SES Performance Review Board, 73726 [E5-7257]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
73726
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 13, 2005 / Notices
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and
its implementing regulations at 5 CFR
part 1320 do not apply.
Dated: December 5, 2005.
Dale N. Bosworth,
Chief.
[FR Doc. 05–23983 Filed 12–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
Text of Proposed Directive
Note: The Forest Service organizes its
directive system by alpha-numeric codes and
subject headings. Only the section of the FSH
1909.15, Environmental Policy and
Procedures Handbook, affected by this
proposed directive is included in this notice.
Please note, however, that category 15 (para.
16) is reserved. A notice for comment was
published for category 16 on January 5, 2005
(70 FR 1062). A final directive for this CE has
not been adopted as of the date of publication
of this Federal Register notice. The complete
text of FSH 1909.15, Chapter 30 may
obtained by contacting the individuals listed
in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or from
the Forest Service home page on the World
Wide Web at https://www.fs.fed.us/im/
directives/fsh/1909.15/1909.15,30.txt. The
intended audience for this direction is Forest
Service employees charged with planning
and administering oil and gas exploration
and development projects on NFS lands
under Federal lease.
FSH 1909.15—Environmental Policy
and Procedures Handbook Chapter
30—Categorical Exclusion from
Documentation
Add new paragraphs 16 and 17 as
follows:
31.2—Categories of Action for Which a
Project or Case File and Decision Memo
Are Required
Routine, proposed actions within any
of the following categories may be
excluded from documentation in an EIS
or an EA; however, a project or case file
is required and the decision to proceed
must be documented in a decision
memo (sec. 32). As a minimum, the
project or case file should include any
records prepared, such as: The names of
interested and affected people, groups,
and agencies contacted; the
determination that no extraordinary
circumstances exist; a copy of the
decision memo (sec. 05); and a list of
the people notified of the decision.
Maintain a project or case file and
prepare a decision memo for any of the
categories of actions set forth in section
21.21 through 31.23.
*
*
*
*
*
16. [Reserved]
17. Approval of a Surface Use Plan of
Operations for oil and natural gas
exploration or development activities
within a new oil and/or gas field, so
long as the approval will not authorize
VerDate Aug<31>2005
00:22 Dec 13, 2005
activities in excess of any of the
following:
a. One mile of new road construction
b. One mile of road reconstruction
c. Three miles of pipeline installation
d. Four drill sites.
Jkt 208001
AMERICAN BATTLE MONUMENTS
COMMISSION
SES Performance Review Board
American Battle Monuments
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
appointment of members of the ABMC
Performance Review Board.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theodore Gloukhoff, Director of
Personnel and Administration,
American Battle Monuments
Commission, Courthouse Plaza II, Suite
500, 2300 Clarendon Boulevard,
Arlington, Virginia, 22201–3367,
Telephone Number: (703) 696–6908.
American Battle Monuments
Commission SES Performance Review
Board Mr. Gerald W. Barnes, Chief,
Operations Division, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers Mr. Donald L. Basham,
Chief, Engineering & Construction, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers Mr. Stephen
Coakley, Director of Resource
Management, US Army Corps of
Engineers
Theodore Gloukhoff,
Director, Personnel and Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–7257 Filed 12–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–533–810
Stainless Steel Bar from India: Notice
of Court Decision Not in Harmony and
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 20, 2005, in Slater
Steels Corp. v. United States, Consol.
Court No. 02–00551, Slip Op. 05–137
(CIT October 20, 2005) (‘‘Slater III’’), a
lawsuit challenging the Department of
Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’) Notice
of Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Review: Stainless Steel Bar from India,
67 FR 53336 (August 15, 2002) (‘‘Final
Results’’) and the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum (July 5,
2002) (‘‘Decision Memorandum’’), the
Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’)
affirmed the Department’s third remand
determination and entered a judgment
order. In the remand determination, the
Department did not collapse Viraj
Alloys Limited (‘‘VAL’’) with Viraj
Impoexpo Limited (‘‘VIL’’) and Viraj
Forgings Limited (‘‘VFL’’). The
Department calculated an individual
antidumping duty margin for VIL/VFL.
The Department did not calculate an
individual antidumping duty margin for
VAL because it did not export the
subject merchandise to the United
States during the period of review. The
resulting antidumping duty margin for
VIL/VFL is 0.84 percent.
Consistent with the decision of the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit (‘‘Federal Circuit’’) in Timken
Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed.
Cir. 1990) (‘‘Timken’’), the Department
will continue to order the suspension of
liquidation of the subject merchandise
until there is a ‘‘conclusive’’ decision in
this case. If the case is not appealed, or
if it is affirmed on appeal, the
Department will instruct the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to liquidate all relevant entries of
subject merchandise for VIL/VFL.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 30, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Williams, AD/CVD Enforcement
Office 1, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4619.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In the underlying administrative
review covering the period February 1,
2000, though January 31, 2001, the
Department collapsed VAL, VIL, and
VFL pursuant to 19 USC § 1677(33) and
19 CFR § 351.401(f) (2000). See Final
Results; see also Decision Memorandum
at Comment 1. As a collapsed entity,
VAL/VIL/VFL received a de minimis
dumping margin.
Based upon the record evidence, the
Department found that VAL, VIL, and
VFL ‘‘meet the regulations’ collapsing
requirements.’’ Decision Memorandum
at Comment 1. First, the Department
found that ‘‘VAL and VIL can produce
subject merchandise (i.e., similar or
identical products) and can continue to
do so, independently or under existing
leasing agreements, without substantial
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 73726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7257]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AMERICAN BATTLE MONUMENTS COMMISSION
SES Performance Review Board
AGENCY: American Battle Monuments Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the
ABMC Performance Review Board.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theodore Gloukhoff, Director of
Personnel and Administration, American Battle Monuments Commission,
Courthouse Plaza II, Suite 500, 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Arlington,
Virginia, 22201-3367, Telephone Number: (703) 696-6908. American Battle
Monuments Commission SES Performance Review Board Mr. Gerald W. Barnes,
Chief, Operations Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mr. Donald L.
Basham, Chief, Engineering & Construction, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mr. Stephen Coakley, Director of Resource Management, US Army Corps of
Engineers
Theodore Gloukhoff,
Director, Personnel and Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-7257 Filed 12-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6120-01-P
