Approval, Disapproval, and Limited Approval and Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District; Stationary Source Permits, 15899-15901 [2015-06705]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 58 / Thursday, March 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Quota type
Eligible person
(viii) CVC or CPC IFQ ....................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 680.43
Revocation of CVC and CPC QS.
(a) Beginning July 1, 2019, the
Regional Administrator will revoke all
CVC QS and CPC QS held by an
individual who has not met the
participation requirements set forth in
§ 680.40(m). The Regional
Administrator will revoke an
individual’s CVC QS or CPC QS in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in this section.
(b) Notice of C Share QS Inactivity.
The Regional Administrator will issue a
Notice of C Share QS Inactivity to an
individual holding CVC or CPC QS if,
after reviewing the CVC or CPC QS
holder’s Applications for Annual Crab
IFQ Permit, the Regional Administrator
determines that the CVC or CPC QS
holder has failed to meet the
participation requirements in
§ 680.40(m). A CVC or CPC QS holder
who receives such a Notice will have 60
days to provide the Regional
Administrator with information
demonstrating participation as crew that
meets the requirements of § 680.40(m).
(c) Initial administrative
determination (IAD). The Regional
Administrator will prepare and send an
IAD to the CVC or CPC QS holder
following the expiration of the 60-day
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Mar 25, 2015
Eligibility requirements
All eligible individuals for CVC or
CPC QS.
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Eligibility for CVC or CPC QS/IFQ.
Indicate (YES or NO) whether this
application is intended for a person who
wishes to buy CVC or CPC QS/IFQ. If
YES, provide evidence demonstrating
that the applicant meets the criteria set
forth in paragraph (c)(1)(vii) of this
section. Acceptable evidence is limited
to an ADF&G fish ticket imprinted with
the applicant’s State of Alaska permit
card and signed by the applicant, an
affidavit from the vessel owner, or a
signed receipt for an IFQ crab landing
on which the applicant was acting as
the permit holder’s crab IFQ hired
master.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) IFQ derived from CVC QS or CPC
QS. IFQ derived from CVC or CPC QS
may be transferred by lease on an
annual basis.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Revise § 680.43 to read as follows:
Jkt 235001
(ii) Participated as crew in at least one delivery of crab in a
CR crab fishery in any 3 of the 5 crab fishing years starting on July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2005.
According to the requirements in paragraph (c)(1)(vii) of this section.
evidentiary period if the Regional
Administrator determines that the
information or evidence provided by the
CVC or CPC QS holder fails to
demonstrate participation as crew and is
insufficient to rebut the information
included in the CVC or CPC QS holder’s
Applications for Annual Crab IFQ
Permit, or if the additional information
or evidence is not provided within the
time period specified in the Notice of C
Share QS Inactivity. The IAD will
explain the basis for the revocation
determination. A CVC or CPC QS holder
who receives an IAD for revocation may
appeal under the appeals procedures set
forth at 15 CFR part 906. A CVC or CPC
QS holder who avails himself or herself
of the opportunity to appeal an IAD for
revocation will not receive crab IFQ or
IPQ until after the final resolution of
that appeal in the QS holder’s favor.
[FR Doc. 2015–06928 Filed 3–25–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0746; FRL–9924–49–
Region 9]
Approval, Disapproval, and Limited
Approval and Disapproval of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
California; Monterey Bay Unified Air
Pollution Control District; Stationary
Source Permits
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve certain revisions to the
Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution
Control District (MBUAPCD or District)
portion of the applicable state
implementation plan (SIP) for the State
of California and to disapprove certain
other revisions. This action was
proposed in the Federal Register on
October 15, 2014. These revisions
include submittal of certain new or
revised rules governing the issuance of
permits for stationary sources, including
review and permitting of minor sources,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
15899
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and major sources and major
modifications under part C of title I of
the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is taking
this action under the Clean Air Act
obligation to take action on State
submittals of revisions to state
implementation plans. The intended
effect is to update the applicable SIP
with current MBUAPCD permitting
rules and set the stage for remedying
certain deficiencies in these rules.
DATES:
This rule is effective on April 27,
2015.
EPA has established docket
number [EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0746]
for this action. Generally, documents in
the docket for this action are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California 94105–3901.
While all documents in the docket are
listed at https://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps,
multi-volume reports), and some may
not be available in either location (e.g.,
confidential business information
(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, by
phone: (415) 972–3534 or by email at
yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comment
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On October 15, 2014 (79 FR 61797),
EPA proposed several actions in
connection with certain revisions to the
MBUAPCD portion of the California SIP
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board under the CAA. Table
1 lists the rules submitted for EPA
action.
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
15900
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 58 / Thursday, March 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Rule No.
200
203
204
206
207
208
212
...................................................
...................................................
...................................................
...................................................
...................................................
...................................................
...................................................
Permits Required .......................................................................................
Application .................................................................................................
Cancellation of Applications ......................................................................
Standards for Granting Applications .........................................................
Review of New or Modified Sources .........................................................
Standards for Granting Permits to Operate (Request to Repeal) ............
Public Availability of Emission Data ..........................................................
EPA proposed a combination of
actions consisting of disapproval of Rule
200 (Permits), limited approval and
limited disapproval of Rule 207 (Review
of New or Modified Sources), repeal of
Rule 208 (Standards for Granting
Permits to Operate) and approval of
Rules 203 (Application), 204
(Cancellation of Applications), 206
(Standards for Granting Applications)
and 212 (Public Availability of Emission
Data). We noted one specific deficiency
in Rule 200 and several deficiencies in
Rule 207 that are the basis for the
disapproval actions. Please see the
proposed notice and the associated TSD
for a list of these deficiencies.
II. Public Comment
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this
time we received no comments.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted to
change our assessment of the rules as
described in our proposed action.
Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA
and for the reasons provided in our
proposed action and associated TSD,
EPA is finalizing a limited approval and
limited disapproval of Rule 207, a full
disapproval of Rule 200, full approval of
Rules 203, 204, 206 and 212 and the
request to repeal Rule 208.
Our full disapproval of Rule 200
means the current SIP approved version
of Rule 200—Permits Required will
remain in effect. (64 FR 35577 July 1,
1999).
The limited disapproval of Rule 207
triggers an obligation for EPA to
promulgate a Federal Implementation
Plan unless the State of California
corrects the deficiencies, and EPA
approves the related plan revisions
within two years of the final action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
MBUAPCD rules described in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Mar 25, 2015
Adopted or
revised
Rule title
Jkt 235001
amendments to 40 CFR 52.220 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the appropriate EPA office (see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12/13/00
10/16/02
3/21/01
3/21/01
4/20/11
12/13/00
10/16/02
Submitted
5/8/01
12/12/02
5/31/01
5/31/01
5/12/11
5/8/01
12/12/02
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 58 / Thursday, March 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
40 CFR Part 52
Dated: March 4, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[EPA–R06–OAR–2008–0636; FRL–9925–11–
Region 6]
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(282)(i)(C)(2) and
(3) and (c)(284)(i)(A)(5) and
(c)(308)(i)(E) and (c)(453) to read as
follows:
■
Identification of plan.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(282) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(2) Rule 204, ‘‘Cancellation of
Applications,’’ revised on March 21,
2001.
(3) Rule 206, ‘‘Standards for Issuing
Authorities to Construct and Permits to
Operate,’’ revised on March 21, 2001.
*
*
*
*
*
(284) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(5) Rule 200, ‘‘Permits Required,’’
revised on December 13, 2000.
*
*
*
*
*
(308) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Monterey Bay Unified Air
Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 203, ‘‘Application,’’ revised
October 16, 2002.
(2) Rule 212, ‘‘Public Availability of
Emission Data,’’ revised on October 16,
2002.
*
*
*
*
*
(453) New and amended regulations
for the following APCDs were submitted
on May 12, 2011.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Monterey Bay Unified Air
Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 207, ‘‘Review of New or
Modified Sources,’’ revised on April 20,
2011.
[FR Doc. 2015–06705 Filed 3–25–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Mar 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dated: March 13, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
Accordingly, the amendments to 40
CFR 52.1620 published in the Federal
Register on February 2, 2015 (80 FR
5471), which were to become effective
on April 3, 2015, are withdrawn.
[FR Doc. 2015–06701 Filed 3–25–15; 8:45 am]
On February 2, 2015, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
published a direct final rule approving
revisions to the Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County, New Mexico State
Implementation Plan. These revisions
add definitions and clarifying changes
to the general provisions and add a new
emissions inventory regulation that
establishes reporting requirements for
stationary sources in Albuquerque/
Bernalillo County. The direct final rule
was published without prior proposal
because EPA anticipated no adverse
comments. EPA stated in the direct final
rule that if we received relevant, adverse
comments by March 4, 2015, EPA
would publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register. EPA received a
comment on February 20, 2015 from the
Sierra Club stating in relevant part, that
an Acting Regional Administrator
cannot sign approvals, disapprovals, or
any combination of approvals or
disapproval, in whole or in part, due to
the fact that the authority to act on
agency actions on state implementation
plans is delegated only to, and therefore
can only be signed by, the Regional
Administrator. EPA considers this a
relevant, adverse comment and
accordingly we are withdrawing our
direct final rule approval, and in a
separate subsequent final rulemaking
we will address the comment received.
The withdrawal is being taken pursuant
to section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
SUMMARY:
Subpart F—California
*
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxides, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.
AGENCY:
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; New
Mexico; Albuquerque/Bernalillo
County; Revisions to Emission
Inventory Requirements, and General
Provisions
15901
The direct final rule published
on February 2, 2015 (80 FR 5471), is
withdrawn effective March 26, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John Walser (6PD–L), Air Planning
Section, telephone (214) 665–7128, fax
(214) 665–6762, email: walser.john@
epa.gov.
DATES:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2014–0624, 0625; FRL
9924–32–OSWER]
National Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
(‘‘CERCLA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’), as amended,
requires that the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (‘‘NCP’’) include a list
of national priorities among the known
releases or threatened releases of
hazardous substances, pollutants or
contaminants throughout the United
States. The National Priorities List
(‘‘NPL’’) constitutes this list. The NPL is
intended primarily to guide the
Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘the
EPA’’ or ‘‘the agency’’) in determining
which sites warrant further
investigation. These further
investigations will allow the EPA to
assess the nature and extent of public
health and environmental risks
associated with the site and to
determine what CERCLA-financed
remedial action(s), if any, may be
appropriate. This rule adds two sites to
the General Superfund section of the
NPL.
SUMMARY:
The document is effective on
April 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Contact information for the
EPA Headquarters and EPA Region 5
dockets:
• Docket Coordinator, Headquarters;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;
CERCLA Docket Office; 1301
Constitution Avenue NW.; William
Jefferson Clinton Building West, Room
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 58 (Thursday, March 26, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15899-15901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06705]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0746; FRL-9924-49-Region 9]
Approval, Disapproval, and Limited Approval and Disapproval of
Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; Monterey Bay Unified Air
Pollution Control District; Stationary Source Permits
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve certain revisions to the Monterey Bay Unified Air
Pollution Control District (MBUAPCD or District) portion of the
applicable state implementation plan (SIP) for the State of California
and to disapprove certain other revisions. This action was proposed in
the Federal Register on October 15, 2014. These revisions include
submittal of certain new or revised rules governing the issuance of
permits for stationary sources, including review and permitting of
minor sources, and major sources and major modifications under part C
of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is taking this action under
the Clean Air Act obligation to take action on State submittals of
revisions to state implementation plans. The intended effect is to
update the applicable SIP with current MBUAPCD permitting rules and set
the stage for remedying certain deficiencies in these rules.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number [EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0746]
for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-
3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at https://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at
the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-
volume reports), and some may not be available in either location
(e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, by
phone: (415) 972-3534 or by email at yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,''
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comment
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On October 15, 2014 (79 FR 61797), EPA proposed several actions in
connection with certain revisions to the MBUAPCD portion of the
California SIP submitted by the California Air Resources Board under
the CAA. Table 1 lists the rules submitted for EPA action.
[[Page 15900]]
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adopted or
Rule No. Rule title revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
200........................................ Permits Required................... 12/13/00 5/8/01
203........................................ Application........................ 10/16/02 12/12/02
204........................................ Cancellation of Applications....... 3/21/01 5/31/01
206........................................ Standards for Granting Applications 3/21/01 5/31/01
207........................................ Review of New or Modified Sources.. 4/20/11 5/12/11
208........................................ Standards for Granting Permits to 12/13/00 5/8/01
Operate (Request to Repeal).
212........................................ Public Availability of Emission 10/16/02 12/12/02
Data.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA proposed a combination of actions consisting of disapproval of
Rule 200 (Permits), limited approval and limited disapproval of Rule
207 (Review of New or Modified Sources), repeal of Rule 208 (Standards
for Granting Permits to Operate) and approval of Rules 203
(Application), 204 (Cancellation of Applications), 206 (Standards for
Granting Applications) and 212 (Public Availability of Emission Data).
We noted one specific deficiency in Rule 200 and several deficiencies
in Rule 207 that are the basis for the disapproval actions. Please see
the proposed notice and the associated TSD for a list of these
deficiencies.
II. Public Comment
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this time we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted to change our assessment of the rules as
described in our proposed action. Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA
and for the reasons provided in our proposed action and associated TSD,
EPA is finalizing a limited approval and limited disapproval of Rule
207, a full disapproval of Rule 200, full approval of Rules 203, 204,
206 and 212 and the request to repeal Rule 208.
Our full disapproval of Rule 200 means the current SIP approved
version of Rule 200--Permits Required will remain in effect. (64 FR
35577 July 1, 1999).
The limited disapproval of Rule 207 triggers an obligation for EPA
to promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan unless the State of
California corrects the deficiencies, and EPA approves the related plan
revisions within two years of the final action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
MBUAPCD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR 52.220 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and
[[Page 15901]]
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 4, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(282)(i)(C)(2) and
(3) and (c)(284)(i)(A)(5) and (c)(308)(i)(E) and (c)(453) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(282) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(2) Rule 204, ``Cancellation of Applications,'' revised on March
21, 2001.
(3) Rule 206, ``Standards for Issuing Authorities to Construct and
Permits to Operate,'' revised on March 21, 2001.
* * * * *
(284) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(5) Rule 200, ``Permits Required,'' revised on December 13, 2000.
* * * * *
(308) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 203, ``Application,'' revised October 16, 2002.
(2) Rule 212, ``Public Availability of Emission Data,'' revised on
October 16, 2002.
* * * * *
(453) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were
submitted on May 12, 2011.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 207, ``Review of New or Modified Sources,'' revised on
April 20, 2011.
[FR Doc. 2015-06705 Filed 3-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
