Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 1411-1414 [2015-00166]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Notices
WC Docket 12–375, DA 14–1848,
released December 17, 2014. The full
text of this document may be
downloaded at the following Internet
address: https://www.fcc.gov/document/
comment-deadlines-extended-inmatecalling-second-fnprm. The complete text
may be purchased from Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street SW.,
Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554.
To request alternative formats for
persons with disabilities (e.g., accessible
format documents, sign language,
interpreters, CARTS, etc.), send an
email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 or (202) 418–0432 (TTY). This
document does not contain information
collections subject to the Paperwork Act
of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13. In
addition, therefore, it does not contain
any new or modified information
collection burden[s] for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees,
pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public
Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Summary
1. On October 22, 2014, the
Commission released a Second Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (Inmate Calling
Second FNPRM), seeking comment on a
number of issues. On December 10,
2014, the Prison Policy Initiative (PPI)
filed a letter requesting additional time
for parties to respond to questions
raised in the Commission’s Inmate
Calling Second FNPRM. PPI contends
the additional time will improve the
quality of responses the Commission
receives from the public and industry
participants, and further facilitate the
Commission’s consideration of key
issues at the center of this proceeding.
2. PPI states that it has spoken with
several interested parties that consent to
this request. However, in its opposition
to the PPI Request, Securus
Technologies, Inc. (Securus) argued that
respondents have already had a
sufficient amount of time to prepare
their responses, and ‘‘the issues under
consideration in this proceeding must
be resolved expeditiously in order to
provide finality to what is now a
volatile market.’’
3. Upon review the Commission
agrees in part with the modest extension
requested by PPI, as it allows for more
fulsome comments that will facilitate
the compilation of a complete record in
this proceeding, without undue delay to
its consideration of these issues.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
Federal Communications Commission.
Lynne Engledow,
Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 2015–00100 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or
Bank Holding Company
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank
or bank holding company. The factors
that are considered in acting on the
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of
the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the offices of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than January
26, 2015.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier,
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin
Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55480–0291:
1. Jeffry Anderson and Bruce A.
Anderson, both of Lakota, North Dakota;
each to retain voting shares of Lakota
Bank Holding Company, Inc., and
thereby indirectly retain voting shares
State Bank of Lakota, both in Lakota,
North Dakota.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, January 6, 2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015–00165 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Federal Trade Commission
(FTC or Commission).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The information collection
requirements described below will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). The FTC seeks public
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1411
comments on its proposal to extend for
three years the current PRA clearances
for information collection requirements
contained in three product labeling
rules enforced by the Commission.
Those clearances expire on March 31,
2015.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 10, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comments part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Apparel Rules: FTC File
No. P074201’’ on your comment, and
file your comment online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
apparelrulespra by following the
instructions on the Web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail or deliver your comment to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
CC–5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex J),
Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for copies of the collection of
information and supporting
documentation should be addressed to
Robert M. Frisby, 202–326–2098, or
Lemuel Dowdy, 202–326–2981,
Attorneys, Division of Enforcement,
Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Room CC–
9528, Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Information Collection
Activities
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520, federal
agencies must get OMB approval for
each collection of information they
conduct, sponsor, or require.
‘‘Collection of information’’ means
agency requests or requirements to
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. 44 U.S.C.
3502(3); 5 CFR 1320.3(c). As required by
section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the
FTC is providing this opportunity for
public comment before requesting that
OMB extend the existing PRA clearance
for the information collection
requirements associated with the
Commission’s rules and regulations
under the rules and regulations under
the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939
(‘‘Wool Rules’’), 16 CFR part 300 (OMB
Control Number 3084–0100); rules and
regulations under the Textile Fiber
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
1412
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Notices
Products Identification Act (‘‘Textile
Rules’’), 16 CFR part 303 (OMB Control
Number 3084–0101); and the Care
Labeling of Textile Wearing Apparel
and Certain Piece Goods As Amended
(‘‘Care Labeling Rule’’), 16 CFR 423
(OMB Control Number 3084–0103).
The FTC invites comments on: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond.1 All
comments must be received on or before
March 10, 2015.
Burden Estimates
Staff’s burden estimates for the three
rules in question are based on data from
the Department of Commerce’s Bureau
of the Census, the International Trade
Commission, the Department of Labor’s
Bureau of Labor Statistics (‘‘BLS’’), and
data or other input from the main
industry association, the American
Apparel and Footwear Association
(AAFA). The AAFA, a national trade
association which represents U.S.
apparel, footwear and other sewn
products companies and their suppliers,
has stated that ‘‘[t]he use of labels on
textiles and apparels is beneficial to
consumers, manufacturers, and business
in general as it allows for the necessary
flow of information along the supply
chain.’’ 2 The relevant information
collection requirements in these rules
and staff’s corresponding burden
estimates follow. The estimates address
the number of hours needed and the
labor costs incurred to comply with the
requirements. Staff believes that a
significant portion of hours and labor
costs currently attributable to burden
below are time and financial resources
usually and customarily incurred by
persons in the course of their regular
activity (e.g., industry participants
already have and/or would have care
labels regardless of the rule(s)) and
could be excluded from PRA-related
burden.3
1. Wool Rules (OMB Control Number:
3084–0100)
The Wool Products Labeling Act of
1939 (‘‘Wool Act’’) 4 prohibits the
misbranding of wool products. The
Wool Rules establish disclosure
requirements that assist consumers in
making informed purchasing decisions
and recordkeeping requirements that
assist the Commission in enforcing the
Rules.
Estimated annual hours burden:
1,880,000 hours (160,000 recordkeeping
hours + 1,720,000 disclosure hours).
Recordkeeping: Staff estimates that
approximately 4,000 wool firms are
subject to the Wool Rules’
recordkeeping requirements. Based on
Task
an average annual burden of 40 hours
per firm, the total recordkeeping burden
is 160,000 hours.
Disclosure: Approximately 8,000 wool
firms, producing or importing about
600,000,000 wool products annually,
are subject to the Wool Rules’ disclosure
requirements. Staff estimates the burden
of determining label content to be 30
hours per year per firm, or a total of
240,000 hours, and the burden of
drafting and ordering labels to be 60
hours per firm per year, or a total of
480,000 hours. Staff believes that the
process of attaching labels is now fully
automated and integrated into other
production steps for about 40 percent of
all affected products. For the remaining
360,000,000 items (60 percent of
600,000,000), the process is semiautomated and requires an average of
approximately ten seconds per item, for
a total of 1,000,000 hours per year.
Thus, the total estimated annual burden
for all firms is 1,720,000 hours (240,000
hours for determining label content +
480,000 hours to draft and order labels
+ 1,000,000 hours to attach labels). Staff
believes that any additional burden
associated with advertising disclosure
requirements would be minimal (less
than 10,000 hours) and can be
subsumed within the burden estimates
set forth above.
Estimated annual cost burden:
$16,380,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely relating to labor costs).
The chart below summarizes the total
estimated costs.
Hourly rate
Burden hours
Labor cost
Determine label content ...................................................................................................
Draft and order labels ......................................................................................................
Attach labels ....................................................................................................................
Recordkeeping .................................................................................................................
$ 26.00
17.00
5 5.50
17.00
240,000
480,000
1,000,000
160,000
$6,240,000
8,160,000
5,500,000
2,720,000
Total ..........................................................................................................................
............................
............................
$16,380,000
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Staff believes that there are no current
start-up costs or other capital costs
associated with the Wool Rules. Because
the labeling of wool products has been
an integral part of the manufacturing
process for decades, manufacturers have
in place the capital equipment
necessary to comply with the Rules.
Based on knowledge of the industry,
1 As part of its regulatory review program, the
Commission is currently reviewing the Care
Labeling Rule. See Federal Trade Commission: Care
Labeling of Textile Wearing Apparel and Certain
Piece Goods as Amended: Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking; Request for Public Comment, 77 FR
58338 (Sept. 20, 2012). The Commission held a
public roundtable on the proposed amendments on
March 28, 2014. See 79 FR 9442 (Feb. 19, 2014).
The Commission recently completed its review of
the Textile and Wool Rules. Federal Trade
Commission: Rules and Regulations Under the
Textile Fiber Products Identification Act: Final
Rule, 79 FR 18766 (Apr. 4, 2014); Federal Trade
Commission: Rules and Regulations under the Wool
Products Labeling Act of 1939; Final Rule, 79 FR
32157 (June 4, 2014).
2 Page one from comment by Kevin M. Burke,
President and CEO, American Apparel & Footwear
Association, March 26, 2012, Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Public Comment;
Rules and Regulations under the Wool Products
Labeling Act of 1939; 77 FR 4498 (Jan. 30, 2012).
3 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2).
4 15 U.S.C. 68 et seq.
5 For imported products, the labels generally are
attached in the country where the products are
manufactured. According to information compiled
by an industry trade association using data from the
U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade
Administration and the U.S. Census Bureau,
approximately 97.5% of apparel used in the United
States is imported. With the remaining 2.5%
attributable to U.S. production at an approximate
domestic hourly wage of $10 to attach labels, staff
has calculated a weighted average hourly wage of
$5.50 per hour attributable to U.S. and foreign labor
combined. The estimated percentage of imports
supplied by particular countries is based on trade
data for the year ending in September 2014
compiled by the Office of Textiles and Apparel,
International Trade Administration. Wages in major
textile exporting countries, factored into the above
hourly wage estimate, were based on 2012 data
from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. See Table 1.1 Indexes of hourly
compensation costs in manufacturing, U.S. dollar
basis, 1996–2012 (Index, U.S. = 100) available at:
https://www.bls.gov/fls/#compensation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Notices
staff believes that much of the
information required by the Wool Act
and Rules would be included on the
product label even absent their
requirements. Similarly, recordkeeping
and advertising disclosures are tasks
performed in the ordinary course of
business so that covered firms would
incur no additional capital or other nonlabor costs as a result of the Rules.
2. Textile Rules (OMB Control Number:
3084–0101)
The Textile Fiber Products
Identification Act (‘‘Textile Act’’) 6
prohibits the misbranding and false
advertising of textile fiber products. The
Textile Rules establish disclosure
requirements that assist consumers in
making informed purchasing decisions,
and recordkeeping requirements that
assist the Commission in enforcing the
Rules. The Rules also contain a petition
procedure for requesting the
establishment of generic names for
textile fibers.
Estimated annual hours burden:
39,186,772 hours (1,237,015
recordkeeping hours + 37,949,757
disclosure hours).
Recordkeeping: Staff estimates that
approximately 19,031 textile firms are
subject to the Textile Rules’
recordkeeping requirements. Based on
an average burden of 65 hours per firm,
the total recordkeeping burden is
1,237,015 hours.
Disclosure: Approximately 22,642
textile firms, producing or importing
about 20.8 billion textile fiber products
annually, are subject to the Textile
Rules’ disclosure requirements.7 Staff
estimates the burden of determining
label content to be 65 hours per year per
firm, or a total of 1,471,730 hours and
the burden of drafting and ordering
labels to be 80 hours per firm per year,
or a total of 1,811,360 hours.8 Staff
believes that the process of attaching
labels is now fully automated and
Task
1413
integrated into other production steps
for about 40 percent of all affected
products. For the remaining 12.48
billion items (60 percent of 20.8 billion),
the process is semi-automated and
requires an average of approximately ten
seconds per item, for a total of
34,666,667 hours per year. Thus, the
total estimated annual burden for all
firms is 37,949,757 hours (1,471,730
hours to determine label content +
1,811,360 hours to draft and order labels
+ 34,666,667 hours to attach labels).9
Staff believes that any additional burden
associated with advertising disclosure
requirements or the filing of generic
fiber name petitions would be minimal
(less than 10,000 hours) and can be
subsumed within the burden estimates
set forth above.
Estimated annual cost burden:
$280,754,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely relating to labor costs).
The chart below summarizes the total
estimated costs.
Hourly rate
Burden hours
Labor cost
Determine label content ...................................................................................................
Draft and order labels ......................................................................................................
Attach labels ....................................................................................................................
Recordkeeping .................................................................................................................
$ 26.00
17.00
10 5.50
17.00
1,471,730
1,811,360
34,666,667
1,237,015
$38,264,980
30,793,120
190,666,669
21,029,255
Total ..........................................................................................................................
............................
............................
$280,754,024
Staff believes that there are no current
start-up costs or other capital costs
associated with the Textile Rules.
Because the labeling of textile products
has been an integral part of the
manufacturing process for decades,
manufacturers have in place the capital
equipment necessary to comply with the
Rules’ labeling requirements. Industry
sources indicate that much of the
information required by the Textile Act
and Rules would be included on the
product label even absent their
requirements. Similarly, recordkeeping,
6 15
U.S.C. 70 et seq.
estimated consumption of garments in the
U.S. in 2012 was 19.4 billion. However, staff
estimates that 1 billion garments are exempt from
the Textile Act (i.e., any kind of headwear and
garments made from something other than a textile
fiber product, such as leather) or are subject to a
special exemption for hosiery products sold in
packages where the label information is contained
on the package. Based on available data, staff
estimates that an additional 3 billion household
textile products (non-garments, such as sheets,
towels, blankets) were consumed. However,
approximately 0.6 billion of all of these garments
and household products are subject to the Wool
Act, not the Textile Act, because they contain some
amount of wool. Thus, the estimated net total
products subject to the Textile Act is 20.8 billion
(19.4 ¥ 1 + 3 = 21.4 ¥ 0.6 = 20.8 billion).
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
The Care Labeling Rule requires
manufacturers and importers to attach a
permanent care label to all covered
textile clothing in order to assist
consumers in making purchase
decisions and in determining what
method to use to clean their apparel.
Also, manufacturers and importers of
piece goods used to make textile
clothing must provide the same care
information on the end of each bolt or
roll of fabric.
Estimated annual hours burden:
34,742,226 hours (solely relating to
disclosure 11).
Staff estimates that approximately
22,642 manufacturers or importers of
textile apparel, producing about 18.4
billion textile garments annually, are
subject to the Rule’s disclosure
requirements. The burden of developing
8 In 2007, Congress amended the Wool Act to
explicitly define ‘‘cashmere’’ and certain terms used
to describe superfine wool (e.g., ‘‘Super 80s,’’
‘‘Super 90s,’’ etc.). See Public Law 109–428. In
2014, the Commission revised the Wool Rules to
incorporate these amendments as well as to clarify
and streamline certain provisions and to allow more
flexibility in marketing wool products (e.g.,
allowing the use of certain hang-tags that do not
disclose a product’s full fiber content). The
Commission sought comment on the increased
burden, if any, imposed by these changes but did
not receive any comments asserting that the
amendments would increase compliance costs. See
79 FR 32157 (June 4, 2014).
9 The Commission revised the Textile Rules in
2006 in response to amendments to the Textile Act.
See 70 FR 73369 (Dec. 12, 2005). These
amendments concerned the placement of labels on
packages of certain types of socks and, therefore, do
not place any additional disclosure burden on
covered entities. In 2014, the Commission revised
the Textile Rules to clarify and streamline certain
provisions and to allow more flexibility in
marketing textile products (e.g., allowing the use of
certain hang-tags that do not disclose the product’s
full fiber content). The Commission sought
comment on the increased burden, if any, imposed
by these changes but did not receive any comments
asserting that the amendments would increase
compliance costs. See 79 FR 18766 (Apr. 4, 2014).
10 See note 3.
11 The Care Labeling Rule imposes no specific
recordkeeping requirements. Although the Rule
requires manufacturers and importers to have
reliable evidence to support the recommended care
instructions, companies rely on current technical
literature or past experience.
invoicing, and advertising disclosures
are tasks performed in the ordinary
course of business; therefore, covered
firms would incur no additional capital
or other non-labor costs as a result of the
Rules.
3. The Care Labeling Rule (OMB Control
Number: 3084–0103)
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
1414
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Notices
proper care instructions may vary
greatly among firms, primarily based on
the number of different lines of textile
garments introduced per year that
require new or revised care instructions.
Staff estimates the burden of
determining care instructions to be 100
hours each year per firm, for a
cumulative total of 2,264,200 hours.
Staff further estimates that the burden of
drafting and ordering labels is 80 hours
each year per firm, for a total of
1,811,360 hours. Staff believes that the
process of attaching labels is fully
automated and integrated into other
production steps for about 40 percent of
the approximately 18.4 billion garments
that are required to have care
instructions on permanent labels.12 For
the remaining 11.04 billion items (60
percent of 18.4 billion), the process is
semi-automated and requires an average
of approximately ten seconds per item,
for a total of 30,666,667 hours per year.
Task
Thus, the total estimated annual burden
for all firms is 34,742,226 hours
(2,264,200 hours to determine care
instructions + 1,811,360 hours to draft
and order labels + 30,666,666 hours to
attach labels).
Estimated annual cost burden:
$258,329,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely relating to labor costs).
The chart below summarizes the total
estimated costs.
Hourly rate
Burden hours
Labor cost
Determine care instructions .............................................................................................
Draft and order labels ......................................................................................................
Attach labels ....................................................................................................................
$ 26.00
17.00
13 5.50
2,264,200
1,811,360
30,666,667
$58,869,200
30,793,120
168,666,669
Total ..........................................................................................................................
............................
............................
258,328,989
You can file a comment online or on
paper. Write ‘‘Apparel Rules: FTC File
No. P074201’’ on your comment. Your
comment—including your name and
your state—will be placed on the public
record of this proceeding, including, to
the extent practicable, on the public
Commission Web site, at https://
www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm.
As a matter of discretion, the
Commission tries to remove individuals’
home contact information from
comments before placing them on the
Commission Web site. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for making sure that
your comment does not include any
sensitive personal information, such as
a Social Security number, date of birth,
driver’s license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, such as medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, do not include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is . . .
privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed
in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include
competitively sensitive information
such as costs, sales statistics,
inventories, formulas, patterns, devices,
manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
If you want the Commission to give
your comment confidential treatment,
you must file it in paper form, with a
request for confidential treatment, and
you must follow the procedure
explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General
Counsel, in his or her sole discretion,
grants your request in accordance with
the law and the public interest. Postal
mail addressed to the Commission is
subject to delay due to heightened
security screening. As a result, the
Commission encourages you to submit
your comments online. To make sure
that the Commission considers your
online comment, you must file it at
https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/
ftc/apparelrulespra by following the
instructions on the Web-based form. If
this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov, you also may file
a comment through that Web site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘Apparel Rules: FTC File No.
P074201’’ on your comment and on the
envelope, and mail it to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, 600
12 About 1 billion of the 19.4 billion garments
produced annually are either not covered by the
Care Labeling Rule (gloves, hats, caps, and leather,
fur, plastic, or leather garments) or are subject to an
exemption that allows care instructions to appear
on packaging (hosiery).
Staff believes that there are no current
start-up costs or other capital costs
associated with the Care Labeling Rule.
Because the labeling of textile products
has been an integral part of the
manufacturing process for decades,
manufacturers have in place the capital
equipment necessary to comply with the
Rule’s labeling requirements. Based on
knowledge of the industry, staff believes
that much of the information required
by the Rule would be included on the
product label even absent those
requirements.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Request for Comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:56 Jan 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC–
5610, (Annex J), Washington, DC 20580,
or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
5th Floor, Suite 5610, (Annex J),
Washington, DC 20024. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
The FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before March 10, 2015. You can find
more information, including routine
uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission’s privacy policy, at
https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
David C. Shonka,
Principal Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015–00166 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[Notice–FAS–2014–02; Docket: 2014–0002;
Sequence: 39]
Notice of Public Meeting for the
Supplemental Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the U.S.
Department of State Foreign Affairs
Security Training Center in Nottoway
County, Virginia
U.S. General Services
Administration (GSA).
AGENCY:
13 See
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
note 3.
09JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1411-1414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00166]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The information collection requirements described below will
be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review,
as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The FTC seeks public
comments on its proposal to extend for three years the current PRA
clearances for information collection requirements contained in three
product labeling rules enforced by the Commission. Those clearances
expire on March 31, 2015.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 10, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper by
following the instructions in the Request for Comments part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``Apparel Rules: FTC
File No. P074201'' on your comment, and file your comment online at
https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/apparelrulespra by following the
instructions on the Web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment
on paper, mail or deliver your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Suite CC-5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver
your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office
of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW., 5th Floor,
Suite 5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for copies of the collection
of information and supporting documentation should be addressed to
Robert M. Frisby, 202-326-2098, or Lemuel Dowdy, 202-326-2981,
Attorneys, Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Room CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Information Collection Activities
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520,
federal agencies must get OMB approval for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or require. ``Collection of
information'' means agency requests or requirements to submit reports,
keep records, or provide information to a third party. 44 U.S.C.
3502(3); 5 CFR 1320.3(c). As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA, the FTC is providing this opportunity for public comment before
requesting that OMB extend the existing PRA clearance for the
information collection requirements associated with the Commission's
rules and regulations under the rules and regulations under the Wool
Products Labeling Act of 1939 (``Wool Rules''), 16 CFR part 300 (OMB
Control Number 3084-0100); rules and regulations under the Textile
Fiber
[[Page 1412]]
Products Identification Act (``Textile Rules''), 16 CFR part 303 (OMB
Control Number 3084-0101); and the Care Labeling of Textile Wearing
Apparel and Certain Piece Goods As Amended (``Care Labeling Rule''), 16
CFR 423 (OMB Control Number 3084-0103).
The FTC invites comments on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond.\1\ All comments must be received on or before March 10,
2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As part of its regulatory review program, the Commission is
currently reviewing the Care Labeling Rule. See Federal Trade
Commission: Care Labeling of Textile Wearing Apparel and Certain
Piece Goods as Amended: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for
Public Comment, 77 FR 58338 (Sept. 20, 2012). The Commission held a
public roundtable on the proposed amendments on March 28, 2014. See
79 FR 9442 (Feb. 19, 2014).
The Commission recently completed its review of the Textile and
Wool Rules. Federal Trade Commission: Rules and Regulations Under
the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act: Final Rule, 79 FR
18766 (Apr. 4, 2014); Federal Trade Commission: Rules and
Regulations under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939; Final
Rule, 79 FR 32157 (June 4, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden Estimates
Staff's burden estimates for the three rules in question are based
on data from the Department of Commerce's Bureau of the Census, the
International Trade Commission, the Department of Labor's Bureau of
Labor Statistics (``BLS''), and data or other input from the main
industry association, the American Apparel and Footwear Association
(AAFA). The AAFA, a national trade association which represents U.S.
apparel, footwear and other sewn products companies and their
suppliers, has stated that ``[t]he use of labels on textiles and
apparels is beneficial to consumers, manufacturers, and business in
general as it allows for the necessary flow of information along the
supply chain.'' \2\ The relevant information collection requirements in
these rules and staff's corresponding burden estimates follow. The
estimates address the number of hours needed and the labor costs
incurred to comply with the requirements. Staff believes that a
significant portion of hours and labor costs currently attributable to
burden below are time and financial resources usually and customarily
incurred by persons in the course of their regular activity (e.g.,
industry participants already have and/or would have care labels
regardless of the rule(s)) and could be excluded from PRA-related
burden.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Page one from comment by Kevin M. Burke, President and CEO,
American Apparel & Footwear Association, March 26, 2012, Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Public Comment; Rules and
Regulations under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939; 77 FR 4498
(Jan. 30, 2012).
\3\ 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Wool Rules (OMB Control Number: 3084-0100)
The Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 (``Wool Act'') \4\ prohibits
the misbranding of wool products. The Wool Rules establish disclosure
requirements that assist consumers in making informed purchasing
decisions and recordkeeping requirements that assist the Commission in
enforcing the Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 68 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated annual hours burden: 1,880,000 hours (160,000
recordkeeping hours + 1,720,000 disclosure hours).
Recordkeeping: Staff estimates that approximately 4,000 wool firms
are subject to the Wool Rules' recordkeeping requirements. Based on an
average annual burden of 40 hours per firm, the total recordkeeping
burden is 160,000 hours.
Disclosure: Approximately 8,000 wool firms, producing or importing
about 600,000,000 wool products annually, are subject to the Wool
Rules' disclosure requirements. Staff estimates the burden of
determining label content to be 30 hours per year per firm, or a total
of 240,000 hours, and the burden of drafting and ordering labels to be
60 hours per firm per year, or a total of 480,000 hours. Staff believes
that the process of attaching labels is now fully automated and
integrated into other production steps for about 40 percent of all
affected products. For the remaining 360,000,000 items (60 percent of
600,000,000), the process is semi-automated and requires an average of
approximately ten seconds per item, for a total of 1,000,000 hours per
year. Thus, the total estimated annual burden for all firms is
1,720,000 hours (240,000 hours for determining label content + 480,000
hours to draft and order labels + 1,000,000 hours to attach labels).
Staff believes that any additional burden associated with advertising
disclosure requirements would be minimal (less than 10,000 hours) and
can be subsumed within the burden estimates set forth above.
Estimated annual cost burden: $16,380,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely relating to labor costs). The chart below summarizes
the total estimated costs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Task Hourly rate Burden hours Labor cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determine label content................................... $ 26.00 240,000 $6,240,000
Draft and order labels.................................... 17.00 480,000 8,160,000
Attach labels............................................. \5\ 5.50 1,000,000 5,500,000
Recordkeeping............................................. 17.00 160,000 2,720,000
-----------------------------------------------------
Total................................................. ................ ................ $16,380,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff believes that there are no current start-up costs or other
capital costs associated with the Wool Rules. Because the labeling of
wool products has been an integral part of the manufacturing process
for decades, manufacturers have in place the capital equipment
necessary to comply with the Rules. Based on knowledge of the industry,
[[Page 1413]]
staff believes that much of the information required by the Wool Act
and Rules would be included on the product label even absent their
requirements. Similarly, recordkeeping and advertising disclosures are
tasks performed in the ordinary course of business so that covered
firms would incur no additional capital or other non-labor costs as a
result of the Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For imported products, the labels generally are attached in
the country where the products are manufactured. According to
information compiled by an industry trade association using data
from the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade
Administration and the U.S. Census Bureau, approximately 97.5% of
apparel used in the United States is imported. With the remaining
2.5% attributable to U.S. production at an approximate domestic
hourly wage of $10 to attach labels, staff has calculated a weighted
average hourly wage of $5.50 per hour attributable to U.S. and
foreign labor combined. The estimated percentage of imports supplied
by particular countries is based on trade data for the year ending
in September 2014 compiled by the Office of Textiles and Apparel,
International Trade Administration. Wages in major textile exporting
countries, factored into the above hourly wage estimate, were based
on 2012 data from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics. See Table 1.1 Indexes of hourly compensation costs in
manufacturing, U.S. dollar basis, 1996-2012 (Index, U.S. = 100)
available at: https://www.bls.gov/fls/#compensation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Textile Rules (OMB Control Number: 3084-0101)
The Textile Fiber Products Identification Act (``Textile Act'') \6\
prohibits the misbranding and false advertising of textile fiber
products. The Textile Rules establish disclosure requirements that
assist consumers in making informed purchasing decisions, and
recordkeeping requirements that assist the Commission in enforcing the
Rules. The Rules also contain a petition procedure for requesting the
establishment of generic names for textile fibers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 70 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated annual hours burden: 39,186,772 hours (1,237,015
recordkeeping hours + 37,949,757 disclosure hours).
Recordkeeping: Staff estimates that approximately 19,031 textile
firms are subject to the Textile Rules' recordkeeping requirements.
Based on an average burden of 65 hours per firm, the total
recordkeeping burden is 1,237,015 hours.
Disclosure: Approximately 22,642 textile firms, producing or
importing about 20.8 billion textile fiber products annually, are
subject to the Textile Rules' disclosure requirements.\7\ Staff
estimates the burden of determining label content to be 65 hours per
year per firm, or a total of 1,471,730 hours and the burden of drafting
and ordering labels to be 80 hours per firm per year, or a total of
1,811,360 hours.\8\ Staff believes that the process of attaching labels
is now fully automated and integrated into other production steps for
about 40 percent of all affected products. For the remaining 12.48
billion items (60 percent of 20.8 billion), the process is semi-
automated and requires an average of approximately ten seconds per
item, for a total of 34,666,667 hours per year. Thus, the total
estimated annual burden for all firms is 37,949,757 hours (1,471,730
hours to determine label content + 1,811,360 hours to draft and order
labels + 34,666,667 hours to attach labels).\9\ Staff believes that any
additional burden associated with advertising disclosure requirements
or the filing of generic fiber name petitions would be minimal (less
than 10,000 hours) and can be subsumed within the burden estimates set
forth above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The estimated consumption of garments in the U.S. in 2012
was 19.4 billion. However, staff estimates that 1 billion garments
are exempt from the Textile Act (i.e., any kind of headwear and
garments made from something other than a textile fiber product,
such as leather) or are subject to a special exemption for hosiery
products sold in packages where the label information is contained
on the package. Based on available data, staff estimates that an
additional 3 billion household textile products (non-garments, such
as sheets, towels, blankets) were consumed. However, approximately
0.6 billion of all of these garments and household products are
subject to the Wool Act, not the Textile Act, because they contain
some amount of wool. Thus, the estimated net total products subject
to the Textile Act is 20.8 billion (19.4 - 1 + 3 = 21.4 - 0.6 = 20.8
billion).
\8\ In 2007, Congress amended the Wool Act to explicitly define
``cashmere'' and certain terms used to describe superfine wool
(e.g., ``Super 80s,'' ``Super 90s,'' etc.). See Public Law 109-428.
In 2014, the Commission revised the Wool Rules to incorporate these
amendments as well as to clarify and streamline certain provisions
and to allow more flexibility in marketing wool products (e.g.,
allowing the use of certain hang-tags that do not disclose a
product's full fiber content). The Commission sought comment on the
increased burden, if any, imposed by these changes but did not
receive any comments asserting that the amendments would increase
compliance costs. See 79 FR 32157 (June 4, 2014).
\9\ The Commission revised the Textile Rules in 2006 in response
to amendments to the Textile Act. See 70 FR 73369 (Dec. 12, 2005).
These amendments concerned the placement of labels on packages of
certain types of socks and, therefore, do not place any additional
disclosure burden on covered entities. In 2014, the Commission
revised the Textile Rules to clarify and streamline certain
provisions and to allow more flexibility in marketing textile
products (e.g., allowing the use of certain hang-tags that do not
disclose the product's full fiber content). The Commission sought
comment on the increased burden, if any, imposed by these changes
but did not receive any comments asserting that the amendments would
increase compliance costs. See 79 FR 18766 (Apr. 4, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated annual cost burden: $280,754,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely relating to labor costs). The chart below summarizes
the total estimated costs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Task Hourly rate Burden hours Labor cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determine label content................................... $ 26.00 1,471,730 $38,264,980
Draft and order labels.................................... 17.00 1,811,360 30,793,120
Attach labels............................................. \10\ 5.50 34,666,667 190,666,669
Recordkeeping............................................. 17.00 1,237,015 21,029,255
-----------------------------------------------------
Total................................................. ................ ................ $280,754,024
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff believes that there are no current start-up costs or other
capital costs associated with the Textile Rules. Because the labeling
of textile products has been an integral part of the manufacturing
process for decades, manufacturers have in place the capital equipment
necessary to comply with the Rules' labeling requirements. Industry
sources indicate that much of the information required by the Textile
Act and Rules would be included on the product label even absent their
requirements. Similarly, recordkeeping, invoicing, and advertising
disclosures are tasks performed in the ordinary course of business;
therefore, covered firms would incur no additional capital or other
non-labor costs as a result of the Rules.
3. The Care Labeling Rule (OMB Control Number: 3084-0103)
The Care Labeling Rule requires manufacturers and importers to
attach a permanent care label to all covered textile clothing in order
to assist consumers in making purchase decisions and in determining
what method to use to clean their apparel. Also, manufacturers and
importers of piece goods used to make textile clothing must provide the
same care information on the end of each bolt or roll of fabric.
Estimated annual hours burden: 34,742,226 hours (solely relating to
disclosure \11\).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The Care Labeling Rule imposes no specific recordkeeping
requirements. Although the Rule requires manufacturers and importers
to have reliable evidence to support the recommended care
instructions, companies rely on current technical literature or past
experience.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff estimates that approximately 22,642 manufacturers or
importers of textile apparel, producing about 18.4 billion textile
garments annually, are subject to the Rule's disclosure requirements.
The burden of developing
[[Page 1414]]
proper care instructions may vary greatly among firms, primarily based
on the number of different lines of textile garments introduced per
year that require new or revised care instructions. Staff estimates the
burden of determining care instructions to be 100 hours each year per
firm, for a cumulative total of 2,264,200 hours. Staff further
estimates that the burden of drafting and ordering labels is 80 hours
each year per firm, for a total of 1,811,360 hours. Staff believes that
the process of attaching labels is fully automated and integrated into
other production steps for about 40 percent of the approximately 18.4
billion garments that are required to have care instructions on
permanent labels.\12\ For the remaining 11.04 billion items (60 percent
of 18.4 billion), the process is semi-automated and requires an average
of approximately ten seconds per item, for a total of 30,666,667 hours
per year. Thus, the total estimated annual burden for all firms is
34,742,226 hours (2,264,200 hours to determine care instructions +
1,811,360 hours to draft and order labels + 30,666,666 hours to attach
labels).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ About 1 billion of the 19.4 billion garments produced
annually are either not covered by the Care Labeling Rule (gloves,
hats, caps, and leather, fur, plastic, or leather garments) or are
subject to an exemption that allows care instructions to appear on
packaging (hosiery).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated annual cost burden: $258,329,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand (solely relating to labor costs). The chart below summarizes
the total estimated costs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Task Hourly rate Burden hours Labor cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determine care instructions............................... $ 26.00 2,264,200 $58,869,200
Draft and order labels.................................... 17.00 1,811,360 30,793,120
Attach labels............................................. \13\ 5.50 30,666,667 168,666,669
-----------------------------------------------------
Total................................................. ................ ................ 258,328,989
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff believes that there are no current start-up costs or other
capital costs associated with the Care Labeling Rule. Because the
labeling of textile products has been an integral part of the
manufacturing process for decades, manufacturers have in place the
capital equipment necessary to comply with the Rule's labeling
requirements. Based on knowledge of the industry, staff believes that
much of the information required by the Rule would be included on the
product label even absent those requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Comments
You can file a comment online or on paper. Write ``Apparel Rules:
FTC File No. P074201'' on your comment. Your comment--including your
name and your state--will be placed on the public record of this
proceeding, including, to the extent practicable, on the public
Commission Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a
matter of discretion, the Commission tries to remove individuals' home
contact information from comments before placing them on the Commission
Web site. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive personal information, such as a Social Security number, date
of birth, driver's license number or other state identification number
or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial account
number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive health
information, such as medical records or other individually identifiable
health information. In addition, do not include any ``[t]rade secret or
any commercial or financial information which is . . . privileged or
confidential,'' as discussed in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). In particular, do
not include competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales
statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for
confidential treatment, and you must follow the procedure explained in
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept confidential
only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, grants
your request in accordance with the law and the public interest. Postal
mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened
security screening. As a result, the Commission encourages you to
submit your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers
your online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/apparelrulespra by following the
instructions on the Web-based form. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov, you also may file a comment through that Web site.
If you file your comment on paper, write ``Apparel Rules: FTC File
No. P074201'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail it to the
following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC-5610, (Annex J), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th
Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610, (Annex J), Washington, DC 20024. If
possible, submit your paper comment to the Commission by courier or
overnight service.
The FTC Act and other laws that the Commission administers permit
the collection of public comments to consider and use in this
proceeding as appropriate. The Commission will consider all timely and
responsive public comments that it receives on or before March 10,
2015. You can find more information, including routine uses permitted
by the Privacy Act, in the Commission's privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
David C. Shonka,
Principal Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-00166 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
