Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, 53369-53370 [2010-21757]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.3
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
FICC is proposing to add a provision
to the rules of GSD to make explicit the
close out netting that would be applied
to obligations between FICC and its
members in the event that FICC
becomes insolvent or defaults in its
obligations to its members.4
FICC has been approached by some of
its dealer members that have requested
that FICC add a provision to the rules
of GSD to make explicit the close out
netting of obligations between FICC and
its members in the event that FICC
becomes insolvent or defaults in its
obligations to its members. Such
members have stated that the proposed
rule change will provide clarity in their
application of balance sheet netting to
their positions with FICC under U.S.
GAAP in accordance with the criteria
specified in the Financial Accounting
Standards Board’s Interpretation No. 39,
Offsetting of Amounts Related to
Certain Contracts (FIN 39). The
members have stated further that the
proposed rule change would allow them
to comply with Basel Accord Standards
relating to netting. Specifically, firms
are able to calculate their capital
requirements on the basis of their net
credit exposure where they have legally
enforceable netting arrangements with
their counterparties, which includes a
close out netting provision in the event
of the default of a counterparty (in this
case, the division of FICC acting as a
CCP).
FICC believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act 5
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to FICC because
the proposed rule change would provide
FICC members with clarity in the
calculation of their capital requirements
with respect to their net credit exposure
where members have legally enforceable
netting arrangements with their
counterparties. Moreover, other clearing
agencies have similar provisions in their
rules for the same purpose.6
3 The Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by FICC.
4 The specific language of the proposed provision
can be found at https://www.dtcc.com/downloads/
legal/rule_filings/2010/ficc/2010-04.pdf.
5 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
6 The Commission has previously approved a
similar provision for another clearing agency for the
same purpose of providing such clearing agency’s
members with the needed clarity. Securities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
(B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
FICC does not believe that the
proposed rule change would impose any
burden on competition.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. FICC will notify
the Commission of any written
comments received by FICC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will: (A) by
order approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change or (B) institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved.
53369
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Section, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
business days between the hours of 10
am and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings
will also be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of FICC
and on FICC’s Web site at https://
www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/
rule_filings/2010/ficc/2010-04.pdf. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FICC–2010–04 and should
be submitted on or before September 21,
2010.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or send an e-mail to
rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR–FICC–2010–04 on the
subject line.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FICC–2010–04. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
Exchange Act Release No. 34–56069 (July 13, 2007),
72 FR 39869 (July 20, 2007).
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2010–21678 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted
below has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and comment. The ICR describes
the nature of the information collection
and the expected burden. The Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
SUMMARY:
7 17
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
31AUN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
53370
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 31, 2010 / Notices
period was published on May 6, 2010
(75 FR 25033–25034).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before September 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30
days, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725–17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Vegega, PhD Chief, Behavioral
Research Division, Office of Behavioral
Safety Research (NTI–131), National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W44–302,
Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Vegega’s
phone number is 202–366–2668 and her
e-mail address is Maria.Vegega@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Focus Group Review of
Advanced Alcohol Detection
Technology.
Type of Request: New information
collection requirement.
Abstract: In 2008, 11,773 people were
killed in alcohol-impaired-driving
crashes. Drivers are considered to be
alcohol-impaired when their blood
alcohol concentration (BAC) is .08
grams per deciliter (g/dL) or higher.
These alcohol-impaired-driving
fatalities accounted for 32 percent of the
total motor vehicle traffic fatalities in
the United States.
In a continuing effort to reduce the
adverse consequences of alcoholimpaired driving, NHTSA in
conjunction with the Automotive
Coalition for Traffic Safety (ACTS) is
undertaking research and development
to explore the feasibility of, and public
policy challenges associated with, use of
in-vehicle alcohol detection technology.
The agency believes that use of vehiclebased, alcohol detection technologies
could help to significantly reduce the
number of alcohol-impaired driving
crashes, deaths and injuries by
preventing drivers from driving while
their blood alcohol concentration (BAC)
is at or above the legal limit. In 2008,
ACTS and NHTSA entered into a 5–
Year Cooperative Agreement to ‘‘explore
the feasibility, the potential benefits of,
and the public policy challenges
associated with a more widespread use
of unobtrusive technology to prevent
drunk driving’’. The goal of this research
effort, the Driver Alcohol Detection
System for Safety (DADSS) project, is to
develop and test prototypes that may be
considered for vehicle integration
thereafter.
As technology development
progresses and decisions are being made
about how to integrate such technology
into vehicles, NHTSA needs a better
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Aug 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
understanding of public preferences
with respect to in-vehicle alcohol
detection devices. Optimization of
technology and public acceptance of it
once deployed will depend on the
extent to which public attitudes are
taken into account during the
development process. Recognizing the
need to obtain input from drivers early
in the development process, NHTSA
proposes to conduct a total of 24 focus
groups in two stages. The first set of
focus groups (12 focus groups) will
obtain information from licensed drivers
on public perceptions and attitudes
concerning in-vehicle alcohol detection
technology designed to prevent alcoholimpaired driving. Information from this
phase of the project will be used by
NHTSA and the DADSS research team
to provide input to decision making
regarding vehicle integration with
respect to the technology under
investigation. A second set of focus
groups (12 focus groups) will gauge
driver reaction to technology
prototypes, obtain input on alternative
prototype features, and obtain guidance
on strategies for introduction of the
technology into the vehicle fleet. The
information will also be used to identify
potential barriers to acceptance of the
technologies.
Affected Public: Drivers age 21 years
and older will be recruited in four
locations to participate in focus groups.
They will be provided with a stipend to
reimburse them for expenses and
compensate them for their time in
participating in the discussions.
Participation by all respondents would
be voluntary and anonymous. All focus
groups will be conducted by a trained
moderator.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 288
hours (24 focus groups with eight
participants in each, averaging 1.5
hours).
Comments are invited on the
following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection;
(iii) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–21757 Filed 8–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35379]
RailAmerica, Inc., Palm Beach Holding,
Inc., RailAmerica Transportation Corp.,
Central Railroad Company of
Indianapolis, Chicago Ft. Wayne and
Eastern Railroad Division, Fortress
Investment Group, LLC, and RR
Acquisition Holding, LLC—Control
Exemption—Delphos Terminal
Company, Inc.
Surface Transportation Board.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Board grants an
exemption, under 49 U.S.C. 10502, from
the prior approval requirements of 49
U.S.C. 11323–25, for RailAmerica, Inc.
(RailAmerica); Palm Beach Holding, Inc.
(Palm Beach); RailAmerica
Transportation Corp. (RTC); Central
Railroad Company of Indianapolis
(CERA); Chicago Ft. Wayne and Eastern
Railroad Division (CFE); Fortress
Investment Group, LLC (Fortress), on
behalf of certain private equity funds
managed by Fortress and its affiliates;
and RR Acquisition Holding, LLC (RR
Acquisition), to acquire control of
Delphos Terminal Company, Inc. (DTC),
subject to labor protective conditions.
Pursuant to an agreement that CERA, a
Class III rail carrier, intends to enter into
with Bunge North America (East), LLC
(Bunge), the parent company of DTC,
CERA will acquire from Bunge all of the
issued and outstanding shares of stock
of DTC and will thus acquire direct
control of DTC. Fortress, RR
Acquisition, RailAmerica, Palm Beach,
and RTC will indirectly control DTC,
because Fortress’s noncarrier affiliate,
RR Acquisition, controls noncarrier
RailAmerica; RailAmerica directly
controls noncarrier Palm Beach; Palm
Beach directly controls noncarrier RTC;
and RTC directly controls CERA.
RailAmerica is a holding company that
directly or indirectly controls 1 Class II
and 29 Class III railroads. Fortress is a
noncarrier that indirectly controls 1
Class II rail carrier.1
SUMMARY:
1 The Board exempted the transfer of indirect
control of that Class II carrier, Florida East Coast
Railway, LLC (FEC), from Fortress to RailAmerica,
with Fortress retaining indirect control of
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53369-53370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21757]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collection and the expected
burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
[[Page 53370]]
period was published on May 6, 2010 (75 FR 25033-25034).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Vegega, PhD Chief, Behavioral
Research Division, Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NTI-131),
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., W44-302, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Vegega's phone number is 202-
366-2668 and her e-mail address is Maria.Vegega@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Focus Group Review of Advanced Alcohol Detection Technology.
Type of Request: New information collection requirement.
Abstract: In 2008, 11,773 people were killed in alcohol-impaired-
driving crashes. Drivers are considered to be alcohol-impaired when
their blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is .08 grams per deciliter (g/
dL) or higher. These alcohol-impaired-driving fatalities accounted for
32 percent of the total motor vehicle traffic fatalities in the United
States.
In a continuing effort to reduce the adverse consequences of
alcohol-impaired driving, NHTSA in conjunction with the Automotive
Coalition for Traffic Safety (ACTS) is undertaking research and
development to explore the feasibility of, and public policy challenges
associated with, use of in-vehicle alcohol detection technology. The
agency believes that use of vehicle-based, alcohol detection
technologies could help to significantly reduce the number of alcohol-
impaired driving crashes, deaths and injuries by preventing drivers
from driving while their blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is at or
above the legal limit. In 2008, ACTS and NHTSA entered into a 5-Year
Cooperative Agreement to ``explore the feasibility, the potential
benefits of, and the public policy challenges associated with a more
widespread use of unobtrusive technology to prevent drunk driving''.
The goal of this research effort, the Driver Alcohol Detection System
for Safety (DADSS) project, is to develop and test prototypes that may
be considered for vehicle integration thereafter.
As technology development progresses and decisions are being made
about how to integrate such technology into vehicles, NHTSA needs a
better understanding of public preferences with respect to in-vehicle
alcohol detection devices. Optimization of technology and public
acceptance of it once deployed will depend on the extent to which
public attitudes are taken into account during the development process.
Recognizing the need to obtain input from drivers early in the
development process, NHTSA proposes to conduct a total of 24 focus
groups in two stages. The first set of focus groups (12 focus groups)
will obtain information from licensed drivers on public perceptions and
attitudes concerning in-vehicle alcohol detection technology designed
to prevent alcohol-impaired driving. Information from this phase of the
project will be used by NHTSA and the DADSS research team to provide
input to decision making regarding vehicle integration with respect to
the technology under investigation. A second set of focus groups (12
focus groups) will gauge driver reaction to technology prototypes,
obtain input on alternative prototype features, and obtain guidance on
strategies for introduction of the technology into the vehicle fleet.
The information will also be used to identify potential barriers to
acceptance of the technologies.
Affected Public: Drivers age 21 years and older will be recruited
in four locations to participate in focus groups. They will be provided
with a stipend to reimburse them for expenses and compensate them for
their time in participating in the discussions. Participation by all
respondents would be voluntary and anonymous. All focus groups will be
conducted by a trained moderator.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 288 hours (24 focus groups with
eight participants in each, averaging 1.5 hours).
Comments are invited on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection;
(iii) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-21757 Filed 8-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P