Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests, 4473-4475 [E9-1620]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 15 / Monday, January 26, 2009 / Notices considers grant applications 2 times per year; respondents usually submit no more than one application per year. Estimated total annual burden hours: 8,392 hours. Abstract: The NHPRC is changing the way it provides information about its grant program. The previously all inclusive grant guidelines booklet is being replaced by a suite of announcements where the information will be specific to the grant opportunity named. The basic information collection remains the same. The grant proposal is used by the NHPRC staff, reviewers, and the Commission to determine if the applicant and proposed project are eligible for an NHPRC grant, and whether the proposed project is methodologically sound and suitable for support. The narrative report is used by the NHPRC staff to monitor the performance of grants. You can also use NARA’s Web site at https://www.archives.gov/nhprc/ guidelines/ to review the guidelines. The forms used to apply for a grant can be found at https:// www.archives.gov/nhprc/forms/. Dated: January 21, 2009. Martha Morphy, Assistant Archivist for Information Services. [FR Doc. E9–1572 Filed 1–23–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7515–01–P THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES Meetings of Humanities Panel AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities. ACTION: Notice of meetings. Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the following meetings of Humanities Panels will be held at the Old Post Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael P. McDonald, Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202) 606–8322. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the Endowment’s TDD terminal on (202) 606–8282. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meetings are for the purpose of panel review, discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications SUMMARY: VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:20 Jan 23, 2009 Jkt 217001 for financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including discussion of information given in confidence to the agency by the grant applicants. Because the proposed meetings will consider information that is likely to disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential and/or information of a personal nature the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, pursuant to authority granted me by the Chairman’s Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined that these meetings will be closed to the public pursuant to subsections (c)(4), and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. 1. Date: February 9, 2009. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 315. Program: This meeting will review applications for Archaeology: Old World in Collaborative Research, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, at the November 5, 2008 deadline. 2. Date: February 10, 2009. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 315. Program: This meeting will review applications for Africa and Asia in Collaborative Research, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, at the November 5, 2008 deadline. 3. Date: February 17, 2009. Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 415. Program: This meeting will review applications for DFG/NEH Joint Digitization Program, submitted to the Office of Digital Humanities, at the October 15, 2008 deadline. 4. Date: February 17, 2009. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 315. Program: This meeting will review applications for Literature, Philosophy, Music, and History of Science in Scholarly Editions, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, at the November 5, 2008 deadline. 5. Date: February 18, 2009. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 315. Program: This meeting will review applications for Religion, Philosophy, History of Science, and Political Science in Collaborative Research, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, at the November 5, 2008 deadline. 6. Date: February 19, 2009. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 315. Program: This meeting will review applications for American, British, and PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4473 Anglophone Literature in Scholarly Editions, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, at the November 5, 2008 deadline. 7. Date: February 23, 2009. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 315. Program: This meeting will review applications for Archaeology: New World in Collaborative Research, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, at the November 5, 2008 deadline. 8. Date: February 24, 2009. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 315. Program: This meeting will review applications for Europe and Latin America in Collaborative Research, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, at the November 5, 2008 deadline. 9. Date: February 25, 2009. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 315. Program: This meeting will review applications for American History in Scholarly Editions, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, at the November 5, 2008 deadline. 10. Date: February 26, 2009. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Room: 315. Program: This meeting will review applications for American Studies in Collaborative Research, submitted to the Division of Research Programs, at the November 5, 2008 deadline. Michael P. McDonald, Advisory Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. E9–1618 Filed 1–23–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7536–01–P NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests AGENCY: National Mediation Board. SUMMARY: The Director, Office of Administration, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before March 14, 2009 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the extent that public E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM 26JAN1 4474 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 15 / Monday, January 26, 2009 / Notices participation in the approval process would defeat the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency’s ability to perform its statutory obligations. The Director, Office of Administration, publishes that notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information collection contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Record keeping burden. OMB invites public comment. Currently, the National Mediation Board is soliciting comments concerning the proposed extension of the Application for Investigation of Representation Dispute and is interested in public comment addressing the following issues: (1) Is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the agency; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the agency enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the agency minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Dated: January 21, 2009. June D. W. King, Director, Office of Administration, National Mediation Board. Application for Investigation of Representation Dispute Type of Review: Extension. Title: Application for Investigation of Representation Dispute. OMB Number: 3140–0001. Frequency: On occasion. Affected Public: Carrier and Union Officials, and employees of railroads and airlines. Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden: Responses: 68 annually. Burden Hours: 17.00. 1. Abstract: When a dispute arises among a carrier’s employees as to who will be their bargaining representative, the National Mediation Board (NMB) is required by Section 2, Ninth, to investigate the dispute, to determine who is the authorized representative, if any, and to certify such representative. The NMB’s duties do not arise until its services have been invoked by a party VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:20 Jan 23, 2009 Jkt 217001 to the dispute. The Railway Labor Act is silent as to how the invocation of a representation dispute is to be accomplished and the NMB has not promulgated regulations requiring any specific vehicle. Nonetheless, 29 CFR 1203.2, provides that applications for the services of the NMB under Section 2, Ninth, to investigate representation disputes may be made on printed forms secured from the NMB’s Office of Legal Affairs or on the Internet at https:// www.nmb.gov/representation/ rapply.html. The application requires the following information: The name of the carrier involved; the name or description of the craft or class involved; the name of the petitioning organization or individual; the name of the organization currently representing the employees, if any; the names of any other organizations or representatives involved in the dispute; and the estimated number of employees in the craft or class involved. This basic information is essential in providing the NMB with the details of the dispute so that it can determine what resources will be required to conduct an investigation. 2. The application form provides necessary information to the NMB so that it can determine the amount of staff and resources required to conduct an investigation and fulfill its statutory responsibilities. Without this information, the NMB would have to delay the commencement of the investigation, which is contrary to the intent of the Railway Labor Act. 3. There is no improved technological method for obtaining this information. The burden on the parties is minimal in completing the ‘‘Application for Investigation of Representation Dispute.’’ 4. There is no duplication in obtaining this information. 5. Rarely are representation elections conducted for small businesses. Carriers/employers are not permitted to request our services regarding representation investigations. The labor organizations, which are the typical requesters, are national in scope and would not qualify as small businesses. Even in situations where the invocation comes from a small labor organization, we believe the burden in completing the application form is minimal and that no reduction in burden could be made. 6. The NMB is required by Section 2, Ninth, to investigate the dispute, to determine who is the authorized representative, if any, and to certify such representative. The NMB has no ability to control the frequency, technical, or legal obstacles, which would reduce the burden. PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7. The information requested by the NMB is consistent with the general information collection guidelines of CFR 1320.6. The NMB has no ability to control the data provided or timing of the invocation. The burden on the parties is minimal in completing the ‘‘Application for Investigation of Representation Dispute.’’ 8. No payments or gifts have been provided by the NMB to any respondents of the form. 9. There are no questions of a sensitive nature on the form. 10. The total time burden on respondents is 17.00 hours annually— this is the time required to collect information. After consulting with a sample of people involved with the collection of this information, the time to complete this information collection is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including gathering the data needed and completion and review of the information. Number of respondents per year: 68. Estimated time per respondent: 15 minutes. Total burden hours per year: 17. (68 × .25) 11. The total collection and mail cost burden on respondents is estimated at $365.16 annually ($340.00 time cost burden + $25.16 mail cost burden.) a. The respondents will not incur any capital costs or start up costs for this collection. b. Cost burden on respondents— detail: The total time burden annual cost is $340.00. Time burden basis: The total hourly burden per year, upon respondents, is 17. Staff cost = $340.00. $20.00 per hour—based on mid-level clerical salary $20.00 × 17 hours per year = $340.00 We are estimating that a mid-level clerical person, with an average salary of $20.00 per hour, will be completing the ‘‘Application for Investigation of Representation Dispute’’ form. The total burden is estimated at 17 hours, therefore, the total time burden cost is estimated at $340.00 per year. The total annual mailing cost to respondents is $25.16. Number of applications mailed by respondents per year: 68. Total estimated cost: $28.56. (68 × .42 stamp) The collection of this information is not mandatory; it is a voluntary request from airline and railroad carrier employees seeking to invoke an investigation of a representation E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM 26JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 15 / Monday, January 26, 2009 / Notices dispute. After consulting with a sample of people involved with the collection of this information, the time to complete this information collection is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including gathering the data needed and completion and review of the information. However, the estimated hour burden costs of the respondents may vary due to the complexity of the specific question in dispute. The application form is available from the NMB’s Office of Legal Affairs and is also available on the Internet at https:// www.nmb.gov/representation/ rapply.html. 12. The total annualized Federal cost is $428.01 This includes the costs of printing and mailing the forms upon request of the parties. The completed applications are maintained by the Office of Legal Affairs. a. Printing cost: $ 80.00. b. Mailing costs: $ 8.01. Basis (mail cost): Forms are requested approximately 3 times per year and it takes 5 minutes to prepare the form for mail. Postage cost = $1.26. 3 (times per year) × .42 (cost of postage) Staff cost = $6.75. $.45 per minute (GS 9/10 $56,371 = $27.01 per hr. ÷ 60) $.45 × 5 minutes per mailing = $2.25 $2.25 × 3 times per year = $6.75 Total Mailing Costs = $8.01 13. Item 13—no change in annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden. 14. The information collected by the application will not be published. 15. The NMB will display the OMB expiration date on the form. 16 (a)—the form does not reduce the burden on small entities; however, the burden is minimized and voluntary. 16 (b)—the form does not indicate the retention period for recordkeeping requirements. 196 (c)—the form is not part of a statistical survey. Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request may be accessed from https://www.nmb.gov or should be addressed to Denise Murdock, NMB, 1301 K Street, NW., Suite 250 E, Washington, DC 20005 or addressed to the e-mail address murdock@nmb.gov or faxed to 202–692–5081. Please specify the complete title of the information collection when making your request. Comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity requirements should be directed to June D. W. King at 202–692–5010 or via Internet address king@nmb.gov. Individuals who use a VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:20 Jan 23, 2009 Jkt 217001 telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD/TDY) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 800–877–8339. [FR Doc. E9–1620 Filed 1–23–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7550–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 52–017; NRC–2008–0149] Virginia Electric and Power Company, D/B/A Dominion Virginia Power, and Old Dominion Electric Cooperative; Correction to Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Public Meeting for North Anna Power Station Unit 3 Combined License Application AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Correction. This document corrects a Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS), NUREG–1917 and public meeting for North Anna Power Station Unit 3 (North Anna) combined license application published in the Federal Register on December 24, 2008 (73 FR 79196). This action is necessary to correctly identify the closing date of the comment period for the North Anna Unit 3 draft SEIS. In addition, this document corrects the Environmental Protection Agency’s Notice of Filing for the draft SEIS published in the Federal Register on January 2, 2009 (74 FR 106). As noted in the December 24, 2008 Federal Register Notice, the comment period for the North Anna draft SEIS, NUREG–1917 is 75 days and begins on the date of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Notice of Filing. The Environmental Protection Agency’s Notice of Filing for the North Anna draft SEIS was January 2, 2009; therefore, the 75-day comment period end date is March 20, 2009. The North Anna, Unit 3 draft SEIS is available for public inspection at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, or from the Publicly Available Records component of the NRC’s Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html, which provides access through the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room link. The accession number in ADAMS for the draft SEIS, NUREG– 1917, is ML083380360. PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4475 Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC’s PDR Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or by sending an e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft SEIS may also be viewed on the Internet at: https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/newreactors/col/north-anna.html. In addition, the Jefferson-Madison Regional Library in Mineral, Virginia; Hanover Branch Library in Hanover, Virginia; Orange County Library in Orange, Virginia; Salem Church Library in Fredericksburg, Virginia; and C. Melvin Snow Memorial Branch Library in Spotsylvania, Virginia have agreed to make the draft SEIS available for public inspection. The staff will hold a public meeting to present an overview of the draft SEIS, NUREG–1917, and to accept public comments. The public meeting will be held in the Auditorium at the Louisa County High School, 757 Davis Highway, Mineral, Virginia, on Tuesday, February 3, 2009. The meeting will convene at 6 p.m. and will continue until 10 p.m., as necessary. The meeting will be transcribed and will include: (1) A presentation of the contents of the draft SEIS, and (2) the opportunity for interested government agencies, organizations, and individuals to provide comments on the draft report. Additionally, the NRC will host informal discussions one hour before the start of the meeting. No formal comments on the draft SEIS will be accepted during the informal discussions. To be considered, comments must be provided either at the transcribed public meeting or in writing. Persons may register to attend or present oral comments at the meeting by contacting Ms. Alicia Williamson, by telephone at 1–800–368–5642, extension 1878, or by Internet to the NRC at: NORTHANNA.COLAEIS@nrc.gov, no later than January 28, 2009. Members of the public may also register to speak at the meeting within 15 minutes of the start of the meeting. Individual oral comments may be limited by the time available, depending on the number of persons who register. Members of the public who have not registered may also have an opportunity to speak, if time permits. Members of the public who require special equipment or accommodations to attend or present information at the public meeting should contact Ms. Williamson no later than January 23, 2009, so that the NRC staff can determine whether the request can be accommodated. E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM 26JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 15 (Monday, January 26, 2009)]
[NO]
[Pages 4473-4475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1620]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD


Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests

AGENCY: National Mediation Board.
SUMMARY: The Director, Office of Administration, invites comments on 
the proposed information collection requests as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before 
March 14, 2009

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an 
early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB 
may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the 
extent that public

[[Page 4474]]

participation in the approval process would defeat the purpose of the 
information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially 
interfere with any agency's ability to perform its statutory 
obligations. The Director, Office of Administration, publishes that 
notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to 
submission of these requests to OMB. Each proposed information 
collection contains the following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., 
new, revision extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) 
Summary of the collection; (4) Description of the need for, and 
proposed use of, the information; (5) Respondents and frequency of 
collection; and (6) Reporting and/or Record keeping burden. OMB invites 
public comment.
    Currently, the National Mediation Board is soliciting comments 
concerning the proposed extension of the Application for Investigation 
of Representation Dispute and is interested in public comment 
addressing the following issues: (1) Is this collection necessary to 
the proper functions of the agency; (2) will this information be 
processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden 
accurate; (4) how might the agency enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the 
agency minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, 
including through the use of information technology.

    Dated: January 21, 2009.
June D. W. King,
Director, Office of Administration, National Mediation Board.

Application for Investigation of Representation Dispute

    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Application for Investigation of Representation Dispute.
    OMB Number: 3140-0001.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Affected Public: Carrier and Union Officials, and employees of 
railroads and airlines.
    Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden:
     Responses: 68 annually.
     Burden Hours: 17.00.
    1. Abstract: When a dispute arises among a carrier's employees as 
to who will be their bargaining representative, the National Mediation 
Board (NMB) is required by Section 2, Ninth, to investigate the 
dispute, to determine who is the authorized representative, if any, and 
to certify such representative. The NMB's duties do not arise until its 
services have been invoked by a party to the dispute. The Railway Labor 
Act is silent as to how the invocation of a representation dispute is 
to be accomplished and the NMB has not promulgated regulations 
requiring any specific vehicle. Nonetheless, 29 CFR 1203.2, provides 
that applications for the services of the NMB under Section 2, Ninth, 
to investigate representation disputes may be made on printed forms 
secured from the NMB's Office of Legal Affairs or on the Internet at 
https://www.nmb.gov/representation/rapply.html. The application requires 
the following information: The name of the carrier involved; the name 
or description of the craft or class involved; the name of the 
petitioning organization or individual; the name of the organization 
currently representing the employees, if any; the names of any other 
organizations or representatives involved in the dispute; and the 
estimated number of employees in the craft or class involved. This 
basic information is essential in providing the NMB with the details of 
the dispute so that it can determine what resources will be required to 
conduct an investigation.
    2. The application form provides necessary information to the NMB 
so that it can determine the amount of staff and resources required to 
conduct an investigation and fulfill its statutory responsibilities. 
Without this information, the NMB would have to delay the commencement 
of the investigation, which is contrary to the intent of the Railway 
Labor Act.
    3. There is no improved technological method for obtaining this 
information. The burden on the parties is minimal in completing the 
``Application for Investigation of Representation Dispute.''
    4. There is no duplication in obtaining this information.
    5. Rarely are representation elections conducted for small 
businesses. Carriers/employers are not permitted to request our 
services regarding representation investigations. The labor 
organizations, which are the typical requesters, are national in scope 
and would not qualify as small businesses. Even in situations where the 
invocation comes from a small labor organization, we believe the burden 
in completing the application form is minimal and that no reduction in 
burden could be made.
    6. The NMB is required by Section 2, Ninth, to investigate the 
dispute, to determine who is the authorized representative, if any, and 
to certify such representative. The NMB has no ability to control the 
frequency, technical, or legal obstacles, which would reduce the 
burden.
    7. The information requested by the NMB is consistent with the 
general information collection guidelines of CFR 1320.6. The NMB has no 
ability to control the data provided or timing of the invocation. The 
burden on the parties is minimal in completing the ``Application for 
Investigation of Representation Dispute.''
    8. No payments or gifts have been provided by the NMB to any 
respondents of the form.
    9. There are no questions of a sensitive nature on the form.
    10. The total time burden on respondents is 17.00 hours annually--
this is the time required to collect information. After consulting with 
a sample of people involved with the collection of this information, 
the time to complete this information collection is estimated to 
average 15 minutes per response, including gathering the data needed 
and completion and review of the information.
    Number of respondents per year: 68.
    Estimated time per respondent: 15 minutes.
    Total burden hours per year: 17.

    (68 x .25)

    11. The total collection and mail cost burden on respondents is 
estimated at $365.16 annually ($340.00 time cost burden + $25.16 mail 
cost burden.)
    a. The respondents will not incur any capital costs or start up 
costs for this collection.
    b. Cost burden on respondents--detail:
    The total time burden annual cost is $340.00.
    Time burden basis: The total hourly burden per year, upon 
respondents, is 17.
    Staff cost = $340.00.

    $20.00 per hour--based on mid-level clerical salary
    $20.00 x 17 hours per year = $340.00

    We are estimating that a mid-level clerical person, with an average 
salary of $20.00 per hour, will be completing the ``Application for 
Investigation of Representation Dispute'' form. The total burden is 
estimated at 17 hours, therefore, the total time burden cost is 
estimated at $340.00 per year.
    The total annual mailing cost to respondents is $25.16.
    Number of applications mailed by respondents per year: 68.
    Total estimated cost: $28.56.

    (68 x .42 stamp)

The collection of this information is not mandatory; it is a voluntary 
request from airline and railroad carrier employees seeking to invoke 
an investigation of a representation

[[Page 4475]]

dispute. After consulting with a sample of people involved with the 
collection of this information, the time to complete this information 
collection is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including 
gathering the data needed and completion and review of the information. 
However, the estimated hour burden costs of the respondents may vary 
due to the complexity of the specific question in dispute. The 
application form is available from the NMB's Office of Legal Affairs 
and is also available on the Internet at https://www.nmb.gov/
representation/rapply.html.
    12. The total annualized Federal cost is $428.01 This includes the 
costs of printing and mailing the forms upon request of the parties. 
The completed applications are maintained by the Office of Legal 
Affairs.
    a. Printing cost: $ 80.00.
    b. Mailing costs: $ 8.01.
    Basis (mail cost): Forms are requested approximately 3 times per 
year and it takes 5 minutes to prepare the form for mail.
    Postage cost = $1.26.
    3 (times per year) x .42 (cost of postage)
    Staff cost = $6.75.

    $.45 per minute (GS 9/10 $56,371 = $27.01 per hr. / 60)
    $.45 x 5 minutes per mailing = $2.25
    $2.25 x 3 times per year = $6.75

    Total Mailing Costs = $8.01
    13. Item 13--no change in annual reporting and recordkeeping hour 
burden.
    14. The information collected by the application will not be 
published.
    15. The NMB will display the OMB expiration date on the form.

    16 (a)--the form does not reduce the burden on small entities; 
however, the burden is minimized and voluntary.
    16 (b)--the form does not indicate the retention period for 
recordkeeping requirements.
    196 (c)--the form is not part of a statistical survey.

    Requests for copies of the proposed information collection request 
may be accessed from https://www.nmb.gov or should be addressed to 
Denise Murdock, NMB, 1301 K Street, NW., Suite 250 E, Washington, DC 
20005 or addressed to the e-mail address murdock@nmb.gov or faxed to 
202-692-5081. Please specify the complete title of the information 
collection when making your request.
    Comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity 
requirements should be directed to June D. W. King at 202-692-5010 or 
via Internet address king@nmb.gov. Individuals who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD/TDY) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.

 [FR Doc. E9-1620 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7550-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.