Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Rule 11.9 of BATS Y-Exchange, Inc., 58019-58022 [2014-22996]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 2014 / Notices holdings, the Intraday Indicative Value, the Disclosed Portfolio, and quotation and last sale information for the Shares. For the above reasons, Nasdaq believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will facilitate the listing and trading of an additional type of activelymanaged exchange-traded fund that will enhance competition among market participants, to the benefit of investors and the marketplace. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (a) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change; or (b) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NASDAQ–2014–090 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:14 Sep 25, 2014 Jkt 232001 All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASDAQ–2014–090. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR– NASDAQ–2014–090 and should be submitted on or before October 17, 2014. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.27 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–22910 Filed 9–25–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–73190; File No. SR–BYX– 2014–022] Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Rule 11.9 of BATS YExchange, Inc. September 23, 2014. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. September 12, 2014, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BYX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’ proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,4 which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange filed a proposal to provide additional functionality with respect to Primary Pegged Orders offered by the Exchange pursuant to Rule 11.9(c)(8). The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange’s Web site at https://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Earlier this year, the Exchange and its affiliate BATS Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’) received approval to effect a merger (the ‘‘Merger’’) of the Exchange’s parent company, BATS Global Markets, Inc., with Direct Edge Holdings LLC, the indirect parent of EDGX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’) and EDGA Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA’’, and together with BZX, BYX and EDGX, the ‘‘BGM Affiliated 27 17 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00151 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58019 3 15 4 17 E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 26SEN1 58020 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 2014 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Exchanges’’).5 In the context of the Merger, the BGM Affiliated Exchanges are working to align certain system functionality, retaining only intended differences between the BGM Affiliated Exchanges. Thus, the proposals set forth below are intended to add certain system functionality currently offered by EDGA and EDGX in order to provide a consistent technology offering for users of the BGM Affiliated Exchanges. The functionality is also similar to functionality offered by the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC and NYSE Arca, Inc.6 The purpose of the proposed rule change is to provide Users of the Exchange with additional options with respect to Primary Pegged Orders (as defined below) offered by the Exchange pursuant to Rule 11.9(c)(8). The Exchange notes that EDGA and EDGX offer additional functionality for Pegged Orders that the Exchange is not proposing to add at this time.7 The Exchange currently allows Users to submit two types of limit orders to the Exchange that are pegged to and priced based on the national best bid or offer (‘‘NBBO’’) and automatically adjusted by the Exchange’s System.8 First, a ‘‘Primary Pegged Order,’’ which is pegged to a price inferior to or equal to the inside quote on the same side of the market (i.e., for a bid, pegged to the NBB or for an offer, pegged to the NBO) by an amount set by the User. Second, a ‘‘Market Pegged Order,’’ which is pegged to a price that offsets the inside quote on the other side of the market (i.e., for a bid, pegged to the NBO or for an offer, pegged to the NBB) by an amount set by the User. At the outset, the Exchange notes that it proposes to modify the definition of Primary Pegged Order to make it more understandable and consistent with the definition of Market Pegged Order by adding a definition of ‘‘Primary Offset Amount’’, which would mean the amount of the offset selected by the User for a Primary Pegged Order. The Exchange proposes to retain the definition of ‘‘Offset Amount,’’ which would mean the amount of the offset 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71375 (January 23, 2014), 79 FR 4771 (January 29, 2014) (SR–BATS–2013–059; SR–BYX–2013–039). 6 See Nasdaq Rule 4751(f)(4); NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(cc). 7 For instance, EDGA and EDGX currently permit displayed Market Pegged Orders as well as aggressive offsets for displayed Primary Pegged Orders (as such terms are defined below). The Exchange is not proposing to add these features. The Exchange anticipates EDGA and EDGX will propose to eliminate these features in the future. 8 As defined in Rule 1.5(aa), the System is the electronic communications and trading facility designated by the Board through which securities orders of Users are consolidated for ranking, execution and, when applicable, routing away. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:14 Sep 25, 2014 Jkt 232001 selected by the User for a Market Pegged Order. The Exchange also proposes two substantive changes to Primary Pegged Orders, as described below. First, pursuant to current Rule 11.9(c)(8), neither type of Pegged Order is eligible to be displayed on the Exchange. The Exchange proposes to maintain this restriction for Market Pegged Orders but to permit Primary Pegged Orders to be displayed on the Exchange provided that they cannot be more aggressive than the NBB or NBO to which they are pegged, as described below. Second, the Exchange proposes to modify the offset that a User can select for a Primary Pegged Order by specifying that such amount is an offset, rather than requiring that the order be inferior to or equal to the inside quote on the same side of the market. This change to Primary Pegged Orders, therefore, would allow Users to select a Primary Offset Amount that would make a Primary Pegged Order more aggressive than the NBB or NBO to which it is pegged (i.e., for a bid, willing to pay a higher price or for an offer, willing to sell for a lower price). However, as noted above, the Exchange proposes to restrict the designation of a Primary Offset Amount that would price a Primary Pegged Order higher than the NBB for a bid or lower than the NBO for an offer to non-displayed Primary Pegged Orders. Thus, as proposed, the Primary Offset Amount for a displayed Primary Pegged Order must result in the price of such order being inferior to or equal to the inside quote on the same side of the market. The Exchange is not proposing to accept displayed Primary Pegged Orders with an aggressive offset at this time because such orders would add functionality to the Exchange that would effectively set the NBBO through a Pegged Order and the Exchange believes that this could potentially add complexity to its System. As an example of an order with a Primary Pegged Order that a User has designated for display, assume the Exchange receives a display-eligible Primary Pegged Order to buy 300 shares of a security with a Primary Pegged Offset to price the order at $0.01 below the NBB. Assume further that the NBBO is $10.09 by $10.10 when the order is received. The Exchange will post and display the order on the Exchange as a bid to buy 300 shares at $10.08. If the NBBO moves to $10.10 by $10.11, the Exchange will adjust to $10.09 the price of the Primary Pegged Order to buy. If the NBBO then moved to $10.08 by $10.11, the Exchange will adjust to $10.07 the price of the Primary Pegged Order to buy. PO 00000 Frm 00152 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 A User could alternatively submit a display-eligible Primary Pegged Order to buy with no Primary Pegged Offset, in which case the initial display price of the order would be $10.09, upon the first adjustment to the NBBO the display price would be $10.10, and upon the final adjustment to the NBBO the display price would be $10.08. A User could not submit a displayeligible Primary Pegged Order to buy with a Primary Pegged Offset to price the order at $0.01 above the NBB, as this would make the order more aggressive than the NBB, and, as proposed, the Exchange will not accept Primary Pegged Orders that are both eligible for display and contain an aggressive Primary Pegged Offset amount. A User could, however, submit a non-displayeligible Primary Pegged Order to buy with a Primary Pegged Offset to price the order at $0.01 above the NBB. Thus, using the example above, the initial ranked price of the order would be $10.10 ($0.01 higher than the NBB of $10.09), upon the first adjustment to the NBBO the adjusted ranked price of the order would be $10.11 ($0.01 higher than the NBB of $10.10), and upon the final adjustment to the NBBO the adjusted ranked price of the order would be $10.09 ($0.01 higher than the NBB of $10.08). 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 9 and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 10 because it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, the proposed changes are designed to provide Users with additional control over their orders that are pegged to the NBBO. The proposal to permit the display of Primary Pegged Orders is consistent with the Act as this proposal is intended to lead to additional displayed liquidity available on the Exchange, thus contributing to the price discovery process. The proposal to permit an aggressive offset on non-displayed Primary Pegged Orders is similarly consistent with the Act as this proposal is intended to allow Users adding liquidity to the Exchange to more aggressively price their orders, 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 10 15 E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM 26SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 2014 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES which, in turn, means an enhanced likelihood of price improvement for incoming orders that execute against such orders. For instance, by permitting a User to designate a Primary Pegged Order to buy on the Exchange with an aggressive Primary Pegged Offset, that means that the Exchange has nondisplayed liquidity priced better than the NBB, which amounts to significant price improvement as compared to the NBB. For the reasons described above, the proposals are directly targeted at removing impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and national market system. The proposed rule change also is designed to support the principles of Section 11A (a)(1)11 of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. In particular, the proposed rule changes to modify the Primary Pegged Order is intended to add system functionality currently offered by EDGA and EDGX in order to provide a consistent technology offering for the BGM Affiliated Exchanges. A consistent technology offering, in turn, will simplify the technology implementation, changes and maintenance by Users of the Exchange that are also participants on BZX, EDGA and/or EDGX. The functionality is similar to functionality offered by Nasdaq and NYSE Arca as well. The proposed rule changes would also provide Users with access to functionality that may result in the efficient execution of such orders and will provide additional flexibility as well as increased functionality to the Exchange’s System and its Users. The Exchange also believes that the changes to restructure the existing rule will contribute to the protection of investors and the public interest by making the Exchange’s rules easier to understand. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange reiterates that the proposed rule change is being proposed in the context of the technology integration of the BGM Affiliated Exchanges. Thus, the Exchange believes this proposed rule change is necessary to permit fair competition among national securities exchanges. In addition, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will benefit Exchange participants in that it is one of several changes necessary to 11 15 U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:14 Sep 25, 2014 Jkt 232001 achieve a consistent technology offering by the BGM Affiliated Exchanges. The Exchange also believes that Pegged Orders generally encourage competition by allowing Users to submit orders that automatically peg to the NBBO consistent with their trading strategy. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 12 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.13 Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder. A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 14 normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),15 the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes that waiver will allow the Exchange to align its re-route functionality across the BGM Affiliated Exchanges in a timely manner, thereby simplifying the technology implementation, changes and maintenance by Users of the Exchange that are also participants on BZX, EDGA and/or EDGX. The Exchange further believes that waiver will allow the Exchange to continue to strive towards 12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 13 17 PO 00000 Frm 00153 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58021 a complete technology integration of the BGM Affiliated Exchanges. The Commission believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with investor protection and the public interest. As a result, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposal operative upon filing.16 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– BYX–2014–022 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549– 1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BYX–2014–022. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; 16 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM 26SEN1 58022 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 2014 / Notices the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BYX– 2014–022, and should be submitted on or before October 17, 2014. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.17 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. estimate; the need for the information; its practical utility; ways to enhance its quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to minimize burden on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Mail, email, or fax your comments and recommendations on the information collection(s) to the OMB Desk Officer and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at the following addresses or fax numbers. (OMB) Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA, Fax: 202–395– 6974, Email address: OIRA_ Submission@omb.eop.gov. [FR Doc. 2014–22996 Filed 9–25–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Request and Comment Request The Social Security Administration (SSA) publishes a list of information collection packages requiring clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with Public Law 104–13, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, effective October 1, 1995. This notice includes revisions and extensions of OMB-approved information collections. SSA is soliciting comments on the accuracy of the agency’s burden (SSA) Social Security Administration, OLCA, Attn: Reports Clearance Director, 3100 West High Rise, 6401 Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235, Fax: 410–966– 2830, Email address: OR.Reports.Clearance@ssa.gov. I. The information collection below is pending at SSA. SSA will submit it to OMB within 60 days from the date of this notice. To be sure we consider your comments, we must receive them no later than November 25, 2014. Individuals can obtain copies of the collection instruments by writing to the above email address. Request to Show Cause for Failure to Appear—20 CFR 404.938, 20 CFR 416.1438, and 20 CFR 404.957(a)(ii)— 0960–0794. When claimants who requested a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ) fail to appear at their scheduled hearing, the ALJ may reschedule the hearing if the claimants establish good cause for missing the hearings. To establish good cause, claimants must show one of the following: (1) SSA did not properly notify the claimant of the hearing, or (2) an unexpected event occurred without sufficient time for the claimant to request a postponement. The claimants can use paper Form HA–L90 to provide their reason for not appearing at their scheduled hearings, or the claimants’ representatives can use Electronic Records Express to submit the HA–L90 online. If the ALJ determines the claimants established good cause for failure to appear at the hearing, the ALJ will schedule a supplemental hearing; if not, the ALJ will make a claims eligibility determination based on the claimants’ evidence of record. Respondents are claimants, or their representatives, seeking to establish good cause for failure to appear at a scheduled hearing before an ALJ. Type of Request: Extension of an OMB-approved information collection. Modality of completion Number of responses Frequency of response Average burden per response (minutes) Estimated total annual burden (hours) HA–L90 (paper or Electronic Records Express) ............................................. 40,000 1 10 6,667 II. SSA submitted the information collections below to OMB for clearance. Your comments regarding the information collections would be most useful if OMB and SSA receive them 30 days from the date of this publication. To be sure we consider your comments, we must receive them no later than October 27, 2014. Individuals can obtain copies of the OMB clearance packages by writing to OR.Reports.Clearance@ ssa.gov. Number of respondents Frequency of response Average burden per response (minutes) Estimated total burden (hours) Television ......................................................................................................... mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Modality of completion 1,000 2 1 33 1. Application for Search of Census Records for Proof of Age—20 CFR 404.716—0960–0097. When preferred evidence of age is not available, or the available evidence is not convincing, SSA may ask the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, to search its records to establish a 17 17 claimant’s date of birth. SSA collects information from claimants using Form SSA–1535–U3 to provide the Census Bureau with sufficient identification information to allow an accurate search of census records. Additionally, the Census Bureau uses a completed, signed SSA–1535–U3 to bill SSA for the search. The respondents are applicants for Social Security benefits who need to establish their date of birth as a factor of entitlement. Type of Request: Revision of an OMBapproved information collection. CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:14 Sep 25, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM 26SEN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58019-58022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22996]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73190; File No. SR-BYX-2014-022]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Rule
11.9 of BATS Y-Exchange, Inc.

September 23, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 12, 2014, BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BYX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange filed a proposal to provide additional functionality
with respect to Primary Pegged Orders offered by the Exchange pursuant
to Rule 11.9(c)(8).
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at https://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
Earlier this year, the Exchange and its affiliate BATS Exchange,
Inc. (``BZX'') received approval to effect a merger (the ``Merger'') of
the Exchange's parent company, BATS Global Markets, Inc., with Direct
Edge Holdings LLC, the indirect parent of EDGX Exchange, Inc.
(``EDGX'') and EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA'', and together with BZX,
BYX and EDGX, the ``BGM Affiliated

[[Page 58020]]

Exchanges'').\5\ In the context of the Merger, the BGM Affiliated
Exchanges are working to align certain system functionality, retaining
only intended differences between the BGM Affiliated Exchanges. Thus,
the proposals set forth below are intended to add certain system
functionality currently offered by EDGA and EDGX in order to provide a
consistent technology offering for users of the BGM Affiliated
Exchanges. The functionality is also similar to functionality offered
by the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC and NYSE Arca, Inc.\6\ The purpose of
the proposed rule change is to provide Users of the Exchange with
additional options with respect to Primary Pegged Orders (as defined
below) offered by the Exchange pursuant to Rule 11.9(c)(8). The
Exchange notes that EDGA and EDGX offer additional functionality for
Pegged Orders that the Exchange is not proposing to add at this
time.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71375 (January 23,
2014), 79 FR 4771 (January 29, 2014) (SR-BATS-2013-059; SR-BYX-2013-
039).
\6\ See Nasdaq Rule 4751(f)(4); NYSE Arca Equities Rule
7.31(cc).
\7\ For instance, EDGA and EDGX currently permit displayed
Market Pegged Orders as well as aggressive offsets for displayed
Primary Pegged Orders (as such terms are defined below). The
Exchange is not proposing to add these features. The Exchange
anticipates EDGA and EDGX will propose to eliminate these features
in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange currently allows Users to submit two types of limit
orders to the Exchange that are pegged to and priced based on the
national best bid or offer (``NBBO'') and automatically adjusted by the
Exchange's System.\8\ First, a ``Primary Pegged Order,'' which is
pegged to a price inferior to or equal to the inside quote on the same
side of the market (i.e., for a bid, pegged to the NBB or for an offer,
pegged to the NBO) by an amount set by the User. Second, a ``Market
Pegged Order,'' which is pegged to a price that offsets the inside
quote on the other side of the market (i.e., for a bid, pegged to the
NBO or for an offer, pegged to the NBB) by an amount set by the User.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\8\ As defined in Rule 1.5(aa), the System is the electronic
communications and trading facility designated by the Board through
which securities orders of Users are consolidated for ranking,
execution and, when applicable, routing away.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

At the outset, the Exchange notes that it proposes to modify the
definition of Primary Pegged Order to make it more understandable and
consistent with the definition of Market Pegged Order by adding a
definition of ``Primary Offset Amount'', which would mean the amount of
the offset selected by the User for a Primary Pegged Order. The
Exchange proposes to retain the definition of ``Offset Amount,'' which
would mean the amount of the offset selected by the User for a Market
Pegged Order. The Exchange also proposes two substantive changes to
Primary Pegged Orders, as described below.
First, pursuant to current Rule 11.9(c)(8), neither type of Pegged
Order is eligible to be displayed on the Exchange. The Exchange
proposes to maintain this restriction for Market Pegged Orders but to
permit Primary Pegged Orders to be displayed on the Exchange provided
that they cannot be more aggressive than the NBB or NBO to which they
are pegged, as described below.
Second, the Exchange proposes to modify the offset that a User can
select for a Primary Pegged Order by specifying that such amount is an
offset, rather than requiring that the order be inferior to or equal to
the inside quote on the same side of the market. This change to Primary
Pegged Orders, therefore, would allow Users to select a Primary Offset
Amount that would make a Primary Pegged Order more aggressive than the
NBB or NBO to which it is pegged (i.e., for a bid, willing to pay a
higher price or for an offer, willing to sell for a lower price).
However, as noted above, the Exchange proposes to restrict the
designation of a Primary Offset Amount that would price a Primary
Pegged Order higher than the NBB for a bid or lower than the NBO for an
offer to non-displayed Primary Pegged Orders. Thus, as proposed, the
Primary Offset Amount for a displayed Primary Pegged Order must result
in the price of such order being inferior to or equal to the inside
quote on the same side of the market. The Exchange is not proposing to
accept displayed Primary Pegged Orders with an aggressive offset at
this time because such orders would add functionality to the Exchange
that would effectively set the NBBO through a Pegged Order and the
Exchange believes that this could potentially add complexity to its
System.
As an example of an order with a Primary Pegged Order that a User
has designated for display, assume the Exchange receives a display-
eligible Primary Pegged Order to buy 300 shares of a security with a
Primary Pegged Offset to price the order at $0.01 below the NBB. Assume
further that the NBBO is $10.09 by $10.10 when the order is received.
The Exchange will post and display the order on the Exchange as a bid
to buy 300 shares at $10.08. If the NBBO moves to $10.10 by $10.11, the
Exchange will adjust to $10.09 the price of the Primary Pegged Order to
buy. If the NBBO then moved to $10.08 by $10.11, the Exchange will
adjust to $10.07 the price of the Primary Pegged Order to buy.
A User could alternatively submit a display-eligible Primary Pegged
Order to buy with no Primary Pegged Offset, in which case the initial
display price of the order would be $10.09, upon the first adjustment
to the NBBO the display price would be $10.10, and upon the final
adjustment to the NBBO the display price would be $10.08.
A User could not submit a display-eligible Primary Pegged Order to
buy with a Primary Pegged Offset to price the order at $0.01 above the
NBB, as this would make the order more aggressive than the NBB, and, as
proposed, the Exchange will not accept Primary Pegged Orders that are
both eligible for display and contain an aggressive Primary Pegged
Offset amount. A User could, however, submit a non-display-eligible
Primary Pegged Order to buy with a Primary Pegged Offset to price the
order at $0.01 above the NBB. Thus, using the example above, the
initial ranked price of the order would be $10.10 ($0.01 higher than
the NBB of $10.09), upon the first adjustment to the NBBO the adjusted
ranked price of the order would be $10.11 ($0.01 higher than the NBB of
$10.10), and upon the final adjustment to the NBBO the adjusted ranked
price of the order would be $10.09 ($0.01 higher than the NBB of
$10.08).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \9\ and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ because it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Specifically, the proposed changes are designed to provide Users
with additional control over their orders that are pegged to the NBBO.
The proposal to permit the display of Primary Pegged Orders is
consistent with the Act as this proposal is intended to lead to
additional displayed liquidity available on the Exchange, thus
contributing to the price discovery process. The proposal to permit an
aggressive offset on non-displayed Primary Pegged Orders is similarly
consistent with the Act as this proposal is intended to allow Users
adding liquidity to the Exchange to more aggressively price their
orders,

[[Page 58021]]

which, in turn, means an enhanced likelihood of price improvement for
incoming orders that execute against such orders. For instance, by
permitting a User to designate a Primary Pegged Order to buy on the
Exchange with an aggressive Primary Pegged Offset, that means that the
Exchange has non-displayed liquidity priced better than the NBB, which
amounts to significant price improvement as compared to the NBB. For
the reasons described above, the proposals are directly targeted at
removing impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and national market system.
The proposed rule change also is designed to support the principles
of Section 11A (a)(1)\11\ of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair
competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. In
particular, the proposed rule changes to modify the Primary Pegged
Order is intended to add system functionality currently offered by EDGA
and EDGX in order to provide a consistent technology offering for the
BGM Affiliated Exchanges. A consistent technology offering, in turn,
will simplify the technology implementation, changes and maintenance by
Users of the Exchange that are also participants on BZX, EDGA and/or
EDGX. The functionality is similar to functionality offered by Nasdaq
and NYSE Arca as well. The proposed rule changes would also provide
Users with access to functionality that may result in the efficient
execution of such orders and will provide additional flexibility as
well as increased functionality to the Exchange's System and its Users.
The Exchange also believes that the changes to restructure the existing
rule will contribute to the protection of investors and the public
interest by making the Exchange's rules easier to understand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange
reiterates that the proposed rule change is being proposed in the
context of the technology integration of the BGM Affiliated Exchanges.
Thus, the Exchange believes this proposed rule change is necessary to
permit fair competition among national securities exchanges. In
addition, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will benefit
Exchange participants in that it is one of several changes necessary to
achieve a consistent technology offering by the BGM Affiliated
Exchanges. The Exchange also believes that Pegged Orders generally
encourage competition by allowing Users to submit orders that
automatically peg to the NBBO consistent with their trading strategy.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\13\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \14\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\15\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange believes
that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes
that waiver will allow the Exchange to align its re-route functionality
across the BGM Affiliated Exchanges in a timely manner, thereby
simplifying the technology implementation, changes and maintenance by
Users of the Exchange that are also participants on BZX, EDGA and/or
EDGX. The Exchange further believes that waiver will allow the Exchange
to continue to strive towards a complete technology integration of the
BGM Affiliated Exchanges. The Commission believes that waiver of the
operative delay is consistent with investor protection and the public
interest. As a result, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay and designates the proposal operative upon filing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\16\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BYX-2014-022 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-2014-022. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change;

[[Page 58022]]

the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BYX-
2014-022, and should be submitted on or before October 17, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-22996 Filed 9-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.