Certain Point-To-Point Network Communication Devices and Products Containing the Same; Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety; Termination of the Investigation, 33215-33216 [2014-13408]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 111 / Tuesday, June 10, 2014 / Notices EIR as part of the process to inform its decision on whether or not to approve the OPP. Resources potentially affected by Reclamation’s approval and KWAPA’s implementation and administration of the OPP may include, but are not limited to: Water resources, including groundwater and water quality, biological resources, land uses including agricultural resources, historic and archaeological resources, environmental justice, Indian Trust Assets, air quality, climate change, greenhouse gas emissions, and socioeconomics including impacts to agricultural production. Special Assistance for Public Scoping Meetings Requests for sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired and all other special assistance needs to participate in the meetings may be submitted by any of the following methods at least five working days before the meeting: • Email to: Ms. Tara Jane Campbell Miranda, Bureau of Reclamation, shakfo-oppcmts@usbr.gov • U.S. Mail to: Ms. Tara Jane Campbell Miranda, Bureau of Reclamation, 6600 Washburn Way, Klamath Falls, Oregon, 97603 • Telephone: Ms. Tara Jane Campbell Miranda (541) 880–2583. A telephone device for the hearing impaired (TDD) is available at 1 (800) 877–8339. Public Disclosure emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment-including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: May 29, 2014. Anastasia T. Leigh, Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific Region. [FR Doc. 2014–13506 Filed 6–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:55 Jun 09, 2014 Jkt 232001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–892] Certain Point-To-Point Network Communication Devices and Products Containing the Same; Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 37) terminating the investigation in its entirety. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on September 9, 2013, based on a complaint filed by Straight Path IP Group, Inc., of Glen Allen, Virginia (‘‘Straight Path’’). 78 FR 55096–97 (Sept. 9, 2013). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of the infringement of claims 1–3, 9, 10, 17, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,009,469; claims 1, 11, 12, 19, 22, 23, and 30 of U.S. Patent No. 6,108,704; and claims 6 and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 6,131,121. The notice of institution named as respondents AmTran Logistics, Inc., of Irvine, California; AmTran Technology Co., Ltd., of New Taipei City, Taiwan; LG Electronics, Inc., of Seoul, Republic of Korea; LG SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 33215 Electronics U.S.A., Inc., of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc., of San Diego, California; Panasonic Corporation of Osaka, Japan; Panasonic Corporation of North America of Secaucus, New Jersey; Sharp Corporation, of Osaka, Japan; Sharp Electronics Corporation of Mahwah, New Jersey; Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., of Foster City, California; Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, of Foster City, California; Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Corporation of America, of New York, New York; Sony Electronics Inc., of San Diego, California; Sony Mobile Communications AB, of Lund, Sweden; Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., of Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications, (USA) Inc., of Atlanta, Georgia; Toshiba Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Toshiba America Inc., of New York, New York; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., of Irvine, California; and Vizio, Inc., of Irvine, California. Id. at 55097. On September 23, 2013, the ALJ granted a motion seeking to amend the complaint to remove respondents Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., and Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. Order No. 2, not reviewed Nov. 4, 2014. On February 5, 2014, the ALJ terminated the investigation with respect to respondents Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation based on a settlement agreement. Order No. 18, not reviewed February 25, 2014. On May 1, 2014, the ALJ terminated the investigation with respect to respondents Sony Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Mobile Communications Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. Order No. 34, not reviewed May 27, 2014. On May 5, 2014, Straight Path filed a motion to terminate the investigation with respect to the remaining respondents based on a withdrawal of the complaint. On May 6, 2014, the Commission Investigative Attorney filed a response supporting the motion. On May 8, 2014, the remaining respondents filed a response indicating that they do not oppose the motion. On May 9, 2014, Straight Path filed a motion for leave to file a reply in support of its motion to terminate the investigation. On May 13, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the motion to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the motion complied with E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1 33216 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 111 / Tuesday, June 10, 2014 / Notices the Commission’s rules and precedent. The ALJ also granted Straight Path’s motion for leave to file a reply. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210). proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States and the State of Indiana v. United Water, Inc. et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1–2601/1. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments: Send them to: By e-mail ........ Issued: June 4, 2014. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. pubcomment-ees.enrd@ usdoj.gov. Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. By mail ........... [FR Doc. 2014–13408 Filed 6–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Water Act On June 3, 2014, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana in the lawsuit entitled United States and the State of Indiana v. United Water, Inc., United Water Environmental Services, Inc., United Water Services, LLC, and United Water Services Indiana, LLC, Civil Action No. 2:14–cv–00193 (N.D. Ind.). The consent decree would resolve claims under the Clean Water Act (‘‘CWA’’), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., based on the alleged violations by United Water, Inc. and its subsidiaries United Water Environmental Services, Inc., United Water Services LLC, and United Water Services Indiana LLC during their operation of a publicly owned wastewater treatment system in the City of Gary, Indiana between 1998 and 2010. A complaint, filed concurrently with the lodging of the proposed decree, sets forth the claims brought under Section 309(b) and (d) of the CWA for: (1) Unauthorized discharges of pollutants under Section 301 of the Act; (2) failure to comply with the terms of a permit issued to Gary Sanitary District under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (‘‘NPDES’’) provisions of the CWA that was effective between 2006 and 2012; and (3) failure to timely submit information requested by EPA in 2010 under Section 308 of CWA. Under the proposed decree, United Water will pay a civil penalty of $645,000. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:55 Jun 09, 2014 Jkt 232001 During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: https:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_ Decrees.html. We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $4.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Maureen M. Katz, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 2014–13442 Filed 6–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1658] Walk-Through Metal Detectors and Hand-Held Metal Detectors Test Method Validation AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, DOJ. ACTION: Notice. National Institute of Justice has recently developed updated versions of its minimum performance standards for walk-through metal detectors and hand-held metal detectors. In order to ensure that the test methods in the standards are properly documented, NIJ is requesting proposals (including price quotes) for test method validation efforts from testing SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 laboratories. NIJ is also seeking the participation of metal detector manufacturers in this effort to ensure that the test methods are valid and reasonable for metal detectors in the market today. Additional information for these efforts may be found through the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center’s Web site by following the link below: https:// www.justnet.org/standards/Metal_ Detectors.html. DATES: Please submit quotes or expressions of interest in participation by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 7, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Otterson by telephone at (301) 240–6754 or by email at david.m.otterson@lmco.com. Greg Ridgeway, Acting Director, National Institute of Justice. [FR Doc. 2014–13513 Filed 6–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Docket No. OSHA–2011–0032] Construction Standards on Posting Emergency Telephone Numbers and Floor Load Limits; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. ACTION: Request for public comments. AGENCY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning its proposal to extend the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) approval of the information collection requirements specified in the Construction Standards on Posting Emergency Telephone Numbers and Maximum Safe Floor Load Limits (paragraph (f) of § 1926.50 and paragraph (a)(2) of § 1926.250, respectively). DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by August 11, 2014. ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments electronically at https:// www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting comments. Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer than 10 pages you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 111 (Tuesday, June 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33215-33216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13408]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-892]


Certain Point-To-Point Network Communication Devices and Products 
Containing the Same; Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety; 
Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 37) 
terminating the investigation in its entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on September 9, 2013, based on a complaint filed by Straight Path IP 
Group, Inc., of Glen Allen, Virginia (``Straight Path''). 78 FR 55096-
97 (Sept. 9, 2013). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of the 
infringement of claims 1-3, 9, 10, 17, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,009,469; claims 1, 11, 12, 19, 22, 23, and 30 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,108,704; and claims 6 and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 6,131,121. The notice 
of institution named as respondents AmTran Logistics, Inc., of Irvine, 
California; AmTran Technology Co., Ltd., of New Taipei City, Taiwan; LG 
Electronics, Inc., of Seoul, Republic of Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., 
Inc., of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; LG Electronics MobileComm 
U.S.A., Inc., of San Diego, California; Panasonic Corporation of Osaka, 
Japan; Panasonic Corporation of North America of Secaucus, New Jersey; 
Sharp Corporation, of Osaka, Japan; Sharp Electronics Corporation of 
Mahwah, New Jersey; Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., of Tokyo, Japan; 
Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc., of Foster City, California; 
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, of Foster City, California; 
Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Corporation of America, of New 
York, New York; Sony Electronics Inc., of San Diego, California; Sony 
Mobile Communications AB, of Lund, Sweden; Sony Mobile Communications 
(USA) Inc., of Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Sony Ericsson 
Mobile Communications, (USA) Inc., of Atlanta, Georgia; Toshiba 
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Toshiba America Inc., of New York, New 
York; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., of Irvine, California; 
and Vizio, Inc., of Irvine, California. Id. at 55097.
    On September 23, 2013, the ALJ granted a motion seeking to amend 
the complaint to remove respondents Sony Computer Entertainment 
America, Inc., and Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. Order 
No. 2, not reviewed Nov. 4, 2014. On February 5, 2014, the ALJ 
terminated the investigation with respect to respondents Sharp 
Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation based on a settlement 
agreement. Order No. 18, not reviewed February 25, 2014. On May 1, 
2014, the ALJ terminated the investigation with respect to respondents 
Sony Corporation, Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, Sony 
Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Mobile 
Communications Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, and Sony Mobile 
Communications (USA) Inc. Order No. 34, not reviewed May 27, 2014.
    On May 5, 2014, Straight Path filed a motion to terminate the 
investigation with respect to the remaining respondents based on a 
withdrawal of the complaint. On May 6, 2014, the Commission 
Investigative Attorney filed a response supporting the motion. On May 
8, 2014, the remaining respondents filed a response indicating that 
they do not oppose the motion. On May 9, 2014, Straight Path filed a 
motion for leave to file a reply in support of its motion to terminate 
the investigation.
    On May 13, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the motion 
to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the motion complied 
with

[[Page 33216]]

the Commission's rules and precedent. The ALJ also granted Straight 
Path's motion for leave to file a reply.
    No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has 
determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
Part 210).

    Issued: June 4, 2014.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-13408 Filed 6-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.