Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri, Restriction of Emissions of Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes, 62844-62846 [2014-24760]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
62844
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(26) and (27) in numerical order at the
end of the table to read as follows:
§ 52.1420
Identification of Plan.
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
*
EPA-APPROVED NEBRASKA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of non-regulatory SIP provision
State
submittal
date
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
*
This action addresses the following
CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),
(K), (L), and (M).
This declaration is contained within
Nebraska’s 2010 Sulfur Dioxide
NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submission
concerning
Section
110(a)(2)(E) of the CAA.
*
*
(26) Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2008 Pb
NAAQS.
*
Statewide ..........
10/18/11
*
*
10/21/14 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
(27) Section 128 Declaration: Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality Representation
and Conflicts of Interest Provisions, Section 49–1493(13) of
the NE Political Accountability
and Disclosure Act and Chapter
2 of Title 4, NE Accountability
and Disclosure Commission.
Statewide ..........
8/22/13
10/21/14 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
[FR Doc. 2014–24899 Filed 10–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0687; FRL–9918–17–
Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri, Restriction of Emissions of
Particulate Matter From Industrial
Processes
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Missouri on May 8, 2012,
and October 17, 2013, related to a
Missouri rule titled ‘‘Restriction of
Emission of Particulate Matter from
Industrial Processes.’’ This action
amends the SIP in four ways. The first
is it updates an outdated reference in
the current SIP approved rule. Second,
it provides a hierarchy of compliance
measurement approaches for Particulate
Matter (PM) emissions from industrial
processes. Third, it provides a
clarification on applicability of the
provisions. And fourth, it deletes
redundant definitions.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective December 22, 2014, without
further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse comment by November 20,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
2014. If EPA receives adverse comment,
we will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2014–0687, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: gonzalez.larry@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Larry
Gonzalez, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2014–
0687. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or email
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Air Planning and Development Branch,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa,
Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding
legal holidays. The interested persons
wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the
office at least 24 hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Gonzalez, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
913–551–7041 or by email at
gonzalez.larry@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
EPA is taking direct final action to
approve revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Missouri on May 8, 2012,
and October 17, 2013, related to a
Missouri rule titled ‘‘Restriction of
Emission of Particulate Matter from
Industrial Processes’’ 10 CSR 10–6.400.
This action amends the SIP to update an
outdated reference in the rule, provides
a hierarchy of measurement approaches
used for compliance, clarifies the
applicability of the rule, and deletes
redundant definitions found in the rule.
Today’s action completes four
administrative actions. First, it approves
into the SIP the update to rule 10 CSR
10–6.400 so that it references the new
consolidated rule 10 CSR 10–6.405
‘‘Restriction of Particulate Matter
Emissions From Fuel Burning
Equipment Used For Indirect Heating.’’
This action follows an earlier action
EPA took on September 13, 2012, to
amend the Missouri SIP which
rescinded area-specific indirect heating
rules, 10 CSR 10–2.040, 10–3.060, 10–
4.040, and 10–5.030 and added a new
rule, 10 CSR 10–6.405 which
consolidated the area rules into a single
rule (see 76 FR 56555). Second, it
amends the test methods section to add
a hierarchy of emission measurement
approaches used for compliance
testing—a revision requested by EPA
that has been used in other Missouri
rules. Third, it explicitly clarifies that
the rule provisions are only applicable
to the ‘‘filterable’’ particulate matter.
And, fourth, it eliminates definitions in
the rule 10 CSR 10.6.400 that are also
found at 10 CSR 10–6.020 ‘‘Definitions
and Common Reference Tables.’’
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, the revision
meets the substantive SIP requirements
of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Oct 20, 2014
Jkt 235001
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking direct final action to
approve this SIP revision. We are
publishing this rule without a prior
proposed rule because we view this as
a noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s
Federal Register, we are publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposed rule to approve this SIP
revision, if adverse comments are
received on this direct final rule. We
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. For further information about
commenting on this rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document. If
EPA receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect. We will address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under the terms of Executive
Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993) and is therefore not subject to
review under Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011).
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
62845
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by December 22, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
62846
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 203 / Tuesday, October 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 24, 2014.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry
under ‘‘Chapter 6—Air Quality
Standards, Definitions, Sampling and
Reference Methods, and Air Pollution
Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri’’ for ‘‘10–6.400’’ to read as
follows:
■
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency amends 40 CFR part 52 as set
forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.1320
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
*
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State
effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri
*
10–6.400 .......
*
*
Restrictions of Emission of Particulate Matter
from Industrial Processes.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–24760 Filed 10–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0711; FRL–9917–81–
Region 9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Revisions to the
Nevada State Implementation Plan;
Stationary Source Permits
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the
applicable state implementation plan for
the State of Nevada submitted by the
Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection. The revisions include
amended State rules related to
applications for, and issuance of,
permits for stationary sources, but not
including review and permitting of
major sources and major modifications
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Oct 20, 2014
*
06/27/13
Jkt 235001
*
*
10/21/14 [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
under parts C and D of title I of the
Clean Air Act. EPA is taking action
under the Clean Air Act obligation to
take action on State submittals of
revisions to state implementation plans.
The intended effect of the approval is to
fix deficiencies in the previouslyapproved version of the permitting rules
and to ensure that new or modified
stationary sources do not interfere with
attainment or maintenance of the
national ambient air quality standards.
DATES: This rule is effective on
December 22, 2014 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comments by November 20, 2014. If we
receive such comments, we will publish
a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register to notify the public that this
direct final rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2014–0711, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: R9airpermits@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Laura Yannayon
(AIR–3), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62844-62846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24760]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2014-0687; FRL-9918-17-Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri, Restriction of Emissions of Particulate Matter From
Industrial Processes
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted by the State of Missouri on May 8, 2012, and October
17, 2013, related to a Missouri rule titled ``Restriction of Emission
of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes.'' This action amends
the SIP in four ways. The first is it updates an outdated reference in
the current SIP approved rule. Second, it provides a hierarchy of
compliance measurement approaches for Particulate Matter (PM) emissions
from industrial processes. Third, it provides a clarification on
applicability of the provisions. And fourth, it deletes redundant
definitions.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective December 22, 2014,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by November
20, 2014. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2014-0687, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: gonzalez.larry@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Larry Gonzalez, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2014-0687. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or
email information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30
excluding legal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Gonzalez, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
[[Page 62845]]
913-551-7041 or by email at gonzalez.larry@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is being addressed in this document?
EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Missouri on May 8,
2012, and October 17, 2013, related to a Missouri rule titled
``Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial
Processes'' 10 CSR 10-6.400. This action amends the SIP to update an
outdated reference in the rule, provides a hierarchy of measurement
approaches used for compliance, clarifies the applicability of the
rule, and deletes redundant definitions found in the rule.
Today's action completes four administrative actions. First, it
approves into the SIP the update to rule 10 CSR 10-6.400 so that it
references the new consolidated rule 10 CSR 10-6.405 ``Restriction of
Particulate Matter Emissions From Fuel Burning Equipment Used For
Indirect Heating.'' This action follows an earlier action EPA took on
September 13, 2012, to amend the Missouri SIP which rescinded area-
specific indirect heating rules, 10 CSR 10-2.040, 10-3.060, 10-4.040,
and 10-5.030 and added a new rule, 10 CSR 10-6.405 which consolidated
the area rules into a single rule (see 76 FR 56555). Second, it amends
the test methods section to add a hierarchy of emission measurement
approaches used for compliance testing--a revision requested by EPA
that has been used in other Missouri rules. Third, it explicitly
clarifies that the rule provisions are only applicable to the
``filterable'' particulate matter. And, fourth, it eliminates
definitions in the rule 10 CSR 10.6.400 that are also found at 10 CSR
10-6.020 ``Definitions and Common Reference Tables.''
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking direct final action to approve this SIP revision. We
are publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule because we view
this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment.
However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register,
we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed
rule to approve this SIP revision, if adverse comments are received on
this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period
on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document. If EPA receives adverse comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public that this direct final rule will not take effect. We will
address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms
of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 22, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule
[[Page 62846]]
and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: September 24, 2014.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry under ``Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions,
Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations
for the State of Missouri'' for ``10-6.400'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of Missouri
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-6.400............................. Restrictions of Emission of 06/27/13 10/21/14 [Insert Federal Register
Particulate Matter from citation].
Industrial Processes.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-24760 Filed 10-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
