Presidio Trust Management Plan Main Post Update Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, 75777 [E8-29447]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 240 / Friday, December 12, 2008 / Notices
and maintenance of the system. This
electronic information management
system was known as the Licensing
Support System (LSS). In November,
1998 the Commission approved
amendments to 10 CFR Part 2 that
renamed the Licensing Support System
Advisory Review Panel as the Licensing
Support Network Advisory Review
Panel. The Licensing Support Network
(LSN) became available for use in 2004
and it is anticipated that a hardware and
software refresh program will be
initiated in 2009–2010.
Membership on the Panel will
continue to be drawn from those
interests that will be affected by the use
of the LSN, including the Department of
Energy, the NRC, the State of Nevada,
the National Congress of American
Indians, affected units of local
governments in Nevada, the Nevada
Nuclear Waste Task Force, and a
coalition of nuclear industry groups.
Federal agencies with expertise and
experience in electronic information
management systems may also
participate on the Panel.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
has determined that renewal of the
charter for the LSNARP until December
5, 2010, is in the public interest in
connection with duties imposed on the
Commission by law. This action is being
taken in accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act after
consultation with the Committee
Management Secretariat, General
Services Administration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew L. Bates, Office of the Secretary,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555: Telephone 301–
415–1963.
Dated: December 8, 2008.
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–29449 Filed 12–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PRESIDIO TRUST
Presidio Trust Management Plan Main
Post Update Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement
The Presidio Trust.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare a
Supplement to a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (Pub.
L. 91–190, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
in response to public comment, the
Presidio Trust (Trust) is notifying
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Dec 11, 2008
Jkt 217001
interested parties that it will
supplement the June 2008 Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS) for the Presidio Trust
Management Plan (PTMP) Main Post
Update. The supplement will identify
and discuss the environmental impacts
of a preferred alternative that combines
elements of alternatives previously
analyzed in the draft SEIS.
The Trust
is updating the planning concept for the
Main Post district of the Presidio of San
Francisco (Presidio) in order to take into
account several proposals, including the
Contemporary Art Museum at the
Presidio (CAMP), the Main Post Lodge
and the Presidio Theatre, that were not
fully contemplated in the 2002 PTMP
and its final environmental impact
statement. The updated planning
concept for the Main Post was evaluated
as the proposed action in the draft SEIS
that was circulated on June 13, 2008 (73
FR 33814).
Concurrent with the draft SEIS
analyses, the Trust is also providing for
the review of the proposals under other
federal environmental laws. Chief
among these is the consultation process
required by section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). This
process identifies the historic resources
that may be affected by an undertaking,
assesses the effects on historic resources
through a Finding of Effect (FOE), and
then explores ways to ‘‘avoid, minimize,
or mitigate’’ the effects identified in the
FOE. The draft FOE was circulated for
comment on August 8, 2008. The draft
SEIS and draft FOE are available at
https://www.Presidio.gov in the Major
Projects section.
Following the release of the draft SEIS
and the draft FOE, the Trust has been
working with the National Park Service,
the State Historic Preservation Officer,
and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation to develop approaches that
would avoid, minimize, or mitigate
effects from the various proposals on the
National Historic Landmark District.
These approaches include ways to
reduce building size, scale, and mass;
ways to orient the buildings to the site;
and ways to articulate the buildings
with architectural features. The Trust
shared the results of this work with the
consulting parties in the NHPA
consultation and the proponents’
respective design teams, and also held
a public workshop on November 19,
2008 to communicate these conforming
strategies to interested individuals. The
information, presented as a series of
matrices, is available for public review
on the Trust Web site at https://
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75777
library.presidio.gov/archive/documents/
StandardsEvaluationMatrix.pdf.
Additionally, the Trust conducted a
series of three workshops with the
public on September 25, September 28
and October 2, 2008 that focused on the
development of a preferred alternative.
Through this public process, the Trust
has identified a preferred alternative
that combines elements of the
previously analyzed alternatives, and
which will be the subject of the
supplement. The Trust has elected to
address the preferred alternative in a
supplement to the draft SEIS to best
integrate and satisfy its NEPA and
NHPA requirements. Additional
information on the preferred alternative
is available at https://www.Presidio.gov
(click on Presidio Trust Identifies a
Preferred Alternative). Interested parties
wishing to provide comments on the
previously analyzed alternatives or the
merits of the draft SEIS may continue to
do so, or wait until the supplement is
made available.
The Trust will file the supplement as
a draft and will circulate it at the same
time that a revised draft FOE will be
circulated through the parallel NHPA
section 106 consultation process. The
availability of the supplement (expected
to occur in early 2009) for public and
agency review and comment will be
announced through an EPA-published
notice in the Federal Register, in the
Trust’s regular electronic newsletter
(Presidio E-news), on the Trust web site,
as well as direct mailing to the project
mailing list and other appropriate
means. Both the draft supplement and
the revised draft FOE will be considered
in a final SEIS before the Trust Board of
Directors takes any action (no earlier
than 30 days after release of the final
SEIS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John
Pelka, 415.561.5300.
Dated: December 8, 2008.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E8–29447 Filed 12–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 240 (Friday, December 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 75777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29447]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESIDIO TRUST
Presidio Trust Management Plan Main Post Update Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare a Supplement to a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (Pub. L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.) and in response to public comment, the Presidio Trust (Trust)
is notifying interested parties that it will supplement the June 2008
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the
Presidio Trust Management Plan (PTMP) Main Post Update. The supplement
will identify and discuss the environmental impacts of a preferred
alternative that combines elements of alternatives previously analyzed
in the draft SEIS.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Trust is updating the planning concept
for the Main Post district of the Presidio of San Francisco (Presidio)
in order to take into account several proposals, including the
Contemporary Art Museum at the Presidio (CAMP), the Main Post Lodge and
the Presidio Theatre, that were not fully contemplated in the 2002 PTMP
and its final environmental impact statement. The updated planning
concept for the Main Post was evaluated as the proposed action in the
draft SEIS that was circulated on June 13, 2008 (73 FR 33814).
Concurrent with the draft SEIS analyses, the Trust is also
providing for the review of the proposals under other federal
environmental laws. Chief among these is the consultation process
required by section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA). This process identifies the historic resources that may be
affected by an undertaking, assesses the effects on historic resources
through a Finding of Effect (FOE), and then explores ways to ``avoid,
minimize, or mitigate'' the effects identified in the FOE. The draft
FOE was circulated for comment on August 8, 2008. The draft SEIS and
draft FOE are available at https://www.Presidio.gov in the Major
Projects section.
Following the release of the draft SEIS and the draft FOE, the
Trust has been working with the National Park Service, the State
Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation to develop approaches that would avoid, minimize, or
mitigate effects from the various proposals on the National Historic
Landmark District. These approaches include ways to reduce building
size, scale, and mass; ways to orient the buildings to the site; and
ways to articulate the buildings with architectural features. The Trust
shared the results of this work with the consulting parties in the NHPA
consultation and the proponents' respective design teams, and also held
a public workshop on November 19, 2008 to communicate these conforming
strategies to interested individuals. The information, presented as a
series of matrices, is available for public review on the Trust Web
site at https://library.presidio.gov/archive/documents/
StandardsEvaluationMatrix.pdf.
Additionally, the Trust conducted a series of three workshops with
the public on September 25, September 28 and October 2, 2008 that
focused on the development of a preferred alternative. Through this
public process, the Trust has identified a preferred alternative that
combines elements of the previously analyzed alternatives, and which
will be the subject of the supplement. The Trust has elected to address
the preferred alternative in a supplement to the draft SEIS to best
integrate and satisfy its NEPA and NHPA requirements. Additional
information on the preferred alternative is available at https://
www.Presidio.gov (click on Presidio Trust Identifies a Preferred
Alternative). Interested parties wishing to provide comments on the
previously analyzed alternatives or the merits of the draft SEIS may
continue to do so, or wait until the supplement is made available.
The Trust will file the supplement as a draft and will circulate it
at the same time that a revised draft FOE will be circulated through
the parallel NHPA section 106 consultation process. The availability of
the supplement (expected to occur in early 2009) for public and agency
review and comment will be announced through an EPA-published notice in
the Federal Register, in the Trust's regular electronic newsletter
(Presidio E-news), on the Trust web site, as well as direct mailing to
the project mailing list and other appropriate means. Both the draft
supplement and the revised draft FOE will be considered in a final SEIS
before the Trust Board of Directors takes any action (no earlier than
30 days after release of the final SEIS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Pelka, 415.561.5300.
Dated: December 8, 2008.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E8-29447 Filed 12-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P