Safety Zone, Marine Week Seattle Seahawks Demonstration, Lake Washington; Seattle, WA, 43646-43648 [2014-17688]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
43646
DATES:
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Effective on July 28, 2014.
Mr.
Paul Crissy, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone
202–372–1093; email Paul.H.Crissy@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Viewing Documents Associated With
This Rule
To view the original rule, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated
with this reulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Background
Need for Correction
In attempting to amend 33 CFR
151.66(c)(3)(iv)(C) to reflect the correct
mail stop for Commandant (CG–OES),
we mistakenly referred to paragraph
(d)(3)(iv)(C) in amendatory instruction
106 on page 79 FR 38435 of that rule.
This rule corrects that error by
amending the correct paragraph.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 151
Administrative practice and
procedure, Oil pollution, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Water pollution control.
Accordingly, 33 CFR part 151 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendment:
PART 151—VESSELS CARRYING OIL,
NOXIOUS LIQUID SUBSTANCES,
GARBAGE, MUNICIPAL OR
COMMERCIAL WASTE, AND BALLAST
WATER
1. The authority citation for part 151
continues to read as follows:
■
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321, 1902, 1903,
1908; 46 U.S.C. 6101; Pub. L. 104–227(110
Stat. 3034); Pub. L. 108–293 (118 Stat. 1063),
§ 623; E.O. 12777, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp. p. 351;
322; DHS Delegation No. 0170.1, sec. 2(77).
[Amended]
2. In § 151.66(c)(3)(iv)(C), remove the
text ‘‘Stop 7126’’ and add, in its place,
the text ‘‘Stop 7509’’.
■
14:46 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0574]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Marine Week Seattle
Seahawks Demonstration, Lake
Washington; Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone for the Marine
Week Seattle Seahawks Demonstration
area on Lake Washington, Seattle, WA.
This event will occur on July 30, 2014
and July 31, 2014. This action is
necessary to protect participants and the
maritime public from the safety hazards
associated with this event, which
involves low flying aircraft, combat
equipment, and other on-water displays,
and will do so by prohibiting any
person or vessel from entering or
remaining in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) or a Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from July
30, 2014 through July 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2014–0574]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LTJG Johnny Zeng, Coast Guard
Sector Puget Sound, Waterways
Management Division; telephone (206)
217–6175, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
Coast Guard
ACTION:
Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
Table of Acronyms
SUMMARY:
On July 7, 2014, the Coast Guard
published its annual technical
amendment final rule (79 FR 38422) to
make non-substantive changes to Title
33 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
[FR Doc. 2014–17687 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
§ 151.66
Dated: July 22, 2014.
Katia Cervoni,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
Sfmt 4700
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because to do so would be
impracticable due to the insufficient
time available for notice and
opportunity to comment prior to the
dates of the actual event and the
inability for the event to be rescheduled.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delayed promulgation would
eliminate the safety zone’s effectiveness
and usefulness in protecting event
participants and the maritime public
during the scheduled event.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this temporary rule
is 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and
160.5; Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat.
2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1 which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to define and establish regulatory safety
zones.
The Marine Corps will be conducting
an aerial and on-water demonstration in
support of Marine Week. The event
involves low flying aircraft, combat
equipment, and other on-water displays,
which will take place immediately
offshore from the Seattle Seahawks
training facility on Lake Washington,
Seattle, WA. The safety zone is
necessary to protect event participants
and the maritime public from the safety
hazards associated with this event.
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone on all waters encompassed
by the following points: 47°32′19″ N,
122°12′14″ W, thence southeasterly to
47°32′11″ N, 122°11′56″ W, thence
southwesterly along the shoreline to
47°31′58″ N, 122°12′11″ W, thence
northwesterly to 47°32′01″ N,
122°12′29″ W, thence northeasterly back
to the point of origin.
Vessels wishing to enter the safety
zone must request permission for entry
by contacting the Joint Harbor
Operations Center at (206) 217–6175, or
the on-scene patrol craft via VHF–FM
Ch 13. If permission for entry is granted
vessels must proceed at a minimum
speed for safe navigation.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This rule is not a significant
regulatory action because it creates a
safety zone that is minimal in size and
short in duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
established safety zones during the
times of enforcement. This rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
a substantial number of small entities
because the temporary safety zone is
minimal in size and short in duration,
maritime traffic will be able to transit
around it and may be permitted to
transit them with the permission from
the Captain of the Port or a Designated
Representative.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43647
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
43648
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 144 / Monday, July 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a temporary safety
zone. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T13–274 to
read as follows:
■
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T13–274 Safety Zone; Marine Week
Seattle Seahawks Demonstration, Lake
Washington; Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is
designated as a safety zone: All waters
encompassed by the following points:
47°32′19″ N, 122°12′14″ W, thence
southeasterly to 47°32′11″ N, 122°11′56″
W, thence southwesterly along the
shoreline to 47°31′58″ N, 122°12′11″ W,
thence northwesterly to 47°32′01″ N,
122°12′29″ W, thence northeasterly back
to the point of origin.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the safety zone
created by this section without the
permission of the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:46 Jul 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
Designated representatives are Coast
Guard personnel authorized by the
Captain of the Port to grant persons or
vessels permission to enter or remain in
the safety zone created by this section.
See 33 CFR part 165, Subpart C, for
additional information and
requirements. Vessels wishing to enter
the zone must request permission for
entry by contacting the Joint Harbor
Operations Center at (206) 217–6175, or
the on-scene patrol craft via VHF–FM
Ch 13. If permission for entry is granted
vessels must proceed at a minimum
speed for safe navigation.
(c) Enforcement Period. This rule is
effective from 7:00 a.m. until 10:00 a.m.
on July 30, 2014, and from 11:00 a.m.
until 2:00 p.m. on July 31, 2014.
Dated: July 11, 2014.
M. W. Raymond,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2014–17688 Filed 7–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0556]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Columbus Road Bridge
Installation, Cuyahoga River,
Cleveland, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH.
This temporary safety zone is intended
to restrict vessels from a portion of the
Cuyahoga River during the installation
operation for the new Columbus Road
Bridge spanning the Cuyahoga River.
This temporary safety zone is necessary
to protect mariners and vessels and
construction crews from the
navigational hazards associated with
blocking the river for the large scale
heavy lift of the bridge structure and
securing it to the towers on either side
of the river.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
July 28, 2014 to 6 a.m. August 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2014–0556]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LTJG Amanda Cost, Chief of
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716–
843–9573, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826 or 1–800–647–5527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest. The final details
for this event were not known to the
Coast Guard until there was insufficient
time remaining before the event to
publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the
effective date of this rule to wait for a
comment period to run would be both
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest because it would inhibit the
Coast Guard’s ability to protect vessels
and mariners from the hazards
associated with the demolition of a
bridge across the span of a river.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this temporary rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest.
E:\FR\FM\28JYR1.SGM
28JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43646-43648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17688]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2014-0574]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Marine Week Seattle Seahawks Demonstration, Lake
Washington; Seattle, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for the Marine
Week Seattle Seahawks Demonstration area on Lake Washington, Seattle,
WA. This event will occur on July 30, 2014 and July 31, 2014. This
action is necessary to protect participants and the maritime public
from the safety hazards associated with this event, which involves low
flying aircraft, combat equipment, and other on-water displays, and
will do so by prohibiting any person or vessel from entering or
remaining in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) or a Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from July 30, 2014 through July 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2014-0574]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LTJG Johnny Zeng, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound,
Waterways Management Division; telephone (206) 217-6175, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.''
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because to do so would be impracticable due to the
insufficient time available for notice and opportunity to comment prior
to the dates of the actual event and the inability for the event to be
rescheduled.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delayed promulgation would
eliminate the safety zone's effectiveness and usefulness in protecting
event participants and the maritime public during the scheduled event.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this temporary rule is 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46
U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1,
6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1 which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to define and establish
regulatory safety zones.
The Marine Corps will be conducting an aerial and on-water
demonstration in support of Marine Week. The event involves low flying
aircraft, combat equipment, and other on-water displays, which will
take place immediately offshore from the Seattle Seahawks training
facility on Lake Washington, Seattle, WA. The safety zone is necessary
to protect event participants and the maritime public from the safety
hazards associated with this event.
[[Page 43647]]
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on all waters
encompassed by the following points: 47[deg]32'19'' N, 122[deg]12'14''
W, thence southeasterly to 47[deg]32'11'' N, 122[deg]11'56'' W, thence
southwesterly along the shoreline to 47[deg]31'58'' N, 122[deg]12'11''
W, thence northwesterly to 47[deg]32'01'' N, 122[deg]12'29'' W, thence
northeasterly back to the point of origin.
Vessels wishing to enter the safety zone must request permission
for entry by contacting the Joint Harbor Operations Center at (206)
217-6175, or the on-scene patrol craft via VHF-FM Ch 13. If permission
for entry is granted vessels must proceed at a minimum speed for safe
navigation.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action because it creates a safety zone that is
minimal in size and short in duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit through the established safety zones during the
times of enforcement. This rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities because the temporary
safety zone is minimal in size and short in duration, maritime traffic
will be able to transit around it and may be permitted to transit them
with the permission from the Captain of the Port or a Designated
Representative.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 43648]]
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a temporary safety
zone. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T13-274 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-274 Safety Zone; Marine Week Seattle Seahawks
Demonstration, Lake Washington; Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is designated as a safety zone:
All waters encompassed by the following points: 47[deg]32'19'' N,
122[deg]12'14'' W, thence southeasterly to 47[deg]32'11'' N,
122[deg]11'56'' W, thence southwesterly along the shoreline to
47[deg]31'58'' N, 122[deg]12'11'' W, thence northwesterly to
47[deg]32'01'' N, 122[deg]12'29'' W, thence northeasterly back to the
point of origin.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR part 165, subpart C, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
safety zone created by this section without the permission of the
Captain of the Port or his designated representative. Designated
representatives are Coast Guard personnel authorized by the Captain of
the Port to grant persons or vessels permission to enter or remain in
the safety zone created by this section. See 33 CFR part 165, Subpart
C, for additional information and requirements. Vessels wishing to
enter the zone must request permission for entry by contacting the
Joint Harbor Operations Center at (206) 217-6175, or the on-scene
patrol craft via VHF-FM Ch 13. If permission for entry is granted
vessels must proceed at a minimum speed for safe navigation.
(c) Enforcement Period. This rule is effective from 7:00 a.m. until
10:00 a.m. on July 30, 2014, and from 11:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. on
July 31, 2014.
Dated: July 11, 2014.
M. W. Raymond,
Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2014-17688 Filed 7-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
