ltd.
73. Liaoning Mineral & Metallurgy Group
Co., Ltd.
74. Liaoning Qunyi Group Refractories Co.,
Ltd.
75. Liaoning Qunyi Trade Co., Ltd.
76. Liaoning RHI Jinding Magnesis Co., Ltd.
77. Liaoning Zhongxing Mining Industry
Group Co., Ltd.
78. LiShuang Refractory Industrial Co., Ltd.
79. Lithomelt Co., Ltd.
80. Lua Viet Bestref Joint Venture Co.
81. Luheng Refractory Co., Ltd.
82. Luoyang Refractory Group Co., Ltd.
83. Mayerton Refractories.
84. Minsource International Ltd.
85. Minteq International Inc.
86. National Minerals Co., Ltd.
87. Navis Zufall Ueberseespeditions.
88. North Refractories Co., Ltd.
89. Orestar Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd.
90. Oreworld Trade (Tangshan) Co., Ltd.
91. Puyang Refractories Co., Ltd.
92. Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd. (HQ).
93. Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd.
(Manufacturing).
94. Qingdao Almatis Trading Co., Ltd. (Sales
Office).
95. Qingdao Blueshell Import & Emport Corp.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19963
96. Qingdao Fujing Group Co., Ltd.
97. Qingdao Huierde International Trade Co.,
Ltd.
98. Refratechnik Cement GmbH.
99. Refratechnik Steel GmbH.
100. RHI AG.
101. RHI GLAS GmbH.
102. RHI Refractories Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
103. RHI Refractories (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
104. RHI Trading Shanghai Branch.
105. RHI Trading (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
106. Rongyuan Magnesite Co., Ltd. of
Dashiqiao City.
107. Shandong Cambridge International
Trade Inc.
108. Shandong Lunai Kiln Refractories Co.,
Ltd.
109. Shandong Refractories Corp.
110. Shanghai Pudong Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd.
111. Shanghai Vista Packaging Co., ltd.
112. Shanxi Dajin International (Group) Co.,
Ltd.
113. Shanxi Xinrong International Trade Co.
Ltd.
114. Shenyang Shenghui Refractory Imp.
115. Shenyang Yi Xin Sheng Lai Refractory
Materials Co., Ltd.
116. Shinagawa Refractories Co., Ltd.
117. Shinagawa Rongyuan Refractories Co.,
Ltd.
118. Sinosteel Corporation.
119. SMMC Group Co., Ltd.
120. Store System Inc. O B Dongning Shunf.
121. Syndicate Exp. Pvt., Ltd.
122. Tangshan Success Import & Export
Trading Co., Ltd.
123. Tianjin New Century Refractories, Ltd.
124. Tianjin New World Import & Export
Trading Co., Ltd.
125. Tianjin Weiyuan Refractory Co., Ltd.
126. The Economic Trading Group of
Haicheng Huoying Corporation Ltd.
127. Vereeniging Refractories (Pty).
128. Vesuvius Advanced Ceramics (Suzhou)
Co. Ltd.
129. Wonjin Refractories Co., Ltd.
130. Wuxi Tian Liang Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.
131. Xiyuan Xingquan Forsterite Co., Ltd.
132. Yanshi City Guangming High-Tech
Refractories Products Co., Ltd.
133. YHS Minerals Co., Ltd.
134. Yingkou Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd.
135. Yingkou Bl Mining Co., Ltd.
136. Yingkou Dalmond Refractories Co., Ltd.
137. Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co.,
Ltd.
138. Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co.,
Ltd. (YGR).
139. Yingkou Heping Samwha Minerals Co.,
Ltd.
140. Yingkou Jiahe Refractories Co., Ltd.
141. Yingkou Jinlong Refractories Group.
142. Yingkou Kyushu Refractories Co., Ltd.
143. Yingkou Qinghua Group Imp. & Emp.
Co., Ltd.
144. Yingkou Qinghua Refractories Co., Ltd.
145. Yingkou Sanhua Refractory Materials
Co., Ltd.
146. Yingkou Tianrun Refractory Co.,Ltd.
147. Yingkou Wonjin Refractory Material Co.,
Ltd.
148. Yingkou Yongji Mag Refractory, Ltd.
149. Yixing Runlong Trade Co., Ltd.
150. Yixing Xinwei Leeshing Refractory
Material Co., Ltd.
151. Yixing Zhenqiu Charging Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
19964
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices
152. Zhejiang Changxing Guangming Special
Refractory Material Foundry, Co., Ltd.
153. Zhejiang Deqing Jinlei Refractory Co.,
Ltd.
154. Zhejiang Huzhou Fuzilin Refractory
Metals Group Co., Ltd.
155. Zhengzhou Annec Industrial Co., Ltd.
156. Zhengzhou Huachen Refractory Co., Ltd.
157. Zhengzhou Huawei Refractories Co.,
Ltd.
158. Zibo Lianzhu Refractory Materials Co.,
Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2015–08591 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–520–803]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab
Emirates: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 8, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate film (PET
Film) from the United Arab Emirates.1
This review covers one producer/
exporter of subject merchandise, JBF
RAK LLC (JBF). Based on our analysis
of the comments and information
received, we made changes to the
Preliminary Results, which are
discussed below. The final weightedaverage dumping margin is listed below
in the section titled ‘‘Final Results of
Review.’’
DATES: Effective Date: April 14, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On December 8, 2014, the Department
published the Preliminary Results.
Since the Preliminary Results, the
following events have taken place: The
Department received timely case briefs
1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 72624 (December 8,
2014) (Preliminary Results).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Apr 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
from JBF on January 14, 2015, and from
DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi
Polyester Film, Inc., and SKC, Inc.,
(collectively, Petitioners) on January 15,
2015.2 JBF filed a timely rebuttal brief
on January 20, 2015.3
Period of Review
The period of review is November 1,
2012, through October 31, 2013.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or primed
polyethylene terephthalate film (PET
Film), whether extruded or co-extruded.
Excluded are metallized films and other
finished films that have had at least one
of their surfaces modified by the
application of a performance-enhancing
resinous or inorganic layer more than
0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is
roller transport cleaning film which has
at least one of its surfaces modified by
application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR
latex. Tracing and drafting film is also
excluded. PET Film is classifiable under
subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by parties in the case
and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, from
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations,
‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate
Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United
Arab Emirates: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results’’
(Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted
by, this notice. A list of the issues
addressed in the Decision Memorandum
is appended to this notice. The Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is available electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Services System
2 See ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film,
Sheet and Strip from the United Arab Emirates (A–
520–803); Case Briefof JBF RAK, LLC,’’ dated
January 14, 2015 and ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate
(PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United
ArabEmirates: Petitioners’ Case BriefCite briefs’’
dated January 15, 2015.
3 See ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film,
Sheet and Strip from the United Arab Emirates (A–
520–803); Rebuttal Brief of JBF RAK, LLC,’’ dated
January 20, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit
of the main Commerce Building, Room
7046. In addition, a complete version of
the Decision Memorandum is also
accessible on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we made
adjustments to our margin calculations
for JBF. Specifically, we have made
adjustments for commissions JBF
received in the home and U.S. markets,
we have adjusted JBF’s finance expense
ratio, and we have adjusted the
materials cost to account for certain
inputs JBF purchased from an affiliated
party.4 A complete discussion of these
adjustments and changes can be found
in the Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
As a result of this review, we
determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
period of November 1, 2012, through
October 31, 2013:
Producer or
exporter
Weighted-average
dumping margin
(percent ad valorem)
JBF RAK LLC .......
11.49
Disclosure
We will disclose to interested parties
the calculations performed in
connection with these final results
within five days of the publication of
this notice, consistent with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review.5 The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP
15 days after the date of publication of
these final results of review.
4 See Memorandum to Mark Hoadley, ‘‘Final
Analysis Memorandum for JBF RAK LLC,’’ April 7,
2015.
5 The Department applied the assessment rate
calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average
Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain
Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77
FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19961-19964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08591]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-954]
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People's Republic of
China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') published the
Preliminary Results of the third administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain magnesia carbon bricks from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC'') on October 9, 2014.\1\ We gave
interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary
Results. Based upon our analysis of the comments received, we made no
change to the Preliminary Results. The final weighted-average dumping
margins are listed below in the ``Final Results of Administrative
Review'' section of this notice. The period of review (``POR'') is
September 1, 2012, through August 31, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the People's
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 61052
(October 9, 2014) (``Preliminary Results''), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective date: April 14, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office
V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 9, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary
Results. On November 10, 2014, the Department received a case brief
from Resco Products, Inc. (``Petitioner'') and Magnesita Refractories
Company, a domestic interested party.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order includes certain magnesia
carbon bricks. Certain magnesia carbon bricks that are the subject of
this order are currently classifiable under subheadings 6902.10.1000,
6902.10.5000, 6815.91.0000, 6815.99.2000 and 6815.99.4000 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For a full description of the scope of the Order, see
Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary,
AD/CVD Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of Third Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the People's Republic of
China,'' (``I&D Memo'') dated concurrently with these results and
hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
We addressed all issues raised in the case brief by parties in this
review in the Decision Memo. A list of issues included in the Decision
Memo is attached as Appendix I to this notice. The Decision Memo is a
public document and it is available electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the
Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, the Decision Memo can be accessed
directly on Enforcement and Compliance's Web site at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Decision Memo and the
electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in content.
Final Partial Rescission of the Administrative Review
In the Preliminary Results, the Department indicated its intention
to rescind this review with respect to Fedmet Resources Corporation
(``Fedmet''), based on Fedmet's statement and supplemental information
that it is a U.S. importer, not a PRC producer.\3\ Subsequent to the
Preliminary Results, no information was submitted on the record
contrary to Fedmet's claim, and no party provided written arguments
regarding this issue. Thus, we are rescinding this review with respect
to Fedmet, and Fedmet's entries will be subject to the appropriate
[[Page 19962]]
exporter's cash deposit requirements and assessment rates, as outlined
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Preliminary Results, 79 FR 61053.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results, Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co.,
Ltd. of Haicheng City (``Fengchi'') submitted a timely-filed
certification that it had no shipments of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR. Thus, we preliminarily determined that
Fengchi had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\4\ We
received no contradictory information from CBP indicating that there
were suspended entries of subject merchandise into the United States
exported by Fengchi. Accordingly, for the final results we continue to
find that Fengchi had no shipments of subject merchandise, and it will
retain its separate-rate status which was in effect at the initiation
of this administrative review.\5\ Consistent with our assessment
clarification, the Department will issue appropriate instructions to
CBP based on our final results.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id.
\5\ Fengchi's no shipments certification also applied to Fengchi
Refractories Co., of Haicheng City; however, that company did not
previously qualify for a separate rate and remains subject to the
cash deposit requirements for the PRC-Wide Entity as discussed
below. See letter to the Department from Fengchi, ``Magnesia Carbon
Bricks from China Case No. A-570-954: No Shipments Letter,'' dated
January 2, 2014.
\6\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (``Assessment
Practice Refinement''); see also the ``Assessment'' section of this
notice, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity
In the Preliminary Results, for the PRC-Wide Entity, the Department
assigned the rate of 236 percent, the only rate ever determined for the
PRC-Wide Entity in this proceeding.\7\ Because this rate is the same as
the rate for the PRC-Wide Entity from previous completed segments in
this proceeding and nothing on the record of the instant review calls
into question the reliability of this rate, we find it appropriate to
continue to apply a rate of 236 percent to the PRC-Wide Entity.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum at 4.
\8\ See, e.g., Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's
Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, 74 FR 8907, 8910 (February 27, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, in the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that
those companies which did not demonstrate eligibility for a separate
rate are properly considered part of the PRC-Wide Entity.\9\ Since the
Preliminary Results, none of these companies submitted comments
regarding these findings. Therefore, we continue to treat these
companies as part of the PRC-Wide Entity.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum at 4.
\10\ For a list of companies that are subject to this
administrative review as part of the PRC-Wide Entity, see Appendix
II to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, in the Preliminary Results, for 155 companies, the
Department found that, while the request for review had been withdrawn,
none of these companies was eligible for a separate rate at the time of
the initiation of this review. Accordingly, these 155 companies will
continue to be considered part of the PRC-Wide Entity, which remained
under review for the Preliminary Results.\11\ Thus, the Department did
not rescind the review for any of these 155 companies in the
Preliminary Results.\12\ Since the Preliminary Results, no party has
presented information to the contrary, and, thus, these 155 companies
continue to be considered as part of the PRC-Wide Entity, which remains
under review for the final results.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Preliminary Results, 79 FR 61503.
\12\ See, e.g., Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From
the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 47363,
47365 (August 8, 2012), unchanged in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010- 2011, 78 FR 10130
(February 13, 2013). A change in practice with respect to the
conditional review of the PRC-wide entity is not applicable to this
administrative review. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of
Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in
Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket
Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65964,
65969-70 (November 4, 2013).
\13\ For a list of companies that are subject to this
administrative review as part of the PRC-Wide Entity, see Appendix
II to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period September 1,
2012, through August 31, 2013:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity.................................... 236.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine,
and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212. The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of
the final results of review. For all appropriate entries exported by
the PRC-Wide Entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate
these entries at an antidumping assessment rate of 236.00 percent.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final
results, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that are
eligible for a separate rate from a prior completed segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing
exporter-specific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be eligible for a separate
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-Wide Entity;
and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which are not
eligible for a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter.
These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notifications
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as
a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order
(``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction
of proprietary information disclosed under APO, which continues to
govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
These final results are issued and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
[[Page 19963]]
Dated: April 7, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
(1) Whether the Department Should Limit CBP Data Query to
Suspended AD/CVD Entries
(2) Whether the Department Should Issue Q&V Questionnaires to
All Companies Under Review
(3) Whether Identifying Misclassified Entries Falls Under the
Department's Authority
V. Conclusion
Appendix II
Companies Subject to the Administrative Review that Are Part of the
PRC-Wide Entity
1. ANH (Xinyi) Refractories Co. Ltd.
2. Anyang Rongzhu Silicon Industry Co., Ltd.
3. Barsan Global Lojistik Ve Gum. Mus.
4. Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd.
5. Beijing Tianxing Ceramic Fiber Composite Materials Corp.
6. Benxi Iron & Steel (Group) International Economic & Trading Co.
7. Changxing Magnesium Furnace Charge Co., Ltd.
8. Changxing Wangfa Architectural & Metallurgical Materials Co.,
Ltd.
9. Changzing Zhicheng Refractory Material Factory.
10. China Metallurgical Raw Material Beijing Company.
11. China Quantai Metallurgical (Beijing) Engineering & Science Co.,
Ltd.
12. Chosun Refractories.
13. Cimm Group of China.
14. CNBM International Corporation.
15. Dalian Cerax Co., Ltd.
16. Dalian Dalmond Trading Co., Ltd.
17. Dalian F.T.Z. Huaxin International.
18. Dalian F.T.Z. Maylong Resources Co., Ltd.
19. Dalian Huayu Refractories International Co., Ltd.
20. Dalian LST Metallurgy Co., Ltd.
21. Dalian Masoo International Trading.
22. Dalian Mayerton Refractories Ltd.
23. Dalian Morgan Refractories Ltd.
24. Dashiqiao Bozhong Mineral Products Co., Ltd.
25. Dashiqiao City Magnesite.
26. Dashiqiao City Guangcheng Refractory Co., Ltd.
27. Dashiqiao Jia Sheng Mining Co., Ltd.
28. Dashiqiao Jinlong Refractories Co., Ltd.
29. Dashiqiao RongXing Refractory Material Co., Ltd.
30. Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Material Co., Ltd.
31. Dashiqiao Yutong Packing Factory.
32. Dashiqiao Zhongjian Magnesia.
33. Dengfeng Desheng Refractory Co., Ltd.
34. DFL Minmet Refractories Corp.
35. Duferco SA.
36. Duferco BarInvest SA Beijing Office.
37. Duferco Ironet Shanghai Representative Office.
38. Eastern Industries & Trading Co., Ltd.
39. Far Horizon Trading Limited.
40. Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd of Haicheng City.
41. Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng City.
42. Fengchi Refractories Corp.
43. Ferro Alliages & Mineraux Inc.
44. Firma.
45. Haicheng City Qunli Mining Co., Ltd.
46. Haicheng City Xiyang Import & Export Corporation.
47. Haicheng Donghe Taidi Refractory Co., Ltd.
48. Haicheng Ruitong Mining Co., Ltd.
49. Haiyuan Talc Powder Manufacture Factory.
50. Henan Boma Co. Ltd.
51. Henan Kingway Chemicals Co., Ltd.
52. Henan Tagore Refractories Co., Ltd.
53. Henan Xinmi Changzxing Refractories, Co., Ltd.
54. Hebei Qinghe Refractory Group Co. Ltd.
55. Huailin Refractories (Dashiqiao) Pte. Ltd.
56. Hualude Hardware Products Co. Ltd.
57. Indian Technomac Co., Ltd.
58. Jfe Refractories Corporation.
59. Jiangsu Sujia Group New Materials Co., Ltd.
60. Jiangsu Sujia Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.
61. Jinan Forever Imp. & Emp. Trading Co., Ltd.
62. Jinan Linquan Imp. & Emp. Co. Ltd.
63. Jinan Ludong Refractory Co., Ltd.
64. Kosmokraft Refractory Limited.
65. Kuehne & Nagel Ltd. Dalian Branch Office.
66. Kumas Sanayi Urunleri Ve Insaat Paz.
67. Lechang City Guangdong Province SongXin Refractories Co., Ltd.
68. Liaoning Fucheng Refractories Group Co., Ltd.
69. Liaoning Fucheng Special Refractory Co., Ltd.
70. Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Minerals Ltd.
71. Liaoning Jinding Magnesite Group.
72. Liaoning Mayerton Refractories Co., Ltd.
73. Liaoning Mineral & Metallurgy Group Co., Ltd.
74. Liaoning Qunyi Group Refractories Co., Ltd.
75. Liaoning Qunyi Trade Co., Ltd.
76. Liaoning RHI Jinding Magnesis Co., Ltd.
77. Liaoning Zhongxing Mining Industry Group Co., Ltd.
78. LiShuang Refractory Industrial Co., Ltd.
79. Lithomelt Co., Ltd.
80. Lua Viet Bestref Joint Venture Co.
81. Luheng Refractory Co., Ltd.
82. Luoyang Refractory Group Co., Ltd.
83. Mayerton Refractories.
84. Minsource International Ltd.
85. Minteq International Inc.
86. National Minerals Co., Ltd.
87. Navis Zufall Ueberseespeditions.
88. North Refractories Co., Ltd.
89. Orestar Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd.
90. Oreworld Trade (Tangshan) Co., Ltd.
91. Puyang Refractories Co., Ltd.
92. Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd. (HQ).
93. Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd. (Manufacturing).
94. Qingdao Almatis Trading Co., Ltd. (Sales Office).
95. Qingdao Blueshell Import & Emport Corp.
96. Qingdao Fujing Group Co., Ltd.
97. Qingdao Huierde International Trade Co., Ltd.
98. Refratechnik Cement GmbH.
99. Refratechnik Steel GmbH.
100. RHI AG.
101. RHI GLAS GmbH.
102. RHI Refractories Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
103. RHI Refractories (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
104. RHI Trading Shanghai Branch.
105. RHI Trading (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
106. Rongyuan Magnesite Co., Ltd. of Dashiqiao City.
107. Shandong Cambridge International Trade Inc.
108. Shandong Lunai Kiln Refractories Co., Ltd.
109. Shandong Refractories Corp.
110. Shanghai Pudong Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd.
111. Shanghai Vista Packaging Co., ltd.
112. Shanxi Dajin International (Group) Co., Ltd.
113. Shanxi Xinrong International Trade Co. Ltd.
114. Shenyang Shenghui Refractory Imp.
115. Shenyang Yi Xin Sheng Lai Refractory Materials Co., Ltd.
116. Shinagawa Refractories Co., Ltd.
117. Shinagawa Rongyuan Refractories Co., Ltd.
118. Sinosteel Corporation.
119. SMMC Group Co., Ltd.
120. Store System Inc. O B Dongning Shunf.
121. Syndicate Exp. Pvt., Ltd.
122. Tangshan Success Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd.
123. Tianjin New Century Refractories, Ltd.
124. Tianjin New World Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd.
125. Tianjin Weiyuan Refractory Co., Ltd.
126. The Economic Trading Group of Haicheng Huoying Corporation Ltd.
127. Vereeniging Refractories (Pty).
128. Vesuvius Advanced Ceramics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
129. Wonjin Refractories Co., Ltd.
130. Wuxi Tian Liang Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.
131. Xiyuan Xingquan Forsterite Co., Ltd.
132. Yanshi City Guangming High-Tech Refractories Products Co., Ltd.
133. YHS Minerals Co., Ltd.
134. Yingkou Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd.
135. Yingkou Bl Mining Co., Ltd.
136. Yingkou Dalmond Refractories Co., Ltd.
137. Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co., Ltd.
138. Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co., Ltd. (YGR).
139. Yingkou Heping Samwha Minerals Co., Ltd.
140. Yingkou Jiahe Refractories Co., Ltd.
141. Yingkou Jinlong Refractories Group.
142. Yingkou Kyushu Refractories Co., Ltd.
143. Yingkou Qinghua Group Imp. & Emp. Co., Ltd.
144. Yingkou Qinghua Refractories Co., Ltd.
145. Yingkou Sanhua Refractory Materials Co., Ltd.
146. Yingkou Tianrun Refractory Co.,Ltd.
147. Yingkou Wonjin Refractory Material Co., Ltd.
148. Yingkou Yongji Mag Refractory, Ltd.
149. Yixing Runlong Trade Co., Ltd.
150. Yixing Xinwei Leeshing Refractory Material Co., Ltd.
151. Yixing Zhenqiu Charging Ltd.
[[Page 19964]]
152. Zhejiang Changxing Guangming Special Refractory Material
Foundry, Co., Ltd.
153. Zhejiang Deqing Jinlei Refractory Co., Ltd.
154. Zhejiang Huzhou Fuzilin Refractory Metals Group Co., Ltd.
155. Zhengzhou Annec Industrial Co., Ltd.
156. Zhengzhou Huachen Refractory Co., Ltd.
157. Zhengzhou Huawei Refractories Co., Ltd.
158. Zibo Lianzhu Refractory Materials Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2015-08591 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
