Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules From the People's Republic of China: Amended Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 43713-43715 [2014-17730]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Notices
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Analysis of Comments Received
A list of the issues raised and to
which we have responded in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum, is attached
to this notice as an Appendix.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
determine the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists for the
respondent for the period February 1,
2012, through January 31, 2013.
Ambica Steels Limited ..............
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Producer/exporter
WeightedAverage
Dumping
Margin
(Percent)
0.00
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department
determines, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in
accordance with the final results of this
review. The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these
final results of review.
For assessment purposes, because
Ambica’s weighted-average dumping
margin remains zero or de minimis (i.e.,
less than 0.5 percent) in these final
results, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
the appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties in accordance with
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Our instructions
will be on an importer-specific basis,
where the importer is known, or on a
customer-specific basis, where the
importer is not known.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Ambica for
which it did not know its merchandise
was destined for the United States. In
such instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:53 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication as provided
by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for Ambica will be the
rate established in the final results of
this administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this review
but covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which that manufacturer or exporter
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 12.45
percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established
in the order.2 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
2 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar From
India, 59 FR 66915, 66921 (December 28, 1994).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43713
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
These final results of administrative
review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: July 22, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix—Issues in Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of Issues
1. Whether To Correct the Name of a U.S.
Customer in the Final Liquidation
Instructions
2. Whether To Name All of Ambica’s U.S.
Customers in the Final Liquidation
Instructions
[FR Doc. 2014–17721 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into
Modules From the People’s Republic
of China: Amended Partial Rescission
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
is rescinding the administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,
whether or not assembled into modules,
from the People’s Republic of China
covering the period May 25, 2012,
through November 30, 2013 for the
companies listed in Appendix I of this
notice. The version of the partial
rescission notice signed on June 24,
2014, contained a number of errors
which this amended partial rescission
notice corrects.1 This amended partial
rescission notice takes the place of the
AGENCY:
1 In the version of the partial rescission notice
signed on June 24, 2014, the Department
inadvertently rescinded the review of Shenzen
Topray Co., Ltd. and Spray Energy Co., Ltd., for
which all review requests were not withdrawn and
did not rescind the review of LDK Solar Hi-tech
(Nanchang) Co., Ltd. for which all review requests
were timely withdrawn.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
43714
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Notices
prior version and is being published in
its place.
DATES: Effective Date: July 28, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brandon Farlander or Drew Jackson,
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–0182 or (202) 482–
4406, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 7, 2012, the Department
of Commerce published in the Federal
Register the antidumping duty order on
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,
whether or not assembled into modules
(solar cells), from the People’s Republic
of China (PRC).2 On December 3, 2013,
the Department published a notice of
opportunity to request an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on solar cells.3 The Department received
multiple timely requests for an
administrative review and on February
3, 2014, in accordance with section
751(a) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), the Department published in
the Federal Register a notice of the
initiation of an administrative review of
that order.4 The administrative review
was initiated with respect to 145
companies or groups of companies, and
covers the period from May 25, 2012,
through November 30, 2013. While
there are a number of companies which
remain under review, the requesting
parties have timely withdrawn all
review requests for certain companies,
as discussed below.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Rescission of Review, in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party that requested the
review withdraws its request within 90
days of the date of publication of the
notice of initiation of the requested
review. All requesting parties withdrew
their respective requests for an
administrative review of the entities
listed in Appendix I within 90 days of
2 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the
People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73018
(December 7, 2012).
3 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 78 FR 72636
(December 3, 2013).
4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 6147
(February 3, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:53 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
the date of publication of the Initiation
Notice. The entities listed in Appendix
I had a separate rate granted in the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which they were under
review. Accordingly, the Department is
rescinding this review, in part, with
respect to these entities, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).5
Companies That Have Not
Demonstrated Eligibility for a Separate
Rate
In addition to the companies noted
above, all review requests were timely
withdrawn for other companies that are
currently under review that either do
not have a separate rate because they
have never been reviewed or did not
demonstrate eligibility for a separate
rate in the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding in which
they were under review. Therefore,
these companies will continue to be
subject to the PRC-wide entity rate.
While the requests for review of those
companies were withdrawn by all
parties, those withdrawn companies are
part of the PRC-wide entity which could
come under review in this segment of
the proceeding. If the PRC-wide entity
comes under review we will make a
determination with respect to the PRCwide entity at the final results. A
complete list of these entities without
separate rates is contained in Appendix
II.
Assessment
For the entities in Appendix I for
which the Department has rescinded
this review and which had a separate
rate granted in the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which they were under review, the
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection 15 days
after the publication of this notice in the
Federal Register. For these entities,
antidumping duties shall be assessed on
period of review entries at rates equal to
the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
For the entities in Appendix II, which
are part of the PRC-wide entity during
the instant review period (i.e., have not
established their eligibility for a
separate rate), the Department will issue
assessment instructions 15 days after
publication of the final results of this
review.
PO 00000
5 See
Appendix I.
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers whose entries will be
liquidated as a result of this rescission
notice of their responsibility under 19
CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s assumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders (APOs)
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to APOs of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under an APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: July 16, 2014.
Gary Taverman,
Senior Advisor for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix I
The following companies, which were
named in our Initiation Notice, had a
separate rate granted in the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which they were under review.
Subsequently, interested parties timely
withdrew all requests for review of these
companies. Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this
administrative review with respect to these
companies:
• CEEG (Shanghai) Solar Science Technology
Co., Ltd.
• CEEG Nanjing Renewable Energy Co., Ltd.
• China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co., Ltd.
• CNPV Dongying Solar Power Co., Ltd.
• Hanwha SolarOne (Qidong) Co., Ltd.
• JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd.
• Jetion Solar (China) Co., Ltd.
• Jiawei Solarchina Co. (Shenzhen), Ltd.
• JingAo Solar Co., Ltd.
• LDK Solar Hi-tech (Nanchang) Co., Ltd.
• Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd.
• Ningbo Komaes Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
• Risen Energy Co, Ltd.
• Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
• Shanghai Solar Energy Science &
Technology Co., Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Notices
• tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
• Yuhuan Sinosola Science & Technology
Co., Ltd.6
• Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix II
The following companies, which were
named in our Initiation Notice, either do not
have a separate rate because they have never
been reviewed or were not granted a separate
rate in the most recently completed segment
of this proceeding in which they were under
review. Therefore, these companies will
continue to be subject to the PRC-wide entity
rate. Although interested parties timely
withdrew all requests for review of these
companies, the companies are part of the
PRC-wide entity which could come under
review in this segment of the proceeding. If
the PRC-wide entity comes under review, we
will make a determination with respect to the
PRC-wide entity at the final results.
• Aiko Solar
• Amplesun Solar
• Beijing Hope Industry
• Best Solar Hi-tech
• China Sunergy
• Chinalight Solar
• Dai Hwa Industrial
• EGing
• ENN Solar Energy
• General Solar Power
• Golden Partner Development
• Goldpoly (Quanzhou)
• Hairun Photovoltaics Technology Co., Ltd.
• Hareon Solar Technology
• HC Solar Power Co., Ltd.
• Jia Yi Energy Technology
• Jiangxi Green Power Co. Ltd.
• Jiasheng Photovoltaic Tech
• Jiawei Solar Holding
• Jiutai Energy
• Linuo Photovoltaic
• Perfectenergy
• Polar Photovoltaics
• Qiangsheng (QS Solar)
• QXPV (Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical
Appliance Co., Ltd)
• Refine Solar
• Risun Solar (JiangXi Ruijing Solar Power
Co., Ltd)
• Sanjing Silicon
• Shanghai Chaori Solar Energy
• Shangpin Solar
• Shanshan Ulica
• Shenzhen Global Solar Energy Tech
• Shuqimeng Energy Tech
• Skybasesolar
• Solargiga Energy Holdings Ltd.
• Sunflower
• Sunlink PV
• Sunvim Solar Technology
• Tainergy Tech
• Tianjin Jinneng Solar Cell
• Topray
• Topsolar
• Trony
• Weihai China Glass Solar
• Wuxi Sunshine Power Co., Ltd.
6 The Department notes that it initiated a review
of Yuhan Sinosola Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
However, the the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection’s ACE Secure Data Portal reflects a rate
for Yuhuan Sinosola Science & Technology Co.,
Ltd.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:53 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
• Wuxi University Science Park International
Incubator Co., Ltd.
• Yunnan Tianda
• Yunnan Zhuoye Energy
• Zhejiang Leye Photovoltaic Science &
Technology Co., Ltd.
• Zhejiang Top Point Photovoltaic Co., Ltd.
• Zhejiang Wanxiang Solar Co, Ltd.
• Zhenjiang Huantai Silicon Science &
Technology Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2014–17730 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Environmental Technologies Trade
Advisory Committee Public Meeting
International Trade
Administration, DOC.
ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory
Committee meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice sets forth the
schedule and proposed agenda of a
meeting of the Environmental
Technologies Trade Advisory
Committee (ETTAC).
DATES: The meeting is scheduled for
Tuesday, August 19, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.
Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
Room 4830 at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, Herbert Clark Hoover
Building, 1401 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Maureen Hinman, Office of Energy &
Environmental Industries (OEEI),
International Trade Administration,
Room 4053, 1401 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20230 (Phone:
202–482–0627; Fax: 202–482–5665;
email: maureen.hinman@trade.gov.)
This meeting is physically accessible to
people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to
OEEI at (202) 482–5225 no less than one
week prior to the meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting will take place from 9:00 a.m.
to 3:30 p.m. EDT. The general meeting
is open to the public and time will be
permitted for public comment from
3:00–3:30 p.m. EDT. Those interested in
attending must provide notification by
Thursday, August 14, 2014 at 5:00 p.m.
EDT, via the contact information
provided above. Written comments
concerning ETTAC affairs are welcome
any time before or after the meeting.
Minutes will be available within 30
days of this meeting.
Topics to be considered: The agenda
for this meeting will include follow-up
discussions to the May 28, 2014 joint
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43715
ETTAC-Environmental Trade Working
Group (ETWG) meeting, discussion
regarding next steps for the 2014–2016
charter, and 2012–2014 charter
conclusion action items. The status of
the U.S. Environmental Export Initiative
will also be discussed.
Background: The ETTAC is mandated
by Public Law 103–392. It was created
to advise the U.S. government on
environmental trade policies and
programs, and to help it to focus its
resources on increasing the exports of
the U.S. environmental industry.
ETTAC operates as an advisory
committee to the Secretary of Commerce
and the Trade Promotion Coordinating
Committee (TPCC). ETTAC was
originally chartered in May of 1994.
This meeting will be the final meeting
under the current charter which expires
in September 2014.
Dated: July 17, 2014.
Catherine Vial,
Director, Office of Energy and Environmental
Industries, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2014–17337 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD410
Fisheries of the South Atlantic;
Southeast Data, Assessment, and
Review (SEDAR); Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 41 post Data
Workshop Webinar.
AGENCY:
The SEDAR 41 assessments of
the South Atlantic stocks of red snapper
and gray triggerfish will consist of a
series of workshops and webinars: A
Data Workshop; an Assessment
Workshop; and a Review Workshop. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: A SEDAR 41 post Data
Workshop webinar will be held on
Friday, August 15, 2014, from 1 p.m.
until 4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Meeting address: The
meeting will be held via webinar. The
webinar is open to members of the
public. Those interested in participating
should contact Julia Byrd at SEDAR (see
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHR INFORMATION CONTACT
below) to request an invitation
providing webinar access information.
Please request webinar invitations at
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43713-43715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17730]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled
Into Modules From the People's Republic of China: Amended Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is rescinding the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on crystalline silicon
photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules, from the
People's Republic of China covering the period May 25, 2012, through
November 30, 2013 for the companies listed in Appendix I of this
notice. The version of the partial rescission notice signed on June 24,
2014, contained a number of errors which this amended partial
rescission notice corrects.\1\ This amended partial rescission notice
takes the place of the
[[Page 43714]]
prior version and is being published in its place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In the version of the partial rescission notice signed on
June 24, 2014, the Department inadvertently rescinded the review of
Shenzen Topray Co., Ltd. and Spray Energy Co., Ltd., for which all
review requests were not withdrawn and did not rescind the review of
LDK Solar Hi-tech (Nanchang) Co., Ltd. for which all review requests
were timely withdrawn.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: July 28, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandon Farlander or Drew Jackson, AD/
CVD Operations, Office IV, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
0182 or (202) 482-4406, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 7, 2012, the Department of Commerce published in the
Federal Register the antidumping duty order on crystalline silicon
photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar
cells), from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\2\ On December 3,
2013, the Department published a notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on solar cells.\3\
The Department received multiple timely requests for an administrative
review and on February 3, 2014, in accordance with section 751(a) of
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department published in
the Federal Register a notice of the initiation of an administrative
review of that order.\4\ The administrative review was initiated with
respect to 145 companies or groups of companies, and covers the period
from May 25, 2012, through November 30, 2013. While there are a number
of companies which remain under review, the requesting parties have
timely withdrawn all review requests for certain companies, as
discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not
Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Amended
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73018 (December 7, 2012).
\3\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative
Review, 78 FR 72636 (December 3, 2013).
\4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR
6147 (February 3, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of Review, in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. All
requesting parties withdrew their respective requests for an
administrative review of the entities listed in Appendix I within 90
days of the date of publication of the Initiation Notice. The entities
listed in Appendix I had a separate rate granted in the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in which they were under review.
Accordingly, the Department is rescinding this review, in part, with
respect to these entities, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Companies That Have Not Demonstrated Eligibility for a Separate Rate
In addition to the companies noted above, all review requests were
timely withdrawn for other companies that are currently under review
that either do not have a separate rate because they have never been
reviewed or did not demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in the
most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were
under review. Therefore, these companies will continue to be subject to
the PRC-wide entity rate. While the requests for review of those
companies were withdrawn by all parties, those withdrawn companies are
part of the PRC-wide entity which could come under review in this
segment of the proceeding. If the PRC-wide entity comes under review we
will make a determination with respect to the PRC-wide entity at the
final results. A complete list of these entities without separate rates
is contained in Appendix II.
Assessment
For the entities in Appendix I for which the Department has
rescinded this review and which had a separate rate granted in the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were under
review, the Department intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 15 days
after the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. For these
entities, antidumping duties shall be assessed on period of review
entries at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
For the entities in Appendix II, which are part of the PRC-wide
entity during the instant review period (i.e., have not established
their eligibility for a separate rate), the Department will issue
assessment instructions 15 days after publication of the final results
of this review.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers whose entries
will be liquidated as a result of this rescission notice of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's assumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (APOs)
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to APOs of
their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under an APO in accordance with 19
CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is
subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: July 16, 2014.
Gary Taverman,
Senior Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix I
The following companies, which were named in our Initiation
Notice, had a separate rate granted in the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding in which they were under review.
Subsequently, interested parties timely withdrew all requests for
review of these companies. Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this administrative review with
respect to these companies:
CEEG (Shanghai) Solar Science Technology Co., Ltd.
CEEG Nanjing Renewable Energy Co., Ltd.
China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co., Ltd.
CNPV Dongying Solar Power Co., Ltd.
Hanwha SolarOne (Qidong) Co., Ltd.
JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd.
Jetion Solar (China) Co., Ltd.
Jiawei Solarchina Co. (Shenzhen), Ltd.
JingAo Solar Co., Ltd.
LDK Solar Hi-tech (Nanchang) Co., Ltd.
Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd.
Ningbo Komaes Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
Risen Energy Co, Ltd.
Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
[[Page 43715]]
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Yuhuan Sinosola Science & Technology Co., Ltd.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Department notes that it initiated a review of Yuhan
Sinosola Science & Technology Co., Ltd. However, the the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection's ACE Secure Data Portal reflects a
rate for Yuhuan Sinosola Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd.
Appendix II
The following companies, which were named in our Initiation
Notice, either do not have a separate rate because they have never
been reviewed or were not granted a separate rate in the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were
under review. Therefore, these companies will continue to be subject
to the PRC-wide entity rate. Although interested parties timely
withdrew all requests for review of these companies, the companies
are part of the PRC-wide entity which could come under review in
this segment of the proceeding. If the PRC-wide entity comes under
review, we will make a determination with respect to the PRC-wide
entity at the final results.
Aiko Solar
Amplesun Solar
Beijing Hope Industry
Best Solar Hi-tech
China Sunergy
Chinalight Solar
Dai Hwa Industrial
EGing
ENN Solar Energy
General Solar Power
Golden Partner Development
Goldpoly (Quanzhou)
Hairun Photovoltaics Technology Co., Ltd.
Hareon Solar Technology
HC Solar Power Co., Ltd.
Jia Yi Energy Technology
Jiangxi Green Power Co. Ltd.
Jiasheng Photovoltaic Tech
Jiawei Solar Holding
Jiutai Energy
Linuo Photovoltaic
Perfectenergy
Polar Photovoltaics
Qiangsheng (QS Solar)
QXPV (Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd)
Refine Solar
Risun Solar (JiangXi Ruijing Solar Power Co., Ltd)
Sanjing Silicon
Shanghai Chaori Solar Energy
Shangpin Solar
Shanshan Ulica
Shenzhen Global Solar Energy Tech
Shuqimeng Energy Tech
Skybasesolar
Solargiga Energy Holdings Ltd.
Sunflower
Sunlink PV
Sunvim Solar Technology
Tainergy Tech
Tianjin Jinneng Solar Cell
Topray
Topsolar
Trony
Weihai China Glass Solar
Wuxi Sunshine Power Co., Ltd.
Wuxi University Science Park International Incubator Co.,
Ltd.
Yunnan Tianda
Yunnan Zhuoye Energy
Zhejiang Leye Photovoltaic Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Top Point Photovoltaic Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Wanxiang Solar Co, Ltd.
Zhenjiang Huantai Silicon Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2014-17730 Filed 7-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
