Approval of Subzone Status, 5.11, Inc., Modesto and Lathrop, California, 78784 [2014-30719]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
78784
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
Affected Public: Applicants for
temporary jobs in office and field
positions.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory
to apply for temporary positions.
Legal Authority: Title 13, United
States Code, Section 23 a and c.
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov
.Follow the instructions to view
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Dated: December 24, 2014.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–30627 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[S–132–2014]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Approval of Subzone Status, 5.11, Inc.,
Modesto and Lathrop, California
On November 6, 2014, the Executive
Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones
(FTZ) Board docketed an application
submitted by the Port of Stockton,
California, grantee of FTZ 231,
requesting subzone status subject to the
existing activation limit of FTZ 231, on
behalf of 5.11, Inc., in Modesto and
Lathrop, California.
The application was processed in
accordance with the FTZ Act and
Regulations, including notice in the
Federal Register inviting public
comment (79 FR 67413, 11/13/2014).
The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the
application and determined that it
meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant
to the authority delegated to the FTZ
Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec.
400.36(f)), the application to establish
Subzone 231B is approved, subject to
the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.13, and further
subject to FTZ 231’s 2,000-acre
activation limit.
Dated: December 23, 2014.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–30719 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–967]
Aluminum Extrusions From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on aluminum
extrusions from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review
(‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2012, through April
30, 2013. These final results cover 52
companies for which an administrative
review was initiated, and for which this
administrative review was not rescinded
in the Preliminary Results.1 For these
final results, the Department examined
two mandatory respondents and one
voluntary respondent for which this
review was initiated. The first
mandatory respondent is Guangzhou
Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering
Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong
Kong Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Jangho’’); the
second mandatory respondent is a
single entity that the Department
continues to find is comprised of Guang
Ya Aluminum Industrial Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Guang Ya’’), Foshan Guangcheng
Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guangcheng’’),
Kong Ah International Co., Ltd. (‘‘Kong
Ah’’), and Guang Ya Aluminum
Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd. (‘‘Guang Ya
HK’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang Ya Group’’),
Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Zhongya’’), Zhongya Shaped
Aluminum (HK) Holding Ltd. (‘‘Shaped
Aluminum’’), and Karlton Aluminum
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Karlton’’) (collectively
‘‘Zhongya’’), and Foshan Nanhai Xinya
Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinya’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang
Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya’’).
The Department finds for these final
results that Jangho and the Guang Ya
Group/Zhongya/Xinya entity failed to
demonstrate that they were eligible for
separate rates and thus are part of the
PRC-wide entity. For Kromet
International, Inc. (‘‘Kromet’’), a
voluntary respondent in this review, the
AGENCY:
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 38924 (June
28, 2013) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’); see also Aluminum
Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part;
2012/2013, 79 FR 36003 (June 25, 2014)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department finds that Kromet did not
make sales of subject merchandise at
less than normal value during the POR.
Furthermore, the Department finds
that 19 of the companies under review
(including Kromet) have established
their eligibility for a separate rate.
Additionally, we determine that four
companies, Hong Kong Gree Electric
Appliances Sales Limited (‘‘Gree’’),
Jiuyuan Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiuyuan’’), Shenzhen
Hudson Technology Development Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen Hudson’’), and Skyline
Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Skyline’’) had no shipments. The
Department finds that the remaining
companies under review either failed to
establish their eligibility for a separate
rate or were not responsive, and,
therefore, these companies are part of
the PRC-wide entity.
DATES: Effective Date: December 31,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Terpstra or Paul Stolz, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3965 or (202) 482–
4474, respectively.
Background
On June 25, 2014, the Department
published the Preliminary Results of
this administrative review. At that time,
we invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results.2
We granted parties an extension of time
to submit case and rebuttal briefs.3
On August 8, 2014 we received case
briefs from the Aluminum Extrusions
Fair Trade Committee (‘‘Petitioner’’); 4
Zhongya; Skyline; Jangho; tenKsolar
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘tenKsolar’’);
Permasteelisa South China Factory and
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd.
(collectively, ‘‘Permasteelisa’’); Taishan
City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co.
Ltd., and Kam Kiu Aluminium Products
Sdn. Bhd. (collectively ‘‘Kam Kiu’’). On
2 See
Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36006.
‘‘Second Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an
Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Case Briefs
and Rebuttal Case Briefs,’’ dated July 7, 2014 and
‘‘Second Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an
Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Rebuttal
Briefs,’’ dated August 12, 2014.
4 The individual members of the Committee are
Aerolite Extrusion Company; Alexandria Extrusion
Company; Benada Aluminum of Florida, Inc.;
William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.; Frontier
Aluminum Corporation; Futural Industries
Corporation; Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.;
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation; Profile Extrusion
Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; and Western
Extrusions Corporation.
3 See
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30719]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[S-132-2014]
Approval of Subzone Status, 5.11, Inc., Modesto and Lathrop,
California
On November 6, 2014, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port of
Stockton, California, grantee of FTZ 231, requesting subzone status
subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 231, on behalf of 5.11,
Inc., in Modesto and Lathrop, California.
The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public
comment (79 FR 67413, 11/13/2014). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the
application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval.
Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive
Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone
231B is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations,
including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 231's 2,000-acre
activation limit.
Dated: December 23, 2014.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30719 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
