Technical Amendment to the List of CBP Preclearance Offices in Foreign Countries: Addition of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 46348-46350 [2014-18759]
Download as PDF
46348
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the application for CTAP payments for
the particular program year. The
provisions of § 1412.54 apply to shares
of CTAP payments.
§ 1412.84 Impact of CTAP application on
ARC or PLC.
(a) Applications for CTAP do not
establish eligibility for ARC or PLC.
Interested producers are required to file
documents that are specifically required
for CTAP as specified on the CTAP
application. An application for CTAP
will not be considered an intent to
participate in ARC or PLC and,
conversely, an election or enrollment in
ARC or PLC will not establish eligibility
for CTAP.
(b) [Reserved]
§ 1412.86
CTAP payments.
(a) In the case of producers on a farm
who apply for CTAP as specified in this
part, and where all other eligibility
provisions have been satisfied, CCC will
make CTAP payments available to the
producers on a farm’s application as
specified in this subpart.
(b) CTAP payments for upland cotton
producers on farms with eligible upland
cotton base acres as specified in
§ 1412.82(a) are equal to:
(1) For 2014, the product of
multiplying 60 percent of the farm’s
upland cotton base acres, times the
farm’s direct payment yield for upland
cotton, times $0.09, times the producer’s
share on the approved application; or
(2) Where applicable for 2015
according to this part and subpart, the
product of multiplying 36.5 percent of
the farm’s upland cotton base acres,
times the farm’s direct payment yield
for upland cotton, times $0.09, times the
producer’s share on the approved
application.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1412.87 Transfer of land and successionin-interest.
(a) A succession in interest
application for CTAP is required if there
has been a change in the producer
shares of upland cotton base acres in
§ 1412.82(a) for 2014 or 2015, as
applicable, due to:
(1) A sale of land;
(2) A change of producer, including a
change in a partnership that increases or
decreases the number of partners or
changes who are partners;
(3) A foreclosure, bankruptcy, or
involuntary loss of the farm;
(4) A change in producer shares to
reflect changes in the producer’s share
of the upland cotton base acres relevant
to the originally approved application;
or
(5) Any other change determined by
the Deputy Administrator to be a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Aug 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
succession that will not adversely affect
or defeat the purpose of CTAP.
(b) A succession in interest to the
CTAP application is not permitted if
CCC determines that the change:
(1) Results in a violation of the
landlord-tenant provisions specified in
§ 1412.55; or
(2) Adversely affects or otherwise
defeats the purpose of CTAP.
(c) If a producer who is entitled to
receive CTAP payments dies, becomes
incompetent, or is otherwise unable to
receive the payment, CCC will make the
payment in accordance with part 707 of
this title.
(d) A producer or owner of an
enrolled farm is required to inform the
county committee of changes in interest
in base acres of upland cotton as
specified in § 1412.82(b) on the farm not
later than:
(1) August 1 of the fiscal year in
which the change occurs if the change
requires a reconstitution be completed
in accordance with part 718 of this title;
or
(2) September 30 of the fiscal year in
which the change occurs if the change
does not require a reconstitution be
completed in accordance with part 718
of this title.
(e) In any case in which a CTAP
payment has previously been made to a
predecessor, such payment will not be
paid to the successor, unless such
payment has been refunded in full by
the predecessor.
§ 1412.88 Executed application not in
conformity with regulations.
If, after a CTAP application is
approved by CCC, it is discovered that
such any information contained in the
application is not in conformity with
the provisions of this part, the
provisions of this part will prevail.
§ 1412.89 Division of CTAP payments and
provisions relating to tenants and
sharecroppers.
(a) CTAP payments will be divided in
the manner specified in the applicable
application approved by CCC. CCC will
ensure that 2014 or 2015 producers who
would have a 2014 or 2015 reported
share interest in cropland on the farm
specified in § 1412.82(b) receive
treatment that CCC deems to be
equitable, as determined by CCC. CCC
will refrain from acting on an
application if, as determined by CCC,
there is a disagreement among any
person or legal entity applying as to the
person’s or legal entity’s eligibility to
apply as a tenant and there is
insufficient evidence to indicate
whether the person seeking
participation as a tenant does or does
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
not have a reported share interest in the
cropland on the farm sufficient to cover
the claimed share interest in cotton base
acres of that farm as specified in
§ 1412.82(b) in 2014 or 2015, as
applicable.
(b) CCC may remove an operator or
tenant from an application under this
subpart and part when the operator or
tenant:
(1) Requests, in writing to be removed
from the application;
(2) Files for bankruptcy and the
trustee or debtor in possession fails to
affirm the application, to the extent
permitted by the provisions of
applicable bankruptcy laws;
(3) Dies during the 2014 or 2015
program year and the Administrator of
the estate fails to succeed to the
application within a period of time
determined by the Deputy
Administrator; or
(4) Is the subject of an order of a court
of competent jurisdiction requiring the
removal from the application under this
part and subpart of the operator or
tenant and such order is received by
FSA, as determined by CCC.
(c) In addition to the provisions in
paragraph (b) of this section, tenants are
required to maintain their tenancy
throughout the crop year in order to
remain on an application. Tenants who
fail to maintain tenancy on the acreage
under the application, including failure
to comply with provisions under
applicable State law, may be removed
from an application by CCC. CCC will
assume the tenancy is being maintained
unless notified otherwise by a
participant specified in the application.
Signed on August 4, 2014.
Juan M. Garcia,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation, and Administrator, Farm
Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014–18719 Filed 8–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR PART 101
[CBP Dec. 14–09]
Technical Amendment to the List of
CBP Preclearance Offices in Foreign
Countries: Addition of Abu Dhabi,
United Arab Emirates
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
46349
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ACTION:
Final rule; technical
amendment.
B. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Preclearance Operations
B. The Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Executive Order 12866
This rule amends U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
regulations to reflect that CBP has added
a preclearance location in Abu Dhabi,
United Arab Emirates. CBP Preclearance
operations in Abu Dhabi, United Arab
Emirates officially began on January 24,
2014, pursuant to an agreement between
the Governments of the United States
and the United Arab Emirates. CBP
Officers at preclearance locations
conduct inspections and examinations
to ensure compliance with U.S.
customs, immigration, and agriculture
laws, as well as other laws enforced by
CBP at the U.S. border. Such
inspections and examinations prior to
arrival in the United States generally
enable travelers to exit the domestic
terminal or connect directly to a U.S.
domestic flight without undergoing
further CBP processing.
DATES: Effective Date: August 8, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dylan DeFrancisci, Office of Field
Operations, 202–344–3671,
dylan.defrancisci@cbp.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
An ‘‘Agreement Between the
Government of the United States of
America and the Government of the
United Arab Emirates on Air Transport
Preclearance’’ (Agreement) was signed
on April 15, 2013. Among other things,
the Agreement sets forth the obligations
of the United Arab Emirates and the
United States and establishes the Abu
Dhabi International Airport as a
preclearance location. Under the
Agreement, flights eligible for
preclearance are non-stop commercial
flights that are destined from the United
Arab Emirates to the United States. The
Agreement provides that it will be
carried out in a manner consistent with
the laws and constitutions of both
governments. Preclearance operations
officially began in Abu Dhabi, United
Arab Emirates on January 24, 2014.
Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking is required, the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. This
amendment does not meet the criteria
for a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
specified in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563.
C. Regulatory Amendment
Customs duties and inspection,
Customs ports of entry, Foreign trade
statistics, Imports, Organization and
functions (Government agencies),
Shipments, Vessels.
SUMMARY:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background
A. Preclearance Operations
CBP preclearance operations have
been in existence since 1952.
Preclearance facilities are established
through the cooperative efforts of CBP,
foreign government representatives, and
the local facility authorities and are
evidenced with signed preclearance
agreements.
Each facility is staffed with CBP
Officers responsible for conducting
inspections and examinations in
connection with preclearing passengers,
crew, and their goods bound for the
United States. Generally, travelers who
are inspected at a preclearance facility
are permitted to arrive at a U.S.
domestic facility and exit the U.S.
domestic terminal upon arrival or
connect directly to a U.S. domestic
flight without further CBP processing.
Preclearance operations enhance
security in the air environment through
the screening and inspection of travelers
prior to their arrival in the United
States. Additionally, preclearance
operations facilitate legitimate travel
and relieve passenger congestion at
federal inspection facilities in the
United States. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2013,
over 16 million aircraft travelers were
processed at preclearance locations.
This figure represents more than 15.5
percent of all commercial aircraft
travelers cleared by CBP in FY 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Aug 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
Section 101.5 of the CBP regulations
(19 CFR 101.5) sets forth a list of CBP
preclearance offices in foreign countries.
This document amends this section to
add Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates to
the list of preclearance offices. This
document also corrects the misspelling
of the Oranjestad, Aruba preclearance
location.
II. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency may
waive the normal notice and comment
requirements if it finds, for good cause,
that they are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. Based on an Agreement
between the Governments of the United
States and the United Arab Emirates,
preclearance operations in Abu Dhabi,
United Arab Emirates have been
operating since January 24, 2014. The
final rule merely adds Abu Dhabi,
United Arab Emirates to the list of CBP
preclearance locations in foreign
countries. This amendment is a
technical change to merely update the
list of preclearance locations. Therefore,
notice and comment for this rule is
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest because the rule has no
substantive impact, is technical in
nature, and relates only to management,
organization, procedure, and practice.
For the same reasons, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), a delayed effective date
is not required.
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This document is being issued in
accordance with 19 CFR 0.2(a) because
preclearance locations are not within
the bounds of those regulations for
which the Secretary of the Treasury has
retained sole authority. Therefore, this
rule may be signed by the Secretary of
Homeland Security or his or her
designee.
List of Subjects In 19 CFR Part 101
Amendments to Regulations
For the reasons discussed above, part
101 of title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (19 CFR Part 101) is
amended as set forth below.
PART 101—GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Inapplicability of Public Notice and
Delayed Effective Date Requirements
PO 00000
C. Signing Authority
1. The general authority citation for
part 101 and specific authority citation
for § 101.5 continue to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66,
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624,
1629, 1646a.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 101.5 also issued under 19 U.S.C.
1629.
*
■
*
*
*
*
2. Revise § 101.5 to read as follows:
§ 101.5 CBP preclearance offices in
foreign countries.
Listed below are the preclearance
offices in foreign countries where CBP
Officers are located. A Director,
Preclearance, located in the Office of
Field Operations at CBP Headquarters,
is the responsible CBP Officer exercising
supervisory control over all
preclearance offices.
Country
Aruba .........................
The Bahamas ............
Bermuda ....................
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
CBP office
Oranjestad.
Freeport.
Nassau.
Kindley Field.
46350
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Country
CBP office
Canada ......................
Calgary, Alberta.
Edmonton, Alberta.
Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Montreal, Quebec.
Ottawa, Ontario.
Toronto, Ontario.
Vancouver, British
Columbia.
Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Dublin.
Shannon.
Abu Dhabi.
Ireland .......................
United Arab Emirates
Dated: August 4, 2014.
R. Gil Kerlikowske,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2014–18759 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
19 CFR Part 201
Rules of General Application
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The United States
International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) amends provisions of
its Rules of Practice and Procedure
concerning national security
information. The amendments are
designed to ensure that the
Commission’s procedures with respect
to national security information are
consistent with applicable authorities.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 8, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
R. Barton, Secretary, telephone (202)
205–2000, or Clara Kuehn, AttorneyAdvisor, Office of the General Counsel,
telephone (202) 205–3012, United States
International Trade Commission.
Hearing-impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal at (202)
205–1810. General information
concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server
at https://www.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
335 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1335) authorizes the Commission to
adopt such reasonable procedures,
rules, and regulations as it deems
necessary to carry out its functions and
duties. This rulemaking updates
Subpart F of Part 201 of the
Commission’s existing Rules of Practice
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:19 Aug 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
and Procedure concerning national
security information to ensure that
Subpart F is consistent with Executive
Order 13526 of December 29, 2009, and
its implementing directive (32 CFR part
2001).
On April 17, 2014, the Commission
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NOPR) in the Federal
Register. 79 FR 21658, April 17, 2014.
In the NOPR, the Commission proposed
amendments to Subpart F that would
make non-substantive changes to
existing section 201.42; eliminate
existing section 201.43 and existing
subsections 201.44(b) through (f); and
update the procedures for processing
mandatory declassification review
(‘‘MDR’’) requests in existing subsection
201.44(a) and incorporate them into a
new section 201.43.
In the NOPR, the Commission
requested public comment on the
proposed rules, but no comments were
received. The Commission found no
reason to change the proposed rules
before adopting them as final rules,
which are republished below. A sectionby-section analysis of the rules can be
found at 79 FR 21658–21661 (April 17,
2014).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is inapplicable to this
rulemaking because it is not one for
which a notice of proposed rulemaking
is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any
other statute. Although the Commission
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking, these regulations are
‘‘agency rules of procedure and
practice,’’ and thus are exempt from the
notice requirement imposed by 5 U.S.C.
553(b). Moreover, these rules are
certified as not having a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
These amended rules do not contain
any information collection requirements
subject to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
No actions are necessary under title II
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–4 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538) because these amended
rules will not result in the expenditure
by State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100,000,000 or more in any one
year, and will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
The Commission has determined that
these amended rules do not constitute a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
These amended rules do not have
federalism implications warranting the
preparation of a federalism summary
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
impact statement under Executive Order
13132 (64 FR 43255, August 4, 1999).
These amended rules are not ‘‘major
rules’’ as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from
the reporting requirements of the Act
because they concern rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that
do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 201
Administrative practice and
procedure.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the United States
International Trade Commission
amends 19 CFR part 201 as follows:
PART 201—RULES OF GENERAL
APPLICATION
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sec. 335 of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1335), and sec. 603 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2482), unless
otherwise noted.
■
2. Revise subpart F to read as follows:
Subpart F—National Security Information
Sec.
201.42 Purpose and scope.
201.43 Mandatory declassification review.
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1335; E.O. 13526, 75
FR 707.
Subpart F—National Security
Information
§ 201.42
Purpose and scope.
This subpart supplements Executive
Order 13526 of December 29, 2009, and
its implementing directive (32 CFR part
2001) as it applies to the Commission.
§ 201.43
review.
Mandatory declassification
(a) Requests for mandatory
declassification review—(1) Definitions.
Mandatory declassification review
(‘‘MDR’’) means the review for
declassification of classified information
in response to a request for
declassification that meets the
requirements under section 3.5 of
Executive Order 13526.
(2) Procedures. Requests for MDR of
information in the custody of the
Commission that is classified under
Executive Order 13526 or predecessor
orders shall be directed to the Secretary
to the Commission, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. MDR requests
will be processed in accordance with
Executive Order 13526, its
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46348-46350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18759]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR PART 101
[CBP Dec. 14-09]
Technical Amendment to the List of CBP Preclearance Offices in
Foreign Countries: Addition of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
[[Page 46349]]
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
regulations to reflect that CBP has added a preclearance location in
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. CBP Preclearance operations in Abu
Dhabi, United Arab Emirates officially began on January 24, 2014,
pursuant to an agreement between the Governments of the United States
and the United Arab Emirates. CBP Officers at preclearance locations
conduct inspections and examinations to ensure compliance with U.S.
customs, immigration, and agriculture laws, as well as other laws
enforced by CBP at the U.S. border. Such inspections and examinations
prior to arrival in the United States generally enable travelers to
exit the domestic terminal or connect directly to a U.S. domestic
flight without undergoing further CBP processing.
DATES: Effective Date: August 8, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dylan DeFrancisci, Office of Field
Operations, 202-344-3671, dylan.defrancisci@cbp.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Preclearance Operations
CBP preclearance operations have been in existence since 1952.
Preclearance facilities are established through the cooperative efforts
of CBP, foreign government representatives, and the local facility
authorities and are evidenced with signed preclearance agreements.
Each facility is staffed with CBP Officers responsible for
conducting inspections and examinations in connection with preclearing
passengers, crew, and their goods bound for the United States.
Generally, travelers who are inspected at a preclearance facility are
permitted to arrive at a U.S. domestic facility and exit the U.S.
domestic terminal upon arrival or connect directly to a U.S. domestic
flight without further CBP processing.
Preclearance operations enhance security in the air environment
through the screening and inspection of travelers prior to their
arrival in the United States. Additionally, preclearance operations
facilitate legitimate travel and relieve passenger congestion at
federal inspection facilities in the United States. In Fiscal Year (FY)
2013, over 16 million aircraft travelers were processed at preclearance
locations. This figure represents more than 15.5 percent of all
commercial aircraft travelers cleared by CBP in FY 2013.
B. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Preclearance Operations
An ``Agreement Between the Government of the United States of
America and the Government of the United Arab Emirates on Air Transport
Preclearance'' (Agreement) was signed on April 15, 2013. Among other
things, the Agreement sets forth the obligations of the United Arab
Emirates and the United States and establishes the Abu Dhabi
International Airport as a preclearance location. Under the Agreement,
flights eligible for preclearance are non-stop commercial flights that
are destined from the United Arab Emirates to the United States. The
Agreement provides that it will be carried out in a manner consistent
with the laws and constitutions of both governments. Preclearance
operations officially began in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates on
January 24, 2014.
C. Regulatory Amendment
Section 101.5 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR 101.5) sets forth a
list of CBP preclearance offices in foreign countries. This document
amends this section to add Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates to the list
of preclearance offices. This document also corrects the misspelling of
the Oranjestad, Aruba preclearance location.
II. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Inapplicability of Public Notice and Delayed Effective Date
Requirements
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency
may waive the normal notice and comment requirements if it finds, for
good cause, that they are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest. Based on an Agreement between the Governments of
the United States and the United Arab Emirates, preclearance operations
in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates have been operating since January
24, 2014. The final rule merely adds Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates to
the list of CBP preclearance locations in foreign countries. This
amendment is a technical change to merely update the list of
preclearance locations. Therefore, notice and comment for this rule is
unnecessary and contrary to the public interest because the rule has no
substantive impact, is technical in nature, and relates only to
management, organization, procedure, and practice. For the same
reasons, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), a delayed effective date is
not required.
B. The Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866
Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do
not apply. This amendment does not meet the criteria for a
``significant regulatory action'' as specified in Executive Order
12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563.
C. Signing Authority
This document is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR 0.2(a)
because preclearance locations are not within the bounds of those
regulations for which the Secretary of the Treasury has retained sole
authority. Therefore, this rule may be signed by the Secretary of
Homeland Security or his or her designee.
List of Subjects In 19 CFR Part 101
Customs duties and inspection, Customs ports of entry, Foreign
trade statistics, Imports, Organization and functions (Government
agencies), Shipments, Vessels.
Amendments to Regulations
For the reasons discussed above, part 101 of title 19 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (19 CFR Part 101) is amended as set forth below.
PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The general authority citation for part 101 and specific authority
citation for Sec. 101.5 continue to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, 1202 (General Note
3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624,
1629, 1646a.
* * * * *
Section 101.5 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1629.
* * * * *
0
2. Revise Sec. 101.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 101.5 CBP preclearance offices in foreign countries.
Listed below are the preclearance offices in foreign countries
where CBP Officers are located. A Director, Preclearance, located in
the Office of Field Operations at CBP Headquarters, is the responsible
CBP Officer exercising supervisory control over all preclearance
offices.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country CBP office
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aruba..................................... Oranjestad.
The Bahamas............................... Freeport.
Nassau.
Bermuda................................... Kindley Field.
[[Page 46350]]
Canada.................................... Calgary, Alberta.
Edmonton, Alberta.
Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Montreal, Quebec.
Ottawa, Ontario.
Toronto, Ontario.
Vancouver, British Columbia.
Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Ireland................................... Dublin.
Shannon.
United Arab Emirates...................... Abu Dhabi.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: August 4, 2014.
R. Gil Kerlikowske,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2014-18759 Filed 8-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P