Proposed Use Limit of Battery Caulfield Road and Request for Comments, 44820-44821 [2010-18568]

Download as PDF WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES 44820 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 145 / Thursday, July 29, 2010 / Notices The Request has been assigned Docket No. MC2010–32. The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a contract related to the proposed new product pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR 3015.5. The contract has been assigned Docket No. CP2010–77. Request. In support of its Request, the Postal Service filed six attachments as follows: • Attachment A—a redacted copy of the Governor’s Decision No. 09–6, originally filed in Docket No. MC2009– 25, authorizing certain Priority Mail contracts; • Attachment B—a redacted copy of the contract; • Attachment C—a proposed change in the Mail Classification Schedule competitive product list; • Attachment D—a Statement of Supporting Justification as required by 39 CFR 3020.32; • Attachment E—a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and • Attachment F—an application for non-public treatment of materials to maintain redacted portions of the contract and supporting document under seal. In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Brian G. Denneny, Acting Manager, Sales and Communications, asserts that the service to be provided under the contract will cover its attributable costs, make a positive contribution to institutional costs, and increase contribution toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal Service’s total institutional costs. Id., Attachment D. Thus, Mr. Denneny contends there will be no issue of subsidization of competitive products by market dominant products as a result of this contract. Id. Related contract. A redacted version of the specific Priority Mail Contract 27 is included with the Request. The contract will become effective on the day that the Commission provides all necessary regulatory approvals. It is terminable upon 30 days notice by a party, but could continue for 3 years. The Postal Service represents that the contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). See id., Attachment D. The Postal Service will provide the shipper with Priority Mail packaging for eligible Priority Mail items mailed by the shipper. The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials, including the specific Priority Mail Contract 27, under seal. It maintains that the contract and related financial information, including the customer’s name and the accompanying analyses that provide prices, terms, conditions, cost data, and VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:42 Jul 28, 2010 Jkt 220001 financial projections should remain under seal. See Attachment F. It also requests that the Commission order that the duration of such treatment of all customer-identifying information be extended indefinitely, instead of ending after 10 years. Id. at 7. II. Notice of Filings The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2010–32 and CP2010–77 for consideration of the Request pertaining to the proposed Priority Mail Contract 27 product and the related contract, respectively. In keeping with practice, these dockets are addressed on a consolidated basis for purposes of this order; however, future filings should be made in the specific docket in which issues being addressed pertain. Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal Service’s filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642 and 39 CFR part 3015 and 39 CFR 3020, subpart B. Comments are due no later than July 30, 2010. The public portions of these filings can be accessed via the Commission’s Web site (https:// www.prc.gov). The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public Representative in these dockets. III. Ordering Paragraphs It is ordered: 1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2010–32 and CP2010–77 for consideration of the matter raised in each docket. 2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in these proceedings. 3. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no later than July 30, 2010. 4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register. By the Commission. Shoshana M. Grove, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–18575 Filed 7–28–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S THE PRESIDIO TRUST Proposed Use Limit of Battery Caulfield Road and Request for Comments The Presidio Trust. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Presidio Trust (Trust) is considering two approaches to limit vehicular use of a portion of Battery Caulfield Road in the Presidio of San Francisco (Presidio): (1) Limitation of vehicular use during weekday peak AM and PM hours, 7 to 9 a.m. and 5 to 7 p.m., as well as on weekends (Alternative 1); or (2) limitation of vehicular use at all times (Alternative 2). The proposed limitation on vehicular use is intended to reduce the amount of cut-through traffic to maintain public health and safety, to protect environmental values, to protect natural resources, and to avoid conflict among visitor uses. By restricting the use of Battery Caulfield Road, the Trust also intends to reduce the amount of traffic through the 14th and 15th Avenue gates. Under both Alternative 1 and Alternative 2, designated vehicles (e.g., emergency vehicles, PresidiGo shuttles and designated Presidio residents and tenants) will continue to have unrestricted access to Battery Caulfield Road, and access by pedestrians and bicyclists will remain unrestricted. The Trust invites comments on both of these proposed limits of public use. Located in the Public Health Service Hospital (PHSH) District at the southern end of the Presidio, Battery Caulfield Road is not a major thoroughfare within the Presidio, but rather it is a narrow roadway connecting the upper and lower plateaus of the PHSH District (District). Battery Caulfield Road was built by the Army in 1984 to facilitate internal circulation, not to accommodate through-traffic. The road passes through sensitive wildlife areas and native plant communities, and recreational use of the area has increased with the expansion of the Presidio’s trails and bikeways. Of the total daily traffic through the 15th Avenue gate, an estimated 350–550 cars use Battery Caulfield Road as a cutthrough route, i.e., travel from an origin outside the Presidio to a destination outside the Presidio. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 36 CFR 1001.5, the Board of Directors of the Trust (Board) may impose public use limits or close all or a portion of the area administered by the Trust to all public use or to a specific use or activity, given a determination that such action is necessary to maintain public health and safety, to protect environmental or scenic values, to protect natural or cultural resources, or to avoid conflict among visitor use activities. In its April 2007 Record of Decision for the development of the District, the Board identified its intent to restrict use of Battery Caulfield SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM 29JYN1 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 145 / Thursday, July 29, 2010 / Notices Road—‘‘The Trust will undertake measures to discourage traffic not destined for the [District] from passing through the area, including considering restrictions on Battery Caulfield road to allow passage by [District] traffic only and will institute traffic-calming techniques to slow traffic through the district.’’ (p. 11, PHSH Record of Decision.) By Resolution 08–5 adopted on November 13, 2007, the Board determined that limiting vehicular use of Battery Caulfield Road is necessary to maintain public health and safety, to protect environmental values, to protect natural resources, and to avoid conflict among visitor uses, and authorized the Trust Executive Director to implement Alternative 2. As 36 CFR 1001.5(c) encourages the achievement of public use limits by less restrictive measures where possible, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution 08–5 Trust staff revisited the approach to achieve the desired traffic limitation on Battery Caulfield Road, and have determined that it may possibly be met by Alternative 1, a closure that is limited to weekday peak hours and to weekends. Under Alternative 1, northbound motor vehicle access on Battery Caulfield Road will be restricted beginning approximately at the northern edge of the parking lot at the District lower plateau. Advance warning signage within the District, within the park as a whole, and within the immediate areas of the City (subject to consent by the City of San Francisco) will notify drivers of the restrictions. Southbound traffic will be restricted at the intersection of Battery Caulfield Road and Washington Boulevard. Access by pedestrians and bicyclists will not be restricted, and the anticipated reduction in traffic is expected to improve conditions for these park users. If the Trust determines that Alternative 1 is insufficient to reduce the cut-through traffic adequately, then the Trust will implement Alternative 2. Reference: 16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix; 36 CFR 1001.5. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fa (415.561.5065), The Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129–0052. Comments: Address all written comments about Alternative 1, Alternative 2, or both to: The Planning Department, The Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129–0052. Comments must be received by the Trust no later than September 1, 2010. All written comments submitted to the Trust will be VerDate Mar<15>2010 12:45 Jul 28, 2010 Jkt 220001 considered, and this proposed use limit may be modified accordingly. The final decision of the Trust will be published in the Federal Register. If individuals submitting comments request that their address or other contact information be withheld from public disclosure, it will be honored to the extent allowable by law. Such requests must be stated prominently at the beginning of the comments. The Trust will make available for public inspection all submissions from organizations or businesses and from persons identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations and businesses. Anonymous comments may not be considered. Dated: July 22, 2010. Karen A. Cook, General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2010–18568 Filed 7–28–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Investment Company Act Release No. 29368; File No. 812–13707] Northern Funds, et al.; Notice of Application July 23, 2010. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’). ACTION: Notice of an application for an order pursuant to (a) section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’) granting an exemption from sections 18(f) and 21(b) of the Act; (b) section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act granting an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of the Act; (c) sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the Act granting an exemption from sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Act; and (d) section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit certain joint arrangements. AGENCY: SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION: Applicants request an order that would permit certain registered open-end management investment companies to participate in a joint lending and borrowing facility. APPLICANTS: Northern Funds (‘‘NF’’), Northern Institutional Funds (‘‘NIF’’, each of NF and NIF a ‘‘Trust,’’ and together, the ‘‘Trusts’’), Northern Trust Investments, N.A. (‘‘NTI’’), Northern Trust Global Investments Limited (‘‘NTGIL’’), and The Northern Trust Company of Connecticut (‘‘NTCC’’) (each of NTI, NTGIL, and NTCC, an ‘‘Adviser,’’ and such entities together, the ‘‘Advisers’’). PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 44821 The application was filed on September 30, 2009, and amended on March 4, 2010. Applicants have agreed to file an amendment during the notice period, the substance of which is reflected in this notice. HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission’s Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on August 17, 2010, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer’s interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the Commission’s Secretary. ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549– 1090; Applicants: NF, NIF, and NTI, 50 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603; NTGIL, 50 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5NT, United Kingdom; NTCC, 300 Atlantic Street, Stamford, Connecticut 06901. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven I. Amchan, Senior Counsel, at (202) 551–6826 or Jennifer L. Sawin, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6821 (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained via the Commission’s Web site by searching for the file number, or an applicant using the Company name box, at https:// www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551–8090. FILING DATES: Applicants’ Representations 1. Each Trust is organized as a Delaware statutory trust and is registered under the Act as an open-end management investment company. Each Trust consists of multiple series (‘‘Funds’’). Certain of the Funds hold themselves out as money market funds in reliance on rule 2a–7 under the Act (the ‘‘Money Market Funds’’). NTI, NTGIL, and NTCC are each registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (‘‘Advisers Act’’) and are each indirect subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation. NTI is a national banking E:\FR\FM\29JYN1.SGM 29JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 145 (Thursday, July 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44820-44821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18568]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE PRESIDIO TRUST


Proposed Use Limit of Battery Caulfield Road and Request for 
Comments

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Presidio Trust (Trust) is considering two approaches to 
limit vehicular use of a portion of Battery Caulfield Road in the 
Presidio of San Francisco (Presidio): (1) Limitation of vehicular use 
during weekday peak AM and PM hours, 7 to 9 a.m. and 5 to 7 p.m., as 
well as on weekends (Alternative 1); or (2) limitation of vehicular use 
at all times (Alternative 2). The proposed limitation on vehicular use 
is intended to reduce the amount of cut-through traffic to maintain 
public health and safety, to protect environmental values, to protect 
natural resources, and to avoid conflict among visitor uses. By 
restricting the use of Battery Caulfield Road, the Trust also intends 
to reduce the amount of traffic through the 14th and 15th Avenue gates. 
Under both Alternative 1 and Alternative 2, designated vehicles (e.g., 
emergency vehicles, PresidiGo shuttles and designated Presidio 
residents and tenants) will continue to have unrestricted access to 
Battery Caulfield Road, and access by pedestrians and bicyclists will 
remain unrestricted. The Trust invites comments on both of these 
proposed limits of public use.
    Located in the Public Health Service Hospital (PHSH) District at 
the southern end of the Presidio, Battery Caulfield Road is not a major 
thoroughfare within the Presidio, but rather it is a narrow roadway 
connecting the upper and lower plateaus of the PHSH District 
(District). Battery Caulfield Road was built by the Army in 1984 to 
facilitate internal circulation, not to accommodate through-traffic. 
The road passes through sensitive wildlife areas and native plant 
communities, and recreational use of the area has increased with the 
expansion of the Presidio's trails and bikeways. Of the total daily 
traffic through the 15th Avenue gate, an estimated 350-550 cars use 
Battery Caulfield Road as a cut-through route, i.e., travel from an 
origin outside the Presidio to a destination outside the Presidio.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 36 CFR 1001.5, the Board of Directors 
of the Trust (Board) may impose public use limits or close all or a 
portion of the area administered by the Trust to all public use or to a 
specific use or activity, given a determination that such action is 
necessary to maintain public health and safety, to protect 
environmental or scenic values, to protect natural or cultural 
resources, or to avoid conflict among visitor use activities. In its 
April 2007 Record of Decision for the development of the District, the 
Board identified its intent to restrict use of Battery Caulfield

[[Page 44821]]

Road--``The Trust will undertake measures to discourage traffic not 
destined for the [District] from passing through the area, including 
considering restrictions on Battery Caulfield road to allow passage by 
[District] traffic only and will institute traffic-calming techniques 
to slow traffic through the district.'' (p. 11, PHSH Record of 
Decision.)
    By Resolution 08-5 adopted on November 13, 2007, the Board 
determined that limiting vehicular use of Battery Caulfield Road is 
necessary to maintain public health and safety, to protect 
environmental values, to protect natural resources, and to avoid 
conflict among visitor uses, and authorized the Trust Executive 
Director to implement Alternative 2. As 36 CFR 1001.5(c) encourages the 
achievement of public use limits by less restrictive measures where 
possible, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution 08-5 Trust staff 
revisited the approach to achieve the desired traffic limitation on 
Battery Caulfield Road, and have determined that it may possibly be met 
by Alternative 1, a closure that is limited to weekday peak hours and 
to weekends.
    Under Alternative 1, northbound motor vehicle access on Battery 
Caulfield Road will be restricted beginning approximately at the 
northern edge of the parking lot at the District lower plateau. Advance 
warning signage within the District, within the park as a whole, and 
within the immediate areas of the City (subject to consent by the City 
of San Francisco) will notify drivers of the restrictions. Southbound 
traffic will be restricted at the intersection of Battery Caulfield 
Road and Washington Boulevard. Access by pedestrians and bicyclists 
will not be restricted, and the anticipated reduction in traffic is 
expected to improve conditions for these park users. If the Trust 
determines that Alternative 1 is insufficient to reduce the cut-through 
traffic adequately, then the Trust will implement Alternative 2.
    Reference: 16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix; 36 CFR 1001.5.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fa (415.561.5065), The Presidio 
Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052.
    Comments: Address all written comments about Alternative 1, 
Alternative 2, or both to: The Planning Department, The Presidio Trust, 
34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 94129-0052. 
Comments must be received by the Trust no later than September 1, 2010. 
All written comments submitted to the Trust will be considered, and 
this proposed use limit may be modified accordingly. The final decision 
of the Trust will be published in the Federal Register.
    If individuals submitting comments request that their address or 
other contact information be withheld from public disclosure, it will 
be honored to the extent allowable by law. Such requests must be stated 
prominently at the beginning of the comments. The Trust will make 
available for public inspection all submissions from organizations or 
businesses and from persons identifying themselves as representatives 
or officials of organizations and businesses. Anonymous comments may 
not be considered.

    Dated: July 22, 2010.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-18568 Filed 7-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.