Certain Footwear Products; Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review Granting New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.'s Motion To Intervene as a Respondent, 9748 [2015-03693]

Download as PDF 9748 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 36 / Tuesday, February 24, 2015 / Notices comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. Please be aware that the Commission’s rules with respect to filing have changed. The most recent amendments took effect on July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014), and the revised Commission Handbook on E-filing, available from the Commission’s Web site at https:// edis.usitc.gov. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determination. The Commission has determined these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: February 18, 2015. By order of the Commission. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–03679 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–936] Certain Footwear Products; Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review Granting New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.’s Motion To Intervene as a Respondent U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 36) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.’s (‘‘New Balance’’) motion to intervene as a respondent in the investigation. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:31 Feb 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on November 17, 2014, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Converse Inc. (‘‘Converse’’) of North Andover, Massachusetts. 79 FR 68482. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement of certain U.S. Trademark Registration Nos.: 4,398,753; 3,258,103; and 1,588,960. The complaint further alleges violations of section 337 based upon unfair competition/false designation of origin, common law trademark infringement and unfair competition, and trademark dilution, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. The Commission’s notice of investigation named several respondents. On January 12, 2015, non-party New Balance of Boston, Massachusetts moved to intervene as a respondent in the investigation. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion, and Converse filed a response indicating that it did not oppose the motion and affirmed that intervention would not delay or prejudice adjudication of the original parties’ rights. Other parties did not oppose the motion. On January 27, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 36) granting New Balance’s motion to intervene as a respondent in the investigation. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 210. Issued: February 18, 2015. By order of the Commission. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–03693 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure. AGENCY: Revised Notice of Open Meeting. ACTION: The March 16–17, 2015 meeting of the Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure previously scheduled at the Florida A&M University College of Law, will now be held at the United States Courthouse, 401 West Central Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32801. The announcement for this meeting was previously published in 80FR 4592. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE., Suite 7–240, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 502–1820. Dated: February 19, 2015. Julie Wilson, Attorney Advisor, Rules Committee Support Office. [FR Doc. 2015–03724 Filed 2–23–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 2210–55–P E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 9748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-936]


Certain Footwear Products; Notice of a Commission Determination 
Not to Review Granting New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.'s Motion To 
Intervene as a Respondent

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 36) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.'s (``New Balance'') 
motion to intervene as a respondent in the investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on November 17, 2014, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Converse 
Inc. (``Converse'') of North Andover, Massachusetts. 79 FR 68482. The 
complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement of certain U.S. 
Trademark Registration Nos.: 4,398,753; 3,258,103; and 1,588,960. The 
complaint further alleges violations of section 337 based upon unfair 
competition/false designation of origin, common law trademark 
infringement and unfair competition, and trademark dilution, the threat 
or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in 
the United States. The Commission's notice of investigation named 
several respondents.
    On January 12, 2015, non-party New Balance of Boston, Massachusetts 
moved to intervene as a respondent in the investigation. The Commission 
investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion, and 
Converse filed a response indicating that it did not oppose the motion 
and affirmed that intervention would not delay or prejudice 
adjudication of the original parties' rights. Other parties did not 
oppose the motion.
    On January 27, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 36) 
granting New Balance's motion to intervene as a respondent in the 
investigation. No party petitioned for review of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 
part 210.

    Issued: February 18, 2015.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-03693 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.