Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of Effectiveness of Withdrawal of Rehearing Request, 13535 [2015-05871]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 50 / Monday, March 16, 2015 / Notices
Dated March 4, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[FR Doc. 2015–05866 Filed 3–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
[Docket No. CP15–101–000]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Midwestern Gas Transmission
Company; Notice of Request Under
Blanket Authorization
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No., 2232–610]
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of
Effectiveness of Withdrawal of
Rehearing Request
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
On August 11, 2009, Duke Energy
Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy), filed a
petition asking the Commission to
declare that the state of South Carolina
has waived its water quality
certification for the relicensing of Duke
Energy’s Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric
Project No. 2232. On April 17, 2014, the
Commission denied the petition.1 On
May 16, 2014, Duke Energy filed a
request for rehearing. By delegated order
issued June 16, 2014, rehearing was
granted for the limited purpose of
further consideration.
On August 5, 2014, based on an
agreement among Duke Energy, two
environmental stakeholders, and South
Carolina’s water quality agency, Duke
Energy filed a motion to stay
deliberation on the rehearing request.
On February 18, 2015, having received
a final water quality certification from
the state, Duke Energy filed a notice of
withdrawal of its rehearing request.
Pursuant to Rule 216 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure,2 the withdrawal of any
pleading is effective at the end of 15
days from the date the notice of
withdrawal is filed if, within that
period, no motion in opposition to the
notice is filed and the Commission takes
no action disallowing withdrawal. The
15-day period closed on March 5, 2015.
No such pleading was filed, and the
Commission took no such action.
Accordingly, Duke Energy’s rehearing
request is withdrawn and this
proceeding is thereby terminated.
Dated: March 6, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–05871 Filed 3–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01P
1 Duke
2 18
Energy Carolinas, LLC, 147 FERC ¶ 61,037.
CFR 385.216 (2014).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:09 Mar 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
Take notice that on February 27, 2015,
Midwestern Gas Transmission
Company, (Midwestern Gas), 100 West
5th Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103, filed
in the above Docket, a prior notice
request pursuant to section 157.210 of
the Commission’s regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) requesting
authorization to construct and operate
the Herscher Compressor Station Project
(Project), in Kankakee County, Illinois.
Specifically, Midwestern proposes to
construct an approximately 15,000horsepower natural gas fired engine
compressor station that will allow it to
provide up to 125,000 dekatherms per
day of firm transportation service on its
system. Midwestern estimates the cost
of the Project to be approximately
$25,900,453, all as more fully set forth
in the application which is on file with
the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be
viewed on the web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at FERCOnlineSupport@
ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208–3676, or
TTY, contact (202) 502–8659.
Any questions concerning this
application may be directed to Denise
Adams, Manager Rates and Regulatory
Analysis, Midwestern Gas Transmission
Company, 100 West 5th Street, Tulsa,
Oklahoma, at (918) 732–1408.
Any person may, within 60 days after
the issuance of the instant notice by the
Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214
of the Commission’s Procedural Rules
(18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene
or notice of intervention. Any person
filing to intervene or the Commission’s
staff may, pursuant to section 157.205 of
the Commission’s Regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) (18 CFR 157.205)
file a protest to the request. If no protest
is filed within the time allowed
therefore, the proposed activity shall be
deemed to be authorized effective the
day after the time allowed for protest. If
a protest is filed and not withdrawn
within 30 days after the time allowed
for filing a protest, the instant request
shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of
the NGA.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
13535
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the
Commission’s rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the
Commission staff will either: Complete
its environmental assessment (EA) and
place it into the Commission’s public
record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or
issue a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review. If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is
issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the
Commission staff’s issuance of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS)
or EA for this proposal. The filing of the
EA in the Commission’s public record
for this proceeding or the issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the
completion of all necessary reviews, and
the subsequent need to complete all
federal authorizations within 90 days of
the date of issuance of the Commission
staff’s FEIS or EA.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project should submit an original and
two copies of their comments to the
Secretary of the Commission.
Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission’s
environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents,
and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s
environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be
required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commentary
will not receive copies of all documents
filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests,
and interventions via the internet in lieu
of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (www.ferc.gov)
under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. Persons
unable to file electronically should
submit original and 5 copies of the
protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Dated: March 9, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–05881 Filed 3–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 50 (Monday, March 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05871]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No., 2232-610]
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of Effectiveness of Withdrawal
of Rehearing Request
On August 11, 2009, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy), filed
a petition asking the Commission to declare that the state of South
Carolina has waived its water quality certification for the relicensing
of Duke Energy's Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project No. 2232. On
April 17, 2014, the Commission denied the petition.\1\ On May 16, 2014,
Duke Energy filed a request for rehearing. By delegated order issued
June 16, 2014, rehearing was granted for the limited purpose of further
consideration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, 147 FERC ] 61,037.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 5, 2014, based on an agreement among Duke Energy, two
environmental stakeholders, and South Carolina's water quality agency,
Duke Energy filed a motion to stay deliberation on the rehearing
request. On February 18, 2015, having received a final water quality
certification from the state, Duke Energy filed a notice of withdrawal
of its rehearing request.
Pursuant to Rule 216 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure,\2\ the withdrawal of any pleading is effective at the end of
15 days from the date the notice of withdrawal is filed if, within that
period, no motion in opposition to the notice is filed and the
Commission takes no action disallowing withdrawal. The 15-day period
closed on March 5, 2015. No such pleading was filed, and the Commission
took no such action. Accordingly, Duke Energy's rehearing request is
withdrawn and this proceeding is thereby terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 18 CFR 385.216 (2014).
Dated: March 6, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05871 Filed 3-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01P
